Showing posts with label drugs resistance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drugs resistance. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Decade-long #warming accelerates #antibiotic #resistance in #grassland soils

 


Abstract

Soils are critical reservoirs of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), which are strongly shaped by microbial interactions and environmental conditions and are therefore highly sensitive to disturbance. Although climate warming is recognized as one of the most significant disturbances to microbial communities and their functions, its impacts on soil resistomes remain poorly understood. Here we investigated the effects of decade-long experimental warming on ARGs in grassland soils using integrated experimental and computational approaches. Our results revealed that ARG abundance substantially increased (23.9%) under warming—particularly glycopeptide- and rifamycin-resistance genes. Warming specifically enriched Actinomycetota hosts, including various potential plant pathogens, and enhanced ARG mobility. Large-scale unprecedented isolates-based phenotypic analyses also validated that warming increased bacterial resistance to multiple antibiotics. Further mechanistic analyses revealed that warming increased ARG abundance primarily through co-selection of resistance genes physically linked to adaptive traits (for example, thermal tolerance and nitrogen assimilation) and positive selection for thermal tolerance genes, which could be further amplified via horizontal gene transfer. Together, these findings convincingly demonstrate that climate warming substantially accelerates soil antibiotic resistance at genomic, ecological and evolutionary levels, with broad implications for public health and environmental sustainability in a warming world.

Source: 


Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10413-x

____

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

#Genetic and #biological characterization of a #duck-origin clade 2.3.4.4b #H5N6 avian #influenza virus reveals partial #mammalian #adaptation

 


Highlights

• Duck-origin H5N6 virus A/Duck/Jiangsu/628/2022 shares high homology with the human strain A/Yangzhou/125/2022.

• The 628 strain shows mammalian adaptation markers: HA mutations enhance human receptors affinity and NA mutations reduce sensitivity to neuraminidase inhibitors.

• Limited airborne transmission but detectable droplet-mediated spread suggests increased mammalian transmission risk.


Abstract

Clade 2.3.4.4b H5Nx highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) have caused extensive outbreaks in poultry worldwide. H5 HPAIVs have caused sporadic but severe human infections in China, representing a persistent zoonotic threat. Here, we identified a duck-origin H5N6 HPAIV (A/Duck/Jiangsu/628/2022) through routine surveillance and assessed its biological characteristics and mammalian pathogenesis. Phylogenetic analysis revealed > 98% nucleotide identity between strain 628 and the concurrent human H5N6 strain A/Yangzhou/125/2022. Molecular characterization identified multiple mammalian adaptation markers: hemagglutinin substitutions (S137A, T160A, T192I) associated with enhanced human receptor binding; neuraminidase mutations (I117T, D198N) linked to reduced neuraminidase inhibitor susceptibility; and polymerase complex changes (PB1-D622G, PA-K142Q) conferring increased mammalian cell replication. In vitro studies demonstrated that 628 virus replicated more efficiently in mammalian than in avian cells and exhibited dual receptor-binding specificity. Mouse pathogenicity assays revealed moderate virulence with progressive lung pathology. Critically, transmission experiments confirmed both direct contact and airborne transmission capabilities of 628 in guinea pigs. These findings demonstrate that circulating H5N6 viruses have acquired partial mammalian adaptation while retaining avian fitness, significantly elevating pandemic potential. Enhanced surveillance of wild bird populations, poultry farms, and live poultry markets is urgently needed to develop effective prevention and control strategies.

Source: 


Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037811352600146X?via%3Dihub

____

Saturday, March 28, 2026

Use of #baloxavir as adjunctive #antiviral #therapy to neuraminidase inhibitors in severely immunocompromised individuals infected with #influenza

 


ABSTRACT

Immunocompromised patients are at risk of developing severe influenza, with protracted viral shedding and development of resistance-associated mutations under antiviral treatment. We report a case series of severely immunocompromised hematology patients, including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients, treated with both baloxavir and oseltamivir and describe clinical and virological outcomes and the safety profile of prolonged combination therapy. Allogeneic HCT recipients with influenza infection treated with baloxavir were retrieved via institutional databases. All hospitalized allogeneic HCT patients treated with a combination therapy of baloxavir and oseltamivir over five influenza seasons between October 2019 and May 2025 were included. Six influenza-infected hematology patients (5/6 allogeneic HCT recipients) were treated with combination therapy of oseltamivir and baloxavir. All patients presented with lower respiratory tract infections. Oseltamivir treatment duration ranged from 5 to 31 days, and the number of administered baloxavir doses ranged between one and five. Baloxavir administration was well tolerated, and no adverse events could be attributed to the administered antiviral treatment. All-cause mortality at 3 months post-infection was 66% (4/6), mainly driven by underlying disease. In two patients with protracted shedding, combination therapy did not prevent the development of resistance mutation(s). Combination treatment with prolonged courses of oseltamivir and repeated doses of baloxavir was well tolerated. No definitive conclusions on the efficacy of this approach could be drawn from this study. More data are required on the best treatment of hematology patients infected with influenza.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aac.01659-25

____

Thursday, March 26, 2026

#Survival #trends in patients with difficult-to-treat, #antibiotic-resistant, Gram-negative #infections in the era of next-generation antibiotics in the #USA: a retrospective cohort study

 


Summary

Background

Difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negative infections show resistance to all first-line antibiotics (ie, β-lactams and fluoroquinolones) and have a 40% greater mortality rate than susceptible infections. New antibiotics are now available with improved safety and efficacy and with in-vitro activity against DTR infections; however, their influence on the outcomes of patients with DTR infections remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether and why mortality in patients with DTR infections has changed since the introduction of these newer antibiotics in the USA.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study in the USA, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with a DTR Gram-negative infection, defined as microbiological evidence of DTR Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or Acinetobacter baumannii and receipt of at least 3 consecutive days of any antibiotic therapy, were identified from hospitals reporting microbiology data in the PINC-AI Healthcare Database. We characterised the proportion of inpatient encounters receiving newer DTR-active antibiotics, traditional DTR-active antibiotics, and non-DTR-active antibiotics. We used a generalised linear mixed model with marginal predictions to examine changes in in-hospital mortality, defined as death or discharge to hospice, over the study period when adjusting for patient-related and treatment-related factors (including receipt of a new antibiotic and receipt of in-vitro discordant initial therapy), hospital-related factors (including the availability of newer antibiotics and corresponding susceptibility testing), and COVID-19 pandemic-related factors. A three-way interaction term for time (year), pathogen, and infection site (ie, bloodstream and non-bloodstream) was included given the expected differences in mortality.

Findings

Between Jan 1, 2016, and Aug 31, 2023, 8 319 398 adult inpatient encounters with available microbiology data were recorded from 471 hospitals, of which 9384 (0.11%) encounters had microbiological evidence of an eligible DTR organism. 5065 (54·0%) of these 9384 encounters, from 262 hospitals, met the inclusion criteria for DTR Gram-negative infections and were included in the study. Among this cohort, the prescription of newer antibiotics, as well as the availability of newer antibiotics and their corresponding susceptibility tests, increased substantially from 2016 to 2023. Although the proportion of encounters in which the patient received a newer antibiotic as initial therapy increased from 4% (21 of 589) in 2016 to 15% (34 of 234) in 2023, in most cases (196 [84%] of 234) patients continued to receive in-vitro discordant initial antibiotic therapy, even in 2023. We observed no change in the average marginal effect (the average percentage change per year) for adjusted mortality between 2016 and 2023 for Enterobacterales (0.1% [95% CI −1.1 to 1.4]), P aeruginosa (−0.7% [−1.7 to 0.3]), or A baumannii (−0.4% [−1.8 to 0.9]) infections. When dichotomised into bloodstream and non-bloodstream infections, the marginal effect for adjusted mortality remained unchanged over time for most pathogen and site combinations, with the exception of P aeruginosa bloodstream infections, for which a decrease was observed (−4.5% [−8.2 to −0.60]).

Interpretation

Despite the availability of newer antibiotic agents, the estimated mortality and ongoing use of in-vitro discordant initial antibiotics remains unacceptably high among patients with DTR infections in US hospitals. Prompt recognition of both the pathogen and resistance phenotype could be a crucial component in reducing mortality. Although notable, the decrease over time in adjusted mortality for P aeruginosa bloodstream infections should be considered hypothesis-generating because the cohort of patients with such infections was small.

Funding

US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center; US National Cancer Institute; the Intramural Research Program of the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; and the US Food and Drug Administration.


Research in context

Evidence before this study

Difficult-to-treat resistance is a resistance phenotype describing Gram-negative pathogens that show resistance to all first-line, safe and effective traditional antibiotic options (ie, β-lactams [including carbapenems] and fluoroquinolones). As a result, difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) infections are associated with high mortality, of which they are a better predictor than susceptible infections. Several new antibiotics have been introduced into the US market since 2014 and could provide more treatment options to patients with antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections such as DTR infections, for whom no safe and effective treatment exists. Evidence supporting a reduction in mortality after treatment with these new antibiotics, specifically in patients with AMR infections, is scarce. Understanding the population-level change in mortality following the implementation of these new antibiotic therapies could inform current priorities in therapeutic and diagnostic development to improve outcomes in this high-risk patient population. We searched PubMed from database inception to Dec 16, 2025, for studies with the Medical Subject Headings Major Topics “Bacterial Infections/mortality” AND “Drug Resistance, bacterial”, with no language restrictions. This search returned 426 publications. 34 articles evaluated trends in bacterial resistance over time and associated mortality among drug-resistant bacterial infections, of which 13 examined only Gram-positive bacterial infections and eight examined a period before the introduction of any of the newer antibiotics (ie, before 2014). Mortality estimates over time in the remaining 13 publications considered only discrete phenotypes for which alternative effective treatment options might exist, did not characterise the use of newer antibiotics within the study population, and did not adjust for relevant COVID-19 pandemic-related factors that are likely to affect the interpretation of mortality trends since 2020.

Added value of this study

This study leverages an administrative and clinical database to identify, to our knowledge, the largest cohort to date of hospitalised patients with DTR Gram-negative infections in the USA. We evaluate adjusted mortality trends in patients with DTR infections after the real-world introduction of six new antibiotics (ceftolozane–tazobactam, ceftazidime–avibactam, meropenem–vaborbactam, imipenem–relebactam, eravacycline, and cefiderocol) with broad spectra of activity and variable side-effect profiles. Trends in mortality were examined using a generalised linear mixed model adjusted for relevant patient-related, hospital-related, and COVID-19 pandemic-related covariates. The estimated probability of mortality across DTR Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii infections did not change from 2016 to 2023. When dichotomised into bloodstream and non-bloodstream infections, we identified a 4.5% annual reduction in the adjusted mortality for P aeruginosa bloodstream infections, albeit the sample size for this population was small (n=87). The trends in adjusted mortality for all other pathogen and infection-site combinations remained unchanged. These findings occurred in the setting of persistent and frequent use of in-vitro discordant initial empirical therapy despite a substantial increase in access to and use of newer antibiotic options.

Implications of all the available evidence

Our results underscore the importance of better understanding why survival has not improved across all DTR Gram-negative infections despite the availability of newer, safe, and effective broad-spectrum antibiotic options. The development and real-world implementation of improved rapid diagnostic platforms for early detection of resistant phenotypes could improve patient outcomes. Comparative trials of new antibiotics with increased representation of patients with highly resistant bacterial infections, namely DTR infections, could elucidate the true clinical benefit of newer antibiotics in their respective target populations. Exploration of additional non-antibiotic, host-directed therapies could address the immune dysregulation that might contribute to poor patient outcomes, even among those who die with susceptible infections.

