#Antiviral treatment for #influenza

 

Abstract

Seasonal influenza is a widespread acute respiratory infection that causes significant illness and death worldwide. Two major antiviral classes are neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) and polymerase inhibitors. NAIs, including oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir and laninamivir, block viral release, while polymerase inhibitors such as baloxavir disrupt viral RNA replication. Early administration within 48 h of symptom onset reduces illness duration, severity and complications, particularly in high-risk groups. Oseltamivir is the most widely studied NAI, demonstrating reduced viral shedding, faster symptom resolution and lower complication rates, though gastrointestinal side effects are common. Higher doses generally do not improve outcomes compared to standard dosing. Zanamivir is more effective against influenza B and is inhibitory for most influenza A viruses resistant to oseltamivir, but the inhaled formulation is less suitable for patients with severe illness or airway disease. Intravenous (IV) zanamivir is approved for hospitalized influenza patients in some countries. Peramivir offers IV treatment options, while laninamivir is mainly used in Japan. Baloxavir shows superior viral load reduction and comparable symptom relief to oseltamivir in outpatients, though resistance variants can emerge. Favipiravir and newer polymerase inhibitors are under investigation. Combination therapies may enhance recovery, with limited evidence. Overall, timely antiviral use is critical to reducing influenza’s burden.

This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Evaluating anti-infective drugs’.

Source: 

Link: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article/381/1949/20240344/481548/Antiviral-treatment-for-influenza

____

#Influenza PA #Substitutions and Genetic Diversity of #H1N1pdm09, #H3N2, and B/Victoria Viruses in #Japan During the 2023–2024 Season

 

Abstract

We characterized influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B/Victoria viruses circulating in Japan during 2023–2024, focusing on lineage placement relative to WHO-recommended vaccine strains and on baloxavir resistance (PA/I38T substitutions). We enrolled 210 outpatients with influenza-like illness across eight clinics in six prefectures (October 2023–September 2024). Of these, 209 had an analyzable pre-treatment respiratory specimen for RT-PCR; hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes were sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS). PA/I38T substitutions that confer baloxavir resistance were assessed by cycling-probe RT-PCR, Sanger sequencing, and NGS. HA phylogenies were constructed with global datasets and WHO vaccine reference strains. Of 209 pre-treatment specimens, 181 were influenza-positive (A(H1N1)pdm09 44.2%, A(H3N2) 37.6%, B/Victoria 18.2%); 51 follow-up specimens were collected ≈4–5 days after baloxavir or neuraminidase inhibitor therapy. HA phylogeny placed A(H1N1)pdm09 in clades 5a.2a/5a.2a.1 with predominance of subclade D.2. A(H3N2) clustered exclusively in clade 2a.3a.1 (J lineage, mostly J.1), indicating a mismatch with the season’s A/Darwin/9/2021 vaccine component and supporting the subsequent J-lineage update. All B/Victoria genomes fell within V1A.3a.2 on a C.5 backbone (C.5.1 and C.5.7). No PA/I38T variant was detected in any pre-treatment specimen. Post-baloxavir, PA/I38T emerged in one A(H3N2) case (confirmed by all three methods) and in one B/Victoria case detected by NGS only (minority variant in a low-load sample). NA genes showed no substitutions associated with reduced susceptibility to laninamivir (e.g., E119A, G147E). During 2023–2024, A(H1N1)pdm09 and B/Victoria remained genetically aligned with their vaccine components, whereas A(H3N2) shifted to the J lineage, consistent with the 2024–2025 vaccine update. Although pre-treatment PA/I38T was absent, low-frequency on-therapy selection was observed, including a rare PA/I38T in influenza B/Victoria detected by NGS, suggesting the value of deep sequencing when viral loads are low. These integrated genomic–clinical data support vaccine strain realignment for H3N2 and continued monitoring of baloxavir resistance in outpatient care.

Source: 

Link: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/18/1/13

____

#WHO #clinical practice #guidelines for #influenza: an #update

Abstract

Background

Every year, more than one billion people around the world are infected with influenza, an acute infection of the respiratory tract. Influenza spreads from person to person through air, contaminated hands or objects. Antiviral and immunomodulatory drugs are available for treatment of patients and prophylaxis of exposed persons. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and rapid tests are available for the diagnosis of influenza. 

Objective 

The aim of this World Health Organization (WHO) guideline is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis, drug treatment and prophylaxis of influenza.

Method

This updated guideline has been developed in accordance with standards for trustworthy guidelines. The recommendations are based on systematic reviews on safety and effectiveness. They take into account the magnitude of benefits and harms of treatments, the reliability of the evidence, and the needs of patients and healthcare professionals.

Results

For non-severe influenza, there is a conditional recommendation to use baloxavir if the risk of severe illness is high. Antivirals are not recommended if the risk is low. There is also a strong recommendation against the use of antibiotics if bacterial co-infection is unlikely. Oseltamivir is conditionally recommended for severe influenza. Not recommended are peramivir and zanamivir, as well as macrolide antibiotics (in the absence of co-infection), mTOR inhibitors and plasma therapy, and corticosteroids. Baloxavir and oseltamivir are conditionally recommended for prophylaxis in asymptomatic persons who have been exposed to seasonal influenza viruses and would be at very high risk of becoming hospitalised. For zoonotic influenza, laninamivir and zanamivir are also conditionally recommended in addition to baloxavir and oseltamivir, regardless of individual risk. For diagnosis, the use of NAAT or digital immunoassay (DIA) for suspected non-severe influenza and nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for suspected severe influenza is recommended.

Source: Gesundheitswesen, https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2571-3357#info

____

#Antiviral Susceptibility of #Influenza A(#H5N1) Clade 2.3.2.1c and 2.3.4.4b Viruses from #Humans, 2023-2024

Abstract

During 2023-2024, highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses from clade 2.3.2.1c caused human infections in Cambodia and from clade 2.3.4.4b caused human infections in the Americas. We assessed the susceptibility of those viruses to approved and investigational antiviral drugs. Except for 2 viruses isolated from Cambodia, all viruses were susceptible to M2 ion channel-blockers in cell culture-based assays. In the neuraminidase inhibition assay, all viruses displayed susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral drugs oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, laninamivir, and AV5080. Oseltamivir was ≈4-fold less potent at inhibiting the neuraminidase activity of clade 2.3.4.4b than clade 2.3.2.1c viruses. All viruses were susceptible to polymerase inhibitors baloxavir and tivoxavir and to polymerase basic 2 inhibitor pimodivir with 50% effective concentrations in low nanomolar ranges. Because drug-resistant viruses can emerge spontaneously or by reassortment, close monitoring of antiviral susceptibility of H5N1 viruses collected from animals and humans by using sequence-based analysis supplemented with phenotypic testing is essential.

Source: US National Library of Medicine, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40064473/

____