Showing posts with label filovirus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label filovirus. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

#WHO issues comprehensive #guidelines on #filovirus disease, including #Ebola and #Marburg disease (June 17 '26)

 


    As the Democratic Republic of the Congo is battling an Ebola disease outbreak caused by the Bundibugyo virus, the World Health Organization (WHO) has released its first comprehensive guidelines for the clinical management of filovirus disease which include all types of Ebola and Marburg viruses

    The new guidelines highlight the importance of early supportive care to improve patient survival and health outcomes, outlining 16 evidence-based recommendations.

    Ebola and Marburg diseases are serious and often fatal, with case fatality rates ranging from 25% to 90% in the most severe outbreaks. 

    There have been 72 outbreaks of Ebola and Marburg diseases reported in Africa since 1967, when Marburg virus was first discovered. 

    These outbreaks often have significant socio-economic and psychological impact on communities affected. 

    In the absence of licensed vaccines and treatments for Marburg virus disease, Bundibugyo and Sudan virus diseases, early supportive care significantly improves survival.

    “These new guidelines are a perfect example of how WHO leverages science to better protect and care for people during outbreaks and health emergencies,” WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus says. 

    “The current Bundibugyo virus outbreak is a stark reminder of the need for diligent, holistic and person-focused medical care, to save lives and preserve human dignity. We encourage governments and authorities to integrate these new recommendations into preparedness and outbreak response, to ensure high-quality care for everyone.”

    Developed through global expert consultations and based on the most up-to-date scientific evidence and clinical knowledge, the guidelines translate lessons learned from recent Ebola and Marburg disease outbreaks into practical recommendations for improved patient care. 

    WHO has previously issued several guidelines on clinical care and therapeutics specific to Ebola virus disease.

    The new guidelines have been developed primarily to guide health workers when caring for patients, to harmonize clinical approaches, and enable health facility administrators and policy makers to better plan, prepare for and respond to filovirus disease outbreaks through adequate provision of medical supplies, biomedical equipment, laboratory support, and human resources.

    The practical recommendations aim to support frontline health workers in identifying clinical deterioration, managing dehydration and shock, improving patient monitoring, delivering critical supportive interventions safely, and providing structured follow-up for patients who recovered from Ebola and Marburg diseases. 

    Some of the key recommendations include:

        ° Using prioritized clinical laboratory tests to monitor patients with filovirus disease, to identify and manage treatable problems (such as hypoglycaemia, metabolic disruptions);

        ° Quickly and accurately treating dehydration in patients with filovirus disease using oral and intravenous rehydration;

        ° Promoting early and precise use of intravenous fluids and vasoactive medications to treat shock in patients with filovirus disease (low blood pressure caused by the infection, which if not properly addressed leads to organ failure), guided by serial monitoring of vital signs and markers of perfusion;

        ° Ensuring that if other bacterial infections, including bacterial sepsis, are present in patients with filovirus disease, appropriate treatment with antibiotics is initiated;

        ° Providing structured after-care to patients who have survived filovirus disease to promote well-being, and to prevent further infections linked to viral persistence in people who recovered from the disease.

    For Bundibugyo virus disease, as with other filovirus diseases, early recognition, rapid referral and optimized supportive care remain fundamental components of patient care. 

    Optimized supportive care can reduce complications and provide the foundation on which all other clinical interventions are delivered. 

    It is also a pre-requisite for clinical research evaluating antiviral treatments. These clinical guidelines complement existing WHO guidance and operational tools designed to support safe and effective care delivery.


About WHO

    Dedicated to the well-being of all people and guided by science, the World Health Organization leads and champions global efforts to give everyone, everywhere an equal chance at a safe and healthy life.

    We are the UN agency for health that connects nations, partners and people on the front lines in 150+ locations – leading the world’s response to health emergencies, preventing disease, addressing the root causes of health issues and expanding access to medicines and health care. Our mission is to promote health, keep the world safe and serve the vulnerable.

    “Together for health. Stand with science”, the theme of World Health Day 2026 marks a year-long campaign to highlight science as the foundation for protecting health and well-being worldwide.

Source: 



____

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Regional #Signals Preceding the 2026 #Bundibugyo Virus Disease #Outbreak

 


Highlights

    • Bundibugyo virus circulated undetected for months prior to outbreak declaration.

    • Four earlier regional hemorrhagic fever clusters flagged by open surveillance are unresolved.

    • These clusters warrant urgent reanalysis due to concern for regional spread.


Abstract

Background

The May 2026 Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern after substantial undetected community transmission. We describe regional surveillance signals detected by the Biothreats Emergence, Analysis, and Communications Network (BEACON), our open access event based surveillance program, in the weeks preceding outbreak declaration.

Methods

We reviewed BEACON reports of VHF-compatible illness clusters detected in the transboundary DRC-Uganda-Burundi-South Sudan region during March–April 2026, prior to the May 15 laboratory confirmation of BDBV.

Results

BEACON detected four temporally proximal VHF-compatible illness signals: (1) March 9, North Kivu Province—suspected Ebola case under investigation with unresolved laboratory results; (2) March 10, Kasaï Province—fatal hemorrhagic illness with secondary cases and negative Ebola PCR; (3) March 30, Burundi—35-case undiagnosed cluster near the DRC border with 5 deaths, negative testing for major filoviruses and >200 pathogens, pending metagenomic sequencing; (4) April 22, South Sudan—three suspected VHF cases with negative initial testing. All four signals shared a similar diagnostic phenotype: VHF-compatible presentation, mobilization of investigation teams, negative initial testing, and no publicly reported confirmed etiology. None were formally reported to have been resolved.

Conclusions

Our detection of four unresolved VHF signals preceding the confirmed BDBV outbreak highlights gaps in formal follow-up mechanisms for negative cases and fragmented regional diagnostic coordination. In light of confirmed BDBV circulation and Africa CDC's identification of 10 countries at high risk for spread, these preceding signals warrant urgent retrospective investigation and laboratory.

Source: 


Link: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(26)00497-2/fulltext

____

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

Cryo-EM structures of #Měnglà virus GP reveal combined #Ebola- and #Marburg-like epitope masking strategies for #antibody evasion

 


Abstract

Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus (MARV) are highly lethal filoviruses that cause severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. A recently identified bat-borne filovirus, Měnglà virus (MLAV), uses the same NPC1 receptor as EBOV and MARV, raising concerns about its potential cross-species transmission. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of the MLAV surface glycoprotein (GP) in its unbound form and in complex with the MARV-neutralizing antibody MR191. MLAV GP exhibits distinctive structural features in the Wing and heptad repeat 1D (HR1D) regions, retains a visible Cap structure even after protease treatment, and contains a MARV GP-like α2 helix. MR191, a broadly neutralizing marburgvirus antibody that targets the conserved NPC1 receptor-binding pocket in MLAV GP, nonetheless exhibits impaired neutralizing activity, likely due to shielding by the MLAV Cap. In addition, the MLAV mucin-like domain, α2 helix, and HR1A region hinder binding by representative broadly neutralizing ebolavirus antibodies targeting the GP-waist, including 6D6, CA45, ADI-15878, and ADI-15946. Together, these results provide the first structural insights into MLAV GP and identify immune evasion driven by structural and sequence divergence as a major challenge for pan-filovirus antibody development.

Source: 


Link: https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2529436123?af=R

____

Saturday, May 16, 2026

#Africa #CDC Calls for Urgent Regional Coordination Following #Ebola Virus Disease #Outbreak in #Ituri Province, #DRC, and Imported Ebola #Bundibugyo Case Reported by #Uganda (May 16 '26)

 


    Addis Ababa, Ethiopia / Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo / Kampala, Uganda, 15 May 2026 — The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) is closely monitoring the confirmed Ebola Virus Disease outbreak in Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and the imported Ebola Bundibugyo case reported by the Uganda Ministry of Health. 

    Africa CDC is working with national authorities and partners to support a rapid, coordinated regional response aimed at interrupting transmission, protecting communities and reducing the risk of cross-border spread.

    Following consultations with the DRC Ministry of Health and national public health institutions, preliminary laboratory results from the Institut National de Recherche Biomedicale (INRB) detected Ebola virus in 13 of 20 samples tested with the Bundibugyo Virus.

    As of the latest update from DRC, approximately 246 suspected cases and 65 deaths have been reported, mainly in Mongwalu and Rwampara health zones

    Four deaths have been reported among laboratory-confirmed cases

    Suspected cases have also been reported in Bunia and are pending confirmation. 

    These figures remain provisional and are being validated through laboratory confirmation, line-list harmonization, contact identification and epidemiological investigation.

    In a statement issued on 15 May 2026, Uganda’s Ministry of Health reported a confirmed Ebola Bundibugyo Virus Disease case in a 59-year-old Congolese male who was admitted to Kibuli Muslim Hospital on 11 May 2026 and died on 14 May 2026

    Uganda has reported the case as imported from DRC and has indicated that no local case has yet been confirmed

    Africa CDC is supporting coordination to align laboratory information, contact management and cross-border risk assessment across affected and at-risk settings.

    The confirmation of an imported case reported by Uganda underscores the importance of rapid regional coordination

    Africa CDC remains concerned by the urban context of Bunia and Rwampara, with insecurity intense population movement, mining-related mobility in Mongwalu, gaps in contact listing, infection prevention and control challenges, and the proximity of affected areas to Uganda and South Sudan.

    Due to the cabinet meeting in DRC to discuss this outbreak, Africa CDC agreed to postpone the meeting that was planned and convene this urgent high-level regional coordination meeting today 16 May 2026 with health authorities from DRC, Uganda and South Sudan, together with the WHO, UNICEF, the Pandemic Fund, African Medicines Agency (AMA), U.S. CDC and other response partners. 

    The meeting will focus on immediate response priorities, cross-border surveillance and alert management, laboratory support and sequencing, infection prevention and control, case management, risk communication and community engagement, safe and dignified burials, contact management, logistics and resource mobilization.

    “Africa CDC stands in solidarity with the Governments and people of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda as they respond to this outbreak,” said H.E. Dr Jean Kaseya, Director General of Africa CDC. 

    “The situation requires speed, scientific rigour and regional solidarity. We are working with DRC, Uganda, South Sudan and partners to strengthen surveillance, preparedness and response, and to help contain transmission as quickly as possible.”

    To respond in a more coherent and holistic way to this regional outbreak, Africa CDC took the following immediate actions:

        ° Activate the Incident management Support Team (IMST) including all partners as the regional coordinating mechanism for the 3 countries and approve a 72-hour Incident Action Plan covering DRC and Uganda responses and South Sudan preparedness.

        ° Deploy multidisciplinary surge teams to support DRC and Uganda where the disease is cleared, with parallel readiness support for neighboring countries.

        ° Establish a medical countermeasures workstream to assess diagnostics, PPE, therapeutics, vaccines and cold chain needs, pending final sequencing.