Source: 


Link: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(26)00020-4/fulltext?rss=yes

____

Friday, March 20, 2026

14th Meeting of #WHO #Expert Working Group of the Global #Influenza #Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) for Surveillance of #Antiviral Susceptibility (March 20 '26)



Weekly epidemiological record 

20 MARCH 2026, 101th YEAR, No 12, 2026, 101, 53–56

http://www.who.int/wer 


Executive Summary 

The WHO Expert Working Group on Surveillance of Influenza Antiviral Susceptibility (AVWG) supports the WHO GISRS by providing practical guidance for monitoring antiviral susceptibility of seasonal and emerging influenza viruses through global surveillance efforts

The 14th WHO-AVWG meeting was held in virtual format on 10-12 June 2025


Update on susceptibility of seasonal influenza viruses to approved antiviral agents 

From approximately May 2024 to May 2025, five WHO Collaborating Centres (CCs) and two National Influenza Centres (NICs) reported co-circulation of influenza A(H1N1) pdm09, A(H3N2), and B/Victoria viruses. 

A(H1N1)pdm09 dominated in Eastern Asia{1}. Elevated frequency of influenza neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor (NAI) reduced inhibition/ highly reduced inhibition (RI/HRI) was identified among A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, largely conferred by the NA-H275Y substitution

Reporting frequency was 3.8% in China, lower (≤1%) in other reporting regions, but still measurable and were in some cases a result of prior antiviral use or specific local outbreaks (e.g., a hospital in Iceland with a NA-H275Y+S247N cluster, a primary school classroom outbreak in Japan{2}. The NA-S247N substitution (≤3.3%) was also noted by three centres, but these viruses exhibited normal inhibition (NI) by NAIs when available isolates were tested

Incidence of RI/HRI or NA-associated markers were less frequently reported for A(H3N2) and B/Victoria viruses than A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. 

Markers and incidence of reduced susceptibility to baloxavir was detected at low frequencies of 0.07 to 2.2%, where the latter value represented a small sample set of only 2 of 89 viruses in Japan

Reduced susceptibility or amino acid markers indicative of reduced susceptibility were observed only in influenza A viruses and not influenza B


Update on susceptibility of zoonotic and animal influenza viruses  to approved antiviral agents 

From approximately May 2024 to May 2025, global surveillance data from WHO CCs, NICs, and associated partners including WHO Essential Regulatory Laboratories and the OFFLU (WOAH/FAO Network of Expertise on Animal Influenza) network reported that most zoonotic and avian influenza viruses, particularly circulating A(H5N1/x) HA clade 2.3.4.4b and 2.3.2.1a/e viruses, were broadly susceptible to NAIs and baloxavir

A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b virus oseltamivir inhibitory concentrations remain elevated vs. seasonal N1 viruses. 

Small and isolated incidence of NAI associated RI/HRI or markers included: NA-D199G mediated oseltamivir/zanamivir RI detected in A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b poultry in the Russian Federation (February 2024, reported June 2025), NA-N295S in poultry in India A(H5N1) 2.3.2.1a isolates, and 8 poultry farms in British Columbia, Canada exhibiting A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b with NA-H275Y

Only two viruses with reduced baloxavir susceptibility were identified, 1 human virus with PA-I38M (California, USA) and 1 environmental virus isolate with PA-V100I (China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region). 

Beyond A(H5N1/x), nearly 30 avian influenza subtypes including A(H9N2), A(H7N2), A(H7N7), and A(H7N9), and A(H10N7) were analysed across surveillance sites in the Bangladesh, Egypt, the Netherlands and the United States of America (USA). 

They generally lacked NA or PA genotypic markers of reduced drug susceptibility and when available for phenotypic testing, were susceptible to both NAIs and baloxavir. 

A(H7N2) and A(H7N7) viruses from the Netherlands displayed oseltamivir RI compared to human seasonal references, but this may be due to foldchange comparison to a mismatched NA subtype. 

Swine-origin variant viruses (A(H1N1)v, A(H1N2)v, A(H3N2)v) tested across the USA and Europe were largely free of genotypic or phenotypic indicators of reduced susceptibility/inhibition to NAIs or baloxavir. 

Some viruses (the  Netherlands) showed slightly higher NAI median inhibitory concentrations to historical or human seasonal baselines, but all remained below NAI RI thresholds. 


Update of protocols and guidance for GISRS laboratories 

Both genotypic and phenotypic assays may be used as tools to monitor susceptibility of influenza viruses to NAIs and baloxavir

The WHO-AVWG routinely reviews and updates influenza NA and PA amino acid substitutions associated with reduced susceptibility to NAIs and baloxavir; updated tables for the previous reporting period were included on the WHO website{3–5}. 

The US CDC continues to update and ship reference virus panels that can be used for NAI and baloxavir susceptibility testing, available via the International Reagent Resource{6} 

Further guidance on baloxavir and other PA inhibitor testing included the Influenza Replication Inhibition Neuraminidase-based Assay (IRINA), published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA{7} and included on the WHO website{8}. 

The WHO AVWG continues to develop algorithms for NICs to aid in influenza response planning (zoonotic, pandemic, and antiviral resistance-specific events), guidance to aid in decisions making for testing strategies (genotypic vs. phenotypic), and guidance for consideration of baloxavir and PA inhibitor specific amino acid substitutions associated with reduced drug susceptibility{9}. 

Additionally, the WHO-AVWG has worked with GISAID to continue to refine and implement modifications to existing tools to facilitate identification of NA and PA substitutions upon sequence submission. 


Outbreak and pandemic preparedness with clinicians’ perspectives 

Two physicians, Profs. Prof. David Hui and Bin Cao, were invited to present recently updated WHO guidance on clinical practice guidelines for influenza{10}. 

