Immunogenicity and safety of AS03-adjuvanted A/Astrakhan/3212/2020 #H5N8 -like #influenza #vaccine in adults: Phase 1/2, observer-blinded, randomized trial

 

ABSTRACT

Influenza pandemics arise from novel influenza A viruses. Recent emergence of a new clade (2.3.4.4.b) of the highly pathogenic H5N1 in animals and humans highlighted its pandemic potential. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of GSK’s AS03-adjuvanted H5N8 vaccine in adults. In this phase 1/2, observer-blinded, age-stratified, randomized trial, healthy US adults (age, ≥18 y) received two intramuscular doses of hemagglutinin antigen (3.75 or 7.50 μg) with AS03A or AS03B, administered 21 d apart. Immunogenicity – seroprotection rates (SPRs), seropositivity, geometric mean titers (GMTs), geometric mean fold rise (GMFR), and seroconversion rates (SCRs) – was evaluated on day 43 using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Of 520 enrolled participants, 518 were vaccinated. On day 43, the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research criteria for influenza vaccines were met. HI SPRs, seropositivity rates, SCRs, GMTs, and GMFR appeared to be higher in the AS03A vs AS03B group. Immune responses were generally higher in younger (aged 18–64 y) vs older (aged ≥65 y) adults. Immune responses were also detected in MN assays, with a correlation between HI and MN responses on day 43 across age groups and vaccine formulations. Safety was acceptable, with no increase in adverse events post-dose 2. Reactogenicity appeared more common in younger adults. The antigen-sparing potential of AS03 was demonstrated, with an acceptable safety profile. The benefit/risk profile was favorable for all formulations tested, including 3.75 µg AS03A (licensed in the US).

ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05975840.

Source: 

Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2026.2649314

____

#Ensitrelvir for #Covid19 Postexposure #Prophylaxis in #Household Contacts

 

Abstract

Background

Ensitrelvir, an oral inhibitor of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 3C-like protease, is approved in Japan for the treatment of mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Previously, no antiviral agents were approved for postexposure prophylaxis in household contacts of patients with Covid-19.

Methods

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned persons who were SARS-CoV-2–negative on local diagnostic testing but were household contacts of a patient with Covid-19 (the index patient) to receive either ensitrelvir (375 mg on day 1 and 125 mg daily on days 2 through 5) or placebo within 72 hours after symptom onset in the index patient. The primary end point was Covid-19 (defined by a central laboratory–confirmed positive reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction assay and the presence of ≥1 of 14 prespecified Covid-19 symptoms lasting ≥48 hours) by day 10 in a household contact in the modified intention-to-treat population (all the participants who underwent randomization, had a central laboratory–confirmed negative RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, and received at least one dose of the trial drug or placebo).

Results

The modified intention-to-treat population included 1030 participants in the ensitrelvir group and 1011 in the placebo group. The mean age of the participants was 42.4 years; 71.1% had undergone randomization within 48 hours after symptom onset in the index patient, and 37.0% had at least one risk factor for severe Covid-19. The incidence of Covid-19 was lower in the ensitrelvir group than in the placebo group (2.9% vs. 9.0%; risk ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.49; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events during the trial was similar in the two groups (15.1% in the ensitrelvir group and 15.5% in the placebo group), as was the incidence of serious adverse events (0.2% in each group). No Covid-19–related hospitalizations or deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Ensitrelvir administered to household contacts of a patient with Covid-19 within 72 hours after symptom onset in the index patient was effective in preventing Covid-19 in the contacts. (Funded by Shionogi; SCORPIO-PEP Japan Registry for Clinical Trials number, jRCT2031230124; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05897541.)

Source: 

Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2509306?query=TOC

____

Efficacy and #Safety of an #mRNA Seasonal #Influenza #Vaccine in Adults

 

Abstract

Background

Seasonal influenza causes substantial illness and death in adults 50 years of age or older, even with current vaccines. An investigational messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccine called mRNA-1010 encodes hemagglutinin glycoproteins from World Health Organization–recommended influenza strains.

Methods

In this phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adults 50 years of age or older to receive trivalent mRNA-1010 (37.5 μg, which includes 12.5 μg of each strain) or a licensed standard-dose comparator. The primary efficacy end point was relative vaccine efficacy against reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR)–confirmed, protocol-defined influenza-like illness caused by influenza A or B, from at least 14 days after vaccination through the end of the influenza season. Hypothesis testing was conducted hierarchically to assess noninferiority (lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval [CI], >−10%), superiority (lower boundary of the 95% CI, >0%), and a higher level of superiority (lower boundary of the 95% CI, >9.1%).

Results

A total of 40,703 participants received mRNA-1010 (20,350 participants) or the standard-dose comparator (20,353 participants); the median follow-up was 181 days (range, 1 to 227). RT-PCR–confirmed, protocol-defined influenza-like illness was observed in 411 of 20,179 recipients of mRNA-1010 (2.0%) and 557 of 20,124 recipients of the standard-dose comparator (2.8%), which corresponds to a relative vaccine efficacy of 26.6% (95% CI, 16.7 to 35.4), thereby meeting the criteria for noninferiority, superiority, and higher-level superiority. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with mRNA-1010 than with the standard-dose comparator (injection-site pain in 65.8% vs. 29.8%, fatigue in 45.1% vs. 20.3%, headache in 37.8% vs. 18.0%, and myalgia in 35.4% vs. 11.6%); most reactions were mild to moderate and transient. Serious adverse events were reported in 2.2% of the recipients of mRNA-1010 (with three events considered by the investigator to be vaccine-related) and in 1.9% of the recipients of the standard-dose comparator (with two events considered by the investigator to be vaccine-related).

Conclusions

In this trial, mRNA-1010 was superior to standard-dose licensed vaccines for prevention of RT-PCR–confirmed, protocol-defined influenza-like illness in adults 50 years of age or older. Solicited adverse reactions were more frequent with mRNA-1010. (Funded by Blackstone Life Sciences and Moderna; Fluent ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06602024.)

Source: 

Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2516491?query=TOC

____

A Phase 1/2 Dose-Ranging Safety and Immunogenicity Study of #mRNA-Based Candidate #Pandemic #Influenza #Vaccines in Healthy Adults

 

Abstract

Background

Influenza A viruses pose a persistent pandemic threat. We report safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity findings for mRNA-1018 pandemic influenza vaccine candidates from a phase 1/2 study in healthy adults.

Methods

In Part A, participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 mRNA-1018 candidates at 1 of 3 dose levels across 2 influenza A groups: (1) H5N8/H5-only or (2) H7N9/H7-only. H5N8 and H7N9 candidates were administered at 25, 50, or 100-µg and H5-only and H7-only at 12.5, 25, or 50-µg. Part B participants were randomized to receive 12.5, 25, or 50-µg H5-only-CG. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of vaccine candidates. Secondary objectives included evaluation of humoral immunogenicity through day 205 by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), neuraminidase inhibition, and microneutralization assays.

Results

Parts A and B comprised 1195 and 304 dosed participants, respectively. Overall, solicited local adverse reactions (ARs) within 7 days of vaccination occurred in 76.8% of participants across vaccine candidates and dose levels, most commonly injection-site pain. Solicited systemic ARs were reported in 62.8% of participants, most frequently fatigue and headache. Solicited ARs were predominantly grade 1–2 in severity, with few grade 3 and no grade 4 events. Post-vaccination immune responses, assessed absolutely, by HAI titers and dynamically, by seroconversion rates, tended to increase with vaccine dose. H5-based candidates induced stronger strain-specific HAI, but with comparable microneutralization titers, versus H7-based candidates.

Conclusions

Vaccine candidates were sufficiently well-tolerated and immunogenic. Further development of mRNA pandemic influenza vaccines is warranted for pandemic preparedness.

Source: 

Link: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciag278/8662346

____

Oral #Nirmatrelvir – Ritonavir for #Covid19 in Higher-Risk #Outpatients

 

Abstract

Background

Nirmatrelvir–ritonavir has been shown to reduce progression to severe illness from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in unvaccinated high-risk outpatients. The effectiveness of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir in persons who have been vaccinated, infected naturally, or both is unclear.

Methods

In two open-label platform trials (PANORAMIC in the United Kingdom and CanTreatCOVID in Canada), we enrolled higher-risk adults (≥50 years of age or ≥18 years of age with coexisting conditions) in the community who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and had been unwell for 5 days or less. The participants were randomly assigned to receive usual care plus nirmatrelvir (300 mg)–ritonavir (100 mg) twice a day for 5 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was hospitalization or death from any cause within 28 days after randomization.

Results

From December 8, 2021, to September 30, 2024, a total of 3516 participants in the PANORAMIC trial and 716 participants in the CanTreatCOVID trial underwent randomization. In the PANORAMIC trial, 14 of 1698 participants (0.8%) in the nirmatrelvir–ritonavir group and 11 of 1673 participants (0.7%) in the usual-care group were hospitalized or died (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.55 to 2.62; probability of superiority, 0.334). In the CanTreatCOVID trial, 2 of 343 participants (0.6%) in the nirmatrelvir–ritonavir group and 4 of 324 participants (1.2%) in the usual-care group were hospitalized or died (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.08 to 2.23; probability of superiority, 0.830). In a substudy involving 634 participants, viral load was reduced by the end of treatment with nirmatrelvir–ritonavir. Serious adverse events with nirmatrelvir–ritonavir were reported in 9 participants in the PANORAMIC trial and in 4 participants in the CanTreatCOVID trial.

Conclusions

In two open-label trials, nirmatrelvir–ritonavir did not reduce the incidence of hospitalization or death among vaccinated higher-risk participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, and others; PANORAMIC ISRCTN number, 2021-005748-31; CanTreatCOVID ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05614349.)

Source: 

Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2502457?query=TOC

____

Heterologous two-dose #Ebola #vaccine regimen in #pregnant women in #Rwanda: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial

 

Abstract

Risk of death for both mother and fetus following Ebola virus infection is extremely high. In this study, healthy women in Rwanda aged ≥18 years were randomized to two-dose Ebola vaccination (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo) during pregnancy (group A) or postpartum (group B). Unvaccinated pregnant group B women served as control. This was a parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center trial to evaluate the safety (primary endpoint—outcomes of interest and serious adverse events (SAEs)) and immunogenicity (secondary endpoint) of the two-dose Ebola vaccination. Among 3,484 women screened, 2,013 were randomized, and 2,012 women and 1,945 infants born alive were descriptively analyzed. Adverse outcomes of interest occurred in women (5.2% in group A and 7.3% in group B) and infants (26.0% in group A and 25.6% in group B). The most common maternal outcome of interest was pathways to preterm birth (3.2% in group A and 3.4% in group B), and the most common infant outcome of interest was small for gestational age (14.3% in group A and 11.8% in group B). Maternal/fetal and neonatal/infant SAE frequencies were comparable between groups (9.8% in group A, 9.0% in group B and 21.9% in group A, 15.9% in group B, respectively). Anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein-specific binding antibody response (secondary endpoint) was sustained in ≥90% of women at 1 year postdose 1. In group A, binding antibodies were detected in cord blood (99%) and infant serum (95%) samples 14 weeks postbirth. The trial met all primary and secondary objectives. Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo did not raise concerns regarding adverse maternal/fetal or neonatal/infant outcomes, had no unexpected safety issues, and induced binding antibody responses in women and offspring through passive transfer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04556526.

Source: Nature Medicine, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03932-z

____