Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Coadministration of #ribavirin and #arenaviral entry #inhibitor LHF-535 enhances antiviral benefit against authentic #Lassa virus

{Excerpt}

Highlights

• A new strain of Lassa virus (LASV) was successfully isolated and characterized.

• The combination of ribavirin and LHF-535 has been demonstrated to exhibit synergistic effects in inhibiting LASV.

• The findings provide new directions for the development of antiviral drugs and vaccines for Lassa fever.


Dear Editor,

Lassa virus (LASV) is the causative agent of the acute viral hemorrhagic Lassa fever (LF), which is classified into Mammarenavirus within the Arenaviridae family, with a single-stranded, negative-sense, bi-segmented RNA genome. Due to its high pathogenicity and lethality, LASV is considered as a priority threat to public health, with an estimated cases of 300,000 infections and 5,000 deaths annually. LASV was first isolated and described as a clinical entity in 1969 in Lassa, Nigeria (Garry, 2023). LASV isolates of different geographic and host origins are highly diverse in genomic sequences and phylogenetically classified into up to seven lineages, with each lineage predominately localized in specific countries. Although the research on LF has been carried out for decades since the pathogen first characterized, there is no approved antiviral drugs or vaccines for clinical use against LASV to date (Grant et al., 2023). One possible reason that hindered the development of countermeasures is that the preclinical studies on authentic LASV are restricted in high bio-containment biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) facilities. In this letter, we describe isolation, and characterization of the LASV from the clinical samples. And we applied a coadministration assay of antiviral drugs for LASV by using a clinically isolated Mammarenavirus lassaense strain in the BSL-4 facility, aiming to investigate new therapeutic strategies for LASV infection.

(...)

Source: Virologica Sinica, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995820X25000380?via%3Dihub

____

Monday, April 14, 2025

Co-Infections with #Orthomarburgviruses, #Paramyxoviruses, and #Orthonairoviruses in Egyptian Rousette #Bats, #Uganda and Sierra Leone

Abstract

We report 1.3% (19/1,511) of Egyptian rousette bats (ERBs) in Uganda and Sierra Leone were co-infected with different combinations of Marburg, Sosuga, Kasokero, or Yogue viruses. To prevent infection by those viruses, we recommend avoiding ERB-populated areas, avoiding ERBs and ERB-contaminated objects, and thoroughly washing harvested fruits before consumption.

Source: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/31/5/24-1669_article

____

Highly Pathogenic Avian #Influenza A(#H5N1) #Outbreak in Endangered #Cranes, Izumi Plain, #Japan, 2022–23

Abstract

During the 2022–23 winter season, >1,500 endangered cranes, including hooded crane (Grus monacha) and white-naped crane (Grus vipio), were found debilitated or dead in the Izumi Plain, Japan. Most of the cranes, particularly those collected in November, were infected with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 viruses; virus shedding was higher from the trachea than from the cloaca. The isolation rate from the cranes’ roost water was not markedly higher than that of previous seasons, suggesting that the viruses might be more effectively transmitted among cranes via the respiratory route than through feces. Most wild bird–derived H5N1 isolates were phylogenetically distinct from viruses isolated on nearby chicken farms, indicating limited relationship between the wild bird and chicken isolates. Serologic analyses suggested that herd immunity had little effect on outbreak subsidence. This study deepens our understanding of the circumstances surrounding the unexpected HPAI outbreaks among these endangered cranes.

Source: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/31/5/24-1410_article

____

The #WHO #Bacterial Priority #Pathogens #List 2024: a prioritisation study to guide research, development, and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance

Summary

Background

The 2017 WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List (BPPL) has been instrumental in guiding global policy, research and development, and investments to address the most urgent threats from antibiotic-resistant pathogens, and it is a key public health tool for the prevention and control of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Since its release, at least 13 new antibiotics targeting bacterial priority pathogens have been approved. The 2024 WHO BPPL aims to refine and build on the previous list by incorporating new data and evidence, addressing previous limitations, and improving pathogen prioritisation to better guide global efforts in combating AMR.

Methods

The 2024 WHO BPPL followed a similar approach to the first prioritisation exercise, using a multicriteria decision analysis framework. 24 antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens were scored based on eight criteria, including mortality, non-fatal burden, incidence, 10-year resistance trends, preventability, transmissibility, treatability, and antibacterial pipeline status. Pathogens were assessed on each of the criteria on the basis of available evidence and expert judgement. A preferences survey using a pairwise comparison was administered to 100 international experts (among whom 79 responded and 78 completed the survey) to determine the relative weights of the criteria. Applying these weights, the final ranking of pathogens was determined by calculating a total score in the range of 0–100% for each pathogen. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of experts’ consistency, background, and geographical origin on the stability of the rankings. An independent advisory group reviewed the final list, and pathogens were subsequently streamlined and grouped into three priority tiers based on a quartile scoring system: critical (highest quartile), high (middle quartiles), and medium (lowest quartile).

Findings

The pathogens’ total scores ranged from 84% for the top-ranked bacterium (carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae) to 28% for the bottom-ranked bacterium (penicillin-resistant group B streptococci). Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (including K pneumoniae, Acinetobacter spp, and Escherichia coli), as well as rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis, were ranked in the highest quartile. Among the bacteria commonly responsible for community-acquired infections, the highest rankings were for fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (72%), Shigella spp (70%), and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (64%). Other important pathogens on the list include Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The results of the preferences survey showed a strong inter-rater agreement, with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and Kendall's coefficient of concordance both at 0·9. The final ranking showed high stability, with clustering of the pathogens based on experts’ backgrounds and origins not resulting in any substantial changes to the ranking.

Interpretation

The 2024 WHO BPPL is a key tool for prioritising research and development investments and informing global public health policies to combat AMR. Gram-negative bacteria and rifampicin-resistant M tuberculosis remain critical priority pathogens, underscoring their persistent threat and the limitations of the current antibacterial pipeline. Focused efforts and sustained investments in novel antibacterials are needed to address AMR priority pathogens, which include high-burden antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as Salmonella and Shigella spp, N gonorrhoeae, and S aureus. Beyond research and development, efforts to address these pathogens should also include expanding equitable access to existing drugs, enhancing vaccine coverage, and strengthening infection prevention and control measures.

Source: Lancet Infectious Diseases, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(25)00118-5/fulltext?rss=yes

____

The spatiotemporal #ecology of #Oropouche virus across Latin #America: a multidisciplinary, laboratory-based, modelling study

Summary

Background

Latin America has been experiencing an Oropouche virus (OROV) outbreak of unprecedented magnitude and spread since 2023–24 for unknown reasons. We aimed to identify risk predictors of and areas at risk for OROV transmission.

Methods

In this multidisciplinary, laboratory-based, modelling study, we retrospectively tested anonymised serum samples collected between 2001 and 2022 for studies on virus epidemiology and medical diagnostics in Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Peru with nucleoprotein-based commercial ELISAs for OROV-specific IgG and IgM antibodies. Serum samples positive for IgG from different ecological regions and sampling years were tested against Guaroa virus and two OROV glycoprotein reassortants (Iquitos virus and Madre de Dios virus) via plaque reduction neutralisation testing (PRNT) to validate IgG ELISA specificity and support antigenic cartography. Three OROV strains were included in the neutralisation testing, a Cuban OROV isolate from the 2023–24 outbreak, a contemporary Peruvian OROV isolate taken from a patient in 2020, and a historical OROV isolate from Brazil. We analysed the serological data alongside age, sex, cohort, and geographical residence data for the serum samples; reported OROV incidence data; and vector occurrence data to explore OROV transmission in ecologically different regions of Latin America. We used the MaxEnt machine learning methodology to spatially analyse and predict OROV infection risk across Latin America, fitting one model with presence–absence serological data (seropositive results were recorded as presence and seronegative results were recorded as absence) and one model with presence-only, reported incidence data from 2024. We computed marginal dependency plots, variable contribution, and permutation metrics to analyse the impact of socioecological predictors and fitted a generalised linear mixed-effects model with logit link and binary error structure to analyse the potential effects of age, sex, or cohort type bias and interactions between age or sex and cohort type in our serological data. We conducted antigenic cartography and evolutionary characterisations of all available genomic sequences for all three OROV genome segments from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, including branch-specific selection pressure analysis and the construction of OROV phylogenetic trees.

Findings

In total, 9420 serum samples were included in this study, representing 76 provinces in the six Latin American countries previously mentioned. The sex distribution across the combined cohorts was 48% female (4237 of 8910 samples with available data) and 52% male (4673 of 8910 samples) and the mean age was 29·5 years (range 0–95 years). The samples were collected from census-based cohorts, cohorts of healthy individuals, and cohorts of febrile patients receiving routine health care. The average OROV IgG antibody detection rate was 6·3% (95% CI 5·8–6·8), with substantial regional heterogeneity. The presence–absence, serology-based model predicted high-risk areas for OROV transmission in the Amazon River basin, around the coastal and southern areas of Brazil, and in parts of central America and the Caribbean islands, consistent with case data from the 2023–24 outbreak reported by the Pan American Health Organization. Areas with a high predicted risk of OROV transmission with the serology-based model showed a statistically significant positive correlation with state-level incidence rates per 100 000 people in 2024 (generalised linear model, p=0·0003). The area under the curve estimates were 0·79 (95% CI 0·78–0·80) for the serology-based model and 0·66 (95% CI 0·65–0·66) for the presence-only incidence-based model. Longitudinal diagnostic testing of serum samples from cohorts of febrile patients suggested constant circulation of OROV in endemic regions at varying intensity. Climate variables accounted for more than 60% of variable contribution in both the serology-based and incidence-based models. Antigenic cartography, evolutionary analyses, and in-vitro growth comparisons showed clear differentiation between OROV and its glycoprotein reassortants, but not between the three different OROV strains. PRNT titres of OROV-neutralising serum samples were strongly correlated between all three tested OROV isolates (r>0·83; p<0·0001) but were not correlated with the two glycoprotein reassortants.

Interpretation

Our data suggest that climatic factors are major drivers of OROV spread and were potentially exacerbated during 2024 by extreme weather events. OROV glycoprotein reassortants, but not individual OROV strains, probably have distinct antigenicity. Preparedness for OROV outbreaks requires enhanced diagnostics, surveillance, and vector control in current and future endemic areas, which could all be informed by the risk predictions presented in this Article.

Source: Lancet Infectious Diseases, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(25)00110-0/fulltext?rss=yes

____

Highly Pathogenic Avian #Influenza in Northern #Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) in the #Netherlands

Abstract

We report highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 virus infection in 10 Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) found dead throughout January and February 2024 in the Netherlands. Five birds were infected with the H5N5 subtype, notable for markers of adaptation to mammals. Continuous infectious disease surveillance remains important in wild birds.

Source: US National Library of Medicine, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40223286/

____

#Surveillance for #human #infections with avian #influenza A(#H5) viruses: objectives, case #definitions, #testing and reporting (#WHO)



Key points 

• The overall objective of continual global surveillance for human infection with avian influenza A(H5) viruses is to detect and characterize any influenza A(H5) viruses infecting humans in order to: 

- (1) promptly trigger public health control and response actions, 

- (2) assess the trends of such infections and the public health risks posed (including the risk of a pandemic); and 

- (3) inform global pandemic preparedness activities. 

• Specific surveillance objectives include rapidly detecting human cases of influenza A(H5) virus infection, monitoring the incidence of new cases over time and geographical distribution, assessing and monitoring changes in transmission patterns to promptly detect any unusual events that may signal human-to-human transmission of the virus, characterizing and monitoring changes in any influenza A(H5) viruses infecting humans relative to those circulating in animals to inform control strategies, describing the clinical presentation of illness and identifying risk factors for infection and severe outcomes. 

• Close collaboration with the animal health and environment sectors is essential to understand the extent of the risk of human exposures, to target enhanced surveillance and case finding activities, and to prevent and control the spread of influenza A viruses in animals. 

• Under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) (1), States Parties are required to notify WHO within 24 hours of any laboratory-confirmed case of human influenza caused by a new subtype according to the WHO case definition (2). Human infection caused by a new subtype has been established as being unusual or unexpected and may have serious public health impact. For this reason, even a single case of human infection with a new influenza subtype that fulfils the WHO case definition must always be notified immediately to WHO, regardless of the context in which it occurs. For events involving suspected cases of human influenza caused by a new subtype (e.g., in the absence of laboratory confirmation), States Parties are required to carry out an assessment of such events according to the decision instrument contained in Annex 2 of the IHR (2005), and then to notify WHO of all qualifying events within 24 hours of such an assessment. Notifications and other event-related communications under the IHR are carried out, by the most efficient means of communication available, between the National IHR Focal Point on behalf of the State Party concerned and the WHO IHR Contact Point at the respective WHO Regional Office.  


Background and rationale 

The avian influenza A(H5N1) epizootic has led to unprecedented numbers of  deaths in wild birds; outbreaks and culling in domestic poultry; and A(H5N1)  infections in mammals, including humans. Such human infections remain rare and  thus far have been associated with exposure to infected animals or to  contaminated environments, without subsequent sustained human-to-human  transmission. However, A(H5N1) viruses pose a significant public health risk, with  human infections often causing severe disease and high mortality. In addition,  such viruses have the potential to adapt to humans and with pandemic potential.  

Other influenza A(H5) virus subtypes, such as A(H5N2), A(H5N6) and (H5N8),  have also been detected in birds and mammals, including in humans. The current  influenza A(H5) situation warrants intense global monitoring and a coordinated  global response (3). 

Due to the potential significant risk to human health, and the far-reaching  implications of the disease for the health of wild birds and other animal  populations, a “One Health” approach is essential in effectively tackling avian  influenza. Close collaboration with the animal health and environment sectors is  vital for understanding the extent of the risk of human exposures, and for  preventing and controlling the spread of A(H5) and other influenza A viruses in  animals. In addition to surveillance approaches at the human-animal-environment  interface, it is recommended that countries, through their National  Influenza Centres (NICs) and other influenza laboratories within the WHO Global  Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS), remain alert to the  possibility of human influenza A virus infections of zoonotic origin. 

Following prompt testing, early and appropriate clinical management should be  initiated, and precautionary measures put in place to assess and prevent potential  further spread among humans and animals. Epidemiological and  virological surveillance, and the follow-up of suspected and confirmed human  cases, should be conducted systematically. (4, 5) The WHO implementation  guidance on surveillance for human infection with influenza A(H5) viruses is  summarized below and will be updated as the situation evolves or as more  information becomes available. 


Surveillance objectives 

Overall objective of continual global surveillance To promptly trigger public health  control and response actions; to detect and characterize any influenza A(H5)  viruses infecting humans to assess the public health risks posed (including the risk  of a pandemic), and to inform global pandemic influenza preparedness. 

Within these overall objectives, the specific objectives of such surveillance are to:  

1. rapidly detect any human cases of A(H5) virus infection; o assess and monitor  changes in virus transmission patterns and promptly detect any unusual events  that may signal human-to-human transmission of the virus; o monitor the  incidence of new cases over time and geographical distribution;  

2. characterize and monitor changes in any A(H5) viruses infecting humans  relative to those in animals to inform control strategies; and 

3. describe the clinical presentation of illness and identify risk factors for infection  and severe outcomes. 


Surveillance and investigation of human infections with A(H5) viruses 

For all countries 

• A collaborative, One Health approach to surveillance is needed to identify when  humans could be at risk of zoonotic influenza A virus infections, detect human  cases when they occur and monitor for human-to-human virus transmission. 

• Use information gathered from animal health surveillance on the circulation of  influenza A viruses in animals to inform the risk assessment and targeted  surveillance of human populations and guide appropriate measures. If timely and  of good quality, such information can inform the investigation of respiratory  events reported from health care or community settings and unexpected or  unexplained changes in trends observed in public health surveillance systems for  acute respiratory illnesses. 

• Vigilance for the emergence of novel influenza viruses of pandemic potential  should be maintained at all times. In the context of the co-circulation of SARS- CoV-2 and influenza viruses, WHO has published practical guidance for integrated  surveillance (6). 

• To detect human cases, event-based and indicator-based surveillance are  important. Approaches to surveillance should include respiratory event-based  surveillance at health facilities, community event-based surveillance where  appropriate, establishment of nationally notifiable diseases and conditions  reporting, the use of laboratory networks. These approaches can be  complemented with the monitoring of acute respiratory disease trends and  influenza detections in indicator-based surveillance, public media campaigns,  social media monitoring and targeted surveillance among at-risk populations. 

o It is essential to have a monitoring system for possible human-to-human virus  transmission in place to enable a rapid transition to more intensive case detection  and to provide a platform for further investigations (7). 

• Raise awareness and be prepared for the possibility of human infections with  any novel influenza virus of zoonotic origin, including influenza A(H5) viruses. 

• In hospital settings, clinicians should be alerted and consider testing patients  with severe unexplained acute respiratory illness for influenza, especially if: 

(1) the patient had, in the 14 days prior to illness onset, lived in or travelled to an  area in which influenza A(H5) infections had recently been detected in humans  and/or animals; 

(2) the patient had been exposed to live or dead wild or domestic animals, or to  environments such as exhibitions, markets or farms where live animals are kept  or sold; or 

(3) the patient had been exposed to other individuals with recent acute  respiratory illness who had such histories or exposures as outlined in (1) or (2). 

o Test any health care worker who develops an acute respiratory illness or  conjunctivitis and has been caring for patients with severe unexplained acute  respiratory illness. 

o In settings where there may be limited access to health care, or areas known to  be at risk of influenza infections and outbreaks in animals, community  representatives should be trained to report clusters1 of respiratory illness, illness  in people exposed to infected or potentially infected animals or outbreaks in  animals, through a standard reporting channel. 

o Increase awareness among laboratories of the importance of molecular  detection of influenza A(H5) viruses in human clinical specimens (respiratory and  conjunctival) and of collaboration with an affiliated NIC and provide guidance on  immediate shipping of positive but un-subtypeable influenza A or A(H5)-positive  specimens to a WHO Collaborating Centre on influenza for detailed virus characterization. 

o Maintain trained rapid response teams and establish protocols in advance for  outbreak investigation, and active and passive case finding, including through  contact tracing, for all clusters of unexplained acute respiratory illness (8, 9). 

For  countries with A(H5) viruses suspected or detected in in birds or mammals, in addition to all of the above 

• Countries should have in place an approach for assessing and monitoring the  health of individuals at risk of potential exposure to influenza A(H5) viruses. This  may include individuals who work in the poultry or other livestock industry or fur  farms or zoos (including farmers and veterinarians), visit animal farms or  premises in the course of their work (such as animal and public health  responders), transport or sell live poultry or other animals or carcasses, slaughter  or are involved in culling/depopulating/disposing of poultry or other animals or in  the decontamination of contaminated premises. Additionally, individuals may have  nonoccupational potential exposure to A(H5) viruses in the course of  interacting with infected or potentially infected animals. 

• Raise awareness among clinicians and other health care workers of the  possibility of human infection with avian influenza A(H5) viruses to facilitate early  clinical suspicion and diagnosis, isolation of patients with suspected A(H5) virus  infection, correct use of recommended personal protective equipment and prompt  initiation of antiviral treatment. 

• In outpatient settings, clinicians should consider  testing for influenza in patients  with acute respiratory infection or influenza-like illness or conjunctivitis if  the patient has been exposed to influenza-infected (or presumed to be infected)  birds or other animals in the 14 days prior to illness onset, as described below. 

• Countries should define, based on their available capacity and infrastructure,  which syndromes that clinicians should test, or refer for testing, to ensure that the  health system can effectively manage the testing process without  overburdening facilities or resources. 


Case definitions 

The case definitions provided below are used for surveillance purposes and to  standardize case classification and are not intended to provide complete  descriptions of disease in patients or to guide clinical management. They are also  not intended to be used for additional, more sensitive case finding during outbreak  investigations, which may include investigating any at risk individual  with signs or symptoms of acute respiratory illness. National authorities may  develop other case definitions for other objectives and testing strategies. The case  definitions may change as new information about the disease, epidemiology,  or the viruses become available. WHO clinical practice guidelines  for influenza have been published separately (10). Clinical decisions concerning  the treatment, care or triaging of people potentially infected with an influenza  A(H5) virus should be based on clinical judgement and epidemiological reasoning. 

While most patients infected with influenza A(H5) viruses present with fever,  cough and lower respiratory tract symptoms, the clinical spectrum is broad and  can include mild symptoms (such as upper respiratory tract symptoms or  conjunctivitis only) without fever.  


Suspected influenza A(H5) case definition 

A person presenting with unexplained acute respiratory illness with fever (> 38  °C) or cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing or conjunctivitis. 

AND 

One or more of the following exposures in the 14 days prior to symptom onset: 

• Close contact (within 1 metre) with a person (for example, caring for, speaking  with or touching) who is a suspected or confirmed avian influenza A(H5) case. 

• Exposures in an area where avian influenza A(H5) virus infections in animals or  humans have been suspected or confirmed, such as: 

o close contact (within 1 metre) with live, sick or dead infected animals or animal  products, or consumption or handling of raw uncooked meat, unpasteurized milk  or other raw animal meat or products;  

o direct exposure to surfaces that could be contaminated with infected animal  products or with water contaminated with such products (such as wastewater from  a live bird market or slaughtering facility); or 

o visiting or working at a live animal market, farm, zoo or other setting with  infected animals. 

• Handling samples (animal or human) suspected of containing avian influenza  A(H5) virus in a laboratory or other setting. 


Confirmed case definition 

1. A person with a laboratory-confirmed infection with an avian influenza A(H5)  virus. A laboratory-confirmed infection is considered if it has been confirmed by  positive results from polymerase chain reaction (PCR), virus isolation, or  serological testing of paired acute and convalescent serum.   

Serologic testing of paired acute and convalescent serum specimens: 

• Serological confirmation of an A(H5) case requires paired sera collection (one  acute, one convalescent specimen), with a ≥ 4-fold rise in neutralizing antibody  titres (or equivalent) to an influenza A(H5) virus2 that is antigenically similar to  the virus the person was exposed to, with a convalescent neutralizing titre ≥ 1:40.  Acute serum should be collected within 7 days of symptom onset;  convalescent serum should be collected ≥ 21 days (ideally 21–28 days) after  symptom onset. 

Serologic testing of a single convalescent serum specimen, when the following are met:   

• The criteria for seropositivity of an A(H5) infection using a single convalescent  serum specimen, collected at ≥ 21 days after symptom onset or exposure includes  a neutralizing antibody titre ≥ 1:40 to an influenza A(H5) virus; and 

• A positive result using a different serological assay such as a hemagglutination  inhibition (HI) antibody titre ≥ 1:40, or an influenza A(H5)-specific positive result  from another immunological assay such as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent  assay (ELISA), a multiplex binding antibody assay, or similar binding antibody  assay; and 

• In all assays mentioned above, sera are tested against an influenza A(H5)  virus(es)4 or antigen(s) antigenically similar to the virus the person was exposed to; and  

• The person has an epidemiological link3 to a laboratory-confirmed human case.   

Testing 

All individuals meeting the suspected surveillance case definition or other locally  adapted case definitions for other objectives should be tested according to local  protocols.  

• The types of samples to be collected for the diagnosis of viral infections of the  upper and lower respiratory tract are described in the WHO Manual for the  laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza (11). In cases  presenting with conjunctivitis, conjunctival specimens should be collected. 

o WHO information for the molecular detection of influenza viruses can be found  on the WHO website (12). 

o All influenza A positive specimens that are not able to be subtyped should be  sent immediately to a National Influenza Centre (NIC) if originally tested  elsewhere, and from the NIC to a  WHO Collaborating Centre of GISRS (13) for further analysis in line with the relevant WHO operational guidance (14) under their Terms of Reference (15). 

o Virus isolation from specimens suspected or confirmed to contain avian influenza  A(H5) virus is not recommended, unless it is performed at a WHO  influenza CC or a WHO H5 Reference Laboratory of GISRS, due to the biosafety  requirements. 

o Serologic testing is strongly recommended to be performed or directly supported  by, or performed in collaboration with, a WHO CC or H5 Reference  Laboratory of GISRS. 

o Contact WHO Global Influenza Programme (GISRS-WHOhq@WHO.int) for  support of serology testing for A(H5) and other help to confirm a human infection  with an avian influenza A(H5) virus.  

• Testing of asymptomatic exposed individuals could also be considered on a case- by-case basis, depending on available resources and based on an exposure risk  assessment and testing objectives (for example, as part of an outbreak  investigation or special study to assess asymptomatic transmission). In this  context, the testing of respiratory samples for viable and replicating viruses needs  to be paired with serological testing of acute and convalescent serum  samples. 


Investigation of confirmed cases and monitoring of exposed individuals 

• All confirmed human cases of influenza A(H5) infection should be further  investigated and closely monitored, and contacts also monitored to detect and  rapidly interrupt potential humanto-human virus transmission and to better  understand exposure risks. More detailed guidance can be found in the WHO  Protocol to investigate non-seasonal influenza and other emerging acute  respiratory diseases (9). In addition, various protocols under WHO influenza  investigations and studies (Unity Studies) are currently being updated. When  sharing influenza A(H5)-positive specimens, the relevant WHO operational  guidance should be followed (14). 

• Case definitions for additional case finding should be developed locally and may  be shaped by information obtained from the interview with the confirmed case(s).  

• The specific public health actions that should be implemented immediately  include: 

o testing for cases of human infection with animal influenza A viruses using  appropriate investigation and laboratory protocols; 

o assessing exposure to  animals and travel history of confirmed cases; 

o identification and monitoring of household and other close contacts of a  confirmed case (including health care personnel) and active searching for other  cases; and 

o early detection of any unusual respiratory disease events that could signal  person-to-person transmission of the virus. 

• Public health and animal health authorities should conduct joint investigations of  human cases of novel influenza A virus infection (zoonotic influenza). This will  involve assessing the role of local animals as sources of exposure, understanding  patterns of illnesses or death in local animals and determining whether animal  influenza viruses are circulating in local animals so that appropriate control  measures can be implemented to reduce the risk of continued human exposure.  


Reporting under IHR and information sharing 

Under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005), States Parties are  required to notify WHO within 24 hours of any laboratory-confirmed case of  human influenza caused by a new subtype according to the WHO criteria for IHR  notification (2). Human influenza caused by a new subtype has been established  as being unusual or unexpected and may have serious public health impact. For  this reason, even a single case of human infection with a new influenza subtype  that fulfils the WHO case definition must always be notified immediately to WHO,  regardless of the context in which it occurs. For events involving suspected cases  of human influenza caused by a new subtype (e.g., in the absence of laboratory  confirmation), States Parties are required to carry out an assessment of such  events according to the decision instrument contained in Annex 2 of the IHR  (2005), and then to notify WHO of all qualifying events within 24 hours of such an  assessment. Notifications and other event-related communications under the  IHR are carried out, by the most efficient means of communication available, between the National IHR Focal Point on behalf of the State Party  concerned and the WHO IHR Contact Point at the respective WHO Regional Office. 

A minimum data set reporting form for human infection with an influenza virus  with pandemic potential is available in the Annex of this document. As specified in  Article 6.2 of the IHR (2005), the notification must always include or be followed  by timely and ongoing communication of accurate and sufficiently detailed public  health information about the event as well as the health measures implemented in  response to the event. As the event unfolds, more information may become  available, and the State Party must continue to share the relevant public health  information to allow WHO to conduct its risk assessment with respect to the  ongoing event in collaboration with the notifying State Party. 

WHO has published the WHO case definition for human infections with avian  influenza A(H5) virus requiring notification under IHR (2005) (16). The results of  ongoing surveillance activities, and of studies or other research activities, should  also be communicated to WHO in a timely manner to inform global risk  assessment and guidance. 

Information on human infections and information not under the IHR reporting  requirements (for example, findings from seroprevalence studies) that might be of  public health importance, should be rapidly shared with GISRS for risk  assessment purposes, via WHO CCs, WHO regional officers or the Global influenza  Programme. For example, if a single serum specimen tests positive in a  serology assay but does not meet the notification requirements under IHR as  mentioned above, it is strongly recommended to communicate this information to  a WHO CC of GISRS for surveillance and risk assessment purposes. This includes  situations where a single convalescent serum specimen tests positive by  microneutralization assay and another assay, such as ELISA, but the individual  from whom the specimen was taken did not have an epidemiological link to a  confirmed A(H5) human case, even though they may have had exposure to  A(H5)-infected animals or contaminated environments.  


Wastewater surveillance 

Although Influenza A viruses can be detected in wastewater (and can be  distinguished from influenza B viruses), most of the laboratory assays used cannot  distinguish between different influenza A virus subtypes. It is also  currently not possible to determine the source of an influenza A virus in  wastewater (human waste, animal waste or other) or to know how many cases  must occur in an area before influenza viruses can be detected through  wastewater surveillance. If used, wastewater and environmental surveillance  should be integrated as part of multimodal influenza surveillance (17).  


Methods 

This guidance is based on guidance previously developed by WHO for other  zoonotic influenza subtypes and considers the information reported on human  infections with influenza A(H5) viruses to WHO and GISRS. The guidance also  incorporates information from other WHO products that have become available  since previous versions of surveillance guidance for other zoonotic influenza subtypes were published.  


Contributors 

This surveillance guidance was developed by the World Health Organization  (WHO) Global Influenza Programme through a process of review and consultation  with internal and external experts. WHO expresses its gratitude to those who  reviewed the document for their efforts, experience and insights.  This  surveillance guidance was adapted from previous guidance by Aspen Hammond of  the WHO Global Influenza Programme. 

WHO staff and consultants who contributed to the development of this guidance in  2024 include: Vanessa Cozza (WHO headquarters, Global Influenza Programme), Helge Hollmeyer (WHO headquarters, IHR Secretariat), Joshua Mott (WHO headquarters, Epidemic & Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention), Sergejs Nikisins (WHO headquarters, Global Influenza Programme), Sarika Patel (WHO Country office Cambodia), Dmitriy Pereyaslov (WHO headquarters, Global Influenza Programme), Angel Rodriguez (WHO Regional Office for the Americas), Melissa Rolfes (WHO headquarters, Global Influenza Programme), Magdi Samaan (WHO headquarters, Global Influenza Programme), Maria Van Kerkhove, Marc-Alain Widdowson (WHO Regional Office for Europe), Reina Yamaji (WHO headquarters, Global Influenza Programme) and Wenqing Zhang (WHO headquarters, Global Influenza Programme). Technical experts from the following WHO Collaborating Centres of the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) (13, 18) contributed to this document through their review of the draft document in 2024: WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection & Immunity, Australia; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCD), China; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID), Japan; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; WHO Collaborating Centre for the Surveillance, Epidemiology and Control of Influenza, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA; WHO Collaborating Center for Studies on the Ecology of Influenza in Animals, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, USA; and the WHO Collaborating Centre for Studies on Influenza at the Animalhuman Interface, State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology "VECTOR", Rospotrebnadzor, Russian Federation.  Declaration of interests Technical experts represented institutions designated as WHO Collaborating Centres of the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) and no declarations of interest were required from them for their review of the draft document. 

___

{1} A “cluster” is defined as two or more persons  with onset of symptoms within the same 14-day period and who are associated  with a specific setting, such as a classroom, workplace, household, extended  family, hospital, other residential institution, military barracks or recreational  camp. 

{2} Wild type virus is preferred.  

{3} This may include close contact such as providing care for the patient, including as a health care worker or family member, or other similarly close physical contact, or staying at the same place (e.g. lived with, visited) as a confirmed case while the case was symptomatic.  


References 

1. International Health Regulations (2005). Third edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/246107, accessed 27 August 2024). 

2. Case definitions for the four diseases requiring notification to WHO in all circumstances under the IHR (2005). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/case-definitions-for-the-four-diseases-requiringnotification-to-who-in-all-circumstances-under-the-ihr-(2005), accessed 27 August 2024). 

3. Updated joint FAO/WHO/WOAH public health assessment of recent influenza  A(H5) virus events in animals and people. 20 December 2024  (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/updatedjoint-fao-who-woah-assessment-of-recent-influenza-a(h5n1)-virus-events-in-animals-andpeople_dec2024, accessed 23 January 2025). 

4. Public health resource pack for countries experiencing outbreaks of influenza in animals: revised guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/372248, accessed 27 August 2024). 

5. Practical interim guidance to reduce the risk of infection in people exposed to avian influenza viruses, 5 June 2024.Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 (https://doi.org/10.2471/B09116, accessed 27 August 2024). 

6. Implementing the integrated sentinel surveillance of influenza and other respiratory viruses of epidemic and pandemic potential by the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System: standards and operational guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/379678, accessed 23 January 2025). 

7. “Crafting the mosaic”: a framework for resilient surveillance for respiratory viruses of epidemic and pandemic potential. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/366689, accessed 27 August 2024). 

8. Influenza Investigations & Studies (Unity Studies) [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/surveillance-andmonitoring/influenza-investigations-studies-unity, accessed 27 August 2024). 

9. Protocol to investigate non-seasonal influenza and other emerging acute respiratory diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/275657, accessed 27 August 2024). 

10. Clinical practice guidelines for influenza. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 (https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/378872/9789240097759-eng.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 1 Oct 2024). 

11. Manual for the laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011  (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44518, accessed 27 August 2024). 

12. WHO information for the molecular detection of influenza viruses. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 (https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/laboratorynetwork/quality-assurance/eqa-project/information-for-molecular-diagnosis-of-influenza-virus, accessed 27 August 2024). 

13. WHO Collaborating Centres within the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/initiatives/globalinfluenza-surveillance-and-response-system/who-collaboration-centererl?CxitPEOtTWx0xUd5TJdODSXcnyJqzYd7FZeivpn7xcI=, accessed 27 August 2024). 

14. Operational guidance on sharing influenza viruses with human pandemic potential (IVPP) under the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PIP) Framework. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/259402, accessed 27 August 2024). 

15. Terms of Reference for National Influenza Centres of the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/influenza/national-influenza-centersfiles/nic_tor_en.pdf?sfvrsn=93513e78_30, accessed 27 August 2024). 

16. WHO case definition for human infections with avian influenza A(H5) virus requiring notification under IHR (2005) [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avian-influenza/case-definitions, accessed 7 November 2024). 

17. Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance Summary for Influenza, Pilot version, 6 December 2024. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/defaultsource/wash-documents/wash-related-diseases/wes-summary-for-influenza---pilot-version6dec2024.pdf?sfvrsn=cb7b4f94_3, accessed 29 Jan 2024). 

18. WHO Collaborating Centres Global database [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://apps.who.int/whocc/, accessed 7 November 2024. 


Further reading 

• Current information on animal influenza events reported to the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) can be found at: WAHIS: World Animal Health Information System [website]. World Organisation for Animal Health (https://wahis.woah.org/#/home). 

• The results of human A(H5) surveillance and public health risk assessments and related resources can be found at: Human-animal interface [website]. Geneva: World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avian-influenza). 

(...)

Source: World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/surveillance-for-human-infections-with-avian-influenza-a(-h5)--viruses

____

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Penitent St. Mary Magdalene, Titian (1560 - c.1565)

 


Public Domain.

Source: WikiArt, https://www.wikiart.org/en/titian/penitent-st-mary-magdalene

____

Saturday, April 12, 2025

#Coronavirus Disease Research #References (by AMEDEO, April 12 '25)

 


    Br J Anaesth

  1. GILLIS C, Hasil L, Keane C, Brassard D, et al
    A multimodal prehabilitation class for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a pragmatic randomised type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.
    Br J Anaesth. 2025 Apr 7:S0007-0912(25)00153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Clin Infect Dis

  2. IOANNOU GN, Berry K, Rajeevan N, Li Y, et al
    Target Trial Emulation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection Versus No Infection and Risk of Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 Conditions in the Omicron Variant Versus Prior Eras.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 10:ciaf087. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Int J Infect Dis

  3. JOLLIVET O, Urchueguia-Fornes A, Chung-Delgado K, Johannesen CK, et al
    Respiratory Syncytial Virus hospitalisation burden in children below 18 years in six European countries (2016-2023) pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic.
    Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 7:107903. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107903.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Med Virol

  4. LIU J, Guo L, Zhong J, Wu Y, et al
    Proteomic Analysis of 442 Clinical Plasma Samples From Individuals With Symptom Records Revealed Subtypes of Convalescent Patients Who Had COVID-19.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70203.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  5. ZHANG Y, Pu D, Liu Q, Li B, et al
    Epidemic Outbreak of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection After the end of the Zero-COVID-19 Policy in China: Molecular Characterization and Disease Severity Associated With a Novel RSV-B Clade.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70343.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  6. GUSTANI-BUSS E, Buss CE, Biagi CAO, Oliveira IM, et al
    Unveiling the Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma and Delta Waves in Parana, Brazil - Delta Displacing a Persistent Gamma Through Alternative Routes of Dispersal.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70318.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  7. SUN P, Liu Q, Yuan S, Wang XT, et al
    SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Protein Induces MARCHF1/GPX4-Mediated Ferroptosis by Promoting Lipid Accumulation.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70328.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Travel Med

  8. PATEL P, Freedman DO
    Considerations for prevention and standby emergency treatment for travellers at high- risk of COVID-19 hospitalization.
    J Travel Med. 2025 Apr 4:taaf029. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed        


    J Virol

  9. ZHOU B, Gui Q, Liu C, Guo H, et al
    Structure and function of an unusual R452-dependent monoclonal antibody against SARS-CoV-2.
    J Virol. 2025 Apr 8:e0184424. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01844.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Lancet

  10. SUN L, Selbie D, Khan AS, Karim SSA, et al
    Mobilising national and regional assets and non-state actors for pandemic preparedness.
    Lancet. 2025 Apr 3:S0140-6736(25)00630-0. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00630.
    PubMed        

  11. YUNAS I, Islam MA, Sindhu KN, Devall AJ, et al
    Causes of and risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lancet. 2025 Apr 3:S0140-6736(25)00448-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00448.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Lancet Infect Dis

  12. CHODICK G
    Long-term infectious sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection should be considered in mild cases too.
    Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 1:S1473-3099(25)00074.
    PubMed        

  13. BEJON P, Agweyu A, Ochola-Oyier LI, Hamaluba M, et al
    Rethinking the evidence on COVID-19 in Africa.
    Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 4:S1473-3099(25)00071.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  14. SAWANO M, Bhattacharjee B, Caraballo C, Khera R, et al
    Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus placebo-ritonavir in individuals with long COVID in the USA (PAX LC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2, decentralised trial.
    Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 3:S1473-3099(25)00073.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  15. CAI M, Xu E, Xie Y, Al-Aly Z, et al
    Rates of infection with other pathogens after a positive COVID-19 test versus a negative test in US veterans (November, 2021, to December, 2023): a retrospective cohort study.
    Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 1:S1473-3099(24)00831.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Life Sci

  16. AZEEM M, Cancemi P, Mukhtar F, Marino S, et al
    Efficacy and limitations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines - A systematic review.
    Life Sci. 2025;371:123610.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Nature

  17. THOMPSON B
    From Hippocrates to COVID-19: the scientific fight to prove diseases can be airborne.
    Nature. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-00960.
    PubMed        

  18. LEDFORD H, Kozlov M
    Long COVID activists fought Trump team's research cuts and won - for now.
    Nature. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-00995.
    PubMed        


    Science

  19. KAISER J
    Health agencies reeling as leaders, staff slashed.
    Science. 2025;388:134-135.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  20. JOOSTE I
    No one can replace the U.S. as it retreats from global health.
    Science. 2025;388:138-139.
    PubMed         Abstract available

#Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Research #References (by AMEDEO, April 12 '25)

 


    Arch Virol

  1. HUANG Z, Zhang R, Yao D, Fu H, et al
    Avian influenza A(H5N6) virus detected during live-poultry market surveillance linked to a human infection in Changsha, China, from 2020 to 2023.
    Arch Virol. 2025;170:96.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

  2. ZABRODSKAYA YA, Gavrilova NV, Elpaeva EA, Lozhkov AA, et al
    Corrigendum to "mRNA encoding antibodies against hemagglutinin and nucleoprotein prevents influenza virus infection in vitro" [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 738 (2024) 150945].
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2025 Apr 9:151783. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.151783.
    PubMed        


    BMC Pediatr

  3. VIANA J, Santos JV, Pinto A, Santos A, et al
    Avoidable visits to the paediatric emergency department: associated factors and lessons learned from the pandemic.
    BMC Pediatr. 2025;25:279.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Drug Saf

  4. HAMZAOUI H, Shaum A, Cherkaoui I, Moussa LA, et al
    Assessment of Pharmacovigilance Across University Hospitals in Morocco.
    Drug Saf. 2025;48:527-539.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Epidemiol Infect

  5. SUOMENRINNE-NORDVIK A, Leino T, Shubin M, Auranen K, et al
    Quantifying the direct and indirect components of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness during the Delta variant era.
    Epidemiol Infect. 2025;153:e59.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  6. WITTEVEEN-FREIDL G, Lauenborg Moller K, Voldstedlund M, Gubbels S, et al
    Data for action - description of the automated COVID-19 surveillance system in Denmark and lessons learnt, January 2020 to June 2024.
    Epidemiol Infect. 2025;153:e58.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Clin Microbiol

  7. HEIMSCH KC, Stanoeva KR, Mogling R, Kraus A, et al
    External quality assessment of molecular detection and variant typing of SARS-CoV-2 in European expert laboratories in 2023.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2025;63:e0153824.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Gen Virol

  8. SANCHEZ-MARTINEZ A, Moore T, Freitas TS, Benzaken TR, et al
    Recent advances in the prevention and treatment of respiratory syncytial virus disease.
    J Gen Virol. 2025;106.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Immunol

  9. HATIPOGLU I, Ainsua-Enrich E, Kadel S, Turner S, et al
    IRF4-regulated transcriptional and functional heterogeneity of lung-resident CD11b+ cDC2 subsets during influenza virus infection.
    J Immunol. 2025 Apr 10:vkaf060. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  10. DINANT S, Castille J, Deloizy C, Bruder E, et al
    The prion-family protein Doppel exerts a protective role during influenza virus infection.
    J Immunol. 2025 Apr 9:vkaf031. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect

  11. JIN R, Qin T, Li P, Yuan J, et al
    Increased Circulation of Adenovirus in China During 2023-2024: Association with an Increased Prevalence of Species B and School-Associated Transmission.
    J Infect. 2025 Mar 21:106475. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106475.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  12. PEREZ CM, Ruiz-Rius S, Ramirez-Morros A, Vidal M, et al
    Post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
    J Infect. 2025 Mar 18:106473. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106473.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  13. WADIA U, Moore HC, Richmond PC, Levy A, et al
    Effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing RSV-hospitalisation among young children in Western Australia 2024.
    J Infect. 2025;90:106466.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect Dis

  14. YAMAMOTO S, Mizoue T, Ujiie M, Horii K, et al
    Low levels of post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition antibodies and their correlation with influenza protection among healthcare workers during the 2024/2025 A/H1N1 outbreak in Japan.
    J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 10:jiaf183. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  15. LEWIS NM, Harker EJ, Cleary S, Zhu Y, et al
    Vaccine Effectiveness Against Influenza A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and B-Associated Hospitalizations-United States, September 1, 2023-May 31, 2024.
    J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 8:jiaf185. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Virol

  16. XU S, Liu Y, Luo C, Zhou M, et al
    Identification and characterization of a broadly neutralizing and protective nanobody against the HA1 domain of H5 avian influenza virus hemagglutinin.
    J Virol. 2025 Apr 7:e0209024. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02090.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  17. ADU OF, Sempere Borau M, Fruh SP, Karakus U, et al
    Cell binding, uptake, and infection of influenza A virus using recombinant antibody-based receptors.
    J Virol. 2025 Apr 10:e0227524. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02275.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS Biol

  18. GILBERT SC
    Priorities for rapid and cost-effective vaccines to improve outbreak responses.
    PLoS Biol. 2025;23:e3003114.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS One

  19. BENAVIDES FFW, Veldhuis Kroeze EJB, Leijten L, Schmitz KS, et al
    Neuroinvasive and neurovirulent potential of SARS-CoV-2 in the acute and post-acute phase of intranasally inoculated ferrets.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0311449.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  20. KAMO M, Murakami M, Naito W, Yasutaka T, et al
    Comparison of COVID-19 testing strategies and costs for professional sports teams: A case study of J. League clubs.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0310939.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  21. USTUNDAG MG, Beyhun NE, Topbas M, Turhan S, et al
    Direct medical cost of adult Covid-19 inpatients and its determinants at a university hospital.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0319762.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  22. YEHIA AC, Moreira J, Premaor MO
    Burnout syndrome in resident physicians: A study after the third COVID-19 wave in two tertiary hospitals of southeastern Brazil.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0321443.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  23. GABRIELA BAYOLO S, Miraine Davila F, Gayraud G
    Test allocation based on risk of infection from first and second order contact tracing.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0320291.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  24. BOZIC A, Podgornik R
    Increased preference for lysine over arginine in spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 variant and its daughter lineages.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0320891.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  25. LI F, Tong M, Guan S
    Changes in the network structure of energy markets and financial markets under the different shocks of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and COVID-19.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0318291.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  26. HERBERHOLZ C, Saichol P, Damrongplasit K
    Health insurance type, healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket expenditure in the face of COVID-19: Evidence from Thai national survey data.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0321468.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  27. QUIROS-RAMIREZ MA, Feineisen A, Streuber S, Reips UD, et al
    Virtual Reality experiments in the field.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0318688.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  28. ADEWOPO J, Andree BPJ, Peter H, Solano-Hermosilla G, et al
    AI-imputed and crowdsourced price data show strong agreement with traditional price surveys in data-scarce environments.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0320720.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  29. ASTETE CORNEJO J, Cruz-Ausejo L, Cainamarks Alejandro J, Burgos-Flores MA, et al
    Barriers and limitations to the development of a telemental health service for workers in Peru- A user-centered approach.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0321401.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  30. SHAW RJ, Hamilton OKL, Rhead R, Silverwood RJ, et al
    Associations between different measures of SARS-CoV-2 infection status and subsequent economic inactivity: A pooled analysis of five longitudinal surveys linked to healthcare records.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0321201.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  31. VO DH, Huynh TL, Ho CM, Vo QT, et al
    The impact of social welfare support on mental health in Vietnam.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0318374.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  32. HE T, Tu CC, Wang Z, Hao D, et al
    Potential effect of social support on perceived stress and anxiety in college students during public health crisis: Multiple interactions of gender.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0319799.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  33. J VK, Koshy JM, S D, Narreddy S, et al
    Prevalence and predictors of long COVID at 1 year in a cohort of hospitalized patients: A multicentric qualitative and quantitative study.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0320643.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

  34. LIU X, Balligand T, Le Gall C, Ploegh HL, et al
    A monoclonal anti-hemagglutinin stem antibody modified with zanamivir protects against both influenza A and B viruses.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2424889122.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Vaccine

  35. BERGSTROM F, Gunther F, Britton T
    A counterfactual analysis quantifying the COVID-19 vaccination impact in Sweden.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126870.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  36. DUDLEY MZ, Zapf AJ, Delamater P, Proveaux TM, et al
    Attitudes of California school personnel on potential COVID-19 vaccine mandates and state law SB277 to remove nonmedical vaccine exemptions.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126888.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  37. ANDERSEN KM, Allen KE, Nepal RM, Mateus JS, et al
    Effectiveness of BNT162b2 XBB.1.5 vaccine in immunocompetent adults using tokenization in two U.S. states.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126881.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  38. LEBLANG D, Smith MD, Wesselbaum D
    Global perspectives on COVID-19 vaccination: Impacts on well-being and inequality.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126906.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  39. DIYA O, Gayed J, Lowry FS, Ma H, et al
    A phase 2/3 trial to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of monovalent Omicron JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in adults >/=18 years old.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126869.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  40. MATHUR I, Ruisch A, Conlin M, Oyatoye I, et al
    COVID-19 vaccination integration, innovations and key populations: Results from a global survey.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126863.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  41. CHU CF, Chang TH, Ho JJ
    Comparative analysis of fourteen COVID-19 vaccine injury compensation systems and claim approval rates.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126830.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  42. PEIXOTO DE MIRANDA EJF, Calado RT, Boulos FC, de Sousa Moreira JA, et al
    Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike: Results of a randomized vaccine-controlled phase I ADAPTCOV trial in Brazil.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126680.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  43. BOLU O, Alo OD, Iwara E, Longley AT, et al
    Feasibility of cohort event monitoring and assessment of reactogenicity and adverse events among a cohort of AstraZeneca and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine recipients in Nigeria, 2021.
    Vaccine. 2025;52:126907.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  44. CHEN PL, Richardson RA, Rovito S, Yang G, et al
    Live-attenuated pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccines expressing computationally optimized broadly reactive antigens (COBRAs) are immunogenic and protective in mice and ferrets.
    Vaccine. 2025;53:127090.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  45. LLOYD PC, Acharya G, Zhao H, Shah N, et al
    Safety monitoring of health outcomes following influenza vaccination during the 2023-2024 season among U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older.
    Vaccine. 2025;53:127069.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  46. ZASZTOWT-STERNICKA M, Jagielska A, Rzad M, Szymusik I, et al
    Immunogenicity of inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in pregnant women, including the level of postvaccination antibodies in umbilical cord blood.
    Vaccine. 2025;53:127047.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  47. ZHANG L, Xia Y, Chu L, Sundaram ME, et al
    Differences in seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy profiles between clinicians practicing traditional Chinese medicine and modern Western medicine: A national cross-sectional survey.
    Vaccine. 2025;53:127106.
    PubMed         Abstract available

A Novel #Nobecovirus in an Epomophorus wahlbergi #Bat from #Nairobi, #Kenya

Abstract

Most human emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic, originating in animal hosts prior to spillover to humans. Prioritizing the surveillance of wildlife that overlaps with humans and human activities can increase the likelihood of detecting viruses with a high potential for human infection. Here, we obtained fecal swabs from two fruit bat species—Eidolon helvum (n = 6) and Epomophorus wahlbergi (n = 43) (family Pteropodidae)—in peridomestic habitats in Nairobi, Kenya, and used metagenome sequencing to detect microorganisms. A near-complete genome of a novel virus assigned taxonomically to the Coronaviridae family Betacoronavirus genus and Nobecovirus subclade was characterized from E. wahlbergi. Phylogenetic analysis indicates this unique Nobecovirus clade shares a common ancestor with Eidolon/Rousettus Nobecovirus subclades isolated from Madagascar, Kenya, and Cameroon. Recombination was detected across open reading frames, except the spike protein, in all BOOTSCAN analyses, indicating intra-host coinfection and genetic exchange between genome regions. Although Nobecoviruses are currently bat-specific and are not known to be zoonotic, the propensity of coronaviruses to undergo frequent recombination events and the location of the virus alongside high human and livestock densities in one of East Africa’s most rapidly developing cities justifies continued surveillance of animal viruses in high-risk urban landscapes.

Source: Viruses, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/4/557

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts