Showing posts with label risk assessment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label risk assessment. Show all posts

Monday, June 1, 2026

#Bundibugyo #ebolavirus #outbreak in #DRC and #Uganda: rapid #assessment from the #ESCMID Emerging Infections Subcommittee

 


Introduction

The ongoing outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) caused by Bundibugyo ebolavirus (BDBV) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda represents a major regional public health emergency with international implications. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the event a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on 17 May 2026, while clarifying that it did not meet the criteria for a pandemic emergency [1]. This distinction reflects the revised International Health Regulations framework, which allows WHO to distinguish a PHEIC from a pandemic emergency when an event is serious and internationally relevant but does not meet the additional criteria for a pandemic emergency.

(...)

Source: 


Link: https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.org/article/S1198-743X(26)00285-5/fulltext

____

Friday, May 29, 2026

#Ebola disease caused by #Bundibugyo virus, #DRC & #Uganda (WHO D.O.N., May 29 '26)

 


Situation at a glance

    The Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda continues to evolve rapidly, with increasing case numbers, geographic spread, and ongoing cross-border transmission

    As of 27 May, a total of 906 suspected cases and 223 deaths among suspected cases have been reported in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

    As of 29 May, a total of 134 confirmed cases, including nine in Uganda, with 18 deaths among the confirmed cases, have been reported across both countries. 

    This is an additional 49 confirmed cases, eight confirmed deaths, 160 suspected cases and 47 suspected deaths since the last update on 21 May. 

    In addition, there is one confirmed case, an individual from the United States of America, who had treated patients in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and is currently receiving care in Germany

    In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, transmission is concentrated in Ituri, as well as North Kivu and South Kivu provinces, with challenges in contact tracing and follow-up, insecurity, inadequate isolation, care, and referral systems for patients complicating response efforts. 

    National authorities, in collaboration with WHO and partners, are implementing response measures including deployment of rapid response teams, delivery of medical supplies, strengthened surveillance, laboratory confirmation, infection prevention and control, the set-up of safe and optimized treatment centers, and community engagement.


Description of the situation

    Since the last Disease Outbreak News was published on 21 May 2026, the number of suspected and confirmed cases has increased rapidly in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. 

    In total, 906 suspected cases, including 223 deaths among suspected cases have been reported from Democratic Republic of the Congo; and 134 confirmed cases (nine in Uganda), including 18 deaths (one in Uganda) (CFR 14%) have been reported from the two countries as of 29 May. 

    Additionally, a medical doctor from the United States of America who was exposed as part of their work caring for patients in the Democratic Republic of the Congo tested positive on 17 May and was transported to Germany for treatment and care.

(...)


Democratic Republic of the Congo

    Since the last update dated 21 May, an additional 42 confirmed cases including eight deaths and 160 suspected cases including 47 deaths have been reported from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. 

    As of 27 May 2026, a total of 125 confirmed cases including 17 deaths (CFR 14%); and 906 suspected cases including 223 deaths have been reported from 13 health zones (HZ) in Ituri (7/36 HZ), North Kivu (5/35 HZ) and South Kivu Provinces (1/34 HZ) [1]. 

    Sixteen confirmed cases have been reported among health and care workers to date. 

    Epidemiological and laboratory investigations are ongoing to reclassify all suspected cases and deaths reported in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

    The outbreak remains concentrated in Ituri Province, which accounts for 88% (110) of confirmed cases

    The highest confirmed case numbers in Ituri Province are reported from Bunia (37 cases), Rwampara (33 cases), Mongbwalu (20 cases), and Nyankunde (10 cases) HZ. 

    Of the 17 deaths among confirmed cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 10 were male (nine were over 15 years old and one under 15) and seven were female (five over 15 years old and two under 15).

    A total of 774 samples have been collected as of 27 May. Of these, 648 samples (84%) have been analyzed, with 125 testing positive, representing a test positivity rate (TPR) of 19.2%. This is likely an underestimation of the actual positivity rate as over 100 samples are still awaiting testing and have been sent to Kinshasa for further analysis.

    As of 27 May, 2635 contacts have been listed in Ituri and North Kivu provinces.

    Security incidents against health facilities, and community resistance, have recently emerged as major operational challenges in Ituri Province, with three recent incidents reported in Mongbwalu and Rwampara HZ. These create additional risks for undetected transmission, disrupt outbreak response efforts, and reinforce the need to strengthen community protection and engagement activities

(...)


Uganda

    Since the last update dated 21 May, an additional seven confirmed cases have been reported from Uganda

    As of 29 May 2026, a total of nine confirmed cases including one death have been reported in Kampala (n=8) and Wakiso (n=1), Uganda. 

    Recent cases include a Ugandan driver who transported the first reported case, a Congolese health worker with linkage to the index case, a Congolese woman who travelled to Uganda for medical care, and two Ugandan health workers linked to earlier confirmed case.

    As of 26 May, a total of 436 contacts linked to the cases have been identified and are under follow-up. These include close household contacts and hospital contacts where the cases were hospitalized.

    Exposure risks are associated with healthcare settings and cross-border movements.

(...)


Epidemiology

    Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) is a severe and often fatal form of Ebola disease caused by the Bundibugyo virus, one of the Orthoebolavirus species. 

    It is a zoonotic disease, with fruit bats suspected to be the natural reservoir. 

    Human infection is thought to occur through close contact with the blood or secretions of infected wildlife, such as bats or non-human primates, and it subsequently spreads from person to person through direct contact with the blood, secretions, organs, or other bodily fluids of infected individuals or contaminated surfaces or items. 

    Transmission is particularly amplified in health-care settings when infection prevention and control (IPC) measures are inadequate, and during unsafe burial practices involving direct contact with the deceased.

    The incubation period for BVD ranges from 2 to 21 days, and individuals are not infectious until symptom onset

    Early symptoms such as fever, fatigue, muscle pain, headache, and sore throat, are non-specific, which complicates clinical diagnosis and can delay detection. These symptoms then progress to gastrointestinal symptoms, organ dysfunction, and in some cases haemorrhagic manifestations. Case fatality rates in the past two BVD outbreaks, reported in Uganda and in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2007 and 2012, have ranged from approximately 30% to 50%.

    Differentiating BVD from other endemic febrile illnesses such as malaria is challenging without laboratory confirmation using PCR or antigen/antibody-based assays. 

    Control relies on rapid case identification, isolation and care, contact tracing, safe burials, and strong community engagement, as no approved vaccines or specific treatments currently exist for BVD.


Public health response

    Health authorities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda, in collaboration with WHO and partners, are implementing comprehensive public health measures. WHO Director-General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, traveled to the Democratic Republic of the Congo on 28 May to support the ongoing response.

(...)


WHO risk assessment

    On 22 May 2026, WHO assessed the risk of the outbreak of BVD to be very high at the national level in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, high at the regional level, and low at the global level

    The risk assessment will be continuously reassessed in the coming days based on available and shared information.

(...)


WHO advice

    On 19 May 2026, the Director-General of WHO convened the first meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee, which issued the temporary recommendations on 22 May 2026 to States Parties. These recommendations underscore the importance of coordinated outbreak control, enhanced cross‑border collaboration, and sustained surveillance and preparedness to prevent further regional spread and ensure an effective public health response

    WHO advises against any restriction of travel to, or trade with, the Democratic Republic of the Congo or Uganda based on the currently available information. 

    WHO continues to closely monitor and, where necessary, verify travel and trade measures in relation to this event.

(...)

___

[1] Data source: Centre des opĂ©rations d'urgences de sante publique (COUSP-DRC) available at : SitRep MVE N° 013/2026 – National Institute of Public Health


Citable reference: World Health Organization (29 May 2026). Disease Outbreak News; Bundibugyo Virus Disease, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda. Available at https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON605

Source: 


Link: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON605

____

Thursday, May 28, 2026

#Hantavirus #outbreak linked to cruise ship #travel, Multi-locations (WHO D.O.N., May 28 '26)

 


Situation at a glance

    -- This is the fourth Disease Outbreak News report on the Andes hantavirus outbreak linked to cruise ship travel, following the notification to the World Health Organization (WHO) on 2 May 2026 of severe respiratory illness cases aboard M/V Hondius, a cruise ship

    -- Since the last DON was published on 13 May, three additional confirmed cases were reported, from Canada, the Netherlands, and Spain

    -- The previously reported inconclusive case from the United States of America was subsequently determined to be negative following further laboratory testing and has been removed from the total case count. 

    -- All cases to date have been passengers or crew members on the ship. 

    -- As of 27 May, a total of 13 cases, including three deaths, have been reported (case fatality ratio 23%). 

    -- Eleven cases have been laboratory-confirmed for Andes virus (ANDV) infection, and two are probable cases

    -- Given the long incubation period of up to six weeks, it is not unexpected that cases continue to be reported until the end of the six weeks since last exposure. 

    -- Through the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) channels, National IHR Focal Points (NFPs) have all been informed and are supporting international contact tracing and monitoring efforts. 

    -- WHO has assessed the risk posed by this event to the global population as low and will continue to monitor the epidemiological situation and update the risk assessment as needed.


Description of the situation

    -- On 2 May 2026, WHO received notification from the IHR NFP of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (hereafter referred to as the United Kingdom) regarding a cluster of severe acute respiratory illness, including two deaths and one critically ill passenger, aboard the Netherlands-flagged cruise ship M/V Hondius.

    -- As of 27 May, a total of 13 cases (eleven confirmed and two probable cases), including three deaths (two confirmed and one probable), have been reported. 

    -- Since the last Disease Outbreak News was published on 13 May, three additional confirmed cases have been reported among passengers or crew members, one each from Canada, the Netherlands, and Spain

    -- The case in Canada developed symptoms during contact follow-up, whereas the cases in the Netherlands and Spain were identified through routine weekly testing of high-risk contacts during follow-up. 

    -- The previously reported inconclusive case from the United States of America was subsequently determined to be negative following further laboratory testing and has been removed from the total count on 15 May. 

    -- All confirmed cases are among people who travelled onboard the M/V Hondius.

__

Figure 1. Epidemiological curve of Andes hantavirus cases (n = 13) reported to WHO as of 27 May 2026, 17:00


{Ckick on Image to Enlarge}

___

    -- Based on currently available information, the working hypothesis is that the first case acquired the infection prior to boarding the cruise, through exposure on land

    -- Investigations are ongoing to elucidate the potential circumstances of exposure and the source of the outbreak, in collaboration with authorities in Argentina and Chile, however, the time between the individual’s visit to Chile and the onset of symptoms exceeds the maximum incubation period. 

    -- Therefore, based on the information currently available, exposure in Chile can be ruled out

    -- Current evidence suggests subsequent human-to-human transmission onboard the ship. 

    -- This is also supported by a preliminary analysis of the sequences, which show a near-identical sequence from different cases.[1]

    -- This outbreak is being managed through a coordinated international response

    -- This includes comprehensive epidemiological investigations, case isolation and clinical management, medical evacuations, laboratory testing, and international contact tracing, as well as quarantine and monitoring measures. 

    -- Recommendations are subject to change as new epidemiological and laboratory evidence becomes available, including findings from genetic sequencing.

    -- Follow-up and contact tracing for all contacts of hantavirus cases linked to the cruise ship is ongoing. This includes passengers who disembarked in Saint Helena, United Kingdom, on 24 April; Ascension, United Kingdom, on 27 April; Praia, Cabo Verde, on 6 May; and Tenerife, Spain, on 10 and 11 May, the remaining 25 crew members and the two healthcare workers from the Netherlands who disembarked in the Netherlands on 18 May and 23 May. Passengers who travelled on flights who may have had exposure to subsequently confirmed cases have been identified and contacted.

    -- High-risk contacts are being quarantined and monitored by local health authorities either in their respective countries or in the ship’s flag country, the Netherlands, or third countries (Table 1). 

    -- As of 22 May 2026, more than 600 contacts, including 53% high-risk and 47% low-risk contacts, have been identified across 32 countries, territories and areas, and are either under close monitoring or self-monitoring in line with the updated guidance on management of contacts of Andes virus (ANDV) cases from the MV Hondius cruise ship   published on 17 May.

___

Table 1. Contacts being traced for the Andes hantavirus outbreak on a cruise ship reported to WHO as of 25 May 2026, 17:00.


{Click on Image to Enlarge}

___

Epidemiology

    -- Hantavirus disease is a zoonotic viral disease caused by hantaviruses of the genus Orthohantavirus, family Hantaviridae, order Bunyavirales. More than 20 viral species have been identified within this genus.  

    -- Human hantavirus infection is primarily acquired through contact with the urine, faeces, or saliva of certain species of (specific) infected rodents, or by touching contaminated surfaces. 

    -- Exposure typically occurs during activities such as cleaning buildings with rodent infestations, though it may also occur during routine activities in heavily infested areas. 

    -- Human cases are most commonly reported in rural settings, such as forests, fields, and farms, where rodents are present, and opportunities for exposure are greater.

    -- Human-to-human transmission has currently only been reported for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) associated with Andes virus infection

    -- Andes virus (ANDV) is endemic in South America, with confirmed circulation and human cases reported primarily in Argentina and Chile, and additional cases and related strains identified in Uruguay, southern Brazil, and Paraguay.


Andes virus transmission between humans

    -- Based on the available information and the existing observations of the current outbreak, limited human-to-human transmission of ANDV is known to occur

    -- However, no large-scale human-to-human outbreaks have been observed historically,[2] suggesting a low probability of transmission per contact. 

    -- ANDV circulates in specific species of rodents in the Americas, and there have been many sporadic cases reported in Argentina and Chile that have not led to onward transmission.[3] 

    -- Clusters of human cases have been reported in multiple past outbreaks and have been typically associated with close and prolonged interactions, often in shared indoor environments such as households.  

    -- The largest reported outbreak of ANDV was reported in Argentina in 2018-2019,[2] where high viral titres in combination with attendance at large social gatherings or extensive contacts among people were associated with higher transmission.  

    -- While the available evidence suggests that there are multiple modes of transmission that occur with ANDV, the probability of onward transmission between humans remains low.

    -- In this recent outbreak of ANDV infection reported on a cruise ship, human-to-human transmission has also occurred

    -- Considering the ongoing epidemiological studies and environmental sampling after the disembarkation of all passengers from MV Hondius, the exact mode(s) through which human-to-human transmission occurred and their relative contributions are yet to be fully understood

    -- Therefore, at present, WHO is operating under the assumption that ANDV transmission:

        ° may include contact with an infected individual or contaminated surfaces,

        ° and/or through-the-air transmission (via direct deposition of infectious respiratory particles onto exposed facial mucosal surfaces--mouth, nose or eyes)

        ° and/or airborne transmission (via inhalation of infectious respiratory particles).

    -- The virus does not exhibit transmission dynamics consistent with highly transmissible airborne pathogens (such as measles).

    -- This information is up to date as of 27 May 2026. It will be updated as new evidence becomes available and the understanding of transmission evolves.

    -- Using data from the previously documented human-to-human outbreaks in Argentina [2] and the 13 cases so far recorded from the cruise ship outbreak, WHO estimates that the mean incubation period is 22 days, corresponding to a probability of safe release from quarantine of 96% at 42 days, reducing to 91% at 35 days. This reaffirms WHO’s recommendation of 42 days of quarantine for high-risk contacts and self-monitoring for low-risk contacts.

    -- Using case incidence data from the ANDV outbreak associated with the cruise ship, the effective reproduction number (Rt) for this outbreak as of 22 May is estimated to be 0.7, where anything less than 1.0 indicates that the spread of disease is declining. 


Public health response

    -- Authorities from States Parties managing cases and/or contacts, WHO, and partners have initiated coordinated response measures, including:

        ° Ongoing engagement between WHO and the IHR NFPs of countries managing cases and/or contacts to ensure timely information sharing and coordination of response actions.

        ° International contact tracing and follow up of contacts is ongoing.

        ° WHO is requesting regular information sharing and periodic updates from States Parties through IHR channels regarding contact monitoring and the health status of high-risk contacts.

        ° Epidemiological investigations continue to better define epidemiological links between cases and exposure factors on the ship, as well as to try to understand the potential source of exposure.

    -- WHO has developed and published specific technical guidance documents to support response to the event, including:

        ° Technical guidance on the management of hantavirus onboard ships was shared with States Parties through IHR channels

        ° Technical note for the disembarkation and onward management of passengers and crew in the context of an Andes-virus-associated cluster;

        ° Management of contacts of Andes Virus (ANDV) cases from the MV Hondius cruise ship

    -- IHR NFPs of affected countries have been in contact about passenger and crew    information through established IHR channels for those who were on the ship, as well as on planes where a known case was on board. Nearly 1000 communications have occurred through these established channels.

    -- Risk communication coordination and support are being provided to ensure sharing of regular, timely and evidence-based information. WHO has activated three-level coordination and is supporting national authorities in implementing risk-based, evidence-informed public health measures in accordance with the provisions of the IHR and related WHO technical guidance documents.

    -- WHO regularly convenes expert calls across laboratory, clinical management, epidemiology, infection prevention and control (IPC), and border health and points of entry domains to facilitate timely experience sharing and coordinated expert support.

    -- WHO has supported the streamlining and development of research protocols on the natural clinical history in collaboration with national partner institutions and planned a hantavirus scientific consultation on medical countermeasures.


WHO risk assessment

    -- WHO continues to assess the risk for passengers and crew who were onboard the cruise ship as moderate, as individuals exposed prior to the implementation of control measures may still develop illness during the incubation period and should therefore be closely monitored.

    -- The risk at the global level is assessed as low for the following reasons:

        ° Andes virus has demonstrated limited human-to-human transmission in previous outbreaks, typically occurring among close contacts and within household settings, generally requiring prolonged close exposure. 

        ° Transmission can be contained through early detection, isolation of cases, clinical management, and contact management. However, the ship environment presented an increased risk due to close living quarters, shared indoor spaces, prolonged exposure, and frequent interpersonal interactions, all of which likely facilitated transmission.

        ° Human Pulmonary Syndrome caused by hantaviruses in the Americas, including Andes virus, can have a high case fatality ratio, reaching 40-50%, particularly among elderly individuals and those with co-morbidities. The average age of passengers on board the ship was 65 years old.

        ° Investigations on the travel history and potential exposures of the first case in the Southern Cone subregion of the Americas are ongoing and suggest possible exposure to rodents during recreational activities. Viral sequencing analyses are also ongoing and are comparing the ANDV strain associated with this outbreak with strains circulating in Argentina and Chile, where the disease is enzootic. The preliminary sequencing analysis for the cases indicates a high degree of genetic similarity amongst sequenced cases —showing no more than one single nucleotide polymorphisms difference per individual – which strongly indicates that the outbreak likely arose from a single zoonotic spillover event, or from a very small number of closely related spillover events.[1]

    -- Additional cases may occur among individuals exposed before implementation of containment measures. However, the current response, including quarantine for those who have left the ship and rapid isolation of any new suspect cases and the monitoring of contacts, is expected to limit the risk of further spread.

    -- As there is no specific antiviral treatment for HPS, suspected cases require prompt transfer to an adequately equipped emergency department or intensive care unit, where available, for close monitoring and supportive management to improve chances of recovery. Consequently, for remote areas, rapid transfer to a well-resourced healthcare facility is required, which may be challenging under the current conditions.

    -- For the general public, including people not exposed on board the ship or through close contact with a confirmed case, the overall probability of infection remains low

    -- Current evidence indicates that human-to-human transmission occurs through close and prolonged contact, and can be effectively limited through early detection, isolation of cases, and contact tracing. 


WHO advice

    -- WHO advises States Parties involved in this event to continue coordinated public health management efforts related to the management of cases and contacts associated with the affected ship and flights, as well as in countries where cases and/or contacts have been identified. 

    -- WHO has advised and continues to advise a precautionary approach for management of the outbreak related to the ship, with focus on total containment to minimize the onward risk of transmission to other persons. 

    -- This strategic decision is guided by:

        ° To date, most of the evidence of human-to-human transmission shows it has required prolonged close exposure, although it is possible that some highly infectious individuals could infect others through a lower degree of exposure.

        ° Mode(s) of transmission and which mode is dominant if multiple routes of transmission exist are still uncertain.

        ° Infection is a result of not only exposure, but the setting and duration where exposure has taken place, how infectious the infected person is, and whether personal protective equipment is used.

    -- Although the probability of infection is uncertain, if infection occurs, it can be severe. Currently, there is no specific treatment available and severe disease requires advanced critical care.

    -- There is a relatively low burden of additional infection prevention and control measures.

    -- At this time, WHO does not recommend any changes to routine activities for the general public. People who were on board the affected ship, or who have had close contact with a confirmed case, should follow national health advice. Guidance may be updated as further evidence becomes available.

    -- Recommendations remain dynamic and will be updated as additional epidemiological and laboratory evidence, including genetic sequencing data, becomes available.


Coordination

    -- WHO advises States Parties involved in this event to continue public health coordination related to the management of cases and contacts in countries where they are present or expected to return, as well as of affected conveyances, as applicable and in close coordination with travel and transport authorities, conveyance operators, and other relevant stakeholders at points of entry.

    -- Coordination should ensure the implementation of risk-based, evidence-informed public health measures.


Surveillance

    -- Ongoing epidemiological investigations include detection, investigation, and reporting of suspected cases, as well as contact tracing and monitoring.

    -- As a precautionary measure, high-risk contacts should undergo active monitoring and home or facility quarantine for 42 days following their last exposure.

    -- Current evidence does not support routine laboratory testing or quarantine of low-risk contacts; instead, they should undertake passive self-monitoring and seek medical evaluation if symptoms develop.

    -- Contact tracing and listing should utilize all available information sources, including interviews and relevant conveyance-related documentation (passenger manifests, passenger locator forms, and other relevant activity logs), to ensure completeness.

    -- Early recognition and prompt isolation of suspected cases remain critical to reduce further transmission.


Laboratory

    -- Laboratory testing of suspected cases should be conducted as part of the outbreak response.

    -- Laboratory investigations may include molecular detection, serology, and sequencing to support case confirmation and better understand the outbreak.

    -- Recommendations on laboratory approaches will continue to evolve as new evidence becomes available.


Case management

    -- Early identification, prompt isolation, and clinical evaluation of suspected cases are essential.

    -- When HPS is suspected, patients should be promptly referred for close monitoring and supportive care, including admission to emergency or intensive care settings when needed.

    -- Clinical management is primarily supportive and may include antipyretics, careful fluid management, hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory support, and escalation to advanced interventions for severe cases.

    -- Mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[4] (ECMO), or dialysis may be required for severe disease.

    -- Antibiotics are not routinely indicated for confirmed hantavirus infection, but may be used empirically if bacterial infection cannot be ruled out or is suspected.

    -- Currently, there is no approved specific antiviral treatment for HPS.


Infection Prevention and Control

    -- Suspected or confirmed cases should be isolated in a single, well-ventilated room.

    -- Standard precautions* should be applied at all times for all patients, including hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and appropriate waste management, outlined in the interim guidance published on 8 May

    -- Transmission-based precautions should be implemented in addition to standard precautions. Health and care workers should use appropriate personal protective equipment, including respirators, eye protection, gowns, and gloves.

    -- Suspected or confirmed cases should be isolated in a single, well-ventilated room.

    -- Transmission-based precautions should be implemented in addition to standard precautions.

    -- Hand hygiene should be performed before and after the use of PPE.

    -- Waste from suspected or confirmed cases should be managed as infectious waste.

    -- Airborne precautions should be applied during aerosol-generating procedures.

    -- The duration of standard and transmission-based precautions should be determined on a case-by-case basis.


Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE)

    -- Communication strategies should prioritize transparent, timely, and culturally appropriate information to affected individuals and the general public.

    -- Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) efforts should provide clear, consistent, and actionable information, including explanations of the public health measures being implemented.

    -- Messaging should address public concerns regarding transmissibility, severity, and international travel, and clarify recommended actions for different population groups.

    -- Public health awareness should focus on early detection, timely healthcare seeking, and reducing exposure risks, including occupational and environmental exposures.

    -- RCCE activities should be integrated throughout all phases of the response and align with broader public health measures.

    -- Environmental management strategies, including rodent control, should be included as part of prevention efforts.

    -- Based on the current information available on this event, WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions beyond the restriction of movement of identified high-risk contacts.

___

{*} Standard precautions refer to a set of practices that are applied to the care of patients, regardless of the state of infection (suspicion or confirmation), in any place where health services are provided. These practices aim to protect both healthcare professionals and patients and include hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment, respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette, safe handling of sharps materials, safe injection practices, use of sterile instruments and equipment and cleaning of hospital environments and the environment. Adapted from “Standard precautions for the prevention and control of infections: aide-memoire”- WHO, 2022.  Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-UHL-IHS-IPC-2022.1  


Further information

    -- World Health Organization. Management of contacts of Andes virus (ANDV) cases from the MV Hondius cruise ship. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/management-of-contacts-of-andes-virus-(andv)-cases-fromthe-mv-hondius-cruise-ship

    -- World Health Organization. WHO Technical note for the disembarkation and onward management of passengers and crew in the context of an Andes virus-associated cluster MV Hondius cruise ship. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-technical-note-for-the-disembarkation-and-onward-management-of-passengers-and-crew-in-the-context-of-an-andes-virus-associated-cluster-mv-hondius-cruise-ship

    -- World Health Organization. Hantavirus fact sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hantavirus 

    -- World Health Organization.WHO’s response to hantavirus cases linked to a cruise ship. https://www.who.int/news/item/07-05-2026-who-s-response-to-hantavirus-cases-linked-to-a-cruise-ship

    -- World Health Organization. Handbook for management of public health events on board ships. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549462

    -- World Health Organization. Guide to Ship Sanitation, 3rd edition https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241546690

    -- World Health Organization. Handbook for management of public health events in air transport, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241510165

    -- World Health Organization. Guide to hygiene and sanitation in aviation, 3rd edition, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547772

    -- Preliminary analysis of Orthohantavirus andesense virus sequences from a cruise-ship related cluster, May 2026. https://virological.org/t/preliminary-analysis-of-orthohantavirus-andesense-virus-sequences-from-a-cruise-ship-related-cluster-may-2026/1029

    -- World Health Organization. Standard precautions for the prevention and control of infections: aide-memoire. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-UHL-IHS-IPC-2022.1

    -- World Health Organization. Transmission-based precautions for the prevention and control of infections: aide-memoire. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-UHL-IHS-IPC-2022.2

    -- World Health Organization. Hantavirus outbreak toolbox. https://www.who.int/emergencies/outbreak-toolkit/disease-outbreak-toolboxes/hantavirus-outbreak-toolbox

    -- World Health Organization (8 May 2026). Disease Outbreak News. Hantavirus cluster linked to cruise ship travel, Multi-country. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON600

    -- World Health Organization (4 May 2026). Disease Outbreak News. Hantavirus cluster linked to cruise ship travel- Multi-country. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON599

    -- World Health Organization. A decision framework for effective, equitable and context-specific public health and social measures during public health emergencies: decision navigator: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/ceaf4aa7-00c8-4681-9c35-965e231a3706/content

    -- Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control of hantavirus infection, including Andes virus disease. Interim regional guidance for suspected or confirmed cases. https://iris.paho.org/items/bc5a7b5a-5a0a-4407-829e-663c762ad615

    -- Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization. Clinical management of hantavirus infection, including Andes virus disease: Interim regional guidance for suspected or confirmed cases. https://iris.paho.org/items/0fa0dcb1-4395-467d-a431-5408b4eff337    

    -- Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization. PAHO supports the international response to hantavirus pulmonary syndrome cases linked to a cruise ship in the Atlantic. https://www.paho.org/en/news/7-5-2026-paho-supports-international-response-hantavirus-pulmonary-syndrome-cases-linked

    -- Epidemiological Alert Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS). https://www.paho.org/en/documents/epidemiological-alert-hantavirus-pulmonary-syndrome-americas-region-19-december-2025  

    -- Hantavirus in the Americas: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. Available at: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/40176

    -- Hantavirus Prevention, CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/prevention/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/hps/prevention.html

    -- MartĂ­nez Valeria, Paola N, et al. (2020). “Super-Spreaders” and Person-to-Person Transmission of Andes Virus in Argentina. New England Journal of Medicine. 383. 2230-2241. 10.1056/NEJMoa2009040.

    -- US CDC. How to Clean Up After Rodents: https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-pets/rodent-control/clean-up.html

    -- Hantavirus, Washington State Department of Heath, https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2025-08/420-056-Guideline-Hantavirus.pdf

    -- Hantavirus Infection, MDS Manual, professional version: https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/infectious-diseases/arboviruses-arenaviridae-and-filoviridae/hantavirus-infection

    -- Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hantavirus-pulmonary-syndrome/symptoms-causes/syc-20351838


___

[1] Preliminary analysis of Orthohantavirus andesense virus sequences from a cruise-ship related cluster, May 2026. https://virological.org/t/preliminary-analysis-of-orthohantavirus-andesense-virus-sequences-from-a-cruise-ship-related-cluster-may-2026/1029

[2] “Super-Spreaders” and Person-to-Person Transmission of Andes Virus in Argentina | New England Journal of Medicine. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2009040

[3] Padula PJ, Edelstein A, Miguel SD, LĂłpez NM, Rossi CM, Rabinovich RD. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome outbreak in Argentina: molecular evidence for person-to-person transmission of Andes virus. Virology. 1998 Feb 15;241(2):323-30. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8976. PMID: 9499807.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9499807/

[4] Dietl CA, Wernly JA, Pett SB, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support improves survival of patients with severe Hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2008;135(3):579-584. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.020. 


Citable reference: World Health Organization (28 May 2026). Disease Outbreak News. Hantavirus outbreak linked to cruise ship travel, Multi-locations. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON604

Source: 


Link: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON604

____

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

#Bundibugyo virus disease, #DRC (with exportation to #Uganda) (WHO, RRA, May 27 '26)

 


{Excerpt}

Risk Statement

    -- Given the evolving epidemiological situation of the current Ebola disease outbreak caused by Bundibugyo virus  (BDBV) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) with exportation to Uganda, the initial rapid risk assessment (RRA) on 15 May 2026 has been updated to incorporate newly available information, including recent epidemiological developments, cross-border implications, the declaration of the event as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the WHO Director-General, and ongoing response activities. 

    -- On 5 May 2026, the WHO Country Office in the DRC detected social media reports of an unusual cluster of severe illness and deaths in the Mongbwalu health zone, a rural gold-mining area in Ituri Province in northeastern DRC, close to the borders with South Sudan and Uganda

    -- The affected area is characterised by high population mobility, insecurity, and intense cross-border connectivity with neighbouring countries.  

    -- Clinical presentation among suspected cases included fever, headache, vomiting, profound weakness, and haemorrhagic manifestations, raising concern for a viral haemorrhagic fever. 

    -- Retrospective investigation by a field team at the provincial level covering 15 April through 13 May 2026 identified 246 suspected cases and 65 deaths (Case Fatality Rate (CFR) 26.4%) from three health zones (Mongbwalu, Rwampara, and Bunia), including a family cluster of 15 deaths within a two-week window. 

    -- The presumed first case of the disease is a nurse of unknown age, who died at the local hospital in Bunia health zone on 24 April, where eight attending healthcare workers at the hospital also developed compatible symptoms.  

    -- Twenty samples were collected, representing 12 patients who had travelled from Mongbwalu health zone to Rwampara health zone and the eight healthcare workers who developed symptoms were sent to the Institut National de Recherche BiomĂ©dicale (INRB) in Kinshasa for testing.  

    -- On 14 May 2026, WHO was notified by national authorities at the Centre d'OpĂ©ration des Urgences en SantĂ© Publique (COUSP) of 8 laboratory-confirmed cases of an Orthoebolavirus among the 20 samples tested. 

    -- Further laboratory testing including genomic sequencing confirmed Bundibugyo virus

    -- On 15 May 2026, the Ministry of Health of Uganda reported one imported laboratory-confirmed case of a Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) in Kampala. 

    -- The patient was an elderly male from DRC who travelled to Uganda to seek care at a hospital in Kampala on 11 May and died on 14 May 2026. 

    -- The body was repatriated to DRC on the same day. 

    -- This event confirms the cross-border movement of a symptomatic case and exposure within an urban healthcare setting in Uganda. 

    -- Genetic sequencing results by INRB released on 15 May came back positive for Bundibugyo virus (BDBV). 

    -- On the same day, both DRC and Uganda officially declared Ebola outbreaks in their respective countries. 

    -- On 19 May 2026, a suspected viral haemorrhagic fever alert was reported from Miti-Murhesa health zone in South Kivu Province following the death of a man aged between 25 to 30 years at a local hospital. 

    -- Investigations were initiated to determine whether the event was linked to the ongoing BVD outbreak. 

    -- The case was subsequently confirmed positive for BVD.   

    -- As of 21 May 2026 (the data used for this rapid risk assessment), the outbreak in DRC had expanded to 16 affected health zones, including 12 in Ituri Province, three in North Kivu Province, and Miti-Murhesa health zone in South Kivu Province. 

    -- In total, 661 suspected cases and 160 suspected deaths (CFR 24.2%) have been reported, including 63 confirmed cases and four confirmed deaths associated with BVD. 

    -- Uganda had cumulatively reported two confirmed cases of which one had died. 

    -- This is the 17th Ebola disease (EBOD) outbreak reported in DRC since 1976, and the second outbreak caused by BVD in the country.  

    -- Prior to this current outbreak, two BVD outbreaks had been documented: the first in Uganda during 2007–2008 and the second in DRC in 2012. 

    -- Together, these outbreaks resulted in more than 200 confirmed and probable cases and approximately 66 deaths (CFR 33%).  

    -- The risk at the national level (DRC), which was assessed as high on 15 May 2026, is now on 22 May 2026 assessed as very high due to substantial changes in the epidemiological situation. 

    -- Key factors informing this reassessment include:  

        Outbreak caused by BVD for which no licensed vaccine or specific therapeutics are currently available for prevention and treatment. Early intensive supportive care remains the only current treatment option, along with packages of public health interventions, as done in previous outbreaks. 

        On 15 May, confirmed and suspected cases were reported from both Mongbwalu and Rwampara health zones, with suspected cases also identified in Bunia and alerts from Beni and Butembo health zones in North Kivu Province, indicating early signs of geographic spread beyond the initially affected areas. 

        By 21 May 2026, the outbreak had expanded rapidly from a limited number of affected health zones to 16 health zones across three provinces. Confirmed and suspected cases had been reported in 12 health zones in Ituri Province (Aungba, Bambu, Bunia, Fataki, Komanda, Logo, Lolwa, Mangala, Mongbwalu, Nizi, Nyankunde, and Rwampara), three health zones in North Kivu Province (Butembo, Goma, and Katwa) and one in South Kivu in Miti-Murhesa Health Zone. This rapid geographic expansion over a short period, combined with intense population mobility and cross-border connectivity, indicates a very high risk of further spread within DRC. 

        As of 21 May, high mortality has been reported with an overall CFR of 24.2% (160/661), among suspected cases and 6.3% (4/63) among confirmed case. The current CFR is an underestimation of the actual situation as investigations are still ongoing to identify and re-classify all suspected deaths. 

        The rapid increase in cases and deaths within a short period, combined with the spread across multiple health zones and cross-border transmission, is highly concerning

        Reports of numerous community deaths and the absence of documented safe and dignified burial practices may have facilitated continued community transmission through exposure during funerals and handling of bodies. 

        Healthcare worker infections and low infection prevention and control (IPC) scorecard performance in the area indicate a high risk of exposure in healthcare settings and significant gaps in IPC. 

        Delays in verification of initial signal by authorities and retrospective identification of cases and deaths suggest prolonged circulation before confirmation

        Epidemiological links and the full chain of transmission are not yet clearly established, and the source of the outbreak remains under investigation. 

        The affected provinces of Ituri and North Kivu are highly insecure, with intensified fighting in recent months, causing more than 100 000 people to be newly displaced. 

        The affected area is also characterized by intense population mobility linked to mining activities, trade, and movement between rural and urban centres. 

        Bunia serves as a major referral, transport, and commercial hub, increasing the risk of spread to other provinces. 

        Ongoing conflict in Ituri and North Kivu provinces restricts the movement of surveillance teams, limits the deployment of Rapid Response Teams, and hinders the secure transport of laboratory samples, as well as challenges in contact tracing, safe and dignified burials  and control of population movement of high-risk contacts in those conflict zones. 

        Significant distrust of health and external authorities among the local population. 

        Limited healthcare infrastructure and inadequate isolation capacity may facilitate continued transmission in DRC.  

    -- The level of risk at the regional level (including Uganda) is still assessed as High due to:  

        Confirmed cross-border spread through imported cases to Uganda. 

        As of 20 May, Uganda has cumulatively reported 2 confirmed cases, both were imported cases who came to Uganda to seek medical care. One case died following admission to the local Hospital, and the second case is currently receiving care at the Ebola isolation unit at a Referral hospital. 

        Frequent movement across porous borders between Ituri (DRC), Uganda, and South Sudan. 

        Ongoing epidemiological links along the eastern DRC–western Uganda corridor, historically affected by Ebola outbreaks, including Bundibugyo and Sudan virus disease outbreaks. 

        While not directly bordering Ituri province, Rwanda and Burundi share borders with Eastern DRC and have experienced recent cross-border disease transmission (i.e., mpox), further intensified by ongoing conflict and displacement. 

        High mobility linked to mining, trade, and displacement. 

        Potential for undetected chains of transmission in border communities. 

        Potential for continued spillover to Kampala, Uganda – a densely populated urban hub or other cities with close transport links  

    -- The level of risk at the global level is assessed as low due to:  

        As of 21 May 2026, the outbreak remained geographically limited to DRC with exportation of cases to Uganda at present. 

___

{1}  Confidence refers to the level of confidence in the data/information or the quality of the evidence available at the time the RRA is conducted. Poor quality information may increase the overall perceived risk due to the incertitude in the assessment. 

(...)

Source: 


Link: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-rapid-risk-assessment-ebola-disease-caused-by-bundibugyo-virus--democratic-republic-of-the-congo-and-uganda-v2

____

Friday, May 22, 2026

#Canada, Speaking #Remarks for the Chief Public Health Officer on #Ebola Disease and #Hantavirus Technical #Briefing (May 22 '26)

 


May 22, 2026 | 1:00pm EST


    Thank you for joining us today.

    Before we begin, I want to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded traditional territory of the Anishinaabe Algonquin Nation. I would like to take this moment to reflect on the history of Indigenous people and to honour the original stewards of the lands where we live and work.


Situation Update – Ebola Disease

    I will begin today with an update on the Ebola situation in Africa and what it means for Canada. And then, I will provide an update on Andes hantavirus.

    On May 15, Africa's Centres for Disease Control and Prevention declared an outbreak of Ebola disease in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Cases linked to this outbreak have also been reported in Uganda, including an imported case that was confirmed to be the Bundibugyo virus strain.

    On May 17, the Director General of the World Health Organization declared this outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern due to the evidence of cross-border spread, uncertainty around the true size of the outbreak, the potential for wider regional and global impacts, and the need for global collaboration.

    It is important to be clear: while this is a serious and evolving situation, cases remain localized, and the global risk is low.

    This outbreak is occurring in an area with complex challenges, including proximity to urban centres, security concerns and high levels of population movement associated with mining activity. These factors can increase the potential for spread locally and across borders.

    We recognize the risk for people in the region is high, and our thoughts are with the individuals, families, communities and health workers who are directly bearing the brunt of this challenging outbreak.

    Canada stands ready to assist.


Risk to Canadians

    Based on the Public Health Agency of Canada's rapid risk assessment and in alignment with the World Health Organization, the risk to people in Canada is considered to be low at this time.

    There has never been a case of Ebola disease imported into Canada despite numerous Ebola outbreaks in the affected region.

    I do want to be transparent that, out of an abundance of caution, one individual in Ontario underwent precautionary testing. This individual recently returned from Ethiopia and reported symptoms consistent with a range of illnesses.

    Both initial testing conducted in Ontario and confirmatory testing at the National Microbiology Laboratory were both negative.

    This is a good example of how quickly measures are activated, even when the likelihood of Ebola is very low.

    Ebola disease is transmitted through direct contact with the body fluids of an infected individual who is showing symptoms, or through contact with infected animals or contaminated materials. It is not spread through casual contact, and it does not spread through the air like respiratory viruses.

    Those at highest risk are individuals providing care to patients with Ebola disease, participating in burial practices involving direct contact, or working in healthcare or laboratory settings where the virus is present.


Public Health Response

    While the risk in Canada remains low, we are taking this situation very seriously and are taking a precautionary approach.

    The Public Health Agency of Canada is actively monitoring the outbreak in close collaboration with international partners, including the World Health Organization, as well as provincial and territorial public health authorities.

    At our borders, we have strengthened screening measures. As of May 20, enhanced screening questions have been implemented at airport kiosks for travellers who have been in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or Uganda within the past 21 days.

    Travellers are now asked whether they have been in these countries and whether they are experiencing symptoms or may have been in contact with someone with Ebola disease.

    We have also deployed additional quarantine and screening officers at key airports, and we are maintaining a 24/7 centralized monitoring approach. Signage has been deployed at major airports across the country to ensure travellers know what to do if they feel unwell.

    These measures are supported under the Quarantine Act and are designed to identify potential risks early and ensure that appropriate follow-up actions are taken.

    On Wednesday, a flight was redirected to MontrĂ©al due to a passenger of concern. PHAC quarantine officers assessed the individual, determined they were asymptomatic, and appropriate border procedures were followed.

    For travellers, I want to emphasize the importance of checking the Government of Canada's Travel Advice and Advisories before departure.

    Individuals returning from affected regions should monitor their health for 21 days. If symptoms develop, it is critical that they isolate immediately, away from others and contact local public health authorities before seeking in-person care.


Laboratory and Preparedness Capacity

    Canada has strong laboratory and surveillance systems in place.

    Any suspected case in Canada would be immediately reported, with samples sent to the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg for confirmatory testing. Results are typically available within 24 hours once samples arrive at the lab.

    Our National Microbiology Laboratory continues to play a leading role globally in Ebola research, including work on vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. Canadian scientists were instrumental in the development of the world's first Ebola vaccine, and they continue to contribute to preparedness and response efforts internationally.


International Collaboration

    This outbreak underscores the importance of global collaboration.

    Canada continues to work closely with international partners through established mechanisms such as the World Health Organization and the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network.

    We stand ready to provide technical expertise and support if requested, as we have done in previous outbreaks. Our shared goal is to contain this outbreak at its source and reduce the risk of further spread.


Hantavirus Update

    I will now turn briefly to the situation regarding Andes hantavirus.

    Canada confirmed a case of Andes hantavirus linked to the MV Hondius cruise ship earlier this month. At this time, there have been no additional cases identified in Canada beyond the initial confirmed case in British Columbia, and all high-risk contacts continue to be monitored by local public health authorities.

    The overall risk to the general population in Canada remains low at this time.

    We continue to take a precautionary approach given the severity of this virus, while recognizing that person-to-person transmission of Andes hantavirus is rare and typically requires close, prolonged contact with someone who is symptomatic.

    Our thoughts are with the individual in hospital in British Columbia and their family. We thank our public health colleagues and the clinical team for the excellent care and support they are providing.


World Health Assembly and International Coordination

    This week, I had the opportunity to attend the World Health Assembly in Geneva, where I met with a number of my global counterparts, to discuss the public health challenges we all face.

    I also met Dr. Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization and members of his senior leadership team who are leading emergency response, including the Ebola response in DRC.

    These discussions reinforced the importance of transparency, timely information sharing, and coordination in responding effectively to emerging public health threats.

    The events of the past several weeks have demonstrated that strong global relationships are not only valuable, they are essential.


Conclusion

    In closing, we have robust systems in place for detection, prevention, and response. We are working in close collaboration with provincial and territorial partners, as well as with international organizations and governments, to ensure a coordinated and effective approach.

    We will continue to provide timely updates and clear guidance as new information becomes available.

    I would like to thank our public health partners across the country, our frontline healthcare workers, laboratory scientists, and our international colleagues for their dedication, expertise, and collaboration.

    Together, we are working to protect the health and safety of people in Canada and around the world.

    Thank you. Merci. Miigwetch.

Source: 


Link: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/news/2026/05/speaking-remarks-for-the-chief-public-health-officer0.html

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts