Showing posts with label occupational health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label occupational health. Show all posts

Friday, April 10, 2026

Respirable #Aerosol #Production and Reduction of Avian #Influenza #Transmission #Risk during #Chicken Processing, #Bangladesh

 


Abstract

In Bangladesh, influenza A(H5N1) viruses are endemic in poultry. Processing infected chickens can aerosolize viruses, increasing the risk for human infections. We evaluated particulate matter (PM2.5) mass concentration during slaughtering and defeathering methods used in live bird markets in Bangladesh to identify solutions to reduce aerosol exposure. We slaughtered 675 chickens using cones and barrels with 3 lid types and defeathered 45 chickens using a defeathering machine with 5 lid types. We interviewed 3 slaughterers to understand method preference. For slaughtering, barrels with a solid or star-cut lid reduced PM2.5 mass concentrations by 65%–73% compared with uncovered barrels. For defeathering, machines fully covered by a solid lid or lid with a hole and pivot door reduced PM2.5 mass concentrations by 50% compared with machines with no lid. Slaughterers preferred barrels covered with solid lids and defeathering machines covered with solid or hinged lids. Those methods might reduce aerosol exposure during poultry processing.

Source: 


Link: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/4/25-1878_article

____

Thursday, April 2, 2026

#Serological #Surveillance of Avian #Influenza Virus #H9N2 Subtype in #Occupational Populations Exposed to #Poultry Environment in #China During 2018–2023

 


Abstract

Background

Avian influenza virus (AIV) H9N2 has a major role in the emergence of influenza pandemic. We assessed the risk of AIV H9N2 to the human population and public health.

Method

The hemagglutination inhibition method was used to screen for hemagglutinin antibodies. Microneutralization tests were performed to confirm neutralizing antibodies against the AIV H9N2 subtype. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was conducted to detect the H9 subtype in environmental samples. GraphPad Prism software was used for mapping, and STATA software was used for statistical analysis.

Results

The nationwide seroprevalence among these populations was 0.76%. Seroprevalence was compared across regions, genders, and occupational exposure sites. The seroprevalence rates for males and females showed no significant difference. Significant differences were found across regions and occupational exposure environments (P < .05). The south and southwest regions had the highest seroprevalence rates at 1.58% and 1.38%, respectively. The highest seroprevalence was observed in individuals exposed to live poultry market (1.51%). Significant regional differences in H9 nucleic acid positive rates (NAPRs) were found (P < .05), with the southwest and central regions showing the highest rates at 25.99% and 24.35%, respectively. H9 NAPR in live poultry markets (LPMs), farms, and slaughterhouses varied significantly by region (P < .05).

Conclusions

Poultry-related environments have become a key factor in AIV H9N2 infection among occupational populations. Exposure to LPM showed the highest seroprevalence among occupational groups. The distribution characteristics of H9N2 across different poultry environments increased the risk of infection in occupationally exposed populations.

Source: 


Link: https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/13/4/ofag144/8537381

____

Monday, September 8, 2025

#Dairy #Environments with #Milk Exposure are Most Likely to Have Detection of #Influenza A Virus

 


Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of the H5N1 subtype has been infecting U.S dairy cattle and spreading among dairy farms since March 2024. H5N1 surveillance systems for dairy farms are needed, but information on whether environmental sampling can inform these systems is lacking. To guide a surveillance framework, we determined the environmental locations on H5N1-affected dairies (n = 25) in four states (California, Colorado, Michigan, and Ohio) that harbored influenza A virus (IAV), and explored sample characteristics that may influence viral detection. A total of 623 samples from environments and sale barns were characterized for IAV and classified into six categories based on location. A total of 94 samples (15.1%) had IAV detected, the majority in the following categories: milking equipment/personal protective equipment, parlor surfaces, and wastewater/lagoons/manure. These results suggest that dairy environments most likely to harbor IAV are those with exposure to milk, although the viral load in environmental samples was typically lower than that of bulk tank milk tested on a subset of farms. Mixed effect modeling was used to explore the relationship between IAV detection, Ct value, and days into an outbreak that samples were collected or the category where samples were collected. Days into an outbreak that samples were collected was associated with IAV detection while category of collection was associated with the measured Ct value. These results may guide H5N1 surveillance efforts on dairies, and can be strengthened by studies that collect samples from farm environmental locations prior to, during, and after H5N1 outbreak periods.


Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.


Funding Statement

This project was completed using Federal funds provided through the United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Agreement 25-9419-0731 and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. 75N93021C00016. S.S.L and AJ.C are supported by discretionary funds from Emory University and gift funds to the Emory Center for Transmission of Airborne Pathogens, provided by the California Dairy Research Foundation and Flu Lab, a California-based organization founded to advance innovative approaches for the prevention and treatment of influenza.

Source: MedRxIV, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.03.25335023v1

____

Monday, March 3, 2025

#Portimine A #toxin causes #skin #inflammation through ZAKα-dependent NLRP1 inflammasome activation

Abstract

In 2020–2021, a “mysterious illness” struck Senegalese fishermen, causing severe acute dermatitis in over one thousand individuals following exposure through drift-net fishing activity. Here, by performing deep analysis of the environmental samples we reveal the presence of the marine dinoflagellate Vulcanodinium rugosum and its associated cyclic imine toxins. Specifically, we show that the toxin PortimineA, strongly enriched in environmental samples, impedes ribosome function in human keratinocytes, which subsequently activates the stress kinases ZAKα and P38 and promotes the nucleation of the human NLRP1 inflammasome, leading to the release of IL-1β/IL-18 pro-inflammatory cytokines and cell death. Furthermore, cell-based models highlight that naturally occurring mutations in the P38-targeted sites of human NLRP1 are unable to respond to PortimineA exposure. Finally, the development and use of human organotypic skins and zebrafish models of PortimineA exposure demonstrate that the ZAKα-NLRP1 axis drives skin necrosis and inflammation. Our results exemplify the threats to human health caused by emerging environmental toxins and identify ZAKα and NRLP1 as important pharmacological targets to mitigate PortimineA toxicity.

Source: EMBO Molecular Medicine, https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1038/s44321-025-00197-4

____

Friday, January 10, 2025

#Human #Health #Surveillance During Animal #Disease #Emergencies: #Minnesota Department of Health Response to Highly Pathogenic Avian #Influenza Outbreaks, 2015 and 2022–2023

ABSTRACT

Objectives

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) poses an occupational risk for poultry workers, responders, and others in contact with infected birds. The objective of this analysis was to describe HPAI surveillance methods and outcomes, and highlight the challenges, successes, and lessons learned during the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH’s) public health response to HPAI outbreaks in Minnesota poultry flocks in the years 2015 and 2022–2023.

Methods

During both outbreaks, MDH staff attempted to contact all potentially exposed people and conduct a standardized interview. People were considered exposed and at risk if they had entered a barn with poultry on any HPAI test-positive premises. With their consent, exposed persons were entered into illness monitoring until 10 days from their last exposure. In 2015, MDH monitored the health of poultry workers only. In the 2022–2023 response, MDH monitored the health of poultry workers, backyard flock owners, responders, and private contract workers. In 2022–2023, interview responses were entered into a REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database in real time, which automatically entered the person into monitoring if they consented. Through REDCap, they received an automated email with a unique link to a short survey asking about any symptom development. Where appropriate, interview responses from poultry workers collected in 2015 were compared to interview responses from poultry workers collected in 2022–2023.

Results

From March 3 to June 5, 2015, MDH epidemiologists interviewed and evaluated 375 (86%) of 435 poultry workers from 110 HPAI-infected flocks. From March 25, 2022 through December 31, 2023, MDH epidemiologists interviewed and evaluated 649 (65%) of 992 poultry workers, responders, contractors, and backyard flock owners associated with 151 HPAI-infected flocks. Among poultry workers, self-reported personal protective equipment (PPE) usage declined significantly from 2015 to 2022–2023 (full PPE usage 51.8% vs. 23.9%, p < .01).

Conclusion

MDH’s long standing relationships with animal health officials and the poultry industry resulted in strong poultry worker participation rates in surveillance efforts during HPAI outbreaks in 2015 and 2022–2023. Self-reported PPE usage was low, particularly in 2022–2023. Improvements in PPE accessibility and technology are needed to protect workers and responders in the on-going HPAI outbreak.

Source: Journal of Agromedicine, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1059924X.2024.2442406

_____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts