Updated joint FAO/WHO/WOAH public health #assessment of recent #influenza #H5 virus #events in #animals and #people, based on data as of 1 March '26 (18 May 2026)

Key points 

    -- Based on currently available information, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) / World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) assess the global public health risk posed by Gs/Gd-like high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5) viruses as low. 

    -- The risk of infection for occupationally or frequently exposed persons (e.g., with backyard poultry) is assessed as low to moderate depending on local epidemiologic conditions and the risk mitigation and hygiene measures in place. 

    -- Transmission among animals continues and sporadic human infections at the human-animal-environment interface continue to be reported. 

    -- While additional human infections associated with exposure to infected animals or contaminated environments are expected, the overall global public health impact of such infections is currently considered minor. 

    -- The assessment may change rapidly as new epidemiological or virological information becomes available. 

    -- This joint FAO/WHO/WOAH risk assessment updates the transmission risk using new global information available since the previous assessment of 28 July 2025. 

    -- Given the potential risk to human health and the wide-ranging impacts on wild birds and mammals, poultry, livestock and other animal populations, timely notification to global authorities and the application of a One Health approach remain essential to monitor and characterize virus circulation, limit transmission within species and between species, reduce spread among animals, and prevent human infections. 

Infections in animals  

    -- To date, HPAI A(H5) viruses have been detected in birds and/or mammals across all continents except Oceania. 

    -- The predominant H5 virus clades currently circulating worldwide derive from clades 2.3.2.1 and 2.3.4.4. 

    -- Between 1 July 2025 and 1 March 2026, an additional 185 A(H5N1) events{i} in animals (including birds and bovines) have been reported to WOAH. 

    -- Of these, 1204 outbreaks occurred in poultry (of any farming system), 6326 outbreaks in wild birds and nine outbreaks occurred in bovines.  

H5 clade 2.3.2.1 viruses 

    -- Between 1 July 2025 and 1 March 2026, A(H5N1) clade 2.3.2.1a viruses were detected in poultry in Bangladesh and India, while A(H5N1) clade 2.3.2.1e viruses were detected in poultry in Cambodia 

H5 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses 

    -- Detections of A(H5) in wild and domestic mammals and wild and domestic birds continued to be reported in many countries worldwide. 

    -- During the period of September-November 2025, Europe experienced an exceptional and early season and a high incidence of HPAI A(H5) activity in wild birds, with more than 3200 detections reported across 28 countries. 

    -- This represents a ten-fold increase compared to the same period in 2024. 

    -- Based on genetic data available so far, the A(H5N1) HPAI viruses identified in Europe all fall into clade 2.3.4.4b, and the majority belong to the genotype EA-2024.DI2.12,{3} 

    -- This surge has disproportionately affected migratory waterfowl and colonial species, with widespread A(H5N1) virus infections confirmed in key migratory hosts (e.g., Eurasian wigeons, Northern pintails, Mute swans, Greylag geese) and severe mass mortality events in Eurasian cranes (Grus grus).{4}  

    -- In Africa, poultry outbreaks of A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have been reported in Nigeria and South Africa since September 2025. 

    -- Several other countries in sub-Saharan Africa consider HPAI to be present in their territories. 

    -- Detections of A(H5N1) were also made in wild birds in Namibia and South Africa. 

    -- A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses are considered endemic in Egypt’s poultry populations.   

    -- In Asia, clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have been reported in several countries. 

    -- In India, recent poultry outbreaks have involved A(H5N1), while in Kazakhstan, A(H5N1) was detected in wild birds. 

    -- In the Republic of Korea, detections include A(H5N1), A(H5N6), and A(H5N9), while in Japan A(H5N1) and A(H5N5) viruses have been reported. 

    -- In North America, substantial activity of clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5) viruses has continued since the last assessment. 

    -- In the United States of America, more than 3700 A(H5) detections in wild birds and over 400 A(H5) HPAI outbreaks in poultry were reported, while Canada reported nearly 500 A(H5N1) detections in wild birds and over 80 A(H5) HPAI outbreaks in poultry.{5,6} 

    -- A(H5N1) detections in terrestrial and marine mammals have also been reported. 

    -- Notably, A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b was detected for the first time in northern elephant seals in February 2026 in California, involving a virus of the A3 genotype.{7} 

    -- In central America, Mexico reported H5N1 outbreaks in backyard poultry in October 2025 and A(H5N1) detections in wild birds in November. 

    -- A(H5N1) detections of American genotype D1.1 viruses were reported in domestic birds in the Cayman Islands and Guatemala during the second half of 2025. Genotype D1.1 was the most frequently detected A(H5N1) genotype in North America in 2025, affecting wild birds, poultry and multiple mammalian species, including wild and domestic felids and marine mammals. 

    -- A(H5N2) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses belonging to the K.5 genotype were detected in poultry in Mexico.  

    -- In South America, A(H5N1) has continued to spread, with detections in both poultry and wild birds across multiple countries. 

    -- In late 2025, A(H5N1) outbreaks were reported from Argentina, Brazil and Colombia. 

    -- Where sequence data are available, viruses belong to clade 2.3.4.4b.{8} 

    -- In 2026, additional outbreaks occurred across the region. HPAI A(H5) outbreaks occurred in Peru in backyard poultry and in Uruguay in wild birds, although detailed genetic information for these events is not yet available. 

    -- Between 1 February and 1 March 2026, Argentina detected at least 12 A(H5N1) events across domestic and wild birds, while further A(H5N1) outbreaks occurred in backyard and wild birds in Brazil, and in backyard birds in Colombia and Peru.  

    -- Although the full extent of ongoing circulation and establishment in wild bird populations across South America remains uncertain, evidence suggests that A(H5N1) viruses circulating have continued to diversify through reassortment. 

    -- Viruses detected in Brazil in mid- to late 2025 belonged to two distinct genotypes, K.8 and N.1. 

    -- The K.8 genotype is related to “triple reassortant” viruses{9} identified in Argentina in early 2025, combining North American B3.6- and B3.13-like genomes but with multiple internal gene segments derived from South American low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses (LPAIVs).{10,11} 

    -- Its continued presence is consistent with sustained regional spread. 

    -- In contrast, the N.1 genotype clusters with recent North American B3.2 viruses but contains a PB2 segment derived from South American low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses. 

    -- This suggests a separate, more recent introduction of A(H5N1) viruses to South America, followed by reassortment with locally circulating viruses.{12} 

    -- In the Antarctic peninsula and sub-Antarctic islands, A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have been repeatedly detected in the region, including in sea birds such as skuas and penguins, following their introduction during the 2023–2024 austral summer.{13} 

    -- Detections in wild birds and mammals in the region have continued through 2025–2026. This includes outbreaks in additional sub-Antarctic territories, such as Heard Island, where A(H5N1) was detected in Antarctic fur seals, gentoo penguins and southern elephant seals.{14,15} 

    -- This follows initial detections in southern elephant seals on an earlier voyage in October 2025. 

    -- There was no further evidence of ongoing mass mortality detected on this second voyage in January 2026. 

    -- Further sequencing and phylogenetic analysis are being undertaken. 

    -- The extensive circulation of clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5) viruses in wild and domestic bird populations has resulted in multiple spillover events into wild terrestrial mammals, both carnivorous and omnivorous, wild marine mammals, and domestic cats and dogs.{16} 

    -- Amino acid changes potentially associated with increased virulence, transmission, or adaptation to mammalian hosts have been sporadically identified.{17,18,19}  

    -- Since 2024 and as of 1 March 2026, 1088 dairy herds in 19 states of the United States of America have tested positive for A(H5N1). 

    -- Since the last assessment of 28 July 2025, 14 additional A(H5N1) detections have been reported in the country, with the latest detection confirmed in December 2025 in Wisconsin.{20} 

    -- Analyses of virus sequence data suggest that there have been at least four independent spillovers of A(H5N1) into dairy cattle with the most recent occurring in December 2025.{21} 

    -- In January 2026, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) reported the detection of A(H5N1) HPAI antibodies in the milk of a dairy cow at a dairy farm in Friesland Province, following the investigation of a cat living on that dairy farm that died from an A(H5N1) infection.{22} 

    -- The virus detected in the cat belonged to clade 2.3.4.4b genotype EA-2024.DI2.1—which is distinct from the B3.13 and D1.1 genotypes detected in dairy cattle in the United States of America. No evidence of active infection was found in  the herd, but antibodies were later detected in four additional cows on the same farm, therefore, they do not constitute a case according to the WOAH case definition.  

    -- Mammalian detections of A(H5N5) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have also been reported in recent years, particularly those belonging to the A6 genotype. 

    -- Since 2023, detections have been reported in terrestrial carnivora (northern racoon, striped skunk, red fox, Eurasian lynx, Eurasian Otter, American mink, Arctic fox and domestic cats) across North America and Europe and in marine mammals. 

    -- For the latest information on avian influenza situation in animals worldwide, see the FAO Global Avian Influenza Viruses with Zoonotic Potential situation update and the WOAH situation reports on HPAI, as well as WOAH’s World Animal Health Information System. 

Detections in humans 

    -- Since the last joint assessment of July 2025 and as of 1 March 2026, nine additional human cases of A(H5N1) virus infections, and single cases of A(H5), A(H5N2), A(H5N5) virus infections have been detected (based on date of reporting) in Bangladesh, Mexico and the United States of America. 

    -- Eight A(H5N1) cases were detected in Cambodia, and one was detected in Bangladesh. 

    -- All cases reported direct or indirect exposure to domestic birds or contaminated environments. 

    -- No human-to-human transmission was suspected associated with these confirmed cases. 

    -- The viruses from two cases in Bangladesh belong to clade 2.3.2.1a viruses, viruses from six of the cases from Cambodia belong to clade 2.3.2.1e, and viruses from the cases in Mexico and the United States of America belong to clade 2.3.4.4b.  

Virus characteristics  

    -- Routine monitoring and screening of viral sequences from birds have rarely identified markers of mammalian adaptation in A(H5) viruses, and when detected, these have primarily involved the polymerase proteins. 

    -- Such mutations have been observed more frequently in viruses isolated from mammals. 

    -- The PB2 D701N amino acid mutation has been identified in genotype D1.1 viruses detected in poultry (including chickens and turkeys), wild birds, cats, dairy cattle and wild mammals such as red foxes.{23} 

    -- The PB2 E627K mutation has been detected in some B3.13 viruses identified in dairy cattle and in clade 2.3.2.1 and 2.3.4.4 A(H5) viruses detected in poultry, cats and wild birds across multiple regions. 

    -- Some genetic markers in A(H5N1) virus sequences from human cases have been linked to potentially lower lab-based susceptibility to common antivirals like oseltamivir or baloxavir marboxil; the clinical significance of some of these markers remains uncertain.{24} 

    -- Experimental studies with A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have generally not demonstrated efficient transmission via respiratory droplets.{25,26,27,28,29,30,31} 

    -- Ferret studies conducted by the US CDC using a D1.1 A(H5N1) virus (A/Washington/239/2024) did not show respiratory droplet transmission.{32} 

    -- Overall, currently circulating A(H5N1) viruses would require additional genetic changes to acquire efficient human-to-human transmission via respiratory droplets, consistent with the current low public health risk. 

    -- Based on limited seroprevalence information available on A(H5) viruses, human population immunity against the HA of A(H5) viruses is expected to be minimal; human population immunity targeting the N1 neuraminidase is found to be present although the impact of this immunity is yet to be understood.{33}  

Candidate vaccine viruses (CVV) 

    -- The WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS), in collaboration with animal health partners (FAO, WOAH, OFFLU (Joint WOAH-FAO network of expertise on animal influenza), continue to evaluate candidate vaccine viruses for pandemic preparedness purposes both biannually and on an ad hoc basis. 

    -- Regular genetic and antigenic characterization of contemporary zoonotic influenza viruses are published here with the most recent update on A(H5) CVVs published in February 2026 following the WHO Consultation on the Composition of Influenza Virus Vaccines for Use in the 2026-2027 Northern Hemisphere Influenza Season.  

 

Assessment of current public health risk posed by influenza A(H5N1) viruses{34} 

    -- Despite continued detections of A(H5) viruses in animals and ongoing human exposure at the human-animal-environment interface, relatively few human infections have been reported to date. 

    -- Since the beginning of 2021, the vast majority of reported human A(H5) infections have been associated with direct or indirect exposure to infected animals such as milking cows on an infected dairy farm or participating in mass culling and disposal events at poultry farms, or contaminated environments, such as live poultry markets, or beaches with sick and dying wild birds and marine mammals.{35,36} 

    -- Illness severity has ranged from mild to fatal. 

    -- To date, no human-to-human transmission has been identified through epidemiologic, virologic and serologic investigations, although investigations for some of cases are ongoing. 

    -- Current evidence indicates that these viruses remain avian-adapted, without established mammalian adaptive mutations or the capacity for sustained human-to-human transmission.  

    -- Based on currently available information, FAO/WHO/WOAH assess the global public health risk posed by currently circulating influenza A(H5) viruses as low and unchanged from the previous risk assessment, while the risk of infection for occupationally or frequently exposed persons remains low to moderate depending on local epidemiological conditions and mitigation measures in place. 

    -- However, as influenza viruses are constantly evolving and spreading in animal populations, zoonotic influenza risk assessments require continuous review and may change rapidly. 

    -- WHO, together with FAO and WOAH, continues to evaluate A(H5) viruses closely and will re-assess the risk associated with the currently circulating A(H5) viruses as more information becomes available. 

    -- Further antigenic characterization of A(H5) viruses, including in relation to the existing CVVs, and development of specific reagents are being prioritized at the WHO Collaborating Centres and Essential Regulatory Laboratories of GISRS in collaboration with public health, animal health, and veterinary sector colleagues. 

Recommended actions  

    -- It is recommended that Member States and national authorities: 

        • increase surveillance and vigilance, and assess the risk in human populations, especially amongst occupationally exposed persons, for the possibility of zoonotic infections, particularly through National Influenza Centres (NICs) and other influenza laboratories associated with GISRS, using such methods as active case finding and molecular and serologic methods; 

        • reduce the risk among occupationally exposed persons by reducing environmental exposures and providing adequate and appropriate personal protective equipment; and 

        • conduct epidemiological investigations including case finding around suspected and confirmed human cases to determine if there are additional cases or indications of humanto-human transmission.  

    -- Under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005),{37} States Parties are required to notify WHO within 24 hours of any laboratory-confirmed case of human influenza caused by a new subtype according to the WHO case definition.{38} 

    -- WHO has published the case definition for human infections with avian influenza A(H5) virus requiring notification under IHR (2005).{39}  

    -- Avian influenza is a WOAH-listed disease. Based on Chapter 10.440 of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code, three categories of avian influenza should be notified to WOAH by national Veterinary Authorities through WAHIS. It includes infection with HPAI in poultryii, infection of birds other than poultry including wild birds, and infection of domestic and captive wild birds with low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) viruses having proven natural transmission to humans associated with severe consequences. 

    -- Member States and national authorities are also recommended to: 

        • conduct joint epidemiological investigations in and around suspected and confirmed outbreak areas in animals to determine the extent of spillover; 

        • increase surveillance, including joint/collaborative genomic surveillance, and sharing surveillance data applying One Health principles;  

        • timely reporting efforts for the early detection of A(H5) influenza viruses in domestic birds, wild birds and wild mammals{41}; 

        • include infection with an A(H5) influenza virus as a differential diagnosis, in non-avian species, including cattle, swine and other livestock and farmed domestic and wild animal populations, with high likelihood of exposure to A(H5) viruses; 

        • implement preventive and early response measures to break the chain of infection among domestic animals (for example, poultry and dairy cattle), including considering the use of vaccination to reduce circulation in poultry as per national policies and according to guidance provided by animal health organizations{42,43}; 

        • promptly report high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) events in all animal species, including cattle (according to the WOAH case definition{44}) and other domestic and wild mammals, to WOAH and other international organizations such as FAO;  

        • conduct genetic sequencing and share genetic sequences of influenza viruses and associated metadata in publicly available databases in a timely manner; 

        • protect animals by mitigating the risk of introduction and spread of the disease through implementation and/or strengthening biosecurity in livestock holdings/premises and along the value chain; 

        • protect persons by employing good production and hygiene practices when handling animals and animal products; and 

        • protect persons in contact with suspected/infected animals by providing appropriate personal protective equipment and communicating and educating on the importance and proper use of personal protective equipment and providing information and access to testing. 

    -- Additional sets of recommendations related to avian influenza viruses with zoonotic potential can be found here: 

        • FAO and WOAH Global strategy for the prevention and control of high pathogenicity avian influenza (2024–2033) 

        • Recommendations from the FAO Global Dialogue - Tackling high pathogenicity avian influenza together. Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil – 11 September 2025 

        • FAO recommendations for Global Avian Influenza Viruses with Zoonotic Potential 

        • FAO Recommendations for the surveillance of influenza A(H5N1) in cattle. With broader application to other farmed mammals 

        • WOAH Surveillance of High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza for Smallholder Poultry Systems in Resource-Limited Settings 

        • WHO Practical interim guidance to reduce the risk of infection in people exposed to avian influenza viruses 

        • WHO Surveillance for human infections with avian influenza A(H5) viruses: objectives, case definitions, testing and reporting 

        • WHO Considerations for the use of human A(H5) influenza vaccines during non-pandemic period 

        • WHO guidance on the use of licensed human influenza A(H5) vaccines for the interpandemic and emergence periods 

    -- Additional studies/surveillance, applying One Health principles are warranted, which could provide information to enhance confidence in the risk assessment. 

    -- These may include serological studies in high-risk animal populations, in high-risk human populations, and epidemiological investigations.  

    -- Anyone who may have been exposed to infected or potentially infected animals or contaminated environments should be advised to promptly seek health care if they feel unwell, and to inform their health care provider of their possible exposure. 

    -- Following prompt testing, early and appropriate clinical management should be initiated, and precautionary measures put in place to assess and prevent potential further spread among humans and animals.

    -- Clinicians should also be alerted to potential zoonotic infection in patients with an exposure history to birds or animals especially in areas where A(H5) viruses are known or suspected to be circulating in animals but also in areas where surveillance in animals may be limited.  

    -- Routine epidemiologic and virologic surveillance for influenza should be conducted ideally yearround using a standard case definition in health care facilities according to WHO guidance.{45}  

    -- Timely sharing of information and sequence data from both the human and animal health sectors from all regions should continue to be strongly recommended and is critical for rapid and robust joint risk assessment. 

    -- The rapid sharing of virus materials with WHO Collaborating Centres of GISRS continues to be essential to conduct a thorough risk assessment and develop or adjust targeted response measures. 

    -- The Tool for Influenza Pandemic Risk Assessment (TIPRA) provides an in-depth assessment of risk associated with some zoonotic influenza viruses – notably the likelihood of the virus gaining human-to-human transmissibility, and the impact should the virus gain such transmissibility. 

    -- TIPRA maps relative risk amongst viruses assessed using multiple elements.{46} 

    -- Data pertaining to the risk elements within TIPRA should be generated and shared with WHO.  

    -- Efforts to reduce human exposure to birds, livestock, and other mammals infected with or potentially infected with avian and other animal influenza viruses should be implemented and enhanced to minimize the risk of zoonotic infections. 

    -- Individuals with activities that involve exposure to infected animals and/or contaminated environments are at higher risk and should take necessary precautions to prevent infection. 

    -- Those who are exposed to potentially infected animals should have access to, be trained in their use under different environmental conditions, and wear personal protective equipment including eye protection.{47} 

    -- If they develop respiratory symptoms or conjunctivitis, they should be rapidly tested, and precautionary infection control measures should be put in place to prevent potential further spread among humans and to animals. 

    -- For detailed guidance on treatment, refer to relevant global and national guidance.{48} 

    -- Some manufacturers have initiated production of an A(H5) human vaccine that matches current circulating strains. 

    -- Updated WHO guidance on the use of licensed human influenza A(H5) vaccines for the interpandemic and emergence periods were published in December 2025.{49} 

    -- FAO, WHO and WOAH advise consuming pasteurized milk, instead of raw/unpasteurized milk. Due to the potential health risks from many dangerous zoonotic pathogens, raw/unpasteurized milk consumption should be avoided.{50} 

    -- If pasteurized milk is not available, heating raw milk until it boils makes it safer for consumption.{51}  

___

{i} An event includes all related epidemiologically related outbreaks reported from the time of the immediate notification through to the final report. Separately the total number of outbreaks is also stated. 

{ii} All birds reared or kept in captivity for the production of any commercial animal products or for breeding for this purpose, fighting cocks used for any purpose, and all birds used for restocking supplies of game or for breeding for this purpose, until they are released from captivity. Birds that are kept in a single household, the products of which are used within the same household exclusively, are not considered poultry, provided that they have no direct or indirect contact with poultry or poultry facilities. Birds that are kept in captivity for other reasons, including those that are kept for shows, racing, exhibitions, zoological collections and competitions, and for breeding or selling for these purposes, as well as pet birds, are not considered poultry, provided that they have no direct or indirect contact with poultry or poultry facilities. 

References 

{1} WHO. Genetic and antigenic characteristics of zoonotic influenza A viruses and development of candidate vaccine viruses for pandemic preparedness. February 2026 (https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/vcm-northern-hemisphere-recommendation-20262027/c.-27-feb-2026_zoonotic_vaccinvirus-update.pdf?sfvrsn=8532151e_5). 

{2} European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) for Avian Influenza, Ducatez M, Fusaro A, Gonzales J L, Kuiken T, et al. Unprecedented high level of highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in Europe during the 2025 autumn migration. EFSA Journal 2025;23(11):9811, 9 pp (https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9811). 

{3} EURL. Avian flu data portal. 2026 (eurlaidata.izsvenezie.it/epidemio.php). 

{4} EFSA, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), EURL for Avian Influenza; Buczkowski H, Ducatez M, Fusaro A, et al. Avian influenza overview September-November 2025. EFSA J. 2025 Dec 18;23(12):e9834 (efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9834).  

{5} United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2026. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) Detections in Wild Birds (www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/avian/avian-influenza/hpai-detections/wild-birds?page=1). 

{6} Canada Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). 2026. National Avian Influenza dashboard (cfiancr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/89c779e98cdf492c899df23e1c38fdbc). 

{7} GISAID: EPI_ISL_20420880, EPI_ISL_20420879, EPI_ISL_20420878. 

{8} FAO. FAO alert on avian influenza – risk of upsurge and regional spread through wild birds in Latin America and the Caribbean, 8 April 2026 (https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/02a3ab2c-0f8d-427f-a71a-3f378a6474bd/content). 

{9} GISAID: EPI_ISL_19752381 and EPI_ISL_19823059–68. 

{10} Vanstreels R, Nelson MI, Artuso MC, Marchione VD, Piccini LE, Benedetti E, et al. Novel Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus, Argentina, 2025. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31(12):2279-2283 (https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3112.250783).  

{11} Benedetti, E, Artuso, MC, Byrne, AMP, Garibotto, MDB, Avaro, M, Piccini, LE et al.  Emergence and Evolution of Triple Reassortant Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus, Argentina, 2025. Preprint (https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.0962.v1). 

{12} Rivetti AV Jr, Reischak D, Carnegie L, Otaka JNP, Domingues CS, Cardoso FG et al. Genomic diversity and reassortment of highly pathogenic avian influenza A/H5N1 virus (clade 2.3.4.4b) in Brazil: Evidence of multiple introductions and intra-epidemic reassortment in 2025. Virology. 2026 Feb;615:110751 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2025.110751). 

{13} Steinfurth A, Lynton-Jenkins JG, Cleeland J, Mollett BC, Coombes HA, Moores A et al. Investigating high pathogenicity avian influenza virus incursions to remote islands: detection of H5N1 on Gough Island in the South Atlantic Ocean. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2026 Dec;15(1):2627076 (https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2026.2627076). 

{14} WOAH. World Animal Health Information System (WAHIS). Heard and McDonald Islands - Influenza A viruses of high pathogenicity (Inf. with) (non-poultry including wild birds) (2017-) - Immediate notification [FINAL] ( https://wahis.woah.org/#/inreview/7261?fromPage=event-dashboard-url). 

{15} WOAH. Sharing other important animal health information with WOAH (https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/animal-health-andwelfare/disease-data-collection/sharing-other-important-animal-health-information-with-woah/). 

{16} OFFLU. Beyond poultry: Rethinking monitoring and control of HPAI H5Nx anticipating spillover risks for mammals. 2026 (https://offlu.org/publications/beyond-poultry-rethinking-monitoring-and-control-of-hpai-h5nx-anticipating-spilloverrisks-for-mammals/). 

{17} Puryear W, Sawatzki K, Hill N, Foss A, Stone JJ, Doughty L, et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Outbreak in New England Seals, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(4):786-791 (https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2904.221538). 

{18} Uhart MM, Vanstreels RET, Nelson MI, Olivera V, Campagna J, Zavattieri V et al. Epidemiological data of an influenza A/H5N1 outbreak in elephant seals in Argentina indicates mammal-to-mammal transmission. Nat Commun 15, 9516 (2024) (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467024-53766-5). 

{19} OFFLU. Beyond poultry: Rethinking monitoring and control of HPAI H5Nx anticipating spillover risks for mammals. 2026 (https://offlu.org/publications/beyond-poultry-rethinking-monitoring-and-control-of-hpai-h5nx-anticipating-spilloverrisks-for-mammals/). 

{20} USDA. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) Detections in Livestock. 2026 (www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultrydisease/avian/avian-influenza/hpai-detections/livestock). 

{21} USDA. Update: Genetic sequencing results for Wisconsin dairy herd detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza. 19 December 2025 (www.aphis.usda.gov/news/agency-announcements/update-genetic-sequencing-results-wisconsin-dairy-herd-detection-highly). 

{22} Rijksoverheid (Government of the Netherlands). Antibodies Against the Avian Influenza Virus Found in Dairy Cow. News, 23 January 2026 (www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2026/01/23/antistoffen-vogelgriepvirus-gevonden-bij-melkkoe). 

{23} GISAID. 

{24} US CDC. CDC A(H5N1) Bird Flu Response Update November 18, 2024 (www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1-response-11152024.html). 

{25} US CDC. CDC Reports A(H5N1) Ferret Study Results. 7 June 2024 (www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/ferret-study-results.html). 

{26} Pulit-Penaloza JA, Brock N, Belser JA, Sun X, Pappas C, Kieran TJ et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus of clade 2.3.4.4b isolated from a human case in Chile causes fatal disease and transmits between co-housed ferrets. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024 Mar 17:2332667 (https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2024.2332667). 

{27} Eisfeld AJ, Biswas A, Guan L, Gu C, Maemura T, Trifkovic S et al. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of bovine H5N1 influenza virus. Nature (2024) (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07766-6). 

{28} Restori KH, Septer KM, Field CJ, Patel DR, VanInsberghe D, Raghunathan V et al. Risk assessment of a highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus from mink. Nat Commun 15, 4112 (2024) (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48475-y). 

{29} Pulit-Penaloza JA, Belser JA, Brock N, Kieran TJ, Sun X, Pappas C et al. Transmission of a human isolate of clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) virus in ferrets. Nature. Published online October 28, 2024. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08246-7). 

{30} Gu C, Maemura T, Guan L, Eisfeld AJ, Biswas A, Kiso M et al. A human isolate of bovine H5N1 is transmissible and lethal in animal models. Nature (2024). (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08254-7). 

{31} Brock N, Pulit-Penaloza JA, Belser JA, Pappas C, Sun X, Kieran TJ, et al. Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Isolated from Dairy Farm Worker, Michigan, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31(6):1253-1256 (https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3106.250386). 

{32} US CDC. Influenza Risk Assessment Tool (IRAT) - Virus Report. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus; clade 2.3.4.4b Viruses: A/California/147/2024 and A/Washington/239/2024. Date of Evaluation: March 14, 2025 (www.cdc.gov/pandemicflu/media/pdfs/2025/IRATA-California-Washington.pdf). 

{33} Daulagala P, Cheng S, Chin A, Luk L, Leung K, Wu JT, et al. Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibodies in Healthy Adults after Exposure to Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(1):168-171 (https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3001.230756). 

{34} WHO. (2012). Rapid risk assessment of acute public health events (iris.who.int/handle/10665/70810). 

{35} Garg S, Reinhart K, Couture A, Kniss K, Davis CT, Kirby MK et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Infections in Humans. N Engl J Med. 2025 Feb 27;392(9):843-854 (https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2414610). 

{36} Pardo-Roa, C., Nelson, M.I., Ariyama, N. et al. Cross-species and mammal-to-mammal transmission of clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza A/H5N1 with PB2 adaptations. Nat Commun 16, 2232 (2025) (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57338-z). 

{37} WHO. International Health Regulations (2005), as amended through resolutions WHA67.13 (2014), WHA75.12 (2022), and WHA77.17 (2024) (https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/pdf_files/IHR_2014-2022-2024-en.pdf). 

{38} WHO. Case definitions for the four diseases requiring notification to WHO in all circumstances under the IHR (2005). 2009 (www.who.int/publications/m/item/case-definitions-for-the-four-diseases-requiring-notification-to-who-in-all-circumstances-under-theihr-(2005)). 

{39} WHO. WHO case definition for human infections with avian influenza A(H5) virus requiring notification under IHR (2005). 2024 (www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avian-influenza/case-definitions). 

{40} WOAH. Terrestrial Animal Health Code Chapter 10.4 Infection with high pathogenicity avian influenza viruses (https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/, cited on 05/05/2026). 

{41} El Masry I, Delgado AH, Silva GOD, Dhingra M, Lyons NA. 2024. Recommendations for the surveillance of influenza A(H5N1) in cattle – With broader application to other farmed mammals. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, No. 37. Rome, FAO (https://doi.org/10.4060/cd3422en). 

{42} OFFLU. OFFLU Avian Influenza Vaccine Matching (AIM) for poultry vaccines: H5Nx executive summary, September 2025 (https://offlu.org/publications/offlu-aim-technical-report-september-2025/). 

{43} WOAH. Avian influenza vaccination: why it should not be a barrier to safe trade, December 2023 (www.woah.org/app/uploads/2023/12/en-woah-policybrief-avianinfluenzavaccinationandtrade.pdf). 

{44} WOAH. Case definition for infection of bovines with influenza a viruses of high pathogenicity in poultry (high pathogenicity avian influenza in cattle), 29 October 2025 (https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2025/03/2025-10-case-definiton-hpai-cattle-2.pdf). 

{45} WHO. Implementing the integrated sentinel surveillance of influenza and other respiratory viruses of epidemic and pandemic potential by the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System: standards and operational guidance. 2024 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/379678). 

{46} WHO. Tool for influenza pandemic risk assessment. 2026 (www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avian-influenza/tool-forinfluenza-pandemic-risk-assessment-(tipra)). 

{47} Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), USDA. APHIS Recommendations for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 Virus in Livestock For Workers, 12 April 2024 (www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/recommendations-workers-hpai-livestock.pdf). 

{48} WHO. Guidelines for the clinical management of severe illness from influenza virus infections. 2022 (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/352453). 

{49} WHO. WHO guidance on the use of licensed human influenza A(H5) vaccines for the interpandemic and emergence periods. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 100(51), 643 - 660 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/384548). 

{50} FAO. Preliminary rapid risk assessment of foodborne avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. 14 June 2024 (https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ca83524e-b3f9-4abe-b52b-dea213227fcf/content). 

{51} Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Alimentarius: Code of hygienic practice for milk and milk products (http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/livestockgov/documents/CXP_057e.pdf). 

DISCLAIMER 

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO, FAO and WOAH to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO, FAO and WOAH be liable for damages arising from its use. 

© FAO, WHO, WOAH, 2026 

Source: 

Link: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/updated-joint-fao-who-woah-public-health-assessment-of-recent-high-pathogenicity-avian-influenza-a(h5)-virus-events-in-animals-and-people

____

Sequencing of #Betacoronavirus erinacei from faeces of pet #hedgehogs demonstrates a continuity of #MERS-CoV like viruses in #European and Eurasian hedgehog species

 

Abstract

Hedgehogs have been recently identified as carriers of Betacoronavirus erinacei (also known as Erinaceus coronavirus, EriCoV) a virus closely related to B. cameli responsible for human Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), raising questions about the risk of hedgehog-to-human transmission and suggesting the need for coronavirus (CoV) surveillance in hedgehogs. This study investigated the presence of CoVs in fecal samples of hedgehogs kept as pets in Italy in 2021–2022. A pan-CoV nested RT-PCR targeting the RdRp gene was used for screening and positive samples were sequenced and phylogenetically analyzed. Two (6.2%) out of 30 hedgehogs analyzed were positive for B. erinacei represented by 2/3 (66.7%) long eared hedgehog (Hemiechinus auritus) while all the 27 tested African pygmy hedgehog (Atelerix albiventris) were negative. Whole genome sequence obtained from one B. erinacei-positive sample showed closest homology (85.7%) with B. erinacei previously detected in Erinaceus sp. from Eastern Russia. Phylogeny showed that the virus of this study formed a separate clade in the cluster with other B. erinacei identified in Europe and European Russia and did not cluster with other B. erinacei identified in China in Amur hedgehog (E. amurensis). No recombination events were observed. Analysis of the Spike protein revealed the presence of six out of the 11 key receptor binding residues, including two out of the three critical residues recently identified for the binding of Erinaceus europaeus receptor APN and B. erinacei. Results of this study suggest the presence of a long-eared hedgehog-specific strain of B. erinacei. Overall results support the circulation of coronaviruses along a phylogenetic continuum among different species of hedgehogs and geographic locations, suggesting the need for further CoV surveillance in both domestic and wild animals. There is also a need for studies on the affinity of EriCoV with the H. auritus APN specific receptor to confirm its involvement in the viral entry process.

Source: 

Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352771426000960?via%3Dihub

____

Respiratory #infections due to #human common cold #coronaviruses, #SARS-CoV, #MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2: #epidemiology, #pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine landscapes

 

Summary

Over the past half-century, perceptions of human coronaviruses have evolved from their initial characterisation as causes of the common cold to recognition of their capacity to trigger severe disease and global epidemics. The emergence of three zoonotic coronaviruses—severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2002, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012, and SARS-CoV-2 in 2019, has had profound health, economic, and societal consequences and continues to influence global epidemic-preparedness strategies. All three viruses remain on the WHO Blueprint of priority pathogens for research and development. This Review summarises current knowledge on human coronaviruses, drawing lessons from the past 25 years of epidemic outbreaks. The shared and divergent features of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, including their origins, evolution, transmission determinants, zoonotic transmission, viral entry pathways, pathogenesis, spectrum of clinical manifestations, long-term sequelae, and case-fatality profiles are highlighted. The full range of clinical manifestations, from asymptomatic or atypical presentations to severe acute respiratory and multisystem disease, are outlined together with risk factors for progression and populations with the greatest susceptibility. Diagnostic approaches, including molecular assays, antigen-based tests, and imaging modalities are described alongside current therapeutics, antiviral strategies, immunomodulators, supportive care principles, and evidence from clinical trials. Advances in diagnostics, vaccines, therapeutics, and infection-control practices are examined together with persistent challenges in early recognition, particularly in resource-limited settings. Strengthening multinational clinical trial capacity, leveraging digital innovations, and embedding One Health approaches are essential to mitigating spillover risks and improving global readiness. We review the latest data, identify gaps and opportunities, and outline forward-looking strategies to anticipate and prepare for the threat of future coronaviruses, and other existing or new respiratory pathogens with epidemic potential. Clinicians and other health-care workers play a central role in detecting and reporting possible lethal coronavirus infection including atypical presentations, enabling rapid, coordinated infection control and management responses.

Source: 

Link: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(26)00049-4/abstract?rss=yes

____

Operational #zoonotic #containment of #MERS #coronavirus in #Saudi Arabia: An implementation-oriented #OneHealth genomic #framework

 

Abstract

Background and Aim: 

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) remains a persistent zoonotic threat more than a decade after its first detection, with Saudi Arabia continuing to be the global epicenter of human infections and the main reservoir interface through dromedary camels. Despite ongoing surveillance, advances in molecular diagnostics, and research on vaccines and therapeutics, sporadic zoonotic spillovers and healthcare-associated outbreaks still occur, showing that current prevention strategies are still not enough. This review compiles current evidence from epidemiological studies, camel reservoir research, genomic monitoring, and public health reports published between 2012 and April 2025 to identify the key gaps preventing effective containment. Special focus is given to recent genomic discoveries, including post-2022 clade B sublineages, recombination events, and spike protein changes that might affect transmission and the effectiveness of countermeasures. Available data suggest that MERS-CoV epidemiology is driven by repeated camel-to-human transmission, followed by occasional amplification in healthcare settings rather than sustained community spread. High seroprevalence and frequent detection of viral RNA in juvenile camels, seasonal gathering in markets, and extensive animal movement networks contribute to ongoing viral circulation at the animal–human interface. Genomic studies consistently show close phylogenetic relationships between camel and human isolates, confirming recurrent zoonotic transmissions. However, fragmented surveillance systems, delayed genomic data integration, inconsistent biosecurity practices, and limited field evidence for camel vaccination pose major barriers to control. Additionally, hospital outbreaks continue to occur due to delayed diagnosis, overcrowding, and incomplete adherence to infection-prevention protocols, underscoring the need for improved clinical preparedness. Based on the integrated synthesis of epidemiological, veterinary, and genomic evidence, this review proposes an implementation-focused One Health genomic framework tailored to the Saudi context. The proposed roadmap highlights real-time connection of human and camel surveillance, expands genomic sequencing capacity, targets vaccination strategies in camels and high-risk human populations, standardizes biosecurity measures in markets and abattoirs, and strengthens infection control systems in healthcare facilities. Alignment with national governance structures and Saudi Vision 2030 offers a practical pathway for coordinated multi-sectoral action. This review concludes that MERS-CoV is unlikely to be eradicated soon, but it can be effectively managed through a genomics-enabled, operational One Health approach that combines surveillance, vaccination, clinical preparedness, and policy coordination. The model outlined here provides a scalable way to reduce zoonotic spillover risk and strengthen readiness against future coronavirus and emerging zoonotic threats. 

Source: 

Link: https://veterinaryworld.org/Vol.19/March-2026/29.php

____

Evaluation of Cross-Immunogenicity of #Ferret #Antisera Following Immunization with #H5N1 #Vaccine Strains

 

Abstract

Background: 

Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses of clade 2.3.4.4b have spread globally since 2021, causing extensive outbreaks in avian populations and repeated spillovers into diverse mammalian hosts, including humans. These cross-species transmission events highlight ongoing pandemic risks and underscore the need for vaccine strategies that reflect viral evolution at the human–animal interface. Despite the availability of licensed H5 vaccines and newly recommended World Health Organization (WHO) candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs), the extent to which these vaccines elicit cross-reactive antibody responses against contemporary clade 2.3.4.4b viruses, including mammalian spillover isolates of avian origin, remains incompletely characterized. 

Method: 

In this study, ferret antisera were generated using four WHO-recommended H5 CVVs, including a clade 1 strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004) and three clade 2.3.4.4b strains (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020, A/American wigeon/South Carolina/22-000345-001/2021, and A/Ezo red fox/Hokkaido/1/2022), formulated with alum adjuvant to reflect licensed vaccine formulation used in national preparedness programs. Antibody responses and cross-reactive activity were evaluated using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays against homologous vaccine strains and a feline-origin clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 field isolate from Korea, A/Feline/Korea/SNU-01/2023. 

Results: 

Antisera induced by clade 2.3.4.4b CVVs showed cross-reactive antibody responses against homologous and heterologous clade 2.3.4.4b viruses and demonstrated measurable HI and MN responses against the feline-origin field isolate. In contrast, antisera raised against the clade 1 Vietnam CVV exhibited limited cross-reactivity against clade 2.3.4.4b viruses. Overall, clade 2.3.4.4b CVVs generally showed higher antibody responses than the clade 1 vaccine strain across multiple panels. 

Conclusions: 

These findings provide descriptive insights into antigenic differences between clade 1 and clade 2.3.4.4b viruses and support the antigenic relevance of clade 2.3.4.4b CVVs for contemporary H5N1 strains. This study highlights the importance of ongoing antigenic evaluation to inform vaccine strain selection within a One Health framework.

Source: 

Link: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/14/4/301

____

#Outdoor roaming of owned #cats elevates #risk of zoonotic #pathogen #exposure: A global synthesis

 

Abstract

Domestic animals play a central role in pathogen transmission at the human–wildlife interface. Domestic cats, in particular, are uniquely consequential in disease spillover dynamics due to their global distribution, large, human-subsidized free-roaming populations, and high contact rate with humans, domestic animals, and wildlife. However, the extent to which human ownership and management mitigate this spillover risk remains a key knowledge gap. To address this gap, we conducted a global systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the prevalence and diversity of zoonotic pathogens in indoor-only, outdoor-owned (roaming unsupervised), and unowned (feral or stray) cats. Our dataset comprised 174,064 individuals from 88 countries, representing 124 pathogen species, 97 of which are zoonotic. Using generalized linear models within a Bayesian framework and rarefaction analyses, we show that ownership provides limited protection against zoonoses when owned cats have unsupervised outdoor access. Outdoor-owned cats were 3–5 times more likely to carry zoonotic pathogens than indoor-only cats, and, notably, had infection odds statistically equivalent to those of feral cats, despite receiving presumed veterinary care and feeding. Feral cats carried the highest pathogen diversity, however, outdoor-owned cats still harbour 1.5 times the helminth richness of indoor cats, highlighting their potential as effective bridges for pathogen spillover. With approximately 62% of owned cats roaming freely worldwide, and rates exceeding 90% in some regions, these findings reveal a major yet overlooked route of zoonotic risk. Public health and One Health frameworks have traditionally focused on feral cats; however, our results highlight the need to explicitly incorporate owned outdoor cats into zoonotic disease prevention strategies by restricting unsupervised roaming and promoting responsible ownership practices. Without such integration, current frameworks risk overlooking a pervasive and preventable pathway for pathogen transmission at the human–wildlife–domestic animal interface.

Source: 

Link: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1014160

____

ONWARD: a #OneHealth, pan - #European multidisciplinary #network advancing #surveillance, #research, clinical management and control of zoonotic #hepeviruses

 

Highlight

• HEV remains the leading cause of acute viral hepatitis in Europe

• Surveillance and diagnostics for HEV are heterogeneous across EU/EEA

• Zoonotic HEV circulates widely in pigs, wildlife and food chains

• Rat HEV expands the zoonotic spectrum and clinical burden in Europe

• ONWARD integrates One Health surveillance, research and capacity building

Abstract

Zoonotic hepeviruses, particularly hepatitis E virus (HEV, species Paslahepevirus balayani) represent a major yet underestimated public health challenge in Europe. Despite being the leading cause of acute viral hepatitis, surveillance, diagnostic practices and prevention strategies remain heterogeneous across EU/EEA countries, limiting comparability and hindering accurate burden estimates. Underdiagnosis is further compounded by extrahepatic manifestations and the growing impact of chronic HEV infection in immunocompromised patients. At the human–animal–environment interface, zoonotic HEV circulates widely in domestic pigs, wildlife and food products, while coordinated surveillance and control measures remain inconsistently implemented. The recent recognition of ratHEV (species Rocahepevirus ratti) as a cause of acute and chronic hepatitis in Europe further expands the spectrum of zoonotic hepevirus infections and underscores the need for integrated One Health approaches. To address these challenges, the One Health Zoonotic Hepevirus Network (ONWARD; COST Action CA24140) was launched in 2025 as a pan-European, multidisciplinary collaboration uniting experts across human, veterinary, food safety and environmental health sectors. ONWARD aims to harmonise diagnostic tools, strengthen clinical research, integrate multisectoral surveillance, promote capacity building and support evidence-based policy development. By fostering coordination with European stakeholders ONWARD provides a structured framework to strengthen preparedness, surveillance and response to zoonotic hepevirus threats across Europe.

Source: 

Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653226000338?dgcid=rss_sd_all

____

Mapping #global emergence of #pathogens with #epidemic and #pandemic #potential to inform and accelerate pandemic #prevention, #preparedness, readiness and response

 

Abstract

Introduction 

Increasing occurrence of epidemics and pandemics and concurrent emergence of different pathogens calls for multi-sectoral, multi-pathogen preparedness actions. Data on various factors that drive emergence of diverse pathogens can inform evidence-based preparedness by identifying geographies at-risk. When leveraging evidence within a One Health approach, multiple pathogens can be addressed simultaneously, thereby strengthening countries pandemic preparedness efforts. 

Methods 

For seventeen priority pathogens (avian influenza viruses, zoonotic coronaviruses including COVID-19, hemorrhagic fever viruses including Ebola, Henipaviruses, and arboviruses including yellow fever and Zika), we identified global evidence on animal reservoirs, vectors, environmental suitability, and reported human cases. We discriminated geospatially recorded pathogen detections from a background sample and constructed maps using these datasets to generate an evidence-based assessment of emergence risk globally. 

Results 

Seventeen pathogen-specific assessments were combined into a global composite map. Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia have evidence supporting emergence risk for the greatest number of pathogens (included areas at-risk of all pathogens) and scored highest when strength-of-evidence weightings were factored. The Americas had the lowest tally of considered pathogens. Environmental suitability analyses received the highest weights, reservoir ranges the lowest. 

Discussion 

Preparedness and readiness must consider the range of global biological threats. Our methodology is capable of incorporating changing evidence on emergence potential for multiple pathogens to identify geographies at higher risk with different pathogen combinations. Our maps can contribute to existing decision-support structures, guiding shared interventions and strategic allocation of resources for spillover prevention and pandemic preparedness, thereby enhancing local response capacities applying a multidisciplinary approach.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was concluded in 2024 and supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) before January 22, 2025, the Germany Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) and the Government of France.

Source: 

Link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.20.26347940v1

____

#OneHealth Longitudinal Study #Protocol on #Zoonotic and Vector-Borne #Diseases in Battambang province, #Cambodia: An Inter-Sectoral Approach

 

Abstract

Background 

Tropical low – and middle –income countries are highly vulnerable to zoonoses and vector-borne diseases, with risks amplified by climatic events, environmental change, and limited surveillance capacity. Cambodia is particularly exposed due to its ecological diversity, seasonal flooding, and rapidly changing land use. Globally, however, field based One Health approaches remain under –implemented, limiting practical evidence on how to address these complex threats. 

Methods 

This protocol describes a longitudinal One Health study conducted in three villages of Battambang province, Cambodia, designed to investigate the prevalence and transmission dynamics of zoonotic and potentially zoonotic pathogens at the human –animal –environment interface. The study examines how vector density, diversity, and pathogen circulation are influenced by hydrological variation and seasonality, and assesses the sociodemographic, behavioral, and environmental factors shaping transmission. Integrated data will be collected through serological and molecular analyses in humans and animals, environmental sampling, and entomological surveillance, enabling cross-compartmental and spatiotemporal analyses. 

Expected Results 

The study will generate integrated, cross –sectoral data to characterize pathogen exposure patterns, identify high –risk populations and practices, and inform targeted public health, veterinary, and environmental interventions. Conclusions By sharing this protocol, the work addresses a global methodological gap in operationalizing One Health in the field and supports the development of integrated surveillance strategies in climate-sensitive, resource-limited settings.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study received funding from the French Development Agency (AFD) through the PREACT-AFRICAM Program and from the Fondation Simone et Cino del Duca of Institut de France.

Source: 

Link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.14.26347916v1

____

Developing and #Benchmarking #OneHealth Genomic #Surveillance #Tools for #Influenza A Virus in #Wastewater

 

Abstract

Influenza A viruses (IAV) remain a persistent One Health threat, and whole-genome sequencing from wastewater offers a promising surveillance tool. However, IAV is at low abundance in wastewater, making it difficult to sequence. We benchmarked four targeted enrichment methods suited for whole-genome sequencing including custom and off-the-shelf amplicon and probe-based methods. Our custom HA tiled-amplicon panel was sensitive, fast, and cost-effective, making it suitable for monitoring low-abundance seasonal variants of known subtypes. However, its reliance on conserved and intact primer-binding sites limited primer design to fewer subtypes. A previously published universal amplicon method targeted all IAV subtypes, but it performed poorly in wastewater due to its reliance on intact genome segments. Probe-capture methods were resilient to RNA degradation and mismatches, potentially enabling broader surveillance and detection of emerging strains. However, probes were costly, labor-intensive, and less sensitive than tiled-amplicon. When testing compatibility of sequencing methods with upstream virus concentration and extraction methods, ultrafiltration-based virus concentration outperformed large-volume direct extraction with all four sequencing methods. This set of benchmarking comparisons and custom panels provides needed information for the translation of IAV genomic sequencing into a routine component of wastewater surveillance.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funder Information Declared

University of California, Berkeley, L22CR4507

NIH Common Fund, 4R00GM144747-03

Source: 

Link: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.19.676942v2

_____