Significant updates and discussion surrounded inclusion of baloxavir, which was conditionally recommended for non-severe disease high-risk patients and post-virus exposure prophylaxis (PEP) including influenza viruses associated with high mortality. 

Conditional recommendation against any NAI or baloxavir intervention remains for non-severe disease low-risk patients or seasonal virus PEP. 

Data was presented on multiple PA inhibitors rapidly moving through late-stage clinical trials in China which may have implications on expanded usage of this newer class of influenza drugs. 


Review of External Quality Assessment Programme (EQAP) panels 

EQAP was initiated in 2007 to monitor the quality of GISRS, NICs, other national influenza reference laboratories’ capacity for influenza diagnosis and detection. 

An optional antiviral phenotypic NAI panel was introduced in 2013, and genotypic baloxavir susceptibility was introduced in 2020. 

Results for the 2024 Global EQAP panel were reported during the 14th WHO-AVWG meeting. 

Of the 194 participating laboratories, 26.3% participated in NAI susceptibility testing. 

Results and subsequent discussion from this year’s panel were used by members of WHO-AVWG to assess the training needs of NICs. 


Way forward 

The 2020–2023 Annual Global Update on the Susceptibility of Influenza Viruses (Global AVS) manuscript was published{11} and drafting of a 2023–2025 publication is underway. The next WHO-AVWG meeting will be held in June 2026.

___

{1} World Health Organization. Influenza Transmission Zones. 2026. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/ default-source/influenza/influenzaupdates/2025_09_24_influenza-transmission-zones. pdf?sfvrsn=22361408_3&download=true

{2} Takashita E, Shimizu K, Usuku S, Senda R, Okubo I, Morita H, et al. An outbreak of influenza A(H1N1) pdm09 antigenic variants exhibiting cross-resistance to oseltamivir and peramivir in an elementary school in Japan, September 2024. Euro Surveill. 2024;29(50).

{3} World Health Organization. Summary of neuraminidase (NA) amino acid substitutions assessed for their effects on inhibition by neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs). 2025. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/ influenza/laboratory---network/quality-assurance/human-nai-marker-table_ for-publication_final_20240918.pdf

{4} World Health Organization. Summary of neuraminidase (NA) amino acid substitutions assessed for their effects on inhibition by NA inhibitors (NAIs) among avian influenza viruses of Group 1 (N1, N4, N5, N8 subtypes) and Group 2 (N2, N3, N6, N7, N9 subtypes) NAs. 2025. https://cdn.who.int/media/ docs/default-source/influenza/avwg/avian-nai-marker-whotable__10-10-2025.pdf?sfvrsn=bc0d1e9a_10 

{5} World Health Organization. Summary of polymerase acidic protein (PA) amino acid substitutions assessed for their effects on PA inhibitor (PAI) baloxavir susceptibility. 2025. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/influenza/ laboratory---network/quality-assurance/antiviral-susceptibility-influenza/ pa-marker-who-table_28-11-2025_updated.pdf?sfvrsn=5307d6fe_4

{6} International Reagent Resource. 2026. https://www. internationalreagentresource.org/

{7} Patel MC, Flanigan D, Feng C, Chesnokov A, Nguyen HT, Elal AA, et al. An optimized cell-based assay to assess influenza virus replication by measuring neuraminidase activity and its applications for virological surveillance. Antiviral Res. 2022;208:105457. 

{8} World Health Organization. Baloxavir Susceptibility Assessment using Influenza Replication Inhibition Neuraminidase-based Assay (IRINA). https:// cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/influenza/avwg/cdc-phenotypic-lp492rev01d---baloxavir-susceptibility-assessment-using-irina.pdf? 

{9} Patel MC, Nguyen HT, Mishin VP, Pascua PNQ, Champion C, Lopez-Esteva M, et al. Antiviral susceptibility monitoring: testing algorithm, methods, and f indings for influenza season, 2023-2024. Antiviral Res. 2025;244:106299. 

{10} World Health Organization. Clinical practice guidelines for influenza 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240097759.

{11} Hussain S, Meijer A, Govorkova EA, Dapat C, Gubareva LV, Barr I, et al. Global update on the susceptibilities of influenza viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir, 2020-2023. Antiviral Res. 2025:106217.

___

Source: 


Link: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/1ea408da-cd90-438b-b80c-b00aaf4e7315/content

____

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

#Report on #influenza viruses received and tested by the #Melbourne #WHO CC for #Reference and Research on #Influenza during 2024

 


Abstract

As part of its role in the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS), the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza in Melbourne received 12,180 human influenza-positive samples during 2024. Viruses were analysed for their antigenic, genetic, and antiviral susceptibility properties. Selected viruses were propagated in qualified cells or embryonated hens’ eggs for potential use in seasonal influenza virus vaccines. During 2024, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses predominated, accounting for 33% and 42%, respectively, of all viruses received, compared to 5% for influenza B/Victoria. Of note, one influenza A(H5N1) virus was also received in 2024. The majority of A(H1N1)pdm09 (98%), A(H3N2) (88%) and influenza B (100%) viruses analysed at the Centre were found to be antigenically and genetically similar to the respective WHO recommended vaccine strains for the Southern Hemisphere in 2024. Of 4,007 samples tested for susceptibility to the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir, twelve A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses and one B/Victoria virus showed highly reduced inhibition against oseltamivir or zanamivir. Of 3,294 total samples sequenced for baloxavir susceptibility, 18 of the 1,825 A(H3N2) samples were identified with genetic evidence of reduced susceptibility to baloxavir marboxil in the PA gene.

Source: 


Link: https://ojs.cdi.cdc.gov.au/index.php/cdi/article/view/3449

____

Monday, February 9, 2026

Impaired #host shutoff is a fitness cost associated with #baloxavir marboxil #resistance #mutations in #influenza A virus PA/PA-X nuclease domain

 


Abstract

The polymerase acidic (PA) protein is a subunit of the trimeric influenza A virus (IAV) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and the target of the anti-influenza drug baloxavir marboxil (BXM). As with other direct-acting antivirals, treatment with BXM can lead to selection of viruses carrying resistance mutations. If these mutations have negligible fitness costs, resistant viruses can spread widely and render existing treatments obsolete. Multiple BXM resistance mutations in the nuclease domain of PA have been identified, with I38T and I38M amino acid substitutions occurring frequently. These mutations have minimal to no effects on viral polymerase activity, virus replication, or transmission. However, for reasons that are not well understood, viruses with BXM resistance substitutions have not been able to compete with parental wild-type strains. The IAV genome segment encoding PA also encodes the host shutoff nuclease PA-X, which shares the endonuclease domain with PA but has a unique C-terminal domain generated by ribosomal frameshifting during translation. Unlike their effects on PA activity, the effects of BXM or the I38T/M substitutions on PA-X function remain uncharacterized. In our work, for the first time, we directly examine the effects of baloxavir and the I38T/M substitutions on PA-X activity and show that baloxavir inhibits PA-X activity in a dose dependent manner. Most importantly, we also demonstrate that the I38T/M mutations significantly impair the host shutoff activity of PA-X proteins from different IAV strains of H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1 subtypes. Our work reveals that the deleterious effects of I38T/M on PA-X function may represent an important barrier to the spread of BXM-resistant viruses.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1013550

____

Thursday, February 5, 2026

Genomic #Evolution of #Influenza A Virus During the 2024-2025 Season, the Johns Hopkins Health System: Antigenic Drift Reduces Serum Neutralization

 


Abstract

Introduction

Seasonal influenza causes significant global morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Ongoing viral evolution can lead to vaccine mismatch and the emergence of antiviral resistance, highlighting the importance of genomic surveillance. The 2024–2025 influenza season was characterized by high incidence and increased hospitalizations.

Methods

We analyzed influenza A virus (IAV) genomes and clinical characteristics from the 2024–2025 season. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 648 influenza A–positive clinical specimens collected between October 2024 and April 2025.

Results

Hemagglutinin (HA) sequences were recovered from 74.23% (481/648) of samples and used for subtyping and phylogenetic analysis. A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses co-circulated, representing 55.5% and 44.5% of cases, respectively. Among A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, the HA1 substitution T120A, located near the Sa antigenic site, increased more than twofold compared with the prior season. Circulating A(H3N2) viruses belonged to multiple HA subclades and exhibited distinct amino acid substitutions at key antigenic sites. Neutralization assays using sera from individuals vaccinated with the 2024–2025 seasonal influenza vaccine demonstrated reduced neutralization of three dominant A(H1N1)pdm09 isolates and two A(H3N2) isolates compared with vaccine strains, consistent with antigenic drift. In addition, the neuraminidase substitution S247N, previously associated with reduced oseltamivir susceptibility, was detected in 13.9% of A(H1N1)pdm09 samples.

Discussion

These findings demonstrate ongoing antigenic drift and the presence of antiviral resistance–associated mutations during the 2024–2025 influenza season, underscoring the need for continued genomic surveillance to guide vaccine and antiviral strategies.

Source: 


Link: https://academic.oup.com/jid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/infdis/jiag069/8461561#google_vignette

____

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

#Macrolide #Resistance and P1 Cytadhesin Genotyping of #Mycoplasma pneumoniae during #Outbreak, #Canada, 2024–2025

 


Abstract

We investigated macrolide resistance and P1 genotypes of Mycoplasma pneumoniae during the 2024–2025 outbreak in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Macrolide resistance remained stable at ≈10%–20%, but significant shifts in P1 genotype distribution and resistance rates in P1 types occurred, indicating notable changes in M. pneumoniae molecular epidemiology in Ontario since 2011–2012.

Source: 


Link: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/31/12/25-0872_article

____

Sunday, December 21, 2025

#Influenza PA #Substitutions and Genetic Diversity of #H1N1pdm09, #H3N2, and B/Victoria Viruses in #Japan During the 2023–2024 Season

 


Abstract

We characterized influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B/Victoria viruses circulating in Japan during 2023–2024, focusing on lineage placement relative to WHO-recommended vaccine strains and on baloxavir resistance (PA/I38T substitutions). We enrolled 210 outpatients with influenza-like illness across eight clinics in six prefectures (October 2023–September 2024). Of these, 209 had an analyzable pre-treatment respiratory specimen for RT-PCR; hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS). PA/I38T substitutions that confer baloxavir resistance were assessed by cycling-probe RT-PCR, Sanger sequencing, and NGS. HA phylogenies were constructed with global datasets and WHO vaccine reference strains. Of 209 pre-treatment specimens, 181 were influenza-positive (A(H1N1)pdm09 44.2%, A(H3N2) 37.6%, B/Victoria 18.2%); 51 follow-up specimens were collected ≈4–5 days after baloxavir or neuraminidase inhibitor therapy. HA phylogeny placed A(H1N1)pdm09 in clades 5a.2a/5a.2a.1 with predominance of subclade D.2. A(H3N2) clustered exclusively in clade 2a.3a.1 (J lineage, mostly J.1), indicating a mismatch with the season’s A/Darwin/9/2021 vaccine component and supporting the subsequent J-lineage update. All B/Victoria genomes fell within V1A.3a.2 on a C.5 backbone (C.5.1 and C.5.7). No PA/I38T variant was detected in any pre-treatment specimen. Post-baloxavir, PA/I38T emerged in one A(H3N2) case (confirmed by all three methods) and in one B/Victoria case detected by NGS only (minority variant in a low-load sample). NA genes showed no substitutions associated with reduced susceptibility to laninamivir (e.g., E119A, G147E). During 2023–2024, A(H1N1)pdm09 and B/Victoria remained genetically aligned with their vaccine components, whereas A(H3N2) shifted to the J lineage, consistent with the 2024–2025 vaccine update. Although pre-treatment PA/I38T was absent, low-frequency on-therapy selection was observed, including a rare PA/I38T in influenza B/Victoria detected by NGS, suggesting the value of deep sequencing when viral loads are low. These integrated genomic–clinical data support vaccine strain realignment for H3N2 and continued monitoring of baloxavir resistance in outpatient care.

Source: 


Link: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/18/1/13

____

Thursday, November 20, 2025

Post #COVID19 #resurgence of #Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in French #children (ORIGAMI): a retrospective and prospective multicentre cohort study

 


Summary

Background

Following a decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections resurged in several countries. We aimed to characterise the clinical presentation of paediatric patients admitted to hospital for M pneumoniae during 2023 and 2024 in France.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide, multicentre, retrospective, and prospective observational study across 37 French paediatric hospitals (September, 2023–September, 2024). Children younger than 18 years who were hospitalised with laboratory-confirmed M pneumoniae infection (PCR or serology) were included. Demographics (excluding race), clinical features, laboratory and radiological findings, management, and outcomes data were described and analysed. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06260371) and is complete.

Findings

We included 969 children and adolescents with M pneumoniae infection (7·3 years [SD 4·5], 426 [44%] of 966 patients were female and 540 [56%] of 966 were male). 936 (97%) of all patients were positive by PCR for M pneumoniae. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 628 (87%) of the 726 patients with respiratory involvement, and cutaneous manifestations were reported in 132 (14%) of 969 patients, including 56 (42%) of 132 who had erythema multiforme. Macrolides were prescribed in 884 (95%) of the 931 patients who were prescribed antibiotics, primarily azithromycin (563 [64%] of 884). Macrolide resistance was detected in one (5%) of the 21 tested samples. In total, 57 (6%) of 969 patients required PICU admission and four (<1%) died. Factors significantly associated with PICU admission included being older than 11 years (adjusted odds ratio 2·0 [95% CI 1·1–3·6]; p=0·023), asthma (2·2 [1·2–4·0]; p=0·0072), other underlying conditions (2·1 [1·2–3·7]; p=0·013), and erythema multiforme (3·7 [1·6–8·8]; 0·0025).

Interpretation

The 2023–2024 M pneumoniae epidemic in France resulted in a substantial paediatric hospitalisation burden. Although severe cases were uncommon, children older than 11 years, those with asthma, other comorbidities, and erythema multiforme were at increased risk of PICU admission. Ongoing surveillance and targeted management strategies are warranted for future epidemics.

Funding

Association Clinique et Thérapeutique Infantile du Val de Marne (ACTIV).

Source: 



____

Thursday, October 9, 2025

Molecular basis of #SARS-CoV-2 proofreading enzyme–mediated #resistance to #remdesivir

 


Abstract

SARS-CoV-2’s remarkable resistance to nucleotide analog antivirals such as remdesivir, which thwarts RNA synthesis by inhibiting viral polymerase (RdRp), challenges available therapies. We reveal that remdesivir incorporation destabilizes RdRp–RNA complex while enhancing RNA binding to the proofreading exoribonuclease (ExoN), facilitating remdesivir excision. Conserved ExoN determinants for remdesivir recognition and excision underpin ExoN-mediated resistance across all coronaviruses. These findings inform the design of next-generation antivirals and combination therapies capable of overcoming ExoN-mediated resistance.

Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2519755122

____

Monday, September 22, 2025

Impaired host shutoff is a #fitness cost associated with #baloxavir marboxil #resistance mutations in #influenza A virus PA/PA-X nuclease domain.

 


Abstract

The polymerase acidic (PA) protein is a subunit of the trimeric influenza A virus (IAV) RNAdependent RNA polymerase and the target of the anti-influenza drug baloxavir marboxil (BXM). As with other direct-acting antivirals, treatment with BXM can lead to selection of viruses carrying resistance mutations. If these mutations have negligible fitness costs, resistant viruses can spread widely and render existing treatments obsolete. Multiple BXM resistance mutations in the nuclease domain of PA have been identified, with I38T and I38M amino acid substitutions occurring frequently. These mutations have minimal to no effects on viral polymerase activity, virus replication, or transmission. However, for reasons that are not well understood, viruses with BXM resistance substitutions have not been able to compete with parental wild-type strains. The IAV genome segment encoding PA also encodes the host shutoff nuclease PA-X, which shares the endonuclease domain with PA but has a unique C-terminal domain generated by ribosomal frameshifting during translation. Unlike their effects on PA activity, the effects of BXM or the I38T/M substitutions on PA-X function remain uncharacterized. In our work, for the first time, we directly examine the effects of baloxavir and the I38T/M substitutions on PA-X activity and show that baloxavir inhibits PA-X activity in a dose dependent manner. Most importantly, we also demonstrate that the I38T/M mutations significantly impair the host shutoff activity of PA-X proteins from different IAV strains of H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1 subtypes. Our work reveals that the deleterious effects of I38T/M on PA-X function may represent an important barrier to the spread of BXM-resistant viruses.


Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Source: BioRxIV, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.22.677688v1

____

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Genomic profiling of #cefotaxime-resistant #Haemophilus influenzae from #Norway and #Sweden reveals extensive expansion of virulent #MDR international clones

Abstract

Cefotaxime-resistant Haemophilus influenzae (CRHI) are a global concern, but little is known about their molecular epidemiology. The goal of this study was to perform genomic profiling of 191 CRHI from Norway (n = 183) or Sweden (n = 8) (2006–2018) and assess clonal spread using core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST)-based Life Identification Number (LIN) codes based on whole genome sequencing (Ion Torrent). Cefotaxime resistance was confirmed with broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), interpreted with the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. 35.7% of isolates with cefotaxime gradient MIC of 0.25 mg/L were falsely resistant. All but two isolates (blood) were non-invasive, and all but two (serotype f) were non-typeable. Characterization included calling of resistance determinants, ftsI typing (penicillin-binding protein 3, PBP3), and classification of PBP3-mediated beta-lactam resistance (rPBP3), with assignment to rPBP3 stage and group. All isolates had rPBP3-defining substitutions, and 78.5% were stage 3 (L389F positive). Beta-lactam MICs correlated well with rPBP3 genotypes. Significant proportions of stage 3 isolates were cross-resistant to ceftriaxone (86.0%) and meropenem (meningitis breakpoints, 26.0%). The CRHI prevalence in Norway doubled during the study period and approached 1%. A shift from stage 2 to stage 3 rPBP3 in 2011–2012 led to emergence of CRHI with higher beta-lactam MICs and co-resistance to multiple non-beta-lactams, including extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains. The shift was driven by transformation with two distinct variants of the transpeptidase region and multiclonal expansion. 66.0% of the isolates belonged to 27 clusters. Ten clusters or singletons belonged to international CRHI clones represented in the PubMLST database. The study provides new insight into CRHI evolution, resistance profiles, and clonal dynamics in a period when this phenotype went from exceptional to unusual in Europe. International CRHI clones are described for the first time, including eight high-risk clones associated with invasive disease, calling for enhanced genomic surveillance. LIN coding, supplemented with ftsI typing and rPBP3 staging, is well-suited for definition of CRHI clones. LIN9, defined by ≤ 10 allelic differences, offered the highest resolution level fully supported by maximum likelihood core genome phylogeny and is proposed as a global standard for genomic surveillance of H. influenzae.

Source: Frontiers in Microbiology, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1601390/full

____

#SARS-CoV-2 #Remdesivir Exposure Leads to Different Evolutionary Pathways That Converge in Moderate Levels of Drug #Resistance

Abstract

Various SARS-CoV-2 remdesivir resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) have been reported, but a comprehensive comparison of their resistance levels is lacking. We identified novel RAS and performed head-to-head comparisons with known RAS in Vero E6 cells. A remdesivir escape polyclonal virus exhibited a 3.6-fold increase in remdesivir EC50 and mutations throughout the genome, including substitutions in nsp12 (E796D) and nsp14 (A255S). However, in reverse-genetics infectious assays, viruses harboring both these substitutions exhibited only a slight decrease in remdesivir susceptibility (1.3-fold increase in EC50). The nsp12-E796D substitution did not impair viral fitness (Vero E6 cells or Syrian hamsters) and was reported in a remdesivir-treated COVID-19 patient. In replication assays, a subgenomic replicon containing nsp12-E796D+nsp14-A255S led to a 16.1-fold increase in replication under remdesivir treatment. A comparison with known RAS showed that S759A, located in the active site of nsp12, conferred the highest remdesivir resistance (106.1-fold increase in replication). Nsp12-RAS V166A/L, V792I, E796D or C799F, all adjacent to the active site, caused intermediate resistance (2.0- to 11.5-fold), whereas N198S, D484Y, or E802D, located farther from the active site, showed no resistance (≤2.0-fold). In conclusion, our classification system, correlating replication under remdesivir treatment with RAS location in nsp12, shows that most nsp12-RAS cause moderate resistance.

Source: Viruses, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/8/1055

____

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Genotype #B3.13 #influenza #H5N1 viruses isolated from dairy #cattle demonstrate high #virulence in laboratory #models, but retain #avian virus-like properties

Abstract

In March 2024, clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses were first detected in U.S. dairy cattle. Similar viruses have since caused 70 zoonotic human infections. To assess changes to zoonotic potential, we characterized A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses isolated from cows’ milk and birds. Bovine-derived viruses are lethal in mice and ferrets and transmit to direct but not airborne contact ferrets. All viruses replicate in human bronchial epithelial cells despite preferentially binding avian virus-like receptors. The bovine-derived viruses remain susceptible to FDA-approved antivirals, and they are inhibited by sera from ferrets vaccinated with WHO-recommended candidate vaccine viruses (CVV) or human sera from clade 2.3.4.4c vaccinees. While 2.3.4.4b viruses induce severe disease in mammalian models, they retain many avian virus-like characteristics. Combined, we conclude that the risk of contemporary bovine-derived viruses to humans not in contact with affected animals is low. However, heightened vigilance remains essential to promptly detect and respond to any changes.

Source: Nature Communications, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61757-3

____

Thursday, July 17, 2025

#Antiviral #therapy for #HPAI and reported #oseltamivir #resistance in #Canada

{Excerpt}

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5Nx) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have been circulating in North America since late 2021. Since their initial incursion, they have been associated with unprecedented mortality in wild birds, domestic poultry, and marine mammals throughout the Americas, and are now seen across all global regions except Oceania. Furthermore, transmission among dairy cattle and poultry in the United States has led to growing numbers of human cases, and there was a severe human case in Canada with no known infected animal exposure (1,2).

(...)

