14th Meeting of #WHO #Expert Working Group of the Global #Influenza #Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) for Surveillance of #Antiviral Susceptibility (March 20 '26)

Weekly epidemiological record 

20 MARCH 2026, 101th YEAR, No 12, 2026, 101, 53–56

http://www.who.int/wer 

Executive Summary 

The WHO Expert Working Group on Surveillance of Influenza Antiviral Susceptibility (AVWG) supports the WHO GISRS by providing practical guidance for monitoring antiviral susceptibility of seasonal and emerging influenza viruses through global surveillance efforts. 

The 14th WHO-AVWG meeting was held in virtual format on 10-12 June 2025. 

Update on susceptibility of seasonal influenza viruses to approved antiviral agents 

From approximately May 2024 to May 2025, five WHO Collaborating Centres (CCs) and two National Influenza Centres (NICs) reported co-circulation of influenza A(H1N1) pdm09, A(H3N2), and B/Victoria viruses. 

A(H1N1)pdm09 dominated in Eastern Asia{1}. Elevated frequency of influenza neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor (NAI) reduced inhibition/ highly reduced inhibition (RI/HRI) was identified among A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, largely conferred by the NA-H275Y substitution. 

Reporting frequency was 3.8% in China, lower (≤1%) in other reporting regions, but still measurable and were in some cases a result of prior antiviral use or specific local outbreaks (e.g., a hospital in Iceland with a NA-H275Y+S247N cluster, a primary school classroom outbreak in Japan{2}. The NA-S247N substitution (≤3.3%) was also noted by three centres, but these viruses exhibited normal inhibition (NI) by NAIs when available isolates were tested. 

Incidence of RI/HRI or NA-associated markers were less frequently reported for A(H3N2) and B/Victoria viruses than A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. 

Markers and incidence of reduced susceptibility to baloxavir was detected at low frequencies of 0.07 to 2.2%, where the latter value represented a small sample set of only 2 of 89 viruses in Japan. 

Reduced susceptibility or amino acid markers indicative of reduced susceptibility were observed only in influenza A viruses and not influenza B. 

Update on susceptibility of zoonotic and animal influenza viruses  to approved antiviral agents 

From approximately May 2024 to May 2025, global surveillance data from WHO CCs, NICs, and associated partners including WHO Essential Regulatory Laboratories and the OFFLU (WOAH/FAO Network of Expertise on Animal Influenza) network reported that most zoonotic and avian influenza viruses, particularly circulating A(H5N1/x) HA clade 2.3.4.4b and 2.3.2.1a/e viruses, were broadly susceptible to NAIs and baloxavir. 

A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b virus oseltamivir inhibitory concentrations remain elevated vs. seasonal N1 viruses. 

Small and isolated incidence of NAI associated RI/HRI or markers included: NA-D199G mediated oseltamivir/zanamivir RI detected in A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b poultry in the Russian Federation (February 2024, reported June 2025), NA-N295S in poultry in India A(H5N1) 2.3.2.1a isolates, and 8 poultry farms in British Columbia, Canada exhibiting A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b with NA-H275Y. 

Only two viruses with reduced baloxavir susceptibility were identified, 1 human virus with PA-I38M (California, USA) and 1 environmental virus isolate with PA-V100I (China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region). 

Beyond A(H5N1/x), nearly 30 avian influenza subtypes including A(H9N2), A(H7N2), A(H7N7), and A(H7N9), and A(H10N7) were analysed across surveillance sites in the Bangladesh, Egypt, the Netherlands and the United States of America (USA). 

They generally lacked NA or PA genotypic markers of reduced drug susceptibility and when available for phenotypic testing, were susceptible to both NAIs and baloxavir. 

A(H7N2) and A(H7N7) viruses from the Netherlands displayed oseltamivir RI compared to human seasonal references, but this may be due to foldchange comparison to a mismatched NA subtype. 

Swine-origin variant viruses (A(H1N1)v, A(H1N2)v, A(H3N2)v) tested across the USA and Europe were largely free of genotypic or phenotypic indicators of reduced susceptibility/inhibition to NAIs or baloxavir. 

Some viruses (the  Netherlands) showed slightly higher NAI median inhibitory concentrations to historical or human seasonal baselines, but all remained below NAI RI thresholds. 

Update of protocols and guidance for GISRS laboratories 

Both genotypic and phenotypic assays may be used as tools to monitor susceptibility of influenza viruses to NAIs and baloxavir. 

The WHO-AVWG routinely reviews and updates influenza NA and PA amino acid substitutions associated with reduced susceptibility to NAIs and baloxavir; updated tables for the previous reporting period were included on the WHO website{3–5}. 

The US CDC continues to update and ship reference virus panels that can be used for NAI and baloxavir susceptibility testing, available via the International Reagent Resource{6} 

Further guidance on baloxavir and other PA inhibitor testing included the Influenza Replication Inhibition Neuraminidase-based Assay (IRINA), published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA{7} and included on the WHO website{8}. 

The WHO AVWG continues to develop algorithms for NICs to aid in influenza response planning (zoonotic, pandemic, and antiviral resistance-specific events), guidance to aid in decisions making for testing strategies (genotypic vs. phenotypic), and guidance for consideration of baloxavir and PA inhibitor specific amino acid substitutions associated with reduced drug susceptibility{9}. 

Additionally, the WHO-AVWG has worked with GISAID to continue to refine and implement modifications to existing tools to facilitate identification of NA and PA substitutions upon sequence submission. 

Outbreak and pandemic preparedness with clinicians’ perspectives 

Two physicians, Profs. Prof. David Hui and Bin Cao, were invited to present recently updated WHO guidance on clinical practice guidelines for influenza{10}. 

Significant updates and discussion surrounded inclusion of baloxavir, which was conditionally recommended for non-severe disease high-risk patients and post-virus exposure prophylaxis (PEP) including influenza viruses associated with high mortality. 

Conditional recommendation against any NAI or baloxavir intervention remains for non-severe disease low-risk patients or seasonal virus PEP. 

Data was presented on multiple PA inhibitors rapidly moving through late-stage clinical trials in China which may have implications on expanded usage of this newer class of influenza drugs. 

Review of External Quality Assessment Programme (EQAP) panels 

EQAP was initiated in 2007 to monitor the quality of GISRS, NICs, other national influenza reference laboratories’ capacity for influenza diagnosis and detection. 

An optional antiviral phenotypic NAI panel was introduced in 2013, and genotypic baloxavir susceptibility was introduced in 2020. 

Results for the 2024 Global EQAP panel were reported during the 14th WHO-AVWG meeting. 

Of the 194 participating laboratories, 26.3% participated in NAI susceptibility testing. 

Results and subsequent discussion from this year’s panel were used by members of WHO-AVWG to assess the training needs of NICs. 

Way forward 

The 2020–2023 Annual Global Update on the Susceptibility of Influenza Viruses (Global AVS) manuscript was published{11} and drafting of a 2023–2025 publication is underway. The next WHO-AVWG meeting will be held in June 2026.

___

{1} World Health Organization. Influenza Transmission Zones. 2026. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/ default-source/influenza/influenzaupdates/2025_09_24_influenza-transmission-zones. pdf?sfvrsn=22361408_3&download=true. 

{2} Takashita E, Shimizu K, Usuku S, Senda R, Okubo I, Morita H, et al. An outbreak of influenza A(H1N1) pdm09 antigenic variants exhibiting cross-resistance to oseltamivir and peramivir in an elementary school in Japan, September 2024. Euro Surveill. 2024;29(50).

{3} World Health Organization. Summary of neuraminidase (NA) amino acid substitutions assessed for their effects on inhibition by neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs). 2025. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/ influenza/laboratory---network/quality-assurance/human-nai-marker-table_ for-publication_final_20240918.pdf. 

{4} World Health Organization. Summary of neuraminidase (NA) amino acid substitutions assessed for their effects on inhibition by NA inhibitors (NAIs) among avian influenza viruses of Group 1 (N1, N4, N5, N8 subtypes) and Group 2 (N2, N3, N6, N7, N9 subtypes) NAs. 2025. https://cdn.who.int/media/ docs/default-source/influenza/avwg/avian-nai-marker-whotable__10-10-2025.pdf?sfvrsn=bc0d1e9a_10 

{5} World Health Organization. Summary of polymerase acidic protein (PA) amino acid substitutions assessed for their effects on PA inhibitor (PAI) baloxavir susceptibility. 2025. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/influenza/ laboratory---network/quality-assurance/antiviral-susceptibility-influenza/ pa-marker-who-table_28-11-2025_updated.pdf?sfvrsn=5307d6fe_4. 

{6} International Reagent Resource. 2026. https://www. internationalreagentresource.org/. 

{7} Patel MC, Flanigan D, Feng C, Chesnokov A, Nguyen HT, Elal AA, et al. An optimized cell-based assay to assess influenza virus replication by measuring neuraminidase activity and its applications for virological surveillance. Antiviral Res. 2022;208:105457. 

{8} World Health Organization. Baloxavir Susceptibility Assessment using Influenza Replication Inhibition Neuraminidase-based Assay (IRINA). https:// cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/influenza/avwg/cdc-phenotypic-lp492rev01d---baloxavir-susceptibility-assessment-using-irina.pdf? 

{9} Patel MC, Nguyen HT, Mishin VP, Pascua PNQ, Champion C, Lopez-Esteva M, et al. Antiviral susceptibility monitoring: testing algorithm, methods, and f indings for influenza season, 2023-2024. Antiviral Res. 2025;244:106299. 

{10} World Health Organization. Clinical practice guidelines for influenza 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240097759.

{11} Hussain S, Meijer A, Govorkova EA, Dapat C, Gubareva LV, Barr I, et al. Global update on the susceptibilities of influenza viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir, 2020-2023. Antiviral Res. 2025:106217.

___

Source: 

Link: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/1ea408da-cd90-438b-b80c-b00aaf4e7315/content

____

#Zanamivir - #Amantadine Conjugate: A Dual-Action Agent with Broad-Spectrum Synergistic #Antiviral Efficacy

 

Abstract

Influenza A virus is a highly contagious respiratory pathogen, and its rapid and continuous adaptive mutations for immune escape have limited the efficacy of existing vaccines and antiviral drugs. Here, we report a multimechanism anti-influenza platform based on the conjugation of zanamivir (ZMV) with amantadine (Aman). Aman acts as a hydrophobic tag that promotes the degradation of neuraminidase and concurrently enhances the physicochemical properties of ZMV, leading to improved membrane permeability and a significantly prolonged half-life. Meanwhile, the ZMV moiety counteracts Aman-induced cytotoxic autophagy. The resulting conjugate, compound 7j, exhibits potent activity against a wide range of neuraminidase and M2 ion channel mutations. Notably, a single intravenous dose of 7j fully protected mice from a lethal H1N1 challenge. Our work demonstrates that the rational fusion of ZMV and Aman achieves synergistic multimechanistic antiviral activity with enhanced efficacy and safety, offering a new strategy for the development of next-generation anti-influenza drugs.

Source: 

Link: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c03547

____

#Report on #influenza viruses received and tested by the #Melbourne #WHO CC for #Reference and Research on #Influenza during 2024

 

Abstract

As part of its role in the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS), the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza in Melbourne received 12,180 human influenza-positive samples during 2024. Viruses were analysed for their antigenic, genetic, and antiviral susceptibility properties. Selected viruses were propagated in qualified cells or embryonated hens’ eggs for potential use in seasonal influenza virus vaccines. During 2024, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses predominated, accounting for 33% and 42%, respectively, of all viruses received, compared to 5% for influenza B/Victoria. Of note, one influenza A(H5N1) virus was also received in 2024. The majority of A(H1N1)pdm09 (98%), A(H3N2) (88%) and influenza B (100%) viruses analysed at the Centre were found to be antigenically and genetically similar to the respective WHO recommended vaccine strains for the Southern Hemisphere in 2024. Of 4,007 samples tested for susceptibility to the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir, twelve A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses and one B/Victoria virus showed highly reduced inhibition against oseltamivir or zanamivir. Of 3,294 total samples sequenced for baloxavir susceptibility, 18 of the 1,825 A(H3N2) samples were identified with genetic evidence of reduced susceptibility to baloxavir marboxil in the PA gene.

Source: 

Link: https://ojs.cdi.cdc.gov.au/index.php/cdi/article/view/3449

____

Genomic #Evolution of #Influenza A Virus During the 2024-2025 Season, the Johns Hopkins Health System: Antigenic Drift Reduces Serum Neutralization

 

Abstract

Introduction

Seasonal influenza causes significant global morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Ongoing viral evolution can lead to vaccine mismatch and the emergence of antiviral resistance, highlighting the importance of genomic surveillance. The 2024–2025 influenza season was characterized by high incidence and increased hospitalizations.

Methods

We analyzed influenza A virus (IAV) genomes and clinical characteristics from the 2024–2025 season. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 648 influenza A–positive clinical specimens collected between October 2024 and April 2025.

Results

Hemagglutinin (HA) sequences were recovered from 74.23% (481/648) of samples and used for subtyping and phylogenetic analysis. A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses co-circulated, representing 55.5% and 44.5% of cases, respectively. Among A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, the HA1 substitution T120A, located near the Sa antigenic site, increased more than twofold compared with the prior season. Circulating A(H3N2) viruses belonged to multiple HA subclades and exhibited distinct amino acid substitutions at key antigenic sites. Neutralization assays using sera from individuals vaccinated with the 2024–2025 seasonal influenza vaccine demonstrated reduced neutralization of three dominant A(H1N1)pdm09 isolates and two A(H3N2) isolates compared with vaccine strains, consistent with antigenic drift. In addition, the neuraminidase substitution S247N, previously associated with reduced oseltamivir susceptibility, was detected in 13.9% of A(H1N1)pdm09 samples.

Discussion

These findings demonstrate ongoing antigenic drift and the presence of antiviral resistance–associated mutations during the 2024–2025 influenza season, underscoring the need for continued genomic surveillance to guide vaccine and antiviral strategies.

Source: 

Link: https://academic.oup.com/jid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/infdis/jiag069/8461561#google_vignette

____

#Global #update on susceptibilities of #influenza viruses to #neuraminidase #inhibitors and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor #baloxavir, 2020–2023

Highlights

• Antiviral susceptibility to NA inhibitors and PA inhibitor baloxavir was determined for seasonal and zoonotic influenza viruses circulating globally during 2020–2023.

• Low global frequencies (0.1-0.2%) of seasonal influenza viruses with reduced or highly reduced inhibition by NAI inhibitors were observed as in previous years.

• Low global frequencies of seasonal influenza viruses (∼ 0.1%) with reduced susceptibility to baloxavir were observed, with the rate in Japan elevated (3.3%) in 2022–2023, as has been seen previously.

• For zoonotic viruses, 2.7% contained genetic markers associated with reduced or highly reduced inhibition to NA inhibitors and none contained markers associated with reduced susceptibility for baloxavir.

• For the treatment of influenza, NA inhibitors and baloxavir remain suitable.

ABSTRACT

Antiviral susceptibility of influenza viruses is monitored by the World Health Organization Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System. This study describes a global analysis of the susceptibility of influenza viruses to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (NAIs, oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, laninamivir) and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor (CENI, baloxavir) for three periods (May to May for 2020–2021, 2021–2022 and 2022–2023). In particular, global influenza activity declined significantly in 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 when compared to the pre-pandemic period of COVID-19. Combined phenotypic and NA sequence-based analysis revealed that the global frequency of seasonal influenza viruses with reduced or highly reduced inhibition (RI/HRI) by NAIs remained low, 0.09% (2/2224), 0.12% (27/23465) and 0.23% (124/53917) for 2020–2021, 2021–2022 and 2022–2023, respectively. As in previous years, NA-H275Y in A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses was the most frequent substitution causing HRI by oseltamivir and peramivir. Sequence-based analysis of polymerase acidic (PA) protein supplemented with phenotypic testing revealed low global frequencies of seasonal influenza viruses with reduced susceptibility (RS) to baloxavir, 0.07% (1/1376), 0.05% (9/18380) and 0.12% (48/39945) for 2020–2021, 2021–2022 and 2022–2023, respectively; commonly associated substitutions were PA-I38T/M/L. In Japan, the rate was 3.3% (16/488) during 2022–2023, with 11 A(H3N2) viruses having PA-I38T/M substitutions. For zoonotic viruses, 2.7% (3/111) contained substitutions, one each NA-H275Y, NA-S247N and NA-N295S, associated with RI/HRI NAI phenotypes, and none contained PA substitutions associated with RS to baloxavir. In conclusion, the great majority of seasonal and zoonotic influenza viruses remained susceptible to NAIs and CENI baloxavir.

Source: Antiviral Research, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166354225001433?via%3Dihub

____

#WHO #clinical practice #guidelines for #influenza: an #update

Abstract

Background

Every year, more than one billion people around the world are infected with influenza, an acute infection of the respiratory tract. Influenza spreads from person to person through air, contaminated hands or objects. Antiviral and immunomodulatory drugs are available for treatment of patients and prophylaxis of exposed persons. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and rapid tests are available for the diagnosis of influenza. 

Objective 

The aim of this World Health Organization (WHO) guideline is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis, drug treatment and prophylaxis of influenza.

Method

This updated guideline has been developed in accordance with standards for trustworthy guidelines. The recommendations are based on systematic reviews on safety and effectiveness. They take into account the magnitude of benefits and harms of treatments, the reliability of the evidence, and the needs of patients and healthcare professionals.

Results

For non-severe influenza, there is a conditional recommendation to use baloxavir if the risk of severe illness is high. Antivirals are not recommended if the risk is low. There is also a strong recommendation against the use of antibiotics if bacterial co-infection is unlikely. Oseltamivir is conditionally recommended for severe influenza. Not recommended are peramivir and zanamivir, as well as macrolide antibiotics (in the absence of co-infection), mTOR inhibitors and plasma therapy, and corticosteroids. Baloxavir and oseltamivir are conditionally recommended for prophylaxis in asymptomatic persons who have been exposed to seasonal influenza viruses and would be at very high risk of becoming hospitalised. For zoonotic influenza, laninamivir and zanamivir are also conditionally recommended in addition to baloxavir and oseltamivir, regardless of individual risk. For diagnosis, the use of NAAT or digital immunoassay (DIA) for suspected non-severe influenza and nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for suspected severe influenza is recommended.

Source: Gesundheitswesen, https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2571-3357#info

____

A #monoclonal anti-hemagglutinin stem #antibody modified with #zanamivir protects against both #influenza A and B viruses

Significance

Anti-influenza therapeutics remain essential for the control of influenza infections, which may require hospitalization for the most severe cases. Hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), the two membrane glycoproteins of the influenza virus, play crucial roles in the viral replication cycle. While many monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule inhibitors target HA or NA, each faces limitations tied to their individual properties. We developed an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) by covalently linking the NA inhibitor zanamivir to MEDI8852, an HA stem-specific monoclonal antibody. The MEDI8852–zanamivir conjugate targets both HA and NA and offers robust and long-lasting protection in mice against lethal infections with influenza A and B viruses. This approach represents an addition to anti-influenza therapy.

Abstract

Influenza remains a significant public health threat. Both monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule inhibitors can target the influenza surface glycoproteins hemagglutinin (HA) or neuraminidase (NA) for prevention and treatment of influenza. Here, we combine the strengths of anti-influenza antibodies and small molecules by site-specific conjugation of the NA inhibitor zanamivir to MEDI8852, an HA-specific fully human monoclonal antibody. MEDI8852 targets the conserved stem region of HA and inhibits HA-mediated fusion of the viral and host cell membranes. Elimination of virus-infected cells involves Fcγ receptor–mediated effector functions. The efficacy of MEDI8852 is limited to influenza A viruses. Zanamivir, on the other hand, binds to the active site of NA in both influenza A and B viruses to inhibit NA activity and virus release. However, because of its small size, zanamivir has a short half-life and requires repeated dosing at high concentrations. We produced a MEDI8852–zanamivir antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) that engages Fc-mediated effector functions and benefits from neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-mediated recycling. The MEDI8852–zanamivir conjugate extends the circulatory half-life of zanamivir, targets both influenza HA and NA, and shows enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) compared to MEDI8852 alone. The MEDI8852–zanamivir conjugate protected mice from a lethal (10 × LD50) challenge with influenza A and B viruses at a dose similar to that required for broadly neutralizing anti-NA antibodies, with the added advantage of simultaneously targeting NA (influenza A and B) and HA (influenza A).

Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2424889122

____

#Antiviral Susceptibility of #Influenza A(#H5N1) Clade 2.3.2.1c and 2.3.4.4b Viruses from #Humans, 2023-2024

Abstract

During 2023-2024, highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses from clade 2.3.2.1c caused human infections in Cambodia and from clade 2.3.4.4b caused human infections in the Americas. We assessed the susceptibility of those viruses to approved and investigational antiviral drugs. Except for 2 viruses isolated from Cambodia, all viruses were susceptible to M2 ion channel-blockers in cell culture-based assays. In the neuraminidase inhibition assay, all viruses displayed susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral drugs oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, laninamivir, and AV5080. Oseltamivir was ≈4-fold less potent at inhibiting the neuraminidase activity of clade 2.3.4.4b than clade 2.3.2.1c viruses. All viruses were susceptible to polymerase inhibitors baloxavir and tivoxavir and to polymerase basic 2 inhibitor pimodivir with 50% effective concentrations in low nanomolar ranges. Because drug-resistant viruses can emerge spontaneously or by reassortment, close monitoring of antiviral susceptibility of H5N1 viruses collected from animals and humans by using sequence-based analysis supplemented with phenotypic testing is essential.

Source: US National Library of Medicine, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40064473/

____

Evaluation of #influenza #antiviral #prophylaxis for long-term care residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Influenza is a pervasive respiratory infection which disproportionately burdens long-term care residents. To limit outbreaks, guidelines recommend antiviral prophylaxis, particularly oseltamivir or zanamivir, despite acknowledging the inadequate supporting evidence. Therefore, we aimed to review the literature on the efficacy of oseltamivir, zanamivir, and baloxavir prophylaxis for influenza in long-term care.

Methods

Medline, Embase, PubMed, and several other databases were searched from inception to August 16, 2023. For inclusion, observational studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had to report influenza-like illness (ILI) or infection rates amongst adult long-term care populations receiving prophylaxis. Outcome values were meta-analyzed as intervention-specific pooled proportions (PPs) and risk ratios (RRs) when applicable. Risk of bias was assessed via the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 and Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Results

In total, 14 studies were included, comprising 12,672 residents. Individuals given oseltamivir or zanamivir experienced the fewest symptomatic, test-confirmed infections (oseltamivir PP: 0.7%, 95%CI: 0.1-4.7%, zanamivir PP: 3.0%, 95%CI: 0.9-9.4%) and ILIs (oseltamivir PP: 2.8%, 95%CI: 1.8-4.3%, zanamivir PP: 3.4%, 95%CI: 1.3-7.2%). However, no significant statistical differences were detected versus most other interventions (ILI PP range: 4.5-6.4%, infection PP range: 4.6-7.9%). Similarly, in studies directly comparing either antiviral to placebo, there were no associated benefits despite every RR being below 1 (0.51-0.75) due to expansive 95%CIs.

Conclusions

Oseltamivir or zanamivir could provide some benefit but low statistical power behind most estimates precluded definitive conclusions. Therefore, additional studies (RCTs) are needed to expand the evidence base and validate whether prophylaxis is beneficial in this setting.

Source: Clinical Infectious Diseases, https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaf101/8064583?redirectedFrom=fulltext

____

Highly Pathogenic Avian #Influenza A(#H5N1) Virus: Interim #Recommendations for #Prevention, #Monitoring, and Public Health #Investigations

Summary

The purpose of this guidance is to outline CDC's recommendations for preventing exposures to highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) viruses, infection prevention and control measures including the use of personal protective equipment, testing, antiviral treatment, patient investigations, monitoring of exposed persons (including persons exposed to sick or dead wild and domesticated animals and livestock with suspected or confirmed infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) virus), and antiviral chemoprophylaxis of exposed persons. These recommendations are based on available information and will be updated as needed when new information becomes available.

(...)

Source: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/prevention/hpai-interim-recommendations.html

_____