Showing posts with label tecovirimat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tecovirimat. Show all posts

Thursday, February 26, 2026

#Tecovirimat for the Treatment of #Mpox

 


Abstract

Background

Tecovirimat is approved for smallpox treatment under the Food and Drug Administration Animal Rule on the basis of efficacy in nonhuman primate models of mpox (previously known as monkeypox). However, the clinical efficacy of tecovirimat against human clade II mpox is unclear.

Methods

In a phase 3, international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of oral tecovirimat in adults with laboratory-confirmed clade II mpox. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive tecovirimat or placebo for 14 days. The primary outcome was clinical resolution, assessed in a time-to-event analysis in participants with active skin or mucosal lesions. Secondary outcomes included reduction in pain, assessed in all participants with laboratory-confirmed mpox and in those with severe pain at baseline (pain score, 7 to 10; scale, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]); complete lesion healing (assessed in a time-to-event analysis); viral DNA clearance; and safety.

Results

Of 412 participants who underwent randomization (275 to tecovirimat and 137 to placebo), 344 had laboratory-confirmed mpox, and 336 had active skin or mucosal lesions and were included in the primary analysis. By day 29, the estimated cumulative incidence of clinical resolution was 83% with tecovirimat and 84% with placebo; the competing-risks hazard ratio for clinical resolution was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.31; P=0.89). No substantial between-group differences were seen in pain reduction among participants with severe pain (difference, 0.1 point; 95% CI, −0.8 to 1.0), in complete lesion healing (competing-risks hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.26), or in viral DNA clearance. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was similar in the two groups (4% with tecovirimat and 3% with placebo).

Conclusions

This trial showed no evidence that tecovirimat therapy shortened the time to clinical resolution, reduced pain, or increased viral clearance among adults with clade II mpox. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health; STOMP/A5418 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05534984.)

Source: 


Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2506495?af=R&rss=currentIssue

____

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

#Mpox: disease #manifestations and therapeutic #development

 


ABSTRACT

Mpox, caused by monkeypox virus (MPXV) infection, has emerged as a significant global health threat. The World Health Organization (WHO) has twice declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern for mpox: first for the 2022–2023 global outbreak and subsequently for concurrent outbreaks in Africa. Beyond MPXV, other members of the Orthopoxvirus genus also pose growing risks of zoonotic spillover, with the potential to jump from animal reservoirs to humans. Clinically, mpox is distinguished from other Orthopoxvirus infections by its propensity to cause severe systemic manifestations alongside localized skin lesions, disproportionately affecting vulnerable groups such as children, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals. Although vaccines are available, effective therapeutics are equally essential in combating the mpox crisis. Current antiviral agents, including tecovirimat and brincidofovir, have demonstrated uncertain or disappointing efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies, underscoring the urgent need for further therapeutic development. This review provides a concise synthesis of recent advances in understanding mpox epidemiology and clinical features and offers an in-depth discussion of the current status and future directions in therapeutic development. We highlight the importance of innovative experimental models that can authentically replicate mpox disease manifestations and serve as robust platforms for therapeutic testing. Advancing these research efforts is critical for responding to the ongoing mpox emergency and for sustaining preparedness against future poxvirus epidemics.

Source: Journal of Virology, https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jvi.00152-25?af=R

____

Wednesday, March 12, 2025

#Tecovirimat is #safe but #ineffective as #treatment for clade II #mpox

The antiviral drug tecovirimat used without other antivirals did not reduce the time to clinical resolution of clade II mpox lesions or improve pain control among adults in an international clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). 

The trial enrollment was stopped in late 2024 when an interim analysis showed that tecovirimat monotherapy was ineffective in the study population. Detailed results were presented at the 2025 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in San Francisco.

“This study brought us a step forward in better understanding mpox disease and potential treatment strategies,” said Jeanne Marrazzo, M.D., M.P.H., director of NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which sponsored and funded the trial. “We are grateful to the study team and participants for their contributions to groundbreaking research on a disease that we still do not know enough about.”

Mpox is caused by a virus that spreads mainly through close contact. Two types of the virus have been identified, referred to as clades I and II. A clade II virus subtype caused a global mpox outbreak in 2022, and the virus continues to circulate at low levels. In 2024, a clade I outbreak in Central and East African countries was declared a public health emergency of international concern. Travel-related cases of clade I mpox have been reported in the United States, but the risk of clade I mpox to the U.S. population remains low. People with significantly compromised immune systems or certain preexisting skin conditions, children and pregnant women have an elevated risk of developing severe mpox.

The Study of Tecovirimat for Mpox (STOMP) began in September 2022 as part of the U.S. whole-of-government response to the clade II mpox outbreak. There are no mpox treatments approved in the United States. Based on animal studies, tecovirimat, also known as TPOXX, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat smallpox(link is external)—a disease caused by a virus closely related to, but typically causing disease far more serious than, the virus that causes mpox. The drug had not been studied in people with mpox until the STOMP trial and a complementary study called PALM007 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PALM007 reported findings in 2024 that were similar to the findings reported from STOMP.

STOMP was a randomized international efficacy study that enrolled participants who had been ill with mpox for fewer than 14 days in Argentina, Brazil, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Thailand and the United States, including Puerto Rico. Randomized study participants and trial investigators were blinded, meaning they did not know who received tecovirimat or placebo. Children, pregnant women, study participants with certain skin conditions or substantially suppressed immune systems, and participants who had severe mpox disease as defined in the study protocol were assigned to an open-label study arm, meaning they all received tecovirimat instead of being randomized. The STOMP study assessed the safety of the drug among all study participants and, in randomized arms, evaluated whether a 14-day course of tecovirimat monotherapy reduced the time to clinical resolution of visible mpox lesions and improved other outcome measures like pain, compared to a placebo.

Randomized participants reported experiencing mpox symptoms for a median of eight days before study entry and had a median of nine mpox lesions. About a third of participants reported severe pain, selecting scores of 7-10 on an 11-point scale. By day 29 following study entry, an estimated 83% of participants receiving tecovirimat had reached clinical resolution, compared to 84% who received a placebo, a non-significant difference. Among those reporting severe pain at baseline, improvements were similar between those who received tecovirimat and placebo, with average pain scores decreasing by 3.2 points for participants receiving tecovirimat and by 3.1 points among those receiving the placebo. Participants’ lesions were swabbed and tested for the presence of DNA from the virus that causes mpox throughout the study. At day eight, 48% of participants receiving tecovirimat had undetectable viral DNA compared to 37% of participants receiving the placebo. The difference between the two arms narrowed by day 15 (82% for those receiving tecovirimat versus 80% for those receiving the placebo) as mpox resolved. These differences were not statistically significant at either time point. Adverse event rates were similar between both of the randomized study arms.

A separate exploratory analysis of data collected in STOMP’s open-label arm before the study had closed aimed to determine whether any factors were associated with faster mpox lesion resolution in participants with or at elevated risk of severe mpox. Faster clinical resolution was observed in participants who were younger in age or who did not have HIV or were living with HIV but virally suppressed on antiretroviral therapy; however, no association was significant when considering the duration of symptoms before study entry. The investigators noted that STOMP open-label participants had fewer lesions, but slower clinical resolution than reported from the PALM007 trial.

“Since the start of the clade II outbreak, clinicians treating mpox have had limited evidence to guide their practice, and STOMP provided definitive answers on the lack of clinical utility of tecovirimat monotherapy for the randomized population studied” said Timothy Wilkin, M.D., M.P.H., chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health at the University of California, San Diego. “Taken together, these latest results also highlight that we still have yet to isolate which factors influence mpox disease progression and clinical resolution.”

The STOMP study was conducted by the NIH-funded ACTG, a global clinical trials network focused on HIV and other infectious diseases. SIGA Technologies, Inc., based in New York, provided tecovirimat for the study. Study results also will be published in a scientific journal.

For more information about STOMP, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov using the identifier NCT05534984.

NIAID conducts and supports research—at NIH, throughout the United States, and worldwide—to study the causes of infectious and immune-mediated diseases, and to develop better means of preventing, diagnosing and treating these illnesses. News releases, fact sheets and other NIAID-related materials are available on the NIAID website.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

Source: US National Institute of Health, https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/tecovirimat-safe-ineffective-treatment-clade-ii-mpox

____

Friday, January 24, 2025

#Antiviral activity of #tecovirimat against #monkeypox virus clades 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b

{Excerpt}

The zoonotic Orthopoxvirus monkeypox virus includes two main clades (ie, 1 and 2) relevant to human transmission.1 Two major outbreaks of monkeypox virus have occurred since 2022,1–3 and were declared public health emergencies of international concern by WHO in July, 2022, and August, 2024. The first outbreak was caused by a clade 2b strain that quickly spread worldwide, resulting in approximately 100 000 cases and 200 deaths.3 In the second outbreak, the novel clade 1b emerged.4 As of December, 2024, this upsurge has resulted in more than 55 000 reported or suspected cases and approximately 1000 deaths in DR Congo and neighbouring countries, including Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda, and Angola.4 A few imported clade 1b cases have also been reported in the UK, Sweden, Germany, Belgium, France, the USA, Canada, and Thailand.5 Prevention measures include patient isolation and care as well as vaccines.

(...)

Source: Lancet Infectious Diseases, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(25)00014-3/fulltext?rss=yes

____


My New Space

Most Popular Posts