Source: Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada, https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.3138/jammi-2025-0307

____

Friday, July 11, 2025

Isolation, characterization and phylogenetic analyses of avian #influenza A #H9N2 viruses isolated from #poultry between 2019 and 2023 in #Egypt

Abstract

The current study aimed to investigate the genetic characterization and evolution of low pathogenic avian influenza virus H9N2 in Egypt. Ten H9N2 viruses were recently isolated from samples collected between 2019 and 2023. Phylogenetic analysis of the haemagglutinin (HA) gene segment of the H9N2 isolates showed a relatedness with G1 H9 4.2 lineage and clustered within genotype III of the Egyptian strains identified earlier in 2018. The majority of H9N2 strains had seven and eight glycosylation sites in HA and neuraminidase (NA) respectively. All strains carried H191 and L234 residues in their hemagglutinin which are markers facilitating avian-to-human cross species barrier transmission. No stalk deletions were detected in NA gene. In addition, genetic analysis of the NA and M encoding proteins revealed the absence of substitutions associated with resistance to oseltamivir and amantadine. The NA showed S372A and R403W substitutions which were previously detected in H3N2 and H1N2 viruses that were reported in previous influenza pandemics in 1975 and 2001 respectively. Many mutations associated with virulence and mammalian infection were detected in internal proteins such as PB2(V504), PB1-F2(N66), PA (V127, L672, and L550), M2(S64), and NS1(42S). Analysis showed the presence of full-length PB1-F2 with 227PDZ230 motif which is associated with virus virulence and pathogenesis. Mammalian associated mutations such as PB2 (I 667, T64), PB1-P13, PB1-F2-S82, NP-K214, NP-Q398 and M1-I15 were detected. The HA gene was under positive selection pressure especially at sites 198 and 235 of RBS, while other internal genes were under negative selection pressure. The study highlights the importance of continuous monitoring of H9N2 virus to enable timely implementation of control measures in poultry populations in Egypt.

Source: BMC Veterinary Research, https://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12917-025-04514-4

____

Tuesday, July 1, 2025

A 15-year study of #neuraminidase #mutations and the increasing of S247N mutation in #Spain

Highlights

• In a landscape of a very narrow arsenal of influenza antivirals, resistance mutations are a significant threat.

• Resistance mutations were present in 0.5-5% in A and B influenza viruses during the last 15 years.

• However, S247N resistance mutation in the NA gene sharply increased during 2023-2024 season.

• While this mutation does not confer strong resistance by itself, their fixation could increase the risk of resistance in the future if other resistance mutations appears or get fixed together with it.


Abstract

The therapeutic arsenal against influenza is extremely limited and resistance often arises due to the emergence of mutations, especially in the neuraminidase (NA) gene. This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of NA mutations over 15 years in Spain. To do so, we used the GISAID database from which we downloaded a total of 11,125 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), B/Victoria and B/Yamagata NA virus sequences, and analyzed the resistance mutations using FluSurver software. Our results showed that the occurrence of NA resistance mutations remained constant in the four viruses during the 15 seasons evaluated, being around 0.5-5%. Most of the resistance was found in the A(H1N1)pdm09 subtype (around 70%), especially from the 2023-2024 season onwards, when a significant increase in the occurrence of S247N mutation was observed. The occurrence of this type of mutation before 2022 was rare, but in the 2023-2024 season a total of 44 influenza viruses harboring S247N mutations were detected, while in the other years, only two cases were observed. Some studies have described a significant increase in this mutation over the past two seasons and although it appears to confer only slightly reduced inhibition to oseltamivir, its increase is noteworthy and should be a reason for increased their vigilance.

Source: Virus Research, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168170225000760?via%3Dihub

____

Friday, June 27, 2025

#Global #update on susceptibilities of #influenza viruses to #neuraminidase #inhibitors and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor #baloxavir, 2020–2023

Highlights

• Antiviral susceptibility to NA inhibitors and PA inhibitor baloxavir was determined for seasonal and zoonotic influenza viruses circulating globally during 2020–2023.

• Low global frequencies (0.1-0.2%) of seasonal influenza viruses with reduced or highly reduced inhibition by NAI inhibitors were observed as in previous years.

• Low global frequencies of seasonal influenza viruses (∼ 0.1%) with reduced susceptibility to baloxavir were observed, with the rate in Japan elevated (3.3%) in 2022–2023, as has been seen previously.

• For zoonotic viruses, 2.7% contained genetic markers associated with reduced or highly reduced inhibition to NA inhibitors and none contained markers associated with reduced susceptibility for baloxavir.

• For the treatment of influenza, NA inhibitors and baloxavir remain suitable.


ABSTRACT

Antiviral susceptibility of influenza viruses is monitored by the World Health Organization Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System. This study describes a global analysis of the susceptibility of influenza viruses to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (NAIs, oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, laninamivir) and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor (CENI, baloxavir) for three periods (May to May for 2020–2021, 2021–2022 and 2022–2023). In particular, global influenza activity declined significantly in 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 when compared to the pre-pandemic period of COVID-19. Combined phenotypic and NA sequence-based analysis revealed that the global frequency of seasonal influenza viruses with reduced or highly reduced inhibition (RI/HRI) by NAIs remained low, 0.09% (2/2224), 0.12% (27/23465) and 0.23% (124/53917) for 2020–2021, 2021–2022 and 2022–2023, respectively. As in previous years, NA-H275Y in A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses was the most frequent substitution causing HRI by oseltamivir and peramivir. Sequence-based analysis of polymerase acidic (PA) protein supplemented with phenotypic testing revealed low global frequencies of seasonal influenza viruses with reduced susceptibility (RS) to baloxavir, 0.07% (1/1376), 0.05% (9/18380) and 0.12% (48/39945) for 2020–2021, 2021–2022 and 2022–2023, respectively; commonly associated substitutions were PA-I38T/M/L. In Japan, the rate was 3.3% (16/488) during 2022–2023, with 11 A(H3N2) viruses having PA-I38T/M substitutions. For zoonotic viruses, 2.7% (3/111) contained substitutions, one each NA-H275Y, NA-S247N and NA-N295S, associated with RI/HRI NAI phenotypes, and none contained PA substitutions associated with RS to baloxavir. In conclusion, the great majority of seasonal and zoonotic influenza viruses remained susceptible to NAIs and CENI baloxavir.

Source: Antiviral Research, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166354225001433?via%3Dihub

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts