Susceptibility of wild and domestic #songbirds to #Usutu virus

Abstract

Usutu virus (USUV) is an emerging mosquito-borne orthoflavivirus that can cause neuroinvasive disease in humans and wild birds. USUV clusters phylogenetically within the Japanese encephalitis virus serocomplex, sharing antigenic and ecological similarity with West Nile virus (WNV). USUV is maintained in an enzootic cycle primarily involving passerine birds and Culex spp. mosquitoes. USUV was first isolated in South Africa in 1959 and has since spread throughout Africa and Europe, causing mortality and disease in several wild bird populations, specifically the Eurasian blackbird (Turdus merula). To understand transmission and pathogenesis of USUV in birds, we sought to develop passerine bird models of infection using wild-caught house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus), wild-caught American robins (Turdus migratorius), domestic canaries (Serinus canaria domestica), and captive-bred zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Birds were inoculated with one or two isolates of USUV and viremia was measured. House finches, American robins, and canaries were susceptible to USUV, with 100% of inoculated birds developing viremia. These avian species reach viremias that have the potential to infect Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Clinical disease and histopathological evidence of disease were severe in American robins and moderate to severe in canaries, with limited disease in house finches. However, zebra finches inoculated with one isolate of USUV did not develop detectable viremia. These findings provide additional tools for studying USUV enzootic transmission and pathogenesis in passerine birds.

Source: 

Link: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014213

____

Serological and viral #prevalence of #Oropouche virus (OROV): A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2000–24 including #human, #animal, and #vector #surveillance studies

 

Abstract

Background

Oropouche virus (OROV) is an emerging arbovirus primarily transmitted by biting midges and is increasingly recognized as a public health threat in Central and South America. With over 11,000 confirmed cases reported in 2024, a ten-fold increase from the previous year, its transmission dynamics and true burden remain poorly understood due to diagnostic challenges and fragmented surveillance systems.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) synthesizes OROV prevalence data in humans and summarizes the available data for vectors and animal hosts sampled between 2000 and 2024 to provide updated estimates and identify key surveillance gaps.

Methods

We systematically searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Medline, and LILACS for OROV seroprevalence and viral prevalence studies in human, insect, and animal populations, published up to September 12, 2024. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024551000). Studies were extracted in duplicate, and data were meta-analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Risk of bias was appraised using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Results

We included 71 articles reporting serological or viral prevalence of OROV across nine countries. Between 2000–2024, pooled human seroprevalence among individuals with febrile illness or suspected of Oropouche infection was 12.6% [95% CI 5.3-26.9%] across four South American countries and seroprevalence of 1.1% [95% CI 0.5-2.3%] was observed in asymptomatic groups. Viral prevalence among individuals with febrile illness or suspected of Oropouche infection was 1.5% [0.8-3.0%] across seven South American countries and Haiti. Most studies used convenience sampling and RT-PCR or hemagglutination assays. In vector populations, positive OROV prevalence in Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus was reported in two of 18 sources, while 10.0% and 7.5% animal host prevalence was reported in dogs and cattle, respectively. We found high risk of bias in 11.3% of studies in our critical appraisal, with most animal, human, and vector studies falling in the moderate risk of bias range.

Conclusions

Despite rising numbers of OROV reported cases, prevalence estimates remain limited by sparse surveillance and variable methodology. This review highlights the urgent need for standardized serological assays, community-based studies, and expanded surveillance in animal and vector reservoirs. A One Health approach is essential to monitor OROV transmission and inform regional preparedness efforts.

Source: 

Link: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013340

____