        ° Mandate the Science, Innovation and R&D team, to coordinate sequencing follow-up, evidence review, product options, research protocols and partner engagement.

        ° Convene the regional partner coordination meeting on 16 May at 3pm Geneva time with DRC, Uganda, South Sudan, WHO, AMA and key technical and financing partners,

        ° Hold an evening press briefing on 16 May at 6pm Geneva time to brief the media on this outbreak

        ° Escalate political engagement through President Ramaphosa as the AU PPPR Champion, the AU Commission Chairperson and AU Bureau to secure high-level support for access and coordination.

    Africa CDC urges communities in affected and at-risk areas to follow guidance from national health authorities, report symptoms promptly, avoid direct physical contact with suspected cases, avoid contact with body fluids or contaminated materials, maintain hand hygiene, and support response teams working to protect communities. 

    Health facilities and health workers should maintain a high index of suspicion, apply infection prevention and control measures, and immediately report suspected cases through national reporting channels.

    Ebola Virus Disease is a severe and often fatal illness. It spreads through direct contact with the bodily fluids of infected persons, contaminated materials, or the bodies of persons who have died from the disease. Early detection, prompt isolation and care, contact tracing, infection prevention and control, community engagement, and safe and dignified burials are critical to stopping transmission.

    Africa CDC will continue to provide updates as additional information becomes available, including sequencing results, updates from national health authorities and outcomes of the regional coordination meeting.

###


About Africa CDC

    The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) is the public health agency of the African Union. As an autonomous institution, Africa CDC supports AU Member States to strengthen health systems, improve disease surveillance, and enhance emergency preparedness and response. For more information, visit: http://www.africacdc.org and follow Africa CDC on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and YouTube.

Media ContactWilson Johwa, Senior Communications Officer, Directorate of Communication & Public Information | JohwaW@africacdc.org

Source: 


Link: https://africacdc.org/news-item/africa-cdc-calls-for-urgent-regional-coordination-following-ebola-virus-disease-outbreak-in-ituri-province-drc-and-imported-ebola-bundibugyo-case-reported-by-uganda/

____

Friday, May 15, 2026

#DRC confirms new #Ebola #outbreak, #WHO scales up support (#WHO Regional Office for Africa, May 15 '26)

 


    Kinshasa/Brazzaville — The World Health Organization (WHO) is rapidly scaling up support to the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo following confirmation of an outbreak of Ebola Bundibugyo in the country’s north-eastern Ituri Province.  

    Laboratory analysis conducted by the National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB), the country’s reference laboratory in the capital Kinshasa, confirmed the Ebola outbreak caused by the Bundibugyo species in 13 of 20 samples collected from suspected cases linked to a cluster of severe illness and deaths reported in  Mongbwalu  and  Rwampara health zones in Ituri  Province.

     The Bundibugyo species was first identified in 2007 in Bundibugyo district in western Uganda, during which 131 cases were reported with 42 deaths (case fatality rate of 32%).  

    In the current outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a total of 67 community deaths suspected to be due to Ebola Bundibugyo have been reported so far. 

    Patients presented with symptoms including fever, generalized body pain, weakness, vomiting and, in some cases, bleeding

    Several cases deteriorated rapidly and died

    Given the uncertainties and severity of the illness, there is  concern about the scale of transmission in affected communities.  

    A WHO mission including the WHO representative, the emergency preparedness and response team had already been deployed in Ituri  to support the provincial authorities with investigations that led to the confirmation of the outbreak in the two health zones.

     The team is also working with the national and provincial health authorities to strengthen outbreak control measures and prevent further spread of the virus.

     National authorities have activated emergency coordination mechanisms and deployed additional multidisciplinary rapid response teams to affected areas.  

    Additional WHO experts in epidemiology, infection prevention and control, laboratory diagnostics, clinical care, logistics, risk communication and community engagement are being mobilized to reinforce the frontline response. 

    Priority actions include strengthening disease surveillance, active case finding, contact tracing, infection prevention and control in health facilities, expanding access to safe care, laboratory testing capacity, ensuring safe burials and community sensitization to prevent further spread of the disease.    

    “The Democratic Republic of the Congo has extensive experience responding to Ebola outbreaks, and WHO is rapidly scaling up support to the ongoing response,” said Dr Mohamed Janabi, WHO Regional Director for Africa. 

    "Working closely with national authorities and partners, we are mobilizing swiftly, deploying additional expertise and resources to halt the spread of the virus, protect and save lives.”  

    WHO is airlifting 5 metric tonnes of supplies, including infection prevention and control, materials, laboratory sample transportation equipment, case management, tents and other supplies currently available in Kinshasa to Bunia to support frontline health workers and treatment facilities.    

    The outbreak is affecting areas that present significant operational challenges, including urban areas with intense population movements associated with mining activities, insecurity, and frequent cross- border movement—all of which increase the risk of further transmission.  

    In neighbouring Uganda, the Ministry of Health confirmed Ebola Bundibugyo in a patient from the Democratic Republic of the Congo who was being treated at a health facility but later died

    Ugandan health authorities have activated outbreak control measures, including disease surveillance, screening and response readiness.  

    This marks the 17th recorded outbreak of Ebola disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo since the virus was first identified in 1976 in Yambuku, in Equateur Province.

    The last one was an outbreak of Ebola virus disease that ended in December 2025.  

    Ebola disease is a severe and often fatal illness transmitted through direct contact with the blood, secretions, organs or other bodily fluids of infected people, as well as contaminated surfaces and materials. 

    Early detection, supportive treatment and rapid public health measures significantly improve survival and are critical to stopping transmission.

Source: 


Link: https://www.afro.who.int/countries/democratic-republic-of-congo/news/democratic-republic-congo-confirms-new-ebola-outbreak-who-scales-upsupport

____

Monday, May 4, 2026

Characterization of atypical #Ebola virus disease in #ferrets

 


Abstract

Ebola virus (EBOV) infection typically results in severe—and often lethal—acute disease. However, increasing evidence suggests that EBOV can persist in certain immune-privileged tissues, which may then serve as reservoirs for the later reemergence of EBOV and disease recrudescence. Here, we report atypical EVD recrudescence in a ferret model inoculated with an otherwise lethal dose of EBOV and treated with low doses of a highly potent monoclonal antibody cocktail. Among 32 antibody-treated ferrets, 14 animals survived, while 8 succumbed to acute EVD within about 5–8 days. The remaining 10 animals succumbed to atypical EVD between 12 and 18 days post-infection (DPI) despite having shown no, or very minor, signs of illness during the acute phase of disease. While viremia disappeared by 14 DPI in most animals that succumbed to atypical EVD, it rebounded modestly just prior to death. Unlike animals that died of acute EVD, those that died of atypical EVD showed only a moderate systemic inflammatory response and few signs of organ dysfunction, in line with low levels of virus in the liver and spleen. Interestingly, however, ferrets that died of atypical EVD showed high levels of virus in the brain, consistent with increased markers of inflammation in the central nervous system and significant pathological changes, including a breakdown in the blood-brain barrier and severe meningoencephalitis. Not only does this study shed important light on the atypical and underappreciated manifestations of EVD, but it also establishes the ferret as a valuable model of EBOV recrudescence.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1013916

____

Monday, April 6, 2026

The #Mengla virus (Filoviridae: #Dianlovirus)

 


Abstract

Introduction

Filoviruses associated with various species of pteropodid bats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) are traditionally regarded as potential causative agents of hemorrhagic fevers with epidemic potential. The known agents of Ebola and Marburg fevers periodically cause sporadic cases and epidemic outbreaks in African countries. Recent discoveries of novel filoviruses associated with pteropodid bats in South and Southeast Asia highlight the necessity to investigate their genetic diversity and pathogenic potential.

The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic diversity and pathogenic potential of new filoviruses associated with bats, based on literature data.

Materials and methods

This review is based on an analysis of published literature describing the detection and molecular characterization of novel filoviruses identified in different geographic regions, with a particular focus on filoviruses associated with pteropodid bats in South and Southeast Asia. The analyzed studies include data on virus discovery, genome organization, taxonomic classification, and experimental assessment of biological properties. 

Results

Several novel filoviruses have been identified by metagenomic RNA sequencing of tissues from pteropodid bats captured in South and Southeast Asia. Among them, Mengla virus was detected in tissues of pteropodid bats (Rousettus spp.) captured in Mengla County, Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China. Owing to a high level of genetic divergence, Mengla virus was classified as a representative of a new genus, Dianlovirus, within the family Filoviridae. Although a live isolate of Mengla virus has not yet been obtained, experimental studies using chimeric minigenome systems and virus-like particles suggest that the virus may exhibit tropism for tissues of various vertebrate hosts, including humans.

Conclusion

Members of the family Filoviridae are widely distributed within the geographic range of their natural reservoir–pteropodid bats–across South and Southeast Asia, including viruses evolutionarily related to Ebola and Marburg viruses. Although human disease caused by Mengla virus and other recently discovered filoviruses has not been documented, the potential for cross-species transmission and the emergence of novel filovirus infections in endemic regions remains.

Source: 


Link: https://virusjour.crie.ru/jour/article/view/16805

____

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Confirming #ERVEBO #Vaccination to Support #Ebola Virus #Surveillance

 


Abstract

Accurate confirmation of Ebola vaccination (ERVEBO) is essential for interpreting serologic data and assessing vaccine coverage during Ebola virus (EBOV) outbreaks. Current GP1,2-based assays cannot reliably distinguish vaccine-induced immunity from responses generated by natural infection. We developed a multiplex Luminex assay incorporating EBOV GP1,2, secreted glycoprotein (sGP), and a modified vesicular stomatitis virus nucleoprotein (VSV-P-N), a vector antigen encoded by ERVEBO but absent from wild-type EBOV. By using samples from US vaccinees and controls and a small comparison set from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, we found sGP and VSV-P-N demonstrated 100% sensitivity and >97.6% specificity for identifying vaccinees. In samples collected after a ring vaccination campaign in Guinea, combined sGP and VSV-P-N positivity confirmed vaccination in 94.8% of persons with written and 90.8% of persons with verbal confirmation of vaccination history. Our findings show that sGP and VSV-P-N provide a reliable signature of ERVEBO vaccination and support improved Ebola surveillance.

Source: 


Link: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/4/25-1906_article

____

Friday, March 13, 2026

#Glycoprotein-specific transcriptional response contributes to differential #vaccine #protection against lethal #Ebola virus #infection

 


Abstract

Since the West African Ebola virus (EBOV) epidemic in 2014-2016, recurrent outbreaks of the EBOV-Makona variant have been driven by recrudescence and human-to-human transmission emphasizing the need for effective vaccination strategies. A live-attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-based vaccine expressing the EBOV-Kikwit variant glycoprotein (VSV-Kik) received FDA approval in December 2019 and provides complete, rapid protection against EBOV-Makona as early as 7 days post-vaccination (DPV). During the 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak, the VSV-Kik vaccine, known as ERVEBO, was administered to lower-risk individuals at a 5-fold dose reduction of the standard 2 × 107 PFU to provide broader population protection. Identification of a protective lower dose providing rapid protection would ease supply burdens during future outbreaks and enhance vaccine coverage. We previously generated a VSV-based vaccine expressing the glycoprotein of the Makona variant (VSV-Mak) which provided complete protection against homologous challenge 28 DPV at as low as 1 × 101 PFU. However, the transcriptional responses engendered by VSV-Mak and VSV-Kik vaccines in the context of early EBOV-Makona challenge have not yet been evaluated. In the current study, we compared transcriptional responses following a low dose (1 × 104 PFU) of lab-grade VSV-Mak or GMP-grade VSV-Kik and subsequent EBOV-Makona challenge 10 DPV. VSV-Kik provided complete protection against heterologous challenge and elicited rapid antiviral transcriptional changes followed by the activation of adaptive immunity. On the other hand, VSV-Mak only provided partial protection and induced minimal transcriptional response. These results highlight a glycoprotein-specific transcriptional response after vaccination despite the high EBOV variant homology.

Source: Vaccine, https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/vaccine/vol/79/suppl/C

Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264410X26002185?via%3Dihub

_____

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Structures of #Marburgvirus #glycoprotein and its complex with NPC1 #receptor

 


Abstract

Marburgviruses (MBVs) cause severe haemorrhagic fever with higher fatality rates than Ebola virus (EBOV). Here we show that the MBV glycoprotein (GP) mediates viral entry more efficiently than EBOV GP. Using cryo-EM, we determined structures of MBV GP in three states: (1) unbound; (2) bound to its endosomal receptor NPC1; and (3) complexed with a neutralizing nanobody. The glycan cap shields the receptor-binding site from NPC1 but only partially from the nanobody, enabling limited immune evasion. After glycan cap cleavage, NPC1 binds to MBV GP in a distinct orientation compared with EBOV GP, providing an additional anchor and enhancing receptor affinity. NPC1 engagement also induces substantial conformational changes in MBV GP, probably facilitating membrane fusion. Furthermore, MBV GP is susceptible to the neutralizing nanobody, which mimics NPC1 at the receptor-binding site. Together, our findings reveal MBV GP as a highly efficient entry mediator and suggest structural mechanisms that may contribute to its enhanced entry efficiency.

Source: Nature, https://www.nature.com/

Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10240-0

____

Monday, January 26, 2026

#Marburg virus disease - #Ethiopia [End of the Outbreak] (#WHO, Jan. 26 '26)

 


{Excerpt}

26 January 2026


Situation at a glance

On 26 January 2026, the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia declared the end of the Marburg virus disease (MVD) outbreak

This declaration came after two consecutive incubation periods (a total of 42 days) since the last person confirmed with MVD died and was given a safe and dignified burial, in accordance with WHO recommendations on 14 December 2025. 

As of 25 January 2026, a cumulative total of 19 cases, including 14 confirmed (including nine deaths) and five probable cases (all deaths), were reported. 

A total of 857 contacts listed for monitoring all had completed their 21-day follow-up as of 25 January 2026. 

WHO, through its country office and partners, provided technical, operational and financial support to the government to contain this outbreak.


Description of the situation

On 14 November 2025, after the laboratory confirmation of suspected viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) cases in Jinka town, South Ethiopia Regional State, Ethiopia, the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia declared an outbreak of Marburg Virus Disease (MVD). 

Molecular testing conducted by the National Reference Laboratory at the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) identified Marburg virus (MARV) in patient samples. 

This was the first time Ethiopia was reporting a MVD outbreak.

The first known case was an adult from Jinka town who developed symptoms on 23 October. 

The patient presented to the General Hospital the following day with vomiting, loss of appetite, and abdominal cramps. 

As of 25 January 2026, a cumulative total of 14 confirmed cases, including nine deaths (Case Fatality Rate (CFR) 64.3%) and five probable cases, all of whom had died, were reported by the Ministry of Health from Jinka, Malle and Dasench woredas in South Ethiopia Region and Hawassa in Sidama Region.

As of 25 January 2026, a total of 857 contacts were listed who completed 21 days of follow-up, 760 from the South Ethiopia Region and 97 from the Sidama Region. 

As of 5 January 2026, 3800 samples were tested for the virus.

On 26 January 2026, after two consecutive incubation periods (a total of 42 days), without a new confirmed case reported, after the last confirmed case died and was given a safe and dignified burial, on 14 December 2025, the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia declared the end of the MVD outbreak, as per WHO recommendations.

(...)

Source: 


Link: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON592

____

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

An #mRNA #vaccine encoding the #Ebola virus glycoprotein induces high neutralizing #antibody titers and provides strong protection against lethal infections in mouse models

 


Abstract

Ebola virus (EBOV) is the causative agent of Ebola disease (EBOD), a viral hemorrhagic fever with a notably high case fatality rate. Current treatments for EBOD are limited to monoclonal antibodies or two licensed viral vector vaccines, a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)-vectored vaccine or an adenovirus and modified vaccinia Ankara regimen. However, comparisons of protection, efficacy, and durability with alternative nucleotide platforms remain understudied. Here, we evaluated the immunogenicity of an mRNA vaccine expressing the EBOV glycoprotein (GP) in parallel with rVSV- and DNA-based vaccine platforms. The mRNA EBOV-GP vaccine, formulated in lipid nanoparticles, elicited significantly higher levels of total IgG and neutralizing antibody titers compared to the rVSV-EBOV-GP vaccine. Linear antibody epitope analysis indicated a preference for targeting the mucin-like domain in EBOV-GP1 following rVSV-based vaccination, while the mRNA platform distinctly targeted the internal fusion loop of EBOV-GP2. After characterizing the immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccine, two models of EBOD were used to demonstrate its protective efficacy: a surrogate rVSV-based challenge model of EBOD using type-I interferon deficient C57BL/6 mice and infection of BALB/c mice with authentic mouse-adapted EBOV. In both studies, the EBOV mRNA vaccine fully protected the mouse cohorts against morbidity and mortality. Additionally, the EBOV mRNA vaccine produced greater neutralizing antibody titers compared to the DNA EBOV-GP vaccine. These results suggest that an mRNA vaccine expressing EBOV-GP can induce robust, functional humoral responses that are protective against EBOD, warranting further development as an alternative to, or as part of a vaccine strategy including, viral vectored vaccines.

Source: Frontiers in Immunology, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1682418/full

____

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

#Genomic Insights into #Marburg Virus Strains from 2023 and 2025 #Outbreaks in Kagera, #Tanzania

 


Abstract

Marburg virus (MARV) is the primary cause of Marburg virus disease (MVD), a severe hemorrhagic fever with a high case-fatality rate. The first reported MVD outbreak in Tanzania occurred in 2023, followed by a second outbreak in 2025, both within the Kagera region. During those MVD outbreaks, 174 suspected cases were identified; of those, 10 were laboratory confirmed. After complete genome assembly and bioinformatic analyses, we found the MARV strains of the 2023 and 2025 outbreaks to be closely related and clustered with MARV strains that caused outbreaks in Rwanda (2024) and Uganda (2014). The sequences from both MVD outbreaks in Tanzania showed >99.71% nucleotide identity, suggesting a possible single spillover event followed by limited human-to-human virus transmission. Further ecologic studies are essential to identify potential spillover events, but our findings indicate that closely related MARV strains circulate in Kagera, Tanzania, posing a risk for future outbreak recurrence.

Source: 


Link: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/1/25-1314_article

____

Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Assessing #Ebola virus circulation in the Tshuapa province (#DRC): A #OneHealth #investigation of wildlife and #human interactions

 


Abstract

The wildlife reservoir and spillover mechanisms of Ebola virus remain elusive despite extensive research efforts in endemic areas. This study employed a One Health approach to examine the virus’ circulation in wildlife and the associated human exposure risks in the Tshuapa province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. We screened 1049 samples from 919 animals, predominantly small mammals, collected in 2021, and 380 samples from inhabitants of Inkanamongo village, the site of an Ebola virus disease outbreak in 2014. These samples were screened for evidence of current (RNA) or past (IgG antibodies) Ebola virus infections. We also conducted interviews with 167 individuals in the surrounding districts to assess their interactions with wildlife. While no Ebola virus RNA was detected in the wildlife samples, anti-orthoebolavirus IgG antibodies were found in 13 bats and 38 rodents. Among the human participants, 120 individuals had IgG antibodies against at least 1 orthoebolavirus antigen, with 12 showing seropositivity for 2 antigens of the same orthoebolavirus, despite not having a prior Ebola disease diagnosis. Furthermore, the majority of respondents reported frequent visits to the forest to hunt a variety of wild animals, particularly ungulates and rodents, which could account for occasional viral spillovers. The absence of active Ebola virus circulation in wildlife may reflect seasonal patterns in reservoir ecology, as those observed in bats. Similarly, seasonal human activities, such as hunting and foraging, may result in periodic exposure risks. These findings highlight the importance of continuous, multidisciplinary surveillance to monitor changes in seasonal spillover risks.


Author summary

Since its discovery in 1976 in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Ebola virus (EBOV) has caused more than 20 outbreaks in humans, with fatality rates as high as 90%. While the virus is believed to have an animal origin, naturalist reservoir and the mechanisms of transmission to humans remain poorly understood. Gaining insight into which species may harbour the virus and how transmission occurs is essential to predict and prevent future outbreaks. In this study, we investigate EBOV exposure in wildlife and humans in a region of the DRC with a documented history of outbreaks. Although we did not detect active infection in animals, we found serological evidence of prior exposure in several bat and rodent species, as well as among local residents. Interviews with community members revealed frequent contact with wildlife through hunting and handling, practices that could elevate the risk of animal-to-human transmission. These findings offer new clues about possible EBOV reservoirs and highlight the role of human behaviours in facilitating facilitate spillover events. Our results underscore the need for continued, integrated surveillance to improve understanding of Ebola virus ecology and to help reduce the risk of future Ebola outbreaks in endemic regions.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1013628

____

Saturday, November 15, 2025

#Ethiopia confirms first #outbreak of #Marburg virus disease (#WHO AFRO, Nov. 15 '25)

 


14 November 2025

Addis Ababa—Ethiopia’s Ministry of Health has confirmed an outbreak of Marburg virus disease in the South Ethiopia Region, the first of its kind in the country, following laboratory testing of samples from a cluster of suspected cases of viral haemorrhagic fever.

Genetic analysis by the Ethiopia Public Health Institute revealed that the virus is of the same strain as the one that has been reported in previous outbreaks in other countries in East Africa

A total of nine cases have been reported in the outbreak that has affected Jinka town in the South Ethiopia Region.

The national authorities are scaling up response including community-wide screening, isolation of cases, treatment, contact tracing and public awareness campaigns to curb the spread of the Marburg virus, which is in the same family of viruses that cause Ebola virus disease.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and partners are supporting the government as it intensifies response to halt the spread of the virus and end the outbreak. A team of responders with expertise in viral haemorrhagic fever outbreak response has been deployed along with medical supplies and equipment.  

Marburg virus disease is a severe and often fatal illness caused by the Marburg virus. The disease is transmitted to humans from fruit bats and spreads among people through direct contact with bodily fluids of infected individuals or contaminated materials.

Initial symptoms include high fever, severe headache, muscle aches and fatigue. Many patients develop severe bleeding within a week of onset. Although several promising candidate medical countermeasures are currently undergoing clinical trials, there is no licensed therapeutic or vaccine for effective management or prevention of Marburg virus disease. However, early access to supportive treatment and care – rehydration with oral or intravenous fluids – and treatment of specific symptoms, improve survival.  

In the African region, previous outbreaks and sporadic cases have been reported in Angola, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Equatorial Guinea, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda.

Source: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, https://www.afro.who.int/countries/ethiopia/news/ethiopia-confirms-first-outbreak-marburg-virus-disease

____

Friday, September 19, 2025

RAPID #RISK #ASSESSMENT: #EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE, DRC (#WHO, September 19 '25)

 


{Summary}

Overall risk and confidence

Overall risk

-- National: High 

-- Regional: Moderate   

-- Global: Low   

Confidence in available information 

-- National: Moderate

-- Regional: Moderate

-- Global: Moderate


Risk statement

On 1 September 2025, WHO received an alert from the Ministry of Health of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) regarding suspected cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in the Bulape Health Zone, Kasai Province, DRC. 

The first currently known suspected EVD case was admitted to the Bulape General Reference Hospital on 20 August 2025 and reported to have died five days later (25 August 2025).

This is a 34-year-old female patient with a 34-week gestational age who presented with fever, bloody diarrhoea, followed by anal, oral, and nasal haemorrhage, vomiting, and asthenia

She reportedly died on 25 August 2025, with a clinical picture of multiple organ failure. 

Two of the contacts of this first case (a midwife and a laboratory technician) also developed similar symptoms and died a few days later.  

As of 4 September 2025, a total of 28 suspected cases, including 15 deaths (case fatality ratio: 54 %) had been reported from the Bulape health zone (Bulape, Bulape COM and Dikolo) and Mweka health zone. 

Among deaths, four are health care workers.  

In addition, 20% of the suspected cases are aged under 15 years

Five blood samples and one swab were collected from six suspected cases from the three health areas and arrived today at the National Public Health Laboratory (INRB) in Kinshasa for confirmation testing.

A crisis committee has been activated at the local and provincial levels, risk communication and active surveillance activities are underway, all cases are isolated, Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) measures are being implemented, isolation and contact tracing are underway, and patients are receiving intravenous medications, including ceftriaxone and metronidazole

The INRB confirmed Ebola virus (EBOV), Orthoebolavirus zairense species was detected through RTPCR assays, including GeneXpert, on 3 September.    

At national level, the risk is considered high due to:  

Information gaps on the cases, including the first case, particularly: 

-- the date of symptom onset, 

-- their therapeutic itinerary, 

-- the potential number of contacts within the community, and 

-- epidemiological links between cases does not allow an assessment as to the extent of the outbreak. Similar alerts have been reported from this location/region in the past few months.  

Most of the cases recorded so far in this health zone live in the Health Areas with a high population density and mobility. This could accelerate disease transmission within the community.  

The last EVD outbreak in this health zone, Bulape, was in 2007, 18 years later, the capacities required for the response to a potential EVD outbreak may not exist.  

So far, in addition to Bulape health zone, the epicentre of the outbreak, suspected cases are being reported in the neighbouring district of Mweka showing a potential geographic extension of the outbreak.   

Bulape has a large market every Friday, attracting people from the surrounding villages. The city of Mweka borders a health district in the province of Kasai-Central (Bena Leka). Furthermore, population movements between Bulape and Tshikapa, the capital city of Kasai province, are frequent as part of trading activities.  Tshikapa city is considered as a regional market hub receiving populations from neighbouring provinces.  

At the regional level the risk is moderate due to the proximity of Bulape to Tshikapa city, the capital city of Kasai province and the Angolan border (approximately 100 to 200 kilometres depending on the nearest border crossing point) as well as population movement between Bulape and Tshikapa then Tshikapa and Angola.  

At the global level, the risk is low

(...)

Source: World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-rapid-risk-assessment---ebola-virus-disease--democratic-republic-of-the-congo-v.1

____

Friday, September 12, 2025

#Ebola virus’ hidden #target: virus #transmission to and infection of #skin

 


ABSTRACT

Ebola virus (EBOV), the causative agent of Ebola virus disease, remains one of the World Health Organization’s top 10 threats to global health. Infectious EBOV virions can be found on the surface of skin late in infection and may be transmitted to others through skin-to-skin contact. We investigate in vivo EBOV tropism and the kinetics of virus movement to and from the skin. Increasing viral loads were detected over time in the skin of EBOV-infected non-human primates and mice, with antigen detected in dermal stromal and immune cells. Epidermal cells within and surrounding hair follicles also harbored viral antigen, suggesting a novel mechanism of virus egress to the epidermal surface. During late infection, proinflammatory responses were elevated in infected visceral organs but minimal in the skin despite significant viral loads. We observed similar viral trafficking and cell tropism in the skin of mice intraperitoneally infected with a low containment EBOV model virus, rVSV/EBOV GP, allowing more detailed mechanistic studies. Sites of virus infection in the skin were patchy, with intense focal areas of infection surrounded by uninfected areas. To investigate virus entry into the body through skin, rVSV/EBOV GP was applied to the surface of gently abraded skin to remove the stratum corneum; epidermal keratinocytes were robustly infected with subsequent systemic viral dissemination observed in some mice. Optimal levels of infection within the skin required expression of the phosphatidylserine receptor, AXL. Collectively, our data demonstrate that skin serves as an important organ targeted by EBOV, facilitating virus entry into and egress from the body.

Source: Journal of Virology, https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jvi.01300-25?af=R

____

Thursday, September 11, 2025

#Marburg Virus #Disease in #Rwanda, 2024 — Public Health and Clinical Responses

 


Abstract

Background

On September 27, 2024, Rwanda reported an outbreak of Marburg virus disease (MVD), after a cluster of cases of viral hemorrhagic fever was detected at two urban hospitals.

Methods

We report key aspects of the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of MVD during this outbreak, as well as the overall response to the outbreak. We performed a retrospective epidemiologic and clinical analysis of data compiled across all pillars of the outbreak response and a case-series analysis to characterize clinical features, disease progression, and outcomes among patients who received supportive care and investigational therapeutic agents.

Results

Among the 6340 patients with suspected MVD who underwent testing, 66 had laboratory-confirmed MVD, 51 (77%) of whom were health care workers. The median estimated incubation period was 10 days (interquartile range, 8 to 13), and symptom onset occurred a median of 2 days (interquartile range, 1 to 3) before hospital admission. The results of epidemiologic investigations were highly suggestive of a zoonotic origin of the outbreak: an index patient was identified who had been exposed to Egyptian fruit bats at a mining site. The case fatality rate in the outbreak was 23% (15 deaths among 66 patients). Remdesivir and the monoclonal antibody MBP091 were used under expanded access and clinical trial protocols. In addition, 1710 frontline workers and high-risk contacts received the chimpanzee adenovirus 3–vectored vaccine ChAd3-MARV under emergency use authorization in a phase 2 clinical trial.

Conclusions

Implementation of containment measures, advanced supportive care, and access to investigational countermeasures may have contributed to reduced mortality from MVD in this outbreak. Enhancing surveillance, improving infection prevention and control in health care settings, and ensuring timely deployment of medical countermeasures will be critical for mitigating the effects of future filovirus disease outbreaks.

Source: The New England Journal of Medicine, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2415816?query=TOC

____

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Heterologous two-dose #Ebola #vaccine regimen in #pregnant women in #Rwanda: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial

 


Abstract

Risk of death for both mother and fetus following Ebola virus infection is extremely high. In this study, healthy women in Rwanda aged ≥18 years were randomized to two-dose Ebola vaccination (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo) during pregnancy (group A) or postpartum (group B). Unvaccinated pregnant group B women served as control. This was a parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center trial to evaluate the safety (primary endpoint—outcomes of interest and serious adverse events (SAEs)) and immunogenicity (secondary endpoint) of the two-dose Ebola vaccination. Among 3,484 women screened, 2,013 were randomized, and 2,012 women and 1,945 infants born alive were descriptively analyzed. Adverse outcomes of interest occurred in women (5.2% in group A and 7.3% in group B) and infants (26.0% in group A and 25.6% in group B). The most common maternal outcome of interest was pathways to preterm birth (3.2% in group A and 3.4% in group B), and the most common infant outcome of interest was small for gestational age (14.3% in group A and 11.8% in group B). Maternal/fetal and neonatal/infant SAE frequencies were comparable between groups (9.8% in group A, 9.0% in group B and 21.9% in group A, 15.9% in group B, respectively). Anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein-specific binding antibody response (secondary endpoint) was sustained in ≥90% of women at 1 year postdose 1. In group A, binding antibodies were detected in cord blood (99%) and infant serum (95%) samples 14 weeks postbirth. The trial met all primary and secondary objectives. Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo did not raise concerns regarding adverse maternal/fetal or neonatal/infant outcomes, had no unexpected safety issues, and induced binding antibody responses in women and offspring through passive transfer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04556526.

Source: Nature Medicine, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03932-z

____

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Chapter One - #Mucosal #Sudan virus #infection results in a lethal disease in #ferrets with previous #Lloviu virus infection not providing cross-protection

Abstract

Sudan virus (SUDV) causes highly lethal outbreaks of hemorrhagic disease throughout Africa, but there has yet to be an approved vaccine or therapeutic to combat this public health threat. The most common route of natural exposure to filoviruses is through mucosal contact which greatly impacts initial viral replication. Historically, SUDV animal models used an intramuscular infection route. Here, we sought to further characterize an animal model using mucosal challenge routes and compared the impact that intramuscular, intranasal, or aerosol exposure had on SUDV pathogenicity in a ferret model. We determined that the route of infection did not significantly impact overall SUDV pathogenicity; only subtle changes were detected in magnitude of viremia and oral viral shedding. Additionally, we sought to determine if preexisting Lloviu virus (LLOV) immunity could protect ferrets from lethal SUDV infection. We found that the previous immunity elicited by LLOV infection was not sufficient to protect ferrets from lethal SUDV disease. In conclusion, our results indicate that the infection route has minimal effect on overall pathogenicity of SUDV in ferrets and that prior LLOV infection does not elicit a cross-protective immune response to SUDV.

Source: Advances in Virus Research, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065352725000077?via%3Dihub

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts