Showing posts with label abstract. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abstract. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2026

#Coronavirus Disease Research #References (AMEDEO, August 16 '26)

 


    BMJ

  1. LANG K
    What do we know about covid-19 and smell loss?
    BMJ. 2026;394:e100155.
    PubMed        


    Int J Infect Dis

  2. SEO G, Joo H, Song K, Kim M, et al
    Corrigendum to "Static and dynamic scoring systems for post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 in a Korean Cohort" [International Journal of Infectious Diseases Volume 164, 108378, March 2026].
    Int J Infect Dis. 2026;171:108980.
    PubMed        


    Intensive Care Med

  3. DAOUD T, Villar J, Annane D
    Corticosteroids in ARDS: old controversies, new insights, and future directions.
    Intensive Care Med. 2026 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00134-026-08567.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect

  4. ZHOU S, Liu C, Liu W, Cai K, et al
    Cross-Neutralizing Antibody Responses to Diverse Coronaviruses in the Human Population.
    J Infect. 2026 Aug 11:106827. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2026.106827.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Med Virol

  5. VIZGIRDA G, Underwood AP, Fahnoe U, Solund C, et al
    SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Breadth Is Shaped by Variant Exposure and Immune History.
    J Med Virol. 2026;98:e71054.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Lancet

  6. SCHWARTZ CA, Weiss Y
    Hate has no place in medicine.
    Lancet. 2026;408:606.
    PubMed        


    Lancet Infect Dis

  7. HE P, Song Y, Guo C, Yu L, et al
    Antibody evasion and receptor binding of SARS-CoV-2 variants PQ.16.1.1 and RK.1.
    Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 13:S1473-3099(26)00429.
    PubMed        

#Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Research #References (AMEDEO, August 16 '26)-

 


    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

  1. RAO RM, Kumar N, P SP, Rao MJ, et al
    Convergent genetic and structural parameters of cardiovascular disease related insights of post-acute COVID-19.
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2026;831:154319.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  2. LIU C, Yan Z, Tao Z, Yang W, et al
    C5a-C5aR1 axis activation drives neutrophil extracellular trap formation in SARS-CoV-2 N protein-mediated acute kidney injury.
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2026;831:154305.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Clin Microbiol

  3. AEBISCHER A, Gunther A, Piesche R, Wernike K, et al
    Development of a multi-species luciferase-based double-antigen ELISA for the detection of antibodies against influenza A virus H5 clade 2.3.4.4b.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2026 Aug 13:e0190725. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01907.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Gen Virol

  4. LOZANO-MONTALBA L, Denis Z, Courgnaud V, Moreno-Garcia J, et al
    Glycosphingolipids are essential entry factors for non-influenza orthomyxoviruses.
    J Gen Virol. 2026;107.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Immunol

  5. MCKERNAN KE, Cephus JY, Kuehnle SN, Henriquez-Pilier E, et al
    Deficiency in circulating T cells in four core genotypes mice with Sry translocation.
    J Immunol. 2026;215:vkag207.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect

  6. HANSEN CL, Shaikh N, Naeger S, Torcel-Pagnon L, et al
    Hospitalizations and deaths from major respiratory viruses in the US: An ensemble time series modeling study, 2016-2025.
    J Infect. 2026;93:106811.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  7. VINK E, Murphy ME, Gunson R, MacConnachie A, et al
    Respiratory viral detection in adult severe acute respiratory infection post-COVID-19 pandemic: implications for antimicrobial stewardship.
    J Infect. 2026;93:106805.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  8. RAN J, Zhu L, Ning M, Zhang W, et al
    Age-associated impairment of humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a large community cohort with hybrid immunity.
    J Infect. 2026 Jul 1:106803. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2026.106803.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  9. KONG M, Gao HX, Song XD, Yang GJ, et al
    Convergent neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants over 2.5 years after BA.5/BF.7 breakthrough infection.
    J Infect. 2026 Jun 18:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2026.106799.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  10. ATUKORALE VN, Kwong JC, Hernandez A, Moineddin R, et al
    Factors associated with severe health outcomes among community-dwelling older adults hospitalized with respiratory syncytial virus.
    J Infect. 2026;93:106797.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  11. DONG S, Li M, Huo D, Zhao H, et al
    Impact of EV-A71 vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions on hand, foot, and mouth disease: A 14-year interrupted time series analysis.
    J Infect. 2026;93:106795.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  12. TRUONG T, Radin JM, Li L, Ordonez-Mena JM, et al
    Burden and economic impact of RSV hospitalisations among English adults, 2023/24.
    J Infect. 2026;93:106792.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  13. WANG X, Yin J, Xu B, Guanhua X, et al
    Clinical epidemiological characteristics of hospitalized pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in China.
    J Infect. 2026 Jun 10:106793. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2026.106793.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Virol

  14. PULIT-PENALOZA J, Belser JA, Brock N, Kieran TJ, et al
    Risk assessment of avian influenza A(H5N5) virus from the first human case using the ferret model.
    J Virol. 2026 Aug 11:e0085626. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00856.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    N Engl J Med

  15. LIU Z, Zhang L, Jiang M
    Efficacy and Safety of an mRNA Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults.
    N Engl J Med. 2026;395:724.
    PubMed        

  16. LOCQUET M, Dogne JM
    Efficacy and Safety of an mRNA Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults.
    N Engl J Med. 2026;395:724-725.
    PubMed        

  17. HUANG G, Das R, Wilson E
    Efficacy and Safety of an mRNA Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults. Reply.
    N Engl J Med. 2026;395:725-726.
    PubMed        


    Pediatrics


  18. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2026-2027: Policy Statement.
    Pediatrics. 2026 Aug 10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2026-078778.
    PubMed         Abstract available


  19. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2026-2027: Technical Report.
    Pediatrics. 2026 Aug 10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2026-078779.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS Comput Biol

  20. FORNA A, Damodaran L, Gunning CE, Rahimi P, et al
    Alignment-free prediction of cross-reactivity in influenza A (H3N2) anticipates antigenic drift.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2026;22:e1014628.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS One

  21. MURPHY C, Cheng SMS, Mak L, So HC, et al
    Diagnostic agreement between Rhinoswabs and joint nose and throat swabs for the detection of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 among symptomatic ambulatory patients in Hong Kong.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0355869.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  22. KILDAY D, Korvink M, Tatum D, Cao Z, et al
    Association between COVID-19 by variant period and delivery-related outcomes in the United States.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0355223.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  23. TAMAKI S, Kawashima R, Uematsu T, Kawakami F, et al
    Eosinophil-associated intestinal immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0355607.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  24. PIETAN L, Phillippi E, Melo M, El-Shanti H, et al
    Genome-wide machine learning analysis of anosmia and ageusia with COVID-19.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0355832.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  25. CHEN PY, Dang LH, Hung SH
    The association between meteorological factors and influenza incidence in Taiwan: Regional heterogeneity and subtropical climate variability.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0355559.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  26. PARK S, Kwon JA, Kim HS, Choi Y, et al
    Socioeconomic differences in influenza vaccination coverage by government financial support status: A population-based study in Korea.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0353764.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  27. ALSHAHRANI A, Reddy RS, Gular K, Kakaraparthi VN, et al
    Postural control and trunk mobility impairments in adults with long COVID: A cross-sectional study using computerized posturography and clinical biomechanical tools.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0354593.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  28. TUT G, Lancaster T, Sylla P, Bone D, et al
    High rates of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in residents of long term care facilities despite robust spike-specific immunity following serial vaccination.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0354079.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  29. KIM Y, Lee J, Park J
    Concentration of hospital utilization in the capital area among elderly inpatients from non-capital regions in South Korea: Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0336744.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  30. FREIRE SF, Shimizu IS, Lima CAS, Adhikari NKJ, et al
    The association between resource availability and knowledge, attitudes, and practice about protective ventilation among ICU directors - A nationwide cross-sectional survey.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0355354.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  31. KARADUMAN E, Toprak N, Cevik A, Erail S, et al
    Factors associated with fear and coping strategies during pandemic in female university students: The moderator role of physical activity and infection status.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0355544.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  32. IRIEMENAM NC, Osawe S, Akanbi OA, Akinmulero O, et al
    High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in three states of Nigeria from August to December 2022.
    PLoS One. 2026;21:e0354606.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

  33. DIAZ TOVAR JS, Dos Reis FP, Moriyama LT, Pego-Fernandes PM, et al
    Anatomy-resolved digital twin framework for personalized light dosimetry in lung therapies.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2026;123:e2612370123.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Vaccine

  34. GEBREMARIAM AG, Genie M, Le H, Regan A, et al
    Vaccine uptake in the context of mandate announcement and removal: Evidence from Europe and North America.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128825.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  35. FAVRE G, Pfund A, Gerbier E, Anselem O, et al
    Acceptability and preferences regarding RSV immunisation during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in diverse global settings.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128783.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  36. CARAZO S, Skowronski DM, Sauvageau C, Talbot D, et al
    2024/25 end-of-season KP.2 vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization in older adults: a test-negative study in Quebec, Canada.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128786.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  37. EBRAHIMI N, de Whalley P, Kanji N, Ramasamy MN, et al
    ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus vaccine: Long-term safety and immunological responses.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128951.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  38. DALEXIS RD, Beogo I, Xu Y, Muray M, et al
    Post-COVID-19 pandemic inequities in routine childhood immunization in Canada: racial disparities in uptake of polio, meningococcal conjugate, and varicella vaccines.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128931.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  39. HUSSAIN HS, Yousafzai MT, Iqbal J, Aslam ZM, et al
    Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of fractional vs. full booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines: A non-inferiority, randomized, double-blind, phase IV clinical trial in Pakistan.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128918.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  40. YOON SK, Phillips AL, Battan-Wraith S, Thiese MS, et al
    Real-world effectiveness and safety of protein-based and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (BEEHIVE trial).
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128954.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  41. DIARRA M, Li S, Gaur S, Greenberg P, et al
    Understanding parent motivation for participating in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128960.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  42. BELL S, Chantler T, Passanante A, Pryce J, et al
    Maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine perceptions amongst pregnant women and mothers of infants and toddlers in England: a qualitative study.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128955.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  43. MAEDA H, Igarashi A, Mitsui S, Suzuki K, et al
    Interim analysis of effectiveness of JN.1-adapted conventional and self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults aged >/=60 years, Japan, October 2024-April 2025.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128964.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  44. BARASA L, Onyango G
    The institutional roots of vaccine uptake and hesitancy: evidence from Africa.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128980.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  45. LI J, Wang Z, Gong Y
    Country-level immunization recovery and DTP1 no-dose proxy burden after COVID-19: a descriptive ecological analysis of WUENIC, 2010-2024.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128973.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  46. KIM T, Wang X, Rajtmajer S, Harden JJ, et al
    Elected officials' online anti-vaccination statements respond to online engagement.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128901.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  47. C M, Dymock M, Flanagan KL, Plebanski M, et al
    The Platform trial In COVID-19 priming and BOOsting (PICOBOO): The immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of seven licensed COVID-19 vaccines delivered as fifth dose or subsequent boosters in immunocompetent adults.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128970.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  48. DE PADUA MC, Antunes MOB, Stein RT, Pinto LA, et al
    Effectiveness of BNT162B2 and CoronaVac vaccines in reducing COVID-19 severity among children aged 3-4 years in Brazil.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128974.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  49. TAY CJX, Koh CWT, Ooi JSG, Li HE, et al
    Over-induction of innate immune responses suppresses T cell response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128983.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  50. RAFIZADEH A, Wijekoon D, Aung ET, Aguirre I, et al
    Influenza vaccination uptake among people living with HIV in Melbourne, 2015-2025: a repeated cross-sectional study.
    Vaccine. 2026;90:129038.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  51. SAITOH A, Takaku M
    Partner awareness and support for maternal RSV vaccination: a paired survey of pregnant women and co-residing partners in Japan.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128946.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  52. PAUL KK, Newall AT
    The cost of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) across all ages to the Australian healthcare system.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128922.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  53. AUNG TN, Muyindike W, Hoeppner SS, Nanfuka V, et al
    COVID-19 vaccination among people with HIV in Uganda: lessons from a high-risk group with high vaccine uptake for the next pandemic.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128912.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  54. HENSLEY AA, Jiles KA, Edwards S, Clinchard C, et al
    Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful strategies to increase vaccine intention and improve vaccine uptake for U.S. adult populations in the Affordable Care Act era (2010-2025): a systematic review and meta-regression.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128910.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  55. MCCONEGHY KW, Wilker EH, DeVone F, Skov B, et al
    Vaccine effectiveness of mRNA-1345 against RSV-associated hospitalization and medically attended acute respiratory illness among US veterans, 2025-2026.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128882.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  56. NAKANO T, Iwata S, Oishi K, Iguchi E, et al
    Immunogenicity and safety of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant vaccine S-268024 booster vaccination versus NVX-CoV2373: Interim results from a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled study.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128871.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  57. MALTEZOU HC, Borg M, Botelho-Nevers E, Brantsaeter AB, et al
    Vaccination policies for healthcare personnel in Europe, 2026.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128839.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  58. MYERS TR, Zauche LH, Marquez PL, McCullum I, et al
    V-safe: Summary of findings reported after COVID-19 vaccination to a US CDC active safety surveillance system through June 2023.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128725.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  59. PRAT-AYMERICH C, Yeghiazaryan L, Pathirana RD, Gautier V, et al
    A prematurely terminated phase 2, randomised trial to evaluate immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a single versus two-dose primary vaccination regimen of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in previously SARS-CoV-2 infected children 5-11 years old (CoVacc tri
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128769.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  60. SINGER D, La EM, Dubois de Gennes C, Graham J, et al
    Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination among US adults aged 18-49 years at increased risk for severe RSV disease.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128770.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  61. GONDWE KW, Hearst MO, Mbutuka HR, Khwepeya M, et al
    Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among refugee women at Dzaleka refugee camp in Malawi.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128862.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  62. LIU Z, Wang X, Hu Y, Duan X, et al
    Burden of infection and hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute lower respiratory tract infections in Chinese children: Modeling of national, regional, and provincial estimates.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128875.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  63. MORIO R, Takazono T, Morimoto S, Ashizawa N, et al
    Comparison of immunogenicity of mRNA and protein subunit SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in dialysis patients: a multicenter study.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128861.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  64. TORKAMAN-ASADI F, Bakhtiari S, Safarzadeh M, Riahi-Rad Z, et al
    Clinical outcomes among SARS-CoV-2 omicron-infected adults according to prior infection and vaccination history in Iran: A retrospective registry-based study.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128868.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  65. FLEMING JA, Colistro V, Knudson S, Colomar M, et al
    Timing and frequency of antenatal care visits in relation to maternal respiratory syncytial virus vaccine opportunities in four Latin American countries.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128854.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  66. ASAGA PM, Kroeger A, Yako A, Makpo J, et al
    Global misinformation, local consequences: conspiracy theory endorsement and a graded association with COVID-19 vaccine refusal across Nigeria.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128827.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  67. RICKE IJ, Ward C, Spaulding AB, Sherwood NE, et al
    Caregiver COVID-19 vaccine status and its influence on pediatric vaccination decisions in a US cohort.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128847.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  68. RAZZAGHI H, Garacci E, Kahn KE, Meghani M, et al
    Maternal and infant immunizations for respiratory diseases, United States, may 2025.
    Vaccine. 2026;88:128823.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Virology

  69. BYRNE AMP, James J, Thomas SS, Warren CJ, et al
    Impact of prior low-pathogenicity avian influenza H7N7 exposure on susceptibility and protection against homologous high-pathogenicity avian influenza H7N7 challenge in chickens.
    Virology. 2026;624:111047.
    PubMed         Abstract available

Saturday, August 15, 2026

The association of empirical #treatment with #oseltamivir with the #outcome of critically ill patients admitted with severe acute respiratory illness (#SARI)

 


Abstract

Objective

Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are widely used empirically in critically ill patients with suspected influenza; however, their effect on mortality remains uncertain. This multicenter study evaluates the association between empirical treatment with oseltamivir and the outcome of critically ill patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the ICUs of four hospitals in Saudi Arabia, involving adult patients with SARI from September 2012 to December 2018. Data collected were: demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, and outcomes among patients treated with oseltamivir and those who were not. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. The association of oseltamivir and mortality was evaluated adjusting for propensity score.

Results

During the study period, 456 patients with SARI were included in the study, 301 were treated with empirical oseltamivir within a median of 1 day from presentation (interquartile range, 0-1 day) and a median of 4 days after symptom onset, while 155 patients were not. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Of the included patients, 334 (73%) were tested for influenza using PCR, and 87 (26%) had a confirmed diagnosis of influenza. Patients on oseltamivir were less likely to require rescue oxygen therapy (22.9% vs. 34.8%, p=0.007), and had shorter hospital stay (20 days vs. 27 days, p=0.01). Patients treated with oseltamivir had significantly reduced 90-day mortality on adjusted analyses (aOR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81-0.94, p=0.0002). Subgroup analysis revealed that the association with reduced mortality extends to patients >70 years old (aOR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99, p=0.02) and those with negative influenza tests (aOR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.84, p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Among critically ill patients with SARI, empirical treatment with oseltamivir was associated with lower mortality. These results add to the body of evidence suggesting clinical benefits of oseltamivir in managing critically ill patients with influenza-like illnesses.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20503121261478401

____

High rates of #SARS-CoV-2 #reinfection in residents of long term care facilities despite robust #spike-specific #immunity following serial #vaccination

 


Abstract

Older adult residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) suffered high rates of mortality during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic but their clinical risk has decreased markedly following vaccination. Here we determined humoral and cellular immunity following delivery of a 5th vaccine dose, an mRNA spike B1:BA.1 bivalent vaccine, to care home residents. The delivery of a 5th vaccine elicited a plateau of spike-specific immunity that remained broadly stable over 100 days in almost all people. Despite this, 15% of residents had a primary infection and 30% became reinfected during 6-months of follow up. These findings reveal that serial vaccine delivery can establish robust systemic spike-specific immune responses in frail older people but that this does not reliably prevent SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. As such, additional approaches should be considered to reduce reinfection risk in this vulnerable population group.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354079

____

Friday, August 14, 2026

Innate Immune Responses Induced by #H9N2 #Influenza A Virus and #Klebsiella pneumoniae Co-Infection

 


Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae infection following H9N2 Influenza A virus (IAV) infection causes severe pneumonia. But the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of H9N2 IAV and K. pneumoniae co-infection are complex and need to be further explored. In this study, the lung transcriptomes of mice with H9N2 IAV and K. pneumoniae co-infection were characterized by transcriptomic profiling. As a result, GO enrichment analysis revealed that the differential genes were primarily involved in the activation of immune responses, cellular components of membranes and extracellular spaces, and defense responses against pathogen infections. According to KEGG enrichment, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were concentrated in TLR signaling pathways, RLR signaling pathways, TNF signaling pathways and NLRP3 signaling pathways. Furthermore, in vitro cell models were established to investigate the innate immune responses induced by H9N2 IAV and K. pneumoniae CPS co-stimulation. K. pneumoniae CPS stimulation influenced the cytokine profiles of mink lung epithelial cells infected with H9N2 IAV, worsened cell viability, and aggravated apoptosis, indirectly inhibiting H9N2 IAV replication. The findings demonstrated that K. pneumoniae superinfection modulated the innate immune responses induced by H9N2 IAV infection, contributing to its pathogenesis.

Source: 


Link: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/18/8/900

____

#Antibody #evasion and receptor binding of #SARS-CoV-2 variants #PQ.16.1.1 and RK.1

 


{Excerpt}

Since its rapid global spread beginning in late 2024, the SARS-CoV-2 variant NB.1.8.1 has progressively displaced older omicron variants, and has established near-total dominance in Asia. More recently, two NB.1.8.1-derived sublineages, PQ.16.1.1 and RK.1, have emerged and expanded substantially, particularly in China and Singapore (...). Specifically, the sublineage PQ.16.1.1 acquired the amino acid substitutions Asp253Gly (within the N-terminal domain), alongside Asn417Thr, Asp420Asn, and Ile478Thr (within the receptor-binding domain) relative to the parental NB.1.8.1 strain (...). Concurrently, the RK.1 sublineage (formally classified as a descendant of the PQ.17.7.2.1 branch) acquired Asp420Asn, His445Pro, and Ile478Thr (...). Furthermore, PQ.16.1.1 has continued to evolve into the SV series sublineages (predominantly SV.2 and SV.2.1), which have maintained all receptor-binding domain mutations, including Asp420Asn, and have subsequently come to dominate the circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains in Singapore (...).

(...)

In summary, the convergent acquisition of the Asp420Asn substitution in NB.1.8.1 sublineages again illustrates a classic SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain evolution trade-off: a sacrifice in hACE2 receptor engagement in exchange for profound, targeted evasion of class 1 neutralising antibodies. (...) Given the increased evasion of class 1 antibodies by these Asp420Asn-carrying sublineages, these variants will likely spread from Asia and begin to prevail in countries where mRNA vaccination is common and populations are enriched with class 1 neutralising antibodies. 

Source: 


____

#Vaccine #imprinting drives increased #SARS-CoV-2 #variant infection in #children

 


Abstract

Virus exposure history, particularly first exposure, is believed to shape vaccine efficacy and infection susceptibility; however, evidence for mechanistic links between immune responses in individuals and epidemiological outcome in populations is scarce. Recent co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2 variants XFG and BA.3.2 has revealed a striking enrichment in BA.3.2 cases among children. By combining epidemiological modeling, serology and monoclonal antibody analysis in children and adults, we show the dependence of effective variant-specific antibodies on vaccination history which may explain birth-year influence on differential susceptibility to these co-circulating variants. Ancestral cross-reactive site I antibodies frequently neutralize BA.3.2, but not XFG. By contrast, Omicron type-specific site I/III and III antibodies frequently neutralize XFG but not BA.3.2, revealing a tradeoff in the ability to neutralize these two co-circulating strains. These findings mechanistically link immune history, variant neutralization, antibody repertoire and variant infection risk, and suggest that vaccination regimens in children should prioritize neutralization breadth.


Competing Interest Statement

E.J.W. advises Arpelos Bioscience, Arsenal Biosciences, Coherus, Danger Bio, IpiNovyx, New Limit, Marengo, Pluto Immunotherapeutics Related Sciences, Santa Ana Bio, and Synthekine. E.J.W. is a founder of and holds shares of Coherus, Danger Bio, and Arsenal Biosciences. All other authors declare no competing interests.


Funder Information Declared

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, https://ror.org/043z4tv69, 75N93021C00015, U19AI082630, AI105343, AI108545, AI155577, AI149680

National Cancer Institute, 75N91019D00024, 75N91022F00005, 75N91023F00016

Source: 


Link: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.12.739589v1

____

Thursday, August 13, 2026

Identification and characterization of #PB2 #mutations associated with #mammalian #adaptation of highly pathogenic #H5N1 avian #influenza viruses

 


Abstract

The highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) subtype H5N1 has been continuously circulating among wild bird populations and domestic poultry. It’s ongoing circulation has led to outbreaks in poultry and U.S. dairy cattle populations, as well as sporadic severe infections in individuals engaged in poultry and dairy farming. These occurrences have raised concerns about the potential evolution of this virus into a pandemic strain. To elucidate the molecular determinants facilitating H5N1 cross-species adaptation and to evaluate its implications for public health, we conducted serials of sequence analysis and specific-site mutations on the viral polymerase subunit PB2 to determine its effect on polymerase activity and viral infectivity. The results showed that three mutations in the PB2 protein (E362G, D441N and M631L) were presented cooperative effects associated with enhanced viral replication in mammalian cells. Compared to the original isolated strain of the 2.3.4.4b clade, A/chicken/NL/FAV-0033/2021, these three mutations were predominantly identified in isolates obtained from cattle and other mammalian hosts between 2021 and 2024. The M631L mutation, identified as the primary determinant of increased polymerase activity in mammalian cells, significantly enhanced the binding affinity of PB2 to ANP32A. The mutation E362G and D441N did not increased polymerase activity and viral replication significantly but enhanced binding affinity of PB2 to ANP32A. The combined mutations with E362G, D441N and M631L resulted in a significantly increased polymerase activity and viral replication in H5N1 virus, and significantly elevated viral loads and aggravated pulmonary pathology in lungs of mice with H5N1 infection. These findings indicate that the PB2-M631L mutation constitutes a crucial molecular marker for the adaptation of H5N1 to mammalian hosts, whereas the E362G and D441N mutations likely function as supportive modulatory factors that optimize this host-adaptation process.

Source: 


Link: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1867604/full

____

False-Reactive Fourth-Generation #HIV #Screening Results Before, During, and After #COVID19 #Pandemic in a High-Prevalence Urban Medical Center

 


Highlights

    • False-reactive HIV screens increased during the COVID-19 pandemic

    • Elevated HIV false-reactive proportions persisted post-pandemic

    • False-reactive HIV screens are predominantly low S/CO values

    • Age, race/ethnicity, and syphilis infection were associated with false-reactive results

    • Unresolved reactive screens reveal gaps in reflex nucleic acid test completion


Abstract

Objective

False-reactive results of the fourth-generation HIV-1/2 antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) Combo assay trigger additional testing, increased costs, and patient anxiety. Large-scale analyses of false-reactive results spanning the COVID-19 pandemic in high-prevalence communities are lacking. This study aims to investigate the frequency of false-reactive HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo screening results before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify associated patient factors.

Design

We conducted a retrospective study of HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo assays performed from 2019 – 2024 at a tertiary care medical center in Baltimore, MD. False-reactive proportions were compared across pre-pandemic (January – December 2019; n=12,347), pandemic (January 2020 – June 2023, n=33,546), and post-pandemic (July 2023 – December 2024; n=12,238). Associations between false-reactive results and selected patient factors were assessed.

Results

Among 58,131 screens, 1,236 (2.1%) were reactive; 185 were false-reactive, yielding a false-reactive proportion of 15.0% among reactive results. The false-reactive proportion increased from 5% pre-pandemic to 17.9% at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and remained near 20% during the pandemic, declining to approximately 14% by 2024 post-pandemic. In multivariable analysis, age >65 or <21, White race, and American Indian/Alaska Native race were associated with higher odds of false-reactive results, whereas coinfection of syphilis was associated with lower odds. Most false-reactive results clustered at low signal-to-cutoff ratio (S/CO) values.

Conclusions

False-reactive HIV Ag/Ab screening results increased during the pandemic and remained elevated afterward. Associated factors analysis and S/CO distributions may help interpretation of questionable reactive screens. Our findings reinforce the importance of reflex HIV nucleic acid testing (NAT) for discordant results.

Source: 


Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138665322600082X?dgcid=rss_sd_all

____

Protective Efficacy Evaluation of Various Inactivated #Vaccines Against the Newly Circulated Highly Pathogenic Avian #Influenza Virus #H5N1 of Clade 2.3.4.4b in Pekin #Ducks

 


Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus H5N1of clade 2.3.4.4b has emerged as the predominant lineage circulating in poultry flocks worldwide, raising concerns regarding the protective efficacy of currently available commercial vaccines, particularly in domestic ducks, which play an important role in virus maintenance and transmission. Thus, this study evaluated the immunogenicity along with the protective efficacy of four inactivated H5 vaccines against a recently isolated local HPAI-H5N1 (Newvalley-3-H5N1-2024, clade 2.3.4.4b) strain in Pekin ducks in Egypt. A total of 150 seronegative ducks were divided into vaccinated and control groups (10 groups) and vaccinated at 10 days of age. At 31 days of age, the vaccinated and positive control groups were challenged using 106.5 EID50/0.5 mL/duck with the local isolate (Newvalley-3-H5N1-2024) via the oculo-nasal route. The vaccine efficacy was assessed through clinical signs, survival rate, hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titer, tracheal and cloacal viral shedding quantified by real-time RT-PCR, and histopathological examination of trachea, lung, pancreas, and brain tissues. Generally, all ducks vaccinated with the ValleyVac Avian Flu H5 plus and MEFLUVACTM H5 PLUS 8 showed a significantly higher survival rate (100%) at 10 days post-vaccination (DPV) than those in the positive control (66.7% mortality rate). In contrast, ducks exhibited mortality rates ranging from 6.7% in the SERVAC Flu H5N1 group to 13.4% in the Sinder Fluvac group. The ValleyVac Avian Flu H5 plus and MEFLUVAC™ H5 PLUS 8 vaccines induced the highest HI antibody titers at 7, 14, 21, and 28 DPV in both homologous and heterologous AIV antigens, resulting in a significant reduction in viral load among all vaccinated duck groups (p-value < 0.05) comparable to the positive control group. Conversely, the SERVAC Flu H5N1 and Sinder Fluvac vaccines provided partial protection, suboptimal immunogenicity at different time points, and elevated viral shedding. Histopathological findings in ValleyVac Avian Flu H5 plus and MEFLUVAC™ H5 PLUS 8 vaccines exhibited mild tissue alterations following AIV challenge. Marked pathological lesions were observed in the SERVAC Flu H5N1 and Sinder Fluvac vaccinated groups. Among tested vaccines, both ValleyVac Avian Flu H5 plus and MEFLUVACTM H5 PLUS 8 showed the highest level of protective efficacy against the circulating AIV strain compared with other commercial vaccines. This study highlights the need for continuous molecular surveillance, antigenic matching, and regular updating of vaccine seed strains to ensure efficient HPAI control in Egypt.

Source: 


Link: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/18/8/891

____

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

#Risk #assessment of avian #influenza #H5N5 virus from the first #human case using the #ferret model

 


ABSTRACT

The incursion of Eurasian-origin genotype A6 A(H5N5) virus into North America expanded the genetic diversity among North American highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses and heightened concern about zoonotic risk. Following a fatal human infection with the A(H5N5) virus A/Washington/2148/2025, viral replication was assessed in polarized human bronchial epithelial cells, and pathogenicity, transmissibility in direct contact and respiratory droplet models, and airborne virus shedding were evaluated in ferrets to inform pandemic risk assessment. A(H5N5) displayed robust replication in Calu-3 cells at 33°C and 37°C, showing kinetics and peak titers comparable to those of contemporary genotype B3.13 and D1.1 A(H5N1) viruses. In ferrets, A(H5N5) replicated efficiently in the respiratory tract, disseminated to extrapulmonary tissues, and caused fatal disease in all inoculated animals. Airborne transmission was not observed, and infrequent, low-level detection of virus in air samples paralleled that of A(H5) viruses that are not transmissible via air in ferrets. In a direct contact model, limited transmission was detected within 4 days of exposure, with evidence of lower respiratory tract replication in contact animals. These findings indicate that the A(H5N5) virus has the capacity for robust replication in an airway epithelial cell line and can cause severe systemic infection and mortality in ferrets but has not acquired adaptations for airborne spread in mammals. Collectively, these results underscore heterogeneity among clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5Nx) viruses in North America and the need for genotype-by-genotype evaluation of newly emerged viruses to understand public health risk.


IMPORTANCE

The emergence of Eurasian-origin genotype A6 highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N5) virus in North America has increased viral diversity and raised concerns about zoonotic and pandemic risk. In this study, we evaluated the replication kinetics, pathogenesis, and transmission of A/Washington/2148/2025 A(H5N5) virus, which was isolated from the first reported human infection with this influenza virus subtype, using polarized human bronchial epithelial cells and the ferret model. The A(H5N5) virus replicated efficiently in vitro at temperatures representative of the upper and lower respiratory tracts and caused fatal systemic disease in inoculated ferrets. Limited transmission was observed during 4 days of direct contact. Airborne virus detection was infrequent and did not result in airborne transmission. These findings show that A(H5N5) virus can replicate robustly in mammalian cells and cause severe disease but lacks adaptations supporting efficient airborne spread, informing assessment of the pandemic risk posed by genotype A6 influenza viruses.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.00856-26

____

Protective effect of #H5N8 stockpiled #vaccine against a virus genetically identical to a #human isolate of #bovine #H5N1 #influenza virus

 


Summary

Background

Since early 2024, highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses of clade 2.3.4.4b have caused extensive outbreaks in dairy cattle in the United States, with spillover into mammalian species, including humans. A bovine-derived A(H5N1) virus isolated from a human case retains high pathogenicity and transmissibility in mammalian models, highlighting its pandemic potential. Stockpiled pre-pandemic influenza vaccines are intended to provide early protection before strain-matched vaccines are available; however, their protective efficacy against bovine A(H5N1) viruses has not been directly evaluated in vivo.

Methods

In this study, we assessed the protective efficacy of an AS03-adjuvanted A/Astrakhan/3212/2020 (H5N8) clade 2.3.4.4b-based influenza vaccine stockpiled in Japan using mouse and ferret models. Vaccinated and unvaccinated animals were challenged with a virus genetically identical to a human isolate of bovine A(H5N1) virus. Neutralising antibody responses, viral replication in organs, and survival were evaluated.

Findings

Vaccination with the AS03-adjuvanted A(H5N8)-based stockpiled vaccine induced robust neutralising antibody responses in both animal models, significantly suppressed viral replication, and conferred complete protection against lethal challenge. In contrast, all unvaccinated mice and ferrets succumbed to infection. These findings demonstrate that the AS03-adjuvanted A(H5N8)-based stockpiled vaccine provides strong cross-protective efficacy against bovine A(H5N1) viruses.

Interpretation

An AS03-adjuvanted A(H5N8)-based vaccine stockpiled in Japan could serve as an immediate countermeasure against bovine A(H5N1) viruses during the early phase of a pandemic.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Japan Program for Infectious Diseases Research and Infrastructure (JP20wm0125002) and the Japan Initiative for World-leading Vaccine Research and Development Centers (JP223fa627001) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Source: 


Link: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(26)00314-2/fulltext

____

Loss-of-function #mutation in #Omicron #variants reduces #spike protein expression and attenuates #SARS-CoV-2 infection

 


Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants emerged in 2022 with >30 novel mutations in the spike alone. While most studies focus on receptor binding domain changes, mutations in the C-terminus of S1 (CTS1), adjacent to the furin cleavage site, have largely been ignored. Here, we examine three Omicron mutations in CTS1: H655Y, N679K, and P681H. Generating a SARS-CoV-2 triple mutant (YKH), we find that the mutant increases spike processing, consistent with prior reports for H655Y/P681H. In addition, the YKH mutant induces attenuated disease, but augments viral loads in male golden Syrian hamsters. Next, we generate a single N679K mutant, finding it reduces viral replication in Calu3 human respiratory cells and induces less disease in male golden Syrian hamsters. Mechanistically, the N679K mutant has increased spike processing but also reduces spike in purified virions; spike decreases are further exacerbated in infected Calu3 cell lysates. Importantly, exogenous spike expression reveals that N679K reduces overall spike protein in the context of the epidemic strain. Although a loss-of-function mutation, transmission competition demonstrates that N679K confers a replication advantage in the upper airway, potentially impacting transmissibility. Together, the data show that N679K reduces overall spike protein during Omicron infection, which has implications for infection, immunity, and transmission.

Source: 


Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-76680-4

____

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

#Bacterial #Infection in #Ebola Virus Disease, #Marburg Virus Disease, #CCHF, and #Lassa Fever

 


Abstract

Background

Concern for bacterial coinfection in patients with high consequence viral infections (HCVIs) has made empiric antibiotic administration the standard of care. However, the incidence, microbiology, and clinical significance of bacterial coinfection in HCVIs remain unclear.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of case reports, cohort studies, and cross-sectional analyses describing bacterial coinfection in Ebola virus disease (EVD), Marburg virus disease (MVD), Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), and Lassa fever (LF). Data were extracted on study design, setting, diagnostic methods, pathogens, antibiotic use, and outcomes.

Results

Thirty publications met inclusion criteria. Bacteremia was most commonly reported among patients with CCHF (n = 46), followed by EVD (n = 16), MVD (n = 16), and LF (n = 2). Of 27 EVD patients treated outside Africa, 7 (26%) had bacterial coinfection. Across HCVIs, bacteremia was detected a median of 11 days after symptom onset (range 0–23) and was associated with features of sepsis. Pathogens included enteric flora, healthcare-associated organisms, opportunistic pathogens, and zoonotic bacteria—most notably Brucella spp. in CCHF. Ceftriaxone was the most common empiric antibiotic but is predicted to have activity against a minority of bloodstream isolates. Mortality among coinfected patients with EVD or MVD was similar to those without bacterial coinfection, whereas coinfected CCHF patients had higher mortality than those without coinfection (15.5%; 95% CI 8.0%–25.9% vs 5.7%; 95% CI 5.1%–6.4%).

Conclusions

Despite being a major concern driving empiric antibiotic use, bacterial coinfection in HCVIs remains poorly described, precluding determination of its incidence or clinical significance. Prospective studies with standardized protocols for bacterial diagnosis and characterization of antimicrobial resistance are needed to guide antimicrobial strategies.

Source: 


Link: https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/13/8/ofag404/8741539

____

First detected incursions of avian #influenza #H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b into mainland #Australia from the Southern Ocean

 


Abstract

High pathogenicity avian influenza H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b has caused a panzootic of devastating impact to poultry and wildlife globally. The Australian continent and broader Oceania until recently remained the last major region without confirmed detections. Here we report the first H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b detections from two live seabirds - a brown skua and a southern giant petrel - found on the south coast of Western Australia in June 2026. Virus genome sequencing showed that both viruses were most closely related to H5N1 viruses recently detected on sub-Antarctic islands in the Southern Indian Ocean. In time-calibrated phylogeographic analyses, both viruses sampled in Western Australia clustered with viruses from Heard Island, a sub-Antarctic external territory of Australia. Ancestral location reconstruction also identified Heard Island as the most probable source location, although unsampled intermediate locations cannot be excluded. The two Western Australian detections were estimated to be independent incursions from Heard Island, rather than local transmission on mainland Australia. There was no evidence of reassortment with endemic avian influenza viruses in Australia, and both virus sequences retained key avian-like genetic markers and lacked known substitutions for reduced antiviral susceptibility. These detections revealed a Southern Ocean pathway of recurrent H5N1 incursions into Australia, highlighting the risk of potential establishment on the mainland and the need for heightened surveillance and rapid, nationally-coordinated, virus genomic characterisation.


Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Source: 


Link: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.08.743700v1

____

Monday, August 10, 2026

Effectiveness of #Oseltamivir in Hospitalized #Children With Laboratory-Confirmed #Influenza, 2014-2023

 


Key Points

    ° Question: 

        § Does oseltamivir treatment reduce risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hospital length of stay among pediatric patients hospitalized with influenza?

    ° Findings:  

        § Using a cohort study from a population-based surveillance network in 13 states across 8 influenza seasons, oseltamivir treatment was found to decrease both the likelihood of ICU admission and hospital length of stay among pediatric patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza.

    ° Meaning:  

        § These findings support the current national recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Infectious Diseases Society of America that recommend antiviral treatment for children hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza.


Abstract

Importance  

National organizations recommend antiviral treatment for hospitalized children with influenza; however, use in this setting has recently declined. Studies of oseltamivir effectiveness in children are limited by misclassification bias, unknown symptom onset date, and incomplete capture of antiviral use prior to admission.

Objective  

To assess the association between oseltamivir receipt and intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hospital length of stay (LOS) among pediatric influenza-associated hospitalizations.

Design, Setting, and Participants  

This cohort study used data that were obtained from the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET), which conducts US population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations for all ages across 13 states. The study data include seasons 2014 to 2015 through 2022 to 2023, excluding 2020 to 2021. Participants included children aged younger than 18 years who were hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza and for whom a respiratory symptom onset date was available. These data were analyzed from October 2024 through May 2026.

Exposures  

Oseltamivir receipt as a time-dependent exposure.

Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)  

The primary outcome was time from symptom onset to ICU admission. Secondary outcome was time from admission to discharge (LOS). Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models (aHR) with oseltamivir receipt as a time-dependent exposure were used.

Results  

After exclusions, 6044 influenza cases were included in the primary ICU analysis, of whom 4240 (70.2%) received oseltamivir, and 7103 cases were included in the secondary LOS analysis, of whom 5746 (80.9%) received oseltamivir. In the ICU analysis, the median (IQR) age was 3 (1-7) years, 3382 (56%) were male and 3721 (44%) were female, and 2937 (49%) had 1 or more medical comorbidity—the most common of which was asthma in 1547 children (26%). In adjusted models, compared with untreated children, oseltamivir treatment reduced the hazard of ICU admission (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.80) and shortened LOS (analyzed as hazard of hospital discharge; aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21).

Conclusions and Relevance  

In this cohort of children hospitalized with influenza, oseltamivir treatment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of ICU admission by 31% and decreased hospital LOS. These findings demonstrate the benefits of oseltamivir receipt and support current national recommendations for oseltamivir treatment as soon as possible in children hospitalized with suspected or laboratory-confirmed influenza.

Source: 


Link: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2852671

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts