Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a next-generation #mRNA-1283 #COVID19 #vaccine compared with mRNA-1273 vaccine (NextCOVE)...

Summary

Background

mRNA-1283 is an investigational, next-generation COVID-19 vaccine that encodes only the immunodominant regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein—the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the N-terminal domain rather than the full-length spike used in currently authorised mRNA vaccines. We evaluated the relative vaccine efficacy (rVE), immunogenicity, and safety of mRNA-1283 compared to the first-generation vaccine (mRNA-1273).

Methods

This randomised, observer-masked, active-controlled, phase 3 trial (NextCOVE) was conducted in individuals (aged ≥12 years) with no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days of screening in the USA, the UK, and Canada. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one 10 μg dose of the bivalent formulation of mRNA-1283 (original plus omicron BA.4/BA.5) or 50 μg of the bivalent mRNA-1273, encoding the same variants. Randomisation was stratified by age (12–17 years, 18–64 years, and ≥65 years). Primary objectives comparing mRNA-1283 with mRNA-1273 were non-inferior rVE to prevent a first event of COVID-19 from 14 days after study injection to the end of follow-up (assessed in the per-protocol set for efficacy, with non-inferiority declared when the lower bound of the α-adjusted two-sided CI for rVE was greater than –10%), non-inferior immunogenicity at day 29 (assessed in the per-protocol immunogenicity subset, with non-inferiority declared when the lower bounds of the CIs for the geometric mean concentration ratios [GMRs] of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 D614G and omicron BA.4/BA.5 were >0·667 and the lower bounds of the 95% CI seroresponse rate differences for the two variants were greater than –10%), and safety (assessed in the safety set, which included all participants who received a vaccination). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05815498) and is complete.

Findings

Between March 28 and Aug 23, 2023, we screened 13 054 individuals for eligibility and randomly allocated 11 454 participants (5728 to mRNA-1283 and 5726 to mRNA-1273). 1177 confirmed COVID-19 events occurred up to Jan 31, 2024 (560 [9·9%] of 5679 in mRNA1283.222 and 617 [10·8%] of 5687 in mRNA-1273.222). The median age of participants at enrolment was 56 years (IQR 38–66). Of the 11 417 participants who received a vaccine, 6200 (54·3%) were female and 5217 (45·7%) were male; 9381 (82·2%) were White; and 1510 (13·2%) were Hispanic or Latino. Of the total cohort, 992 (8·7%) participants were aged 12–17 years, 7151 (62·6%) were aged 18–64 years, and 3274 (28·7%) were 65 years and older; in addition, 6857 participants (60·1%) were 50 years and older. The rVE point estimate was 9·3% (99·4% CI –6·6 to 22·8; p=0·0005). The GMR was 1·3 (95% CI 1·2 to 1·5) for BA.4/BA.5 and 1·2 (1·1 to 1·4) for D614G. The day-29 seroresponse rate difference was 14·4% (95% CI 9·3 to 19·4) for BA.4/BA.5 and 10·7% (6·0 to 15·4) for D614G. Local and systemic adverse reactions were similar between mRNA-1283 and mRNA-1273; mRNA-1283 was associated with fewer injection-site pain reactions than mRNA-1273 (3905 [68·5%] of 5701 vs 4419 [77·5%] of 5705, respectively). The frequency of unsolicited adverse events, serious adverse events, and medically attended adverse events were similar between groups during the first 28 days after injection. One event of sudden death occurred in a participant with underlying cardiovascular disease in the mRNA-1273 group; it was reported as related to vaccination due to its temporal association.

Interpretation

mRNA-1283 was well-tolerated. The rVE and immunogenicity non-inferiority criteria were met, with higher antibody responses for mRNA-1283 versus mRNA-1273. The potential clinical benefit of mRNA-1283 versus mRNA-1273 needs to be confirmed in post-marketing evaluation.

Funding

Moderna.

Source: The Lancet Infectious Diseases, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(25)00236-1/fulltext?rss=yes

____

Predictive #models of #influenza A virus #lethal disease yield insights from #ferret respiratory tract and #brain tissues

Abstract

Collection of systemic tissues from influenza A virus (IAV)-infected ferrets at a fixed timepoint post-inoculation represents a frequent component of risk assessment activities to assess the capacity of IAV to replicate systemically. However, few studies have evaluated how the frequency and magnitude of IAV replication at discrete tissues contribute to within-host phenotypic outcomes, limiting our ability to fully contextualize results from scheduled necropsy into risk assessment settings. Employing aggregated data from ferrets inoculated with > 100 unique IAV (both human- and avian-origin viruses, spanning H1, H2, H3, H5, H7, and H9 subtypes), we examined relationships between infectious virus detection in four discrete tissue types (nasal turbinate, lung, brain, and olfactory bulb [BnOB]) to clinical outcomes of IAV-inoculated ferrets, and the utility of including these discrete tissue data as features in machine learning (ML) models. We found that addition of viral tissue titer data maintained high performance metrics of a predictive lethality classification ML model with or without inclusion of serially-collected virological and clinical data. Interestingly, infectious virus in BnOB was detected at higher frequency and magnitude among IAV associated with high pathogenicity phenotypes in ferrets, more so than tissues from the respiratory tract; in agreement, BnOB was the highest relative ranked individual tissue specimen in predictive classification models. This study highlights the potential role of BnOB viral titers in assessing IAV pathogenicity in ferrets, and highlights the role ML approaches can contribute towards understanding the predictive benefit of in vivo-generated data in the context of pandemic risk assessment.

Source: Scientific Reports, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-09154-0

____

Vertical #Transmission of #Bovine #H5N1 during #Pregnancy and #Lactation in #Mice

Abstract

Panzootic spillover of H5N1 virus clade 2.3.4.4b has resulted in expanded host range among placental mammals, with lactation transmission via milk documented. Whether infection during pregnancy leads to in utero or lactational vertical transmission remains unknown. Pregnant outbred mice were infected with A/bovine/Ohio/B24OSU-472/2024 during the second or third trimester equivalent. Second trimester infection caused in utero infection, with infectious virus detected in the uterus, placenta, and fetus. Birth following third trimester infection resulted in offspring with decreased size and neurodevelopmental delays, with infectious virus detected in the neonatal milk ring and lungs as well as mammary tissues. Ongoing H5N1 infections present increased risk for human exposure and an H5N1 vertical transmission model in placental mammals is essential for understanding viral spread and evaluating treatments during pregnancy.

Source: BioRxIV, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.07.663583v1

____

Monday, July 7, 2025

The #spread of highly pathogenic avian #influenza virus is a #social #network problem

Abstract

Despite identification of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza viruses nearly 75 years ago, the transmission pathways among wild animals remain incompletely described. We propose the use of social networks, to complement phylodynamic modeling, for better surveillance, prediction, and prioritization of HPAI.

Source: PLoS Pathogens, https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1013233

____

#Wastewater #Data for Avian #Influenza A(#H5) (#US CDC, July 7 '25)

 


{Excerpt}

Time Period: June 22, 2025 - June 28, 2025

-- H5 Detection3 sites (0.8%)

-- No Detection370 sites (99.2%)

-- No samples in last week52 sites




(...)

Source: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/nwss/rv/wwd-h5.html

____

#Finland - #Influenza A #H5N5 viruses of high pathogenicity (Inf. with) (non-poultry including wild birds) (2017-) - Immediate notification


By © Giles Laurent, gileslaurent.com, License CC BY-SA, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=142133890


 A wild Golden Eagle in Lapin aluehallintovirasto Region.

Source: WOAH, https://wahis.woah.org/#/in-review/6597

____

#Norway - #Influenza A #H5 viruses of high pathogenicity (Inf. with) (non-poultry including wild birds) (2017-) - Immediate notification

 


By Andreas Trepte - Own work, CC BY-SA 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10944563


A Great black-backed Gull in Nordland Region.

Source: WOAH, https://wahis.woah.org/#/in-review/6594

____

Detection of a Novel #Gull-like Clade of Newcastle Disease Virus and #H3N8 Avian #Influenza Virus in the #Arctic Region of #Russia (Taimyr Peninsula)

Abstract

Wild waterbirds are circulating important RNA viruses, such as avian coronaviruses, avian astroviruses, avian influenza viruses, and avian paramyxoviruses. Waterbird migration routes cover vast territories both within and between continents. The breeding grounds of many species are in the Arctic, but research into this region is rare. This study reports the first Newcastle disease virus (NDV) detection in Arctic Russia. As a result of a five-year study (from 2019 to 2023) of avian paramyxoviruses and avian influenza viruses in wild waterbirds of the Taimyr Peninsula, whole-genome sequences of NDV and H3N8 were obtained. The resulting influenza virus isolate was phylogenetically related to viruses that circulated between 2021 and 2023 in Eurasia, Siberia, and Asia. All NDV sequences were obtained from the Herring gull, and other gull sequences formed a separate gull-like clade in the sub-genotype I.1.2.1, Class II. This may indirectly indicate that different NDV variants adapt to more host species than is commonly believed. Further surveillance of other gull species may help to test the hypothesis of putative gull-specific NDV lineage and better understand their role in the evolution and global spread of NDV.

Source: Viruses, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/7/955

____

Sunday, July 6, 2025

Highly pathogenic avian #influenza #H5N1 in the #USA: recent incursions and #spillover to #cattle

Abstract

Since Spring 2024, new genotypes of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b have been identified in the United States (US). These HPAI H5N1 genotypes have caused unprecedented multi-state outbreaks in poultry and dairy farms, and human infections. Here, we discuss the current situation of this outbreak and emphasizes the need for pre-pandemic preparedness to control HPAI H5N1 in both poultry and dairy farms in the US.

Source: npj Viruses, https://www.nature.com/articles/s44298-025-00138-5

____

#H5N1 virus invades the mammary #glands of dairy #cattle through “mouth-to-teat” #transmission

Abstract

H5N1 influenza outbreaks have been reported on more than 1,070 dairy farms across 17 states in the US. Damage to the mammary gland and high levels of virus in milk were common features of the infected cattle, but it is unclear how the virus initially invades the mammary glands, and no control strategy is currently available. Here, we found that cattle oral tissues support H5N1 virus binding and replication, and virus replicating in the mouth of cattle transmitted to the mammary glands of dairy cattle during sucking. We also found that an H5 inactivated vaccine or a hemagglutinin-based DNA vaccine induced sterilizing immunity in cows against challenges with different H5N1 viruses. Our study provides insights into H5N1 virus transmission and control in cattle.

Source: National Science Review, https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaf262/8180392?searchresult=1

____

Three Ladies Adorning a Herm of Hymen, Joshua Reynolds (1773)

 


Public Domain.

Source: WikiArt, https://www.wikiart.org/en/joshua-reynolds/three-ladies-adorning-a-term-of-hymen-1773

____

#Neuraminidase #imprinting and the age-related #risk of zoonotic #influenza

Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza of the H5N1 subtype has shown recent unprecedented expansion in its geographic and host range, increasing the pandemic threat. The younger age of H5N1 versus H7N9 avian influenza in humans has previously been attributed to imprinted pre-immunity to hemagglutinin stalk (HA2) epitopes shared with group 1 (H1N1, H2N2) versus group 2 (H3N2) influenza A subtypes predominating in the human population before versus after 1968, respectively. Here we review the complex immuno-epidemiological interactions underpinning influenza risk assessment and extend the imprinting hypothesis to include a potential role for cross-protective neuraminidase (NA) imprinting. We compare H5N1 distributions and case fatality ratios by age and birth cohort (as proxy for HA2 and/or NA imprinting epoch) not only to H7N9 but also H5N6 and H9N2 avian influenza, representing more varied conditions of zoonotic influenza relatedness to human subtypes of the past century. We show homosubtypic NA imprinting likely further modulates the age-related risk of zoonotic H5N1 and H9N2, with implications for pandemic risk assessment and response.

Source: MedRxIV, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.03.25330844v1

____

Saturday, July 5, 2025

History of Mass Transportation: the FS ALe 582 EMU

 


Di Johannes Smit - https://www.flickr.com/photos/johannes-j-smit/3336090235/, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=112400120

Source: Wikipedia, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotrice_FS_ALe_582

____

#Coronavirus Disease Research #References (by AMEDEO, July 5 '25)

 


    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

  1. MICHELS EHA, Peters-Sengers H, de Brabander J, Schuurman AR, et al
    The Plasma Proteome in Community-acquired Pneumonia: Pathophysiology, Outcome and 10-Year Risk.
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202502-0325.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Ann Intern Med

  2. CROSLEY E, Martin GS
    In COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, awake prone positioning vs. supine positioning increases survival without intubation.
    Ann Intern Med. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-25-02004.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    BMJ

  3. COOPER N, Agius S, Freeman K, Church H, et al
    Impact of physician assistants on quality of care: rapid review.
    BMJ. 2025;390:e086358.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  4. KIRKLAND A, Greer SL
    The antivaccine movement threatens health in the US and worldwide.
    BMJ. 2025;390:r1383.
    PubMed        

  5. LEI Z
    Addressing the indirect health burden of covid-19.
    BMJ. 2025;390:r1268.
    PubMed        

  6. CHEN C, Zhou W, Cui Y, Cao K, et al
    Global, regional, and national characteristics of the main causes of increased disease burden due to the covid-19 pandemic: time-series modelling analysis of global burden of disease study 2021.
    BMJ. 2025;390:e083868.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  7. LOOI MK
    Covid-19: "All hypotheses remain on table," says WHO report into virus origins.
    BMJ. 2025;389:r1358.
    PubMed        


    Clin Infect Dis

  8. DE GUZMAN BETITO G, Magleby R, Caoili JC, Caravas J, et al
    Utilizing Whole Genome Sequencing to Investigate a Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cluster Among Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Care Facility in the Philippines: Insights and Implications for Infection Prevention and Control.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1:ciaf057. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  9. KASSA G, Ogongo I, Rabkin M, Bancroft E, et al
    The East Africa Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Learning Network: An Approach to Improving IPC Competencies and Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-2023.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 24:ciaf245. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Emerg Infect Dis

  10. SU YCF, Zeller MA, Cronin P, Zhang R, et al
    Rapid Emergence and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Intrahost Variants among COVID-19 Patients with Prolonged Infections, Singapore.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Int J Infect Dis

  11. ZHANG X, You Y, Liu J, Sun L, et al
    Effect of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the epidemic trends of scarlet fever in China: A population-based surveillance and modeling study.
    Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 27:107969. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107969.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect

  12. KALKERI R, Zhu M, Cloney-Clark S, Parekh A, et al
    Anti-Spike IgG4 and Fc Effector Responses: The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Platform-Specific Priming and Immune Imprinting.
    J Infect. 2025 Jun 26:106543. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106543.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Med Virol

  13. LIAO Y, Chen Q, Wang H, Pan P, et al
    SARS-CoV-2-Induced PAPOLG Contributes to Inflammation Response by Stabilizing NF-kappaB mRNA.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70478.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  14. SIRIHONGTHONG T, Jitobaom K, Boonarkart C, Thongon S, et al
    In Vitro Synergistic Antiviral Effects of beta-D-N4-hydroxycytidine and Teriflunomide in Combination against a Broad Range of RNA Viruses.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70488.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  15. XU Z, Zhang H, Du B, Jin J, et al
    Age-Specific Patterns of Infection, Co-Infection and Pneumonia Risk in Acute Respiratory Infections: An Active Surveillance Study in China, 2023-2024.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70484.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  16. CAMPOS C, Ibanez-Lligona M, Colomer-Castell S, Gregori J, et al
    Deep Sequencing Reveals Dual Evolution of SARS-CoV-2: Insights Into Defective Genomes From Wuhan-Hu-1 Variants to Omicron Subvariants.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70476.
    PubMed         Abstract available

#Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Research #References (by AMEDEO, July 5 '25)

 


    Biochemistry (Mosc)

  1. KAZAKOVA AA, Leonova EI, Sopova JV, Chirinskaite AV, et al
    Progress in CRISPR/CAS13-Mediated Suppression of Influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection in in vitro and in vivo Models.
    Biochemistry (Mosc). 2025;90:786-803.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    BMC Pediatr

  2. XIANG L, Wang Q, Xu Y, Tong Y, et al
    Paxlovid for the treatment of severe or critical COVID-19 in children.
    BMC Pediatr. 2025;25:493.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    BMJ

  3. CHEN C, Zhou W, Cui Y, Cao K, et al
    Global, regional, and national characteristics of the main causes of increased disease burden due to the covid-19 pandemic: time-series modelling analysis of global burden of disease study 2021.
    BMJ. 2025;390:e083868.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Clin Microbiol

  4. ROBBINS EM, Bertuzis R, Chiu H-C, Miller L, et al
    A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Jul 2:e0145924. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01459.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  5. DRZEWNIOKOVA P, Brian I, Mancin M, Fortin A, et al
    Validation and multi-site deployment of a lyophilized qRT-PCR reagent for the molecular diagnosis of avian influenza and rabies in Sub-Saharan African regions.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Jul 1:e0008025. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00080.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Gen Virol

  6. HIRST JC, Napier A, Burbidge D, Scott K, et al
    Glycan site loss in two egg-adapted live attenuated influenza vaccine strains does not cause antigenic mismatches.
    J Gen Virol. 2025;106.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Immunol

  7. YANG OO
    The immunopathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Overview of lessons learned in the first 5 years.
    J Immunol. 2025;214:1095-1104.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  8. KHAN R, Ji W, Guzman Rivera J, Madhvi A, et al
    A genetically modulated Toll-like receptor-tolerant phenotype in peripheral blood cells of children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome.
    J Immunol. 2025;214:373-383.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  9. BURMAS L, Lee WS, Kelly A, Webster R, et al
    Modulation of germinal center and antibody dynamics via ipsilateral versus contralateral immunization against SARS-CoV-2.
    J Immunol. 2025;214:335-346.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect Dis

  10. HALL VG, Nguyen THO, Smibert OC, Allen LF, et al
    Influenza-Specific T-Cell Responses to Vaccination Are Independent of Underlying Hematological Malignancy: Analysis of a Randomized Influenza Vaccination Trial.
    J Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 2:jiaf297. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Virol

  11. CHEN PR, White SN, Walker LR, Kapczynski DR, et al
    Genetic resilience or resistance in poultry against avian influenza virus: mirage or reality?
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 30:e0082025. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00820.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Pediatrics

  12. MUNOZ FM, Parameswaran L, Gundacker H, Posavad CM, et al
    Infant Antibodies After Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy or Postpartum.
    Pediatrics. 2025 Jun 24:e2024070175. doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-070175.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  13. YONTS AB, Gaviria-Agudelo C, Ratner AJ, O'Leary ST, et al
    April 2025 ACIP Meeting Update: Influenza, COVID-19, HPV, RSV and Other Immunizations.
    Pediatrics. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2025-072444.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS Comput Biol

  14. MURPH AC, Gibson GC, Amona EB, Beesley LJ, et al
    Synthetic method of analogues for emerging infectious disease forecasting.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2025;21:e1013203.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS Med

  15. GOODFELLOW L, Procter SR, Koltai M, Waterlow NR, et al
    The potential global health impact and cost-effectiveness of next-generation influenza vaccines: A modelling analysis.
    PLoS Med. 2025;22:e1004655.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS One

  16. ABBAS AH, Al-Zebeeby A, Al-Saadi M, Neamah AJ, et al
    Analysing genome sequences and associated metadata during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iraq revealed points to be improved: An observational retrospective study.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326750.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  17. ZUO Z, Yu L, Yang C, Wang M, et al
    Factors associated with dyslipidemia among healthcare workers in a COVID-19-designated hospital in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China: A retrospective cohort study from 2019 to 2022.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0323934.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  18. SHEN L, Pan X, Zhu Y, Liu L, et al
    Effects of COVID-19 convalescence on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326155.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  19. BEN AMEUR H, Jamaani F, Abu Alfoul MN
    The dynamic connectedness among infectious diseases, geopolitical risks, cryptocurrency, and commodity markets: Evidence from a partial and multiple wavelet analysis.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0324599.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  20. LIEW EJY, Kwok AOJ, Koh SGM, Ruslan SR, et al
    Examining doctors' business analytics capabilities in using the electronic medical record system for decision-making effectiveness in intensive care units: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0317954.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  21. SMITH ML, Berenda AB, Kilders V, Widmar NO, et al
    Social media perceptions of college football performance and season length 2019-2023.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0325840.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  22. MOHAMMADREZAEI D, Moineddin R, Wang JJ, Valencia JS, et al
    The association between care modality and hospitalizations and emergency department visits for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions during and after the pandemic in Ontario, Canada.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0324805.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  23. ZIESEL A, Jabbari H
    Structural impact of synonymous mutations in six SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0325858.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  24. DAR RA, Hashmy R, Anwar MS, Bohm P, et al
    Semantic knowledge graph fusion for fake news detection: Unifying content-based features and evidence-based analysis in the COVID-19 infodemic.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0321919.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  25. BRITO-MUTUNAYAGAM S, Hamilton DO, Mitsi E, Solorzano C, et al
    Understanding the interaction of upper respiratory tract infection with respiratory syncytial virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae using a human challenge model: a multicenter, randomized controlled study protocol.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0325149.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  26. STIRRUP O, Blackstone J, Cullen-Stephenson I, Fenner R, et al
    VIVALDI-CT shaping care home COVID-19 testing policy: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of asymptomatic testing compared to standard care in care home staff.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0324908.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  27. BIR C, Pasteur K, Widmar N, Croney C, et al
    Pet acquisition trends and veterinary care access in the US.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0325075.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  28. MEDINA FLOREZ JA, Raza S, Lynn Ansell R, Shakeri Z, et al
    Academic case reports lack diversity: Assessing the presence and diversity of sociodemographic and behavioral factors related to Post COVID-19 Condition.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326668.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  29. REHILL P, Barnes R, Biddle N, Edwards B, et al
    Understanding the effect of stay-at-home orders on psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a longitudinal study in Australia.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0325753.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  30. YANG X, Zheng J, Lv X, Wang Q, et al
    Uptake, knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward seasonal influenza vaccination among community healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chongqing Municipality, China: A cross-sectional study.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327012.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  31. MATPAN E, Baykal AT, Telci L, Kundak T, et al
    Time-series metabolomic profiling of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Possible prognostic biomarkers in patients in the ICU by (1)H-NMR analysis.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327244.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  32. SOEORG H, Pall T, Abroi A, Avi R, et al
    The effect of policy measures, school holidays and travel on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adults in Estonia from 2021 to 2022.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327719.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  33. TOULANY M, Khalili N, Heidarzadeh M, Habibelahi A, et al
    Intrauterine growth restriction and its associated factors in Tehran, comparing 3 common standards.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326348.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  34. WANG Y, Shen J, Liu G, Jiang Z, et al
    Analysis of the surveillance results of avian influenza in the external environment of huzhou city from 2017 to 2023.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326382.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  35. WAQO HW, Woldemedihn GM, Asfaw ZG
    Multistate Markov model for household's food insecurity transitions and their influencing predictors during COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326854.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  36. SASAKI LP, Fernandes GM, Silva APD, Pereira YR, et al
    Clinical characteristic and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: The PROUDEST prospective cohort study.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327174.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

  37. AKSOY CG, Barrero JM, Bloom N, Davis SJ, et al
    The global persistence of work from home.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2509892122.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  38. KAO KS, Pihlstrom NL, Niejadlik EG, Cantaert T, et al
    FcgammaRIIIa is a noncanonical costimulatory molecule for CD8 T cells.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2509016122.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  39. KRAUSE NM, Freiling I, Scheufele DA
    Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2400928121.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Vaccine

  40. OSTROWSKY JT, Vestin NC, Mehr AJ, Ulrich AK, et al
    Accomplishments and challenges in developing improved influenza vaccines: An evaluation of three years of progress toward the milestones of the influenza vaccines research and development roadmap.
    Vaccine. 2025;61:127431.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  41. KAHN KE, Santibanez TA, Jain A, Zhou T, et al
    Parental reasons for non-receipt of influenza vaccination among children 6 months-17 years and changes over time, 2015-2024.
    Vaccine. 2025;61:127415.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  42. AUROUX M, Fabacher T, Sauleau E, Arnaud L, et al
    Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination coverage and impact on COVID-19 infection severity in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: A French National Healthcare Database analysis.
    Vaccine. 2025;61:127439.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  43. RZYMSKI P, Plesniak R, Piekarska A, Sznajder D, et al
    Tracking clinical severity of influenza in adult hospitalized patients in 2024: Data from the FluTer registry in Poland.
    Vaccine. 2025;61:127443.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Virology

  44. MEMOLI MJ, Tumpey TM, Jagger BW, Dugan VG, et al
    Corrigendum to: An early 'classical' swine H1N1 influenza virus shows similar pathogenicity to the 1918 pandemic virus in ferrets and mice [Virology, volume 393/2 (2009) 539, 338 - 345.
    Virology. 2025 Jun 28:110611. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2025.110611.
    PubMed        

Avian #Influenza A(#H5N1) - #Cambodia (#WHO D.O.N., July 5 '25)


 

Situation at a glance

Between 1 January and 1 July 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) was notified by Cambodia’s International Health Regulations (IHR) National Focal Point (NFP) of 11 laboratory-confirmed cases of human infection with avian influenza A(H5N1) virus

Seven of the 11 cases were reported in June, an unusual monthly increase

Avian influenza A(H5N1) was first detected in Cambodia, in December 2003, initially affecting wild birds. 

Since then, 83 cases of human infection with influenza A(H5N1), including 49 deaths (case fatality ratio [CFR] of 59%), have been reported in the country. 

While the virus continued to circulate in avian species, no human cases were reported between 2014 and 2022, after which, the virus re-emerged in humans in February 2023. 

Since the re-emergence of human A(H5N1) infections in Cambodia in 2023, a total of 27 cases have been reported (six in 2023, 10 in 2024, and 11 to date in 2025), of which 12 were fatal (CFR 44%). 

Seventeen of the cases occurred in children under 18 years old. 

Avian influenza A(H5N1) is circulating in wild birds, poultry and some mammals around the world, and occasional human infections following exposure to infected animals or contaminated environments are expected to occur. 

In cases detected in Cambodia, exposure to sick poultry, often poultry kept in backyards, has been reported. 

According to the IHR, a human infection caused by a novel influenza A virus subtype is an event that has the potential for high public health impact and must be notified to the WHO. 

Based on currently available information, WHO assesses the current risk to the general population posed by this virus as low

For those occupationally exposed to the virus, such as farm workers, the risk is low to moderate, depending on the measures in place. 

WHO routinely reassesses this risk to factor in new information.


Description of the situation

Between 1 January and 1 July 2025, the National IHR Focal Point (NFP) of the Kingdom of Cambodia notified WHO of 11 laboratory-confirmed case of human infection with avian influenza A(H5N1) virus (clade 2.3.2.1e- formerly classified as 2.3.2.1c; from cases where virus sequences are available to date) including six deaths [CFR: 54%]. 

These cases are reported from the provinces of Siem Reap (4), Takeo (2), Kampong Cham (1), Kampong Speu (1), Kratie (1), Prey Veng (1), Svay Rieng (1). 

Of the total cases reported in 2025, seven cases were reported in June 2025.

Males account for 63% of the cases. Of the 11 cases, three cases were reported in less than five-year-olds, two cases were between the age of 5 and 18 years and six cases were reported in the age group 18-65 years. 

All cases had exposure – handling or culling - of sick poultry, often kept in backyards.

Avian influenza A(H5N1) was detected for the first time in Cambodia in December 2003, initially affecting wild birds. Between 2014 and 2022, there were no reports of human infection with A(H5N1) viruses. However, the re-emergence of human infections with A(H5N1) viruses in Cambodia was reported in February 2023. Since this re-emergence, Cambodia has reported 27 cases of laboratory confirmed human infection with avian influenza A(H5N1) including 12 fatalities (CFR 44%).  

The cases have been reported from eight provinces: Kampong Cham (1), Kampong Speu (1), Kampot (3), Kratie (3), Prey Veng (6), Svay Rieng (4), Siem Reap (5), Takeo (4). 

(...)


Epidemiology

Animal influenza viruses typically circulate within animal populations, but some have the potential to infect humans. Human infections are predominantly acquired through direct contact with infected animals or exposure to contaminated environments. Based on the original host species, influenza A viruses can be categorized such as avian influenza, swine influenza, and other animal-origin influenza subtypes.

Human infection with avian influenza viruses may result in a spectrum of illness, ranging from mild upper respiratory tract symptoms to severe, life-threatening conditions. 

Clinical manifestations include conjunctivitis, respiratory, gastrointestinal symptoms, encephalitis (brain swelling), and encephalopathy (brain damage). 

In some cases, asymptomatic infections with the A(H5N1) virus have been reported in individuals with known exposure to infected animals and environments.

A definitive diagnosis of human avian influenza infection requires laboratory confirmation. WHO regularly updates its technical guidance on the detection of zoonotic influenza, utilizing molecular diagnostic methods such as RT-PCR. 

Clinical evidence indicates that certain antiviral agents, particularly neuraminidase inhibitors (e.g., oseltamivir, zanamivir), have been shown to shorten the duration of viral replication and improve patient outcomes in some cases. This antiviral agent should be administered within 48 hours of symptom onset.

From 2003 to 1 July 2025, 986 cases of human infections with avian influenza A(H5N1), including 473 deaths (CFR 48%), have been reported to WHO from 25 countries. 

Almost all of these cases have been linked to close contact with infected live or dead birds, or contaminated environments. 

From 2003 to the present, 83 cases of human infection with influenza A(H5N1), including 49 deaths (case fatality ratio [CFR] of 59%), have been reported in Cambodia.


Public health response

The Ministry of Health's national and sub-national rapid response teams have deployed to conduct further investigations and respond to the outbreak. This is being implemented in coordination with the local authorities, the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries.  

Investigations have focussed on identifying the source of transmission in both humans and animals, conducting enhanced surveillance, detecting suspected cases, and preventing community transmission;  

-- Close contacts were monitored for their health status;  

-- Health education campaigns were conducted for affected villages. 

- Animal Health:

-- The investigation and response team from the General Directorate of Animal Health and Production (GDAHP) and the  sub-national animal health team conducted outbreak investigation and response to poultry outbreaks, in coordination with Ministry of Health, provincial health departments and local authorities.

-- Investigation on and response to the poultry outbreaks, with the response interventions focusing on disinfection and limiting animal movement across villages;

-- Community awareness and health education to affected communities;

-- Surveillance and monitoring on poultry diseases in affected villages.


WHO risk assessment

From 2003 to 1 July 2025, a total of 986 human cases of infection of influenza A(H5N1) have been reported globally to WHO from 25 countries, including this case.  Almost all of these have been linked to close contact with A(H5N1) infected live or dead birds or mammals, or contaminated environments. Human infection can cause severe disease with a high mortality rate: of the 986 infections reported globally, there have been 473 deaths (CFR 48%). 

In this event, cases have been reported from seven provinces in 2025. All cases have reported direct exposure to sick/dead poultry. While human-to-human transmission cannot be ruled out, the more likely source of exposure of these cases is infected poultry of contaminated environment.  

Based on information available at this time, the overall public health risk from currently known influenza viruses circulating at the human-animal interface has not changed and remains low

For those occupationally exposed to the virus, such as farm workers, the risk is low to moderate, depending on the measures in place. 

Additional cases in persons with exposure to sick/dead poultry is to be expected. 

The occurrence of sustained human-to-human transmission in this event based on currently available information is currently considered unlikely. 

This can, however, change and the risk assessment will be reviewed as needed if additional information becomes available. 

Close analysis of the epidemiological situation, further characterization of the most recent influenza A(H5N1) viruses in both human and animal populations, and serological investigations are critical to update associated risk assessments for public health and promptly adjust risk management measures. 

Current seasonal influenza vaccines are unlikely to protect humans against infections with influenza A(H5N1) viruses. 

Vaccines against influenza A(H5) infection in humans have been developed and licensed in some countries. WHO continues to update the list of zoonotic influenza candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs), which are selected twice a year at the WHO consultation on influenza virus vaccine composition, and on an ad hoc basis as needed. The list of such CVVs is available on the WHO website, see reference below. In addition, the genetic and antigenic characterization of contemporary animal and zoonotic influenza viruses are published here. 

This risk assessment will be reviewed as needed if additional information becomes available. 


WHO advice

Based on available information, this event does not change WHO recommendations on public health measures and influenza surveillance. 

Given the observed extent and frequency of avian influenza in poultry, wild birds and some wild and domestic mammals, the public should avoid contact with any sick or dead animals. 

The public should avoid contact with high-risk environments, such as live animal markets/farms and live poultry or surfaces that might be contaminated by poultry droppings. 

Individuals should report deceased birds and mammals or request their removal by contacting local wildlife or veterinary authorities. 

Eggs, poultry meat and other poultry products should be properly cooked and handled during food preparation. 

Handling sick or dead poultry including slaughtering, butchering, and preparing poultry for consumption, should be avoided.  

Additionally, maintaining good hand hygiene through frequent hand washing with soap or using alcohol-based hand sanitizer is recommended. 

Any person exposed to potentially infected animal or contaminated environments and feels unwell should seek health care promptly and inform their healthcare provider of their possible exposure. 

WHO does not recommend special traveler screening at points of entry or other restrictions due to the current situation of influenza viruses at the human-animal interface. 

In the case of a confirmed or suspected human infection caused by a novel influenza A virus with pandemic potential, including avian influenza viruses, a thorough epidemiologic investigation of the history of animal exposure, travel, and contact tracing should be conducted even while awaiting the confirmatory laboratory results. 

The epidemiologic investigation should also include early identification of unusual events that could signal person-to-person transmission of the novel virus. Clinical samples collected from confirmed or suspected cases should be tested and sent to a WHO collaborating centre (WHOCC) for further characterization. Additional samples should be collected from animals, the environment or any foods suspected to be sources of infection.  

State Parties to the International Health Regulations (2005) are required to immediately notify WHO of any laboratory-confirmed case of a recent human infection caused by a new subtype of influenza virus. Evidence of illness is not required for this notification. WHO has updated the influenza A(H5) confirmed case definition on the WHO website. 


Further Informations

-- Ministry of Health Cambodia press release. 1 July 2025:  https://moh.gov.kh/kh/notice/detail/183

-- World Health Organization Global influenza programme, human-animal interface:  https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avian-influenza 

-- World Health Organization Monthly Risk Assessment Summary:  Influenza at the human-animal interface:  https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avian-influenza/monthly-risk-assessment-summary     

-- World Health Organization Avian Influenza Weekly Update: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/emergencies/surveillance/avian-influenza 

-- Protocol to investigate non-seasonal influenza and other emerging acute respiratory diseases: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-WHE-IHM-GIP-2018.2 

-- Surveillance for human infections with avian influenza A(‎H5)‎ viruses: objectives, case definitions, testing and reporting: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/B09337

-- Public health resource pack for countries experiencing outbreaks of influenza in animals: revised guidance: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240076884

-- Implementing the integrated sentinel surveillance of influenza and other respiratory viruses of epidemic and pandemic potential by the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240101432

-- Case definitions for the four diseases requiring notification in all circumstances under the International Health Regulations (2005):  https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/case-definitions-for-the-four-diseases-requiring-notification-to-who-in-all-circumstances-under-the-ihr-(2005) 

-- Evidence-based risk management along the livestock production and market chain: Cambodia: https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/CA7319EN/ 

-- Disease Outbreak News. 2 September 2024:  https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2024-DON533 

-- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Animal Production and Health Division (NSAH): https://www.fao.org/agriculture/animal-production-and-health/en  

-- World Animal Health Organisation (WOAH). World Animal Health Information System (WAHIS). https://wahis.woah.org/#/in-review/5754?reportId=174349&fromPage=event-dashboard-url 



____

Friday, July 4, 2025

#IAEA #DG #Statement on #Situation in #Ukraine - #Update 300 (July 4 '25)

 


Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) has lost all off-site power for the ninth time during the military conflict and now relies on emergency diesel generators for the electricity it needs, underlining the extremely fragile nuclear safety situation at the site, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said today.

The plant’s connection to its last remaining 750 kilovolt (kV) power line was cut at 17:37 local time today. While the cause was not immediately known, it coincided with air raid alarms in the region, Director General Grossi said, citing information from the Ukrainian nuclear regulator.

It was the first time the ZNPP suffered a complete loss of off-site power since 2 December 2023.

The IAEA team based at the site, Europe’s largest nuclear power plant (NPP), reported that 18 emergency diesel generators immediately started operating to generate the electricity the plant needs to be able to cool the reactors and the spent fuel pools. The plant has diesel fuel for at least 10 days on-site, and arrangements in place to secure further supplies.

“What was once virtually unimaginable – that a major nuclear power plant would repeatedly lose all of its external power connections – has unfortunately become a common occurrence at the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant. Almost three and a half years into this devastating war, nuclear safety in Ukraine remains very much in danger,” Director General Grossi said.

“Our team on the ground will continue to follow the situation very closely and report on further developments there. For now, the plant’s diesel generators are providing the necessary electricity,” he said.

The ZNPP’s six reactors have been in cold shutdown since 2024 but still require cooling water for their reactor cores and spent fuel pools. The ZNPP lost the connection to its last remaining 330 kV back-up power line on 7 May, leaving the plant dependent on its sole 750 kV line. Before the conflict, it had ten off-site power lines available, highlighting the extent to which nuclear safety has deteriorated since February 2022.

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency, https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-300-iaea-director-general-statement-on-situation-in-ukraine

____

#Risk posed by the #HPAI virus #H5N1, Eurasian lineage goose/Guangdong clade 2.3.4.4b. genotype B3.13, currently circulating in the #US

Abstract

The emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1), clade 2.3.4.4b, genotype B3.13 in U.S. dairy cattle marks a significant shift in the virus' host range and epidemiological profile. Infected cattle typically exhibit mild clinical signs, such as reduced milk production, mastitis and fever, with morbidity generally below 20% and mortality averaging 2%. Transmission within farms is primarily driven by contaminated milk and milking procedures, while farm‐to‐farm spread is mainly linked to cattle movement and shared equipment. The virus demonstrates high replication in mammary glands, with infected cows shedding large quantities of virus in milk for up to 3 weeks, even in the absence of clinical signs. Shedding through other routes appears limited. Infected cattle develop virus‐specific antibodies within 7–10 days, offering short‐term protection, though the duration and robustness of immunity remain unclear. Between March 2024 and May 2025, the virus was confirmed in 981 dairy herds across 16 U.S. states, with California particularly affected. Risk factors identified for between‐farm spread include cattle movement, shared equipment and contact with external personnel, while biosecurity measures, including waste management and wildlife deterrence, may reduce the risk of virus introduction. In response to the outbreaks, U.S. authorities implemented strict movement controls, mandatory testing and enhanced biosecurity protocols. Potential pathways of introduction of HPAI B3.13 virus into EU via trade from US could be the import of lactating cows and bovine meat, although strict trade regulations, absence of animal import and limited virus detection in meat, especially in muscle tissue, do not support this occurrence. Import of products containing raw milk could also be potential pathways for virus introduction. Migratory birds – particularly waterfowl – pose potential pathways for introduction during seasonal migrations. The detection of mammalian‐adaptive mutations and zoonotic cases underscores the virus' public health relevance and the need for research, surveillance and cross‐sectoral preparedness.

Source: US National Library of Medicine, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12223544/

____

Leveraging #risk #communication and community engagement and lessons from previous #outbreaks to strengthen a Public Health response: A case study of #DiseaseX in the Panzi region, #DRC

Abstract

On 08 December 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported an outbreak of Disease X in the Panzi Health Zone, Kwango province, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). This unknown pathogen, with 406 cases and 31 deaths at the time of its declaration, predominantly affects children under 5 years. Disease X, hypothesised to be a zoonotic ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus, poses significant challenges because of limited healthcare infrastructure, gaps in risk communication and ineffective community engagement. This opinion article aims to explore these challenges and advocate for the urgent need for culturally tailored, inclusive communication strategies that foster trust and empower local communities in responding to outbreaks. Key approaches highlighted include mobilising local leaders, utilising mobile laboratories for decentralised diagnostics and improving sample collection techniques. Drawing on lessons from previous epidemics, such as COVID-19 and Ebola, this article emphasises the importance of robust surveillance systems, community engagement and effective risk communication, skilled health workforce and collaborative management frameworks. Strengthening early warning systems and ensuring equitable access to diagnostic and treatment resources are essential for mitigating future outbreaks of unknown diseases in resource-limited settings.

Source: Journal of Public Health Africa, https://publichealthinafrica.org/index.php/jphia/article/view/1322

____

#Epidemiology and phylogenomic characterisation of two distinct #mpox #outbreaks in #Kinshasa, #DRC, involving a new #subclade Ia lineage: a retrospective, observational study

Summary

Background

Clade I monkeypox virus is endemic in DR Congo. We aim to describe the epidemiological trends of the cocirculating subclades Ia and Ib mpox outbreaks in Kinshasa, DR Congo.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included suspected and laboratory-confirmed mpox cases reported between Jan 1, 2023, and Oct 31, 2024, in Kinshasa. Skin lesion swabs or blood samples were collected as part of a routine countrywide mpox surveillance programme. To confirm the diagnosis of mpox, all samples were tested at the Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (INRB) using real-time PCR. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted for phylogenomic analysis and assessment of APOBEC3 type mutations. Samples that remained unassigned to subclade Ia or Ib after whole-genome sequencing and real-time PCR were labelled as an unknown subclade.

Findings

As part of routine disease surveillance, 1479 suspected mpox cases were reported in Kinshasa. Samples were collected from 1314 suspected mpox cases and tested by PCR at the INRB. 440 (34%) of 1314 suspected cases had PCR confirmed mpox, with the first confirmed mpox case detected on Aug 18, 2023. 262 (60%) of 440 cases were male, 172 (39%) were female, and six (1%) were unknown, and the median age was 26 years (IQR 19–34). The epidemiological curve suggests two distinct periods during the 2023–24 outbreaks in Kinshasa. Between Aug 18, 2023, and June 30, 2024 (period 1), 218 suspected mpox cases underwent investigation and 24 (11%) were PCR confirmed as mpox; all cases were identified as subclade Ia. After a decline in suspected and confirmed cases in early 2024, the first confirmed subclade Ib mpox case in Kinshasa was reported on July 1, 2024. Between July 1 and Oct 31, 2024 (period 2), 1096 suspected mpox cases were reported and 416 (38%) were PCR confirmed as mpox. In-depth epidemiological case investigations during period 1 identified three small, self-limiting transmission chains between August and September, 2023. Case investigation data were available for 127 cases with PCR confirmed mpox, including clinical symptom data available for 61 (64%) of 95 with subclade Ia. The most commonly reported symptoms were fever (49 [80%] of 61) and skin rash (48 [79%]). The most common lesion locations were genital or anorectal (35 [64%] of 55 cases with available data). Case investigation data were available for 32 cases with subclade Ib mpox, including clinical symptom data available for 21 (66%) with subclade Ib. The most commonly reported symptoms were skin rash (18 [86%] of 21) and fever (12 [57%]). Genital or anorectal involvement was reported in 13 (68%) of 19 cases with available lesion location data. Genomic analysis shows five separate self-limiting clusters of subclade Ia (group II sampled from August, 2023, to August, 2024) and two larger clusters (occurring from July, 2024, to October, 2024, in period 2) belonging to subclade Ia (group II) and subclade Ib. 32 (68%) of 47 mutations for subclade Ia cluster outbreak and 28 (72%) of 39 mutations for subclade Ib outbreak were consistent with APOBEC3 driven changes.

Interpretation

Sustained human-to-human transmission occurred after repeated self-limiting introductions of subclade Ia documented since 2023, which has cocirculated with subclade Ib in Kinshasa from July, 2024. Increased APOBEC3 driven changes in the new subclade Ia lineage support a shift towards human-to-human transmission. These findings reveal important changes in mpox transmission dynamics and suggests that any monkeypox virus subclade has the potential to cause sustained human outbreaks when favourable transmission conditions are met.

Source: Lancet, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)00294-6/abstract?rss=yes

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts