Monday, July 28, 2025

Updated joint #FAO / #WHO / #WOAH public #health #assessment of recent #influenza #H5 virus #events in animals and people (July 28 '25)

 


Key points 

-- At the present time, based on available information, FAO-WHO-WOAH assess the global public health risk of influenza A(H5) viruses to be low, while the risk of infection for occupationally or frequently exposed (e.g., with backyard poultry) persons is low to moderate depending on the risk mitigation and hygiene measures in place and the local avian influenza epidemiological situation. 

-- Transmission between animals continues to occur and, to date, a growing yet still limited number of human infections are being reported. Although additional human infections associated with exposure to infected animals or contaminated environments are expected to occur, the overall public health impact of such infections at a global level, at the present time, is considered minor. The assessment could change if and when additional epidemiological or virological information becomes available. 

-- This risk assessment from FAO, WHO and WOAH updates the assessment of the risk of zoonotic transmission (for example, animal to human) considering additional information made available since the previous assessment of 17 April 2025. 

-- This update is limited to the inclusion of additional information being made available globally. 

-- Due to the potential risk to human health and the far-reaching implications of the disease on the health of wild birds, poultry, livestock and other animal populations, timely notification to global authorities and the use of a One Health approach are essential to: 

- tackle avian influenza effectively, 

- to monitor and characterize virus circulation, 

- to prevent transmission within species and to new species 

- to reduce spread among animals, and 

- to prevent human infections from exposure to animals. 


Infections in animals 

-- To date, H5 avian influenza viruses have been detected in birds and/or mammals across all continents except Oceania. 

-- The predominant H5 virus clades currently circulating worldwide include clades 2.3.2.1 and 2.3.4.4. 

-- Between 1 March and 1 July 2025, an additional 807 A(H5N1) outbreaks in animals (including bird and mammal species) have been reported to WOAH. 

-- Of these, 268 outbreaks occurred in poultry (of any farming system), 389 outbreaks in wild bird and 92 outbreaks occurred in mammalian species. 

-- In Cambodia, 9 out of 14 outbreaks in poultry occurred in the vicinity of reported human cases. 


H5 clade 2.3.2.1 viruses 

-- Since 1 March 2025, clade 2.3.2.1a and 2.3.2.1e (previously classified as a 2.3.2.1c1) viruses have been detected in poultry in Bangladesh and Cambodia, respectively. 

-- Influenza A(H5N1) infections in felids were reported in January 2025 in a wildlife rescue centre in Maharashtra State, India, causing the death of one leopard and three tigers.{2} 

-- Influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.2.1a infections were reported in domestic cats and in samples from a live bird market in January 2025 in Madhya Pradesh, India.{3} 

-- The viruses were closely related to A/Victoria/149/2024, a sample identified in a traveller from India to Australia in 2024, which was characterized as a previously unreported reassortant virus consisting of clade 2.3.2.1a, 2.3.4.4b, and wild bird low pathogenicity avian influenza gene segments.{4} 

-- In April 2025, influenza A(H5N1) infections were reported in two captive Serval cats (Leptailurus serval) in Dhaka Division, Bangladesh.{5}   

-- Influenza A(H5N1) outbreaks observed in captive felines in Thailand during 2003-2004 were characterized by severe pneumonia and high mortality and have been associated with the feeding of infected poultry and likely tiger-to-tiger transmission.{6,7} 


H5 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses 

-- Detections of A(H5) in mammals and wild and domestic birds continue to be reported in many countries worldwide. 

-- Clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5) viruses are circulating in wild and domestic birds, have been involved in multiple spillover events affecting wild carnivorous and marine mammals as well as domestic cats and dogs

-- Clade 2.3.4.4b virus infections reported in mammals in the Americas, Asia and Europe have resulted in severe clinical presentation (e.g., pneumonia, myocardial necrosis), with neurological signs (e.g., meningoencephalitis) in some species. {8, 9} 

-- Amino acid changes potentially associated with increased virulence, transmission, or adaptation to mammalian hosts have been sporadically identified.{10,11} 

-- In March 2024, a clade 2.3.4.4b influenza A(H5N1) virus of the B3.13 genotype was detected in unpasteurized milk samples and oropharyngeal swabs from dairy cattle for the first time in the United States of America (USA).{12,13} Since then, influenza A(H5N1) virus detections have continued to be reported through the testing of dairy cattle and bulk milk samples.{14} 

-- Analyses of virus sequence data from infected dairy cattle in the USA indicated that the detections in dairy herds until February 2025 were linked to a single wild bird-to-dairy cow transmission event of a B3.13 genotype clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) virus that occurred in late 2023 or early 2024.{15} 

-- During January-February 2025, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) confirmed the detection of a genotype D1.1 H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b virus in dairy cattle in the states of Nevada and Arizona , representing two additional separate spillover events from birds to cattle.{16,17} The exact mode of the virus introductions into dairy cattle remains unclear.{18} 

-- The genotype D1.1 virus has been the most frequently detected H5N1 genotype across North America in 2025 and has affected wild birds, poultry and  mammals, including wild and domestic felids and a marine mammal

-- Presently, to our knowledge, viruses from the clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) B3.13 and D1.1 genotypes  have not been detected outside of North America in field conditions.  

-- Between March 2024 and 1 July 2025, 1074 dairy cattle herds in 17 states of the USA have tested positive for A(H5N1). Since the last joint assessment of 17 April 2025, the number of H5N1 detections in dairy herds has significantly decreased despite a surge in the State of Idaho during the month of April.{19} 

-- The exact routes of transmission between dairy cattle, and the roles of viremia and protective immunity remain unclear. 

-- While virus shedding in milk seems to be consistently linked with clinical disease, viral RNA has also been found in respiratory and urine samples intermittently and earlier in infection. 

-- Also, while transmission to new herds has been linked with movement of lactating cows, in multiple instances herds without a link to recent movement of lactating cattle have been affected. Some results indicate seroconversion in non-lactating cattle.{20} 

-- Experimental intramammary infection and re-infection of lactating cows with an A(H5N1) B3.13 virus indicated that while the primary inoculation led to mastitis and viral shedding in milk, secondary inoculation in an unaffected quarter, following resolution of infection from the primary inoculation, resulted in neither clinical manifestations nor virus shedding in milk.{21} 

-- Further studies are needed to understand the continued transmission of A(H5N1) in dairy cattle.  

-- In 2025, over 70 confirmed cases of A(H5) infection were reported in domestic cats in the USA across 19 states. Many cases were presumably linked to raw food diets, exposure to dairy farms, or they occurred in indoor-only cats with unknown exposure routes. Infections frequently resulted in severe respiratory and neurological illness, with high mortality. Detections in other mammals continued to be reported as well.{22} 

-- On 11 February 2025, an outbreak in a mixed backyard flock (chickens, ducks and turkeys) in Chaco province, Argentina was reported to the Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASA). The SENASA reference laboratory deposited the sequences in GISAID database (EPI_ISL_19752381 and EPI_ISL_19823059–68). The phylogenies showed that the A(H5N1) viruses from Argentina collected in 2025 are triple reassortants; the genome resembles that of North American genotypes B3.6 and B3.13, but with the Eurasian PA segment replaced by one from South American low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses.{23} 

-- On 4th March 2025, A(H5N1) virus infection was confirmed in domestic cats on a poultry farm in Belgium. The cats showed severe disease and were euthanized. They were likely infected by consuming contaminated eggs or drinking infected water, although the precise transmission route remains unconfirmed.{24} 

-- On 24 March 2025, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) of the United Kingdom reported their first detection of influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus in a milk sample from a single sheep in Yorkshire. The case was identified on a premises where high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) viruses had been confirmed in domestic birds in February 2025. This H5N1 virus is different from the ones being detected in dairy cattle in the US.{25} 

-- A(H5)-specific antibodies were also detected in multiple samples from the sheep who lived in close proximity to the infected poultry and on a premises likely heavily contaminated with the virus.{26}  

-- On 12 May (confirmed on 15 May) 2025, A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses were detected on a commercial breeder farm in Montenegro, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Over 17,000 birds on the premises either died or were culled.  Subsequently, several suspected cases were reported, and H5 detections in wild birds were confirmed in several states. 

-- In May 2025, A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses were detected in harbour seals and sea otters in Hokkaido, Japan, during investigations of their mortality. The viral sequences, including the hemagglutinin gene, were very similar or identical to clade 2.3.4.4b viruses detected in wild birds in the region, suggesting likely spillover from avian sources. 

-- For the latest information on avian influenza situation in animals worldwide, see the FAO Global Avian Influenza Viruses with Zoonotic Potential situation update and the WOAH situation reports on HPAI, as well as WOAH’s World Animal Health Information System. 


Detections in humans 

-- Since the last joint assessment of April 2025 and as of 1 July 2025, an additional 16 human cases of infection with A(H5N1) viruses have been detected. Of these, nine were detected in Cambodia, two were detected in Bangladesh and India, and single cases were detected in China, Mexico and Viet Nam

-- Of the nine cases detected in Cambodia, four died. The cases detected in India and Mexico were also fatal. All but two cases reported direct or indirect exposure to domestic birds. The source of infection of the case in Mexico was determined as likely indirect exposure to either domestic or wild birds and the exposure information for one case in India was not available. 

-- No human-tohuman transmission was suspected associated with these confirmed cases. 

-- The viruses from  the case in India and from both cases in Bangladesh belong to HA clade 2.3.2.1a viruses. Viruses from all the cases from Cambodia belong to clade 2.3.2.1e viruses. The viruses from the cases in China and Mexico belong to clade 2.3.4.4b viruses.  


Virus characteristics  

-- Regular monitoring and screening of viral sequences from birds has rarely found markers of mammalian adaptation in A(H5) viruses. Those that have been detected are mainly in the polymerase proteins of the virus. Sporadic mutations in polymerase proteins have been observed more frequently in viruses from mammals. 

-- Additional studies on A(H5N1) genotype B3.13 viruses indicate no differences in receptor binding (retaining a preference for binding to avian-like sialic acid receptors).{27} 

-- Some of the D1.1 genotype viruses detected in dairy cattle have the amino acid mutation D701N in the PB2 protein, which has been associated with increased polymerase activity in mammalian cells. 

-- As of 1 March 2025, this mutation has neither been observed in D1.1 viruses detected in wild birds nor in poultry. The virus from the patient in Wyoming infected with A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b genotype D1.1 had the E627K mutation in the PB2 protein which is associated with more efficient virus replication in mammalian cells.{28} This change has not been observed in any D1.1 viruses which have been detected in dairy cattle, but the E627K mutation has been found in some B3.13 viruses detected in dairy cows.  

-- Available virus sequences from human cases have shown some genetic markers that may reduce susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitors (antiviral medicines such as oseltamivir) or endonuclease inhibitors (such as baloxavir marboxil). While these changes may reduce antiviral susceptibility in laboratory testing, the clinical impact of these genetic changes requires further studies.{29}  

-- Experimental studies with A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses, including a B3.13 virus from the human case in Texas and a human case from Michigan, have shown variable transmission between ferrets  by direct contact, but no or inefficient transmission via respiratory droplets in most studies.{30,31,32,33,34,35,36}  

-- An unpublished study in ferrets done by the US CDC with a D1.1 A(H5N1) virus (A/Washington/239/2024) did not show transmission via respiratory droplets.{37} 

-- Currently circulating A(H5N1) viruses would need further genetic changes to gain the ability to spread efficiently among humans via respiratory droplets, consistent with the current level of risk to public health, which is low. 

-- Based on limited seroprevalence information available on A(H5) viruses, human population immunity against the HA of A(H5) viruses is expected to be minimal; human population immunity targeting the N1 neuraminidase is found to be present although the impact of this immunity is yet to be understood.{38} 

-- Experimental studies suggest prior A(H1N1) immunity reduced virus replication and disease severity of bovine-derived B3.13 genotype A(H5N1) virus in ferrets and that ferrets with this pre-existing immunity expressed A(H5N1) cross-reacting antibodies to the neuraminidase protein.{39} However, the effectiveness of quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (QIV) against influenza A(H5N1) virus remains a speculation, as a recent study observed no cross-neutralisation of H5N1 viruses by sera from patients vaccinated against seasonal influenza with QIV.{40}  


Candidate vaccine viruses (CVV) 

-- The WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS), in collaboration with animal health partners (FAO, WOAH, OFFLU (Joint WOAH-FAO network of expertise on animal influenza) and others), continue to evaluate candidate vaccine viruses for pandemic preparedness purposes both bi-annually and on an ad hoc basis. 

-- Regular genetic and antigenic characterization of contemporary zoonotic influenza viruses are published here with the most recent update on A(H5) CVVs published in February 2025 following the WHO Consultation on the Composition of Influenza Virus Vaccines for Use in the 2025-2026 Northern Hemisphere Influenza Season.  

-- The majority of circulating clade 2.3.4.4b viruses reacted well to at least one of the post-infection ferret antisera raised against the existing CVVs. The majority of the clade 2.3.2.1e viruses characterized antigenically reacted well to ferret antisera raised against the existing and CVV proposed in September 2024. Clade 2.3.2.1a viruses detected recently in poultry and felines in India were not characterized antigenically but had HA genes similar to that of the A(H5N1) virus detected in a traveller returning to Australia from India. This virus reacted poorly with ferret antisera raised again available CVVs, thus a new clade 2.3.2.1a CVV was proposed. A new clade 2.3.4.4h CVV was also proposed due to the ongoing detections of this clade of viruses in poultry in China and continued genetic evolution leading to reduced reactivity to existing CVVs. The updated list of available zoonotic influenza candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs) which include A(H5N1) viruses and potency testing reagents is updated on the WHO website. 


Assessment of current public health risk posed by influenza A(H5N1) viruses{41} 

1. What is the global public health risk of additional human cases of infection with avian influenza A(H5) viruses? 

-- Despite the continued detections of A(H5) viruses in animals and continued human exposures to the virus at the human-animal-environment interface, there have been relatively few human infections reported to date.  Of the human cases of A(H5) detections reported since the beginning of 2021, the vast majority were infections in people associated with exposure to A(H5) viruses through direct or indirect contact with infected animals, or contaminated environments, such as live poultry markets or other premises with infected animals. Severity of illness has ranged from mild to fatal, with the majority of mild cases reported by the USA associated with exposure to infected dairy cattle. Thus far, among the cases, there has been no reported or identified human-to-human transmission through follow up epidemiologic, virologic and serologic investigations. Investigations for some of the cases continue. Current virologic and epidemiologic information indicates that these viruses remain avian influenza viruses without established adaptation to mammalian hosts and have not acquired the capacity for sustained transmission between humans.  The epidemiological situation changed in 2024 with the spread of A(H5) virus in the USA dairy cattle population following an initial spillover event from birds to dairy cattle in 2023/24 followed by two additional spillover events identified in 2025. Persons exposed to affected dairy cattle and other infected animals may be in prolonged and close contact with potentially contaminated surfaces and animal products. As long as A(H5) viruses continue to be detected in wild and domestic birds and mammals, including dairy cattle, and related environments, including in unpasteurized/raw milk, further human cases are expected, particularly amongst exposed individuals not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment and/or in environments where mitigation measures are not in place.  

-- Based on currently available information, FAO-WHO-WOAH assesses the global public health risk of influenza A(H5) viruses as low. Although additional human infections associated with exposure to infected animals or contaminated environments are expected to occur, they remain limited in the general population and the overall current public health impact of such infections at a global level is minor, considering the surveillance, response, mitigation and control measures in place.  

-- However, while the risk of infection to the general public is low, among persons with exposure to infected birds or mammals or contaminated environments, the risk of infection can range from low to moderate, depending on nature of the exposure, the duration of exposure, the consistent and appropriate use of personal protective equipment, and the use of other response, mitigation and control measures particularly in environments where animals are kept.  

-- The pandemic potential of these viruses requires enhanced vigilance, especially in animal populations where animal to animal transmission is known to occur, and close monitoring in animals and humans. It remains essential that, while farmers enhance biosecurity on their farms, governments should focus efforts on strengthening surveillance in susceptible animal populations and in persons exposed to infected animals. 

-- In addition to prevention and mitigation  efforts to reduce and/or stop animal to animal transmission and reduce environmental contamination. Furthermore, prevention efforts to stop animals to human transmission and to improve risk communication and community engagement in particular to those occupationally exposed or with backyard poultry and training in the use of personal protective equipment are key to preventing new human infection with these viruses. 


2. What is the likelihood of human-to-human transmission of avian influenza A(H5) viruses?  

-- There has been no reported human-to-human transmission of A(H5) viruses since 2007, although there may be knowledge gaps in investigations around identified human infections. In 2007 and the years prior, small clusters of A(H5) virus infections in humans were reported, including limited human to human transmission from patients to health care workers. Since then, sustained human-to-human transmission of A(H5) viruses has not been reported.{42}  

-- The A(H5) viruses currently detected in mammals, including in human cases, largely retain genomic and biological characteristics of avian influenza viruses and remain well-adapted to spread among birds. Except for within-host acquired amino acid mutations in polymerase proteins, there is still limited evidence for adaptation to mammals and humans even when transmission in non-human mammals has been suspected.{43} 

-- No changes in receptor binding tropism have been consistently observed that would increase binding to receptors in the human upper respiratory tract which is one of several adaptations required to increase the probability of transmission to and among people. In addition, available preliminary sero-studies and seroinvestigations have not identified human-to-human transmission of A(H5N1) in the USA. Therefore, sustained human-to-human transmission of the currently circulating A(H5) viruses is considered unlikely without further genetic changes in the virus. This is actively being assessed by agencies in affected Member States, FAO, WHO, WOAH and partners. WHO, together with FAO and WOAH, continues to evaluate A(H5) viruses closely and will reassess the risk associated with the currently circulating A(H5) viruses as more information becomes available.  

-- Further antigenic characterization of A(H5) viruses, including in relation to the existing CVVs, and development of specific reagents are being prioritized at the WHO Collaborating Centres and Essential Regulatory Laboratories of GISRS in collaboration with public health, animal health, and veterinary sector colleagues.  


Confidence level of the assessment 

-- The overall confidence in the risk assessment is considered medium. The information used is derived from reports from national animal and human health authorities. There may be biases in surveillance, testing and reporting. Although the results and conclusions from peer-reviewed publications, pre-print publications and unpublished data informed this risk assessment, no systematic literature review was undertaken. Critical knowledge gaps remain in the understanding of the epidemiology. 


Recommended actions  

-- It is recommended that Member States and national authorities: 

increase surveillance and vigilance, in human populations, especially amongst occupationally exposed persons, for the possibility of zoonotic infections, particularly through National Influenza Centres (NICs) and other influenza laboratories associated with GISRS; 

assess and reduce the risk among occupationally exposed persons using methods such as active case finding and molecular and serologic methods, reducing environmental exposures, providing adequate and appropriate personal protective equipment; 

conduct active case finding around suspected and confirmed human cases to determine if there are additional cases or indications of human-to-human transmission; and   

work with national agencies and partners to better understand the exposure to and risk from raw/unpasteurized milk and milk products.  

-- Under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005),{44} States Parties are required to notify WHO within 24 hours of any laboratory-confirmed case of human influenza caused by a new subtype according to the WHO case definition.{45} 

-- WHO has published the case definition for human infections with avian influenza A(H5) virus requiring notification under IHR (2005).{46}  

-- Member States and national authorities are also recommended to: 

increase surveillance and timely reporting efforts for the early detection of A(H5) influenza viruses in domestic birds, wild birds and mammals{47}; 

include infection with an A(H5) influenza virus as a differential diagnosis, in non-avian species, including cattle, swine and other livestock and farmed domestic and wild animal populations, with high likelihood of exposure to A(H5) viruses; 

implement preventive and early response measures to break the chain of infection among domestic animals (for example, poultry and dairy cattle), including considering the use of vaccination to reduce circulation in poultry as per national policies and according to guidance provided by animal health organizations{48,49}; 

promptly report high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) events in all animal species, including cattle (according to the WOAH case definition{50}) and other domestic and wild mammals, to WOAH and other international organizations such as FAO;  

conduct genetic sequencing and share genetic sequences of influenza viruses and associated metadata in publicly available databases; 

protect animals by mitigating the risk of introduction and spread of the disease through implementation and/or strengthening biosecurity in livestock holdings/premises and along the value chain; 

protect persons by employing good production and hygiene practices when handling animals and animal products; and 

protect persons in contact with suspected/infected animals by providing appropriate personal protective equipment and communicating and educating on the importance and proper use of personal protective equipment and providing information and access to testing. 

(...)

-- Additional studies/surveillance, applying One Health principles are warranted, which could provide information to enhance confidence in the risk assessment. These may include serological studies in high-risk animal populations, in high-risk human populations, and epidemiological investigations.  Anyone who may have been exposed to infected or potentially infected animals or contaminated environments should be advised to promptly seek health care if they feel unwell, and to inform their health care provider of their possible exposure. Following prompt testing, early and appropriate clinical management should be initiated, and precautionary measures put in place to assess and prevent potential further spread among humans and animals.  

-- Clinicians should also be alerted to potential zoonotic infection in patients with an exposure history to birds or animals especially in areas where A(H5N1) viruses are known or suspected to be circulating in animals but also in areas where surveillance in animals may be limited.  

-- Routine epidemiologic and virologic surveillance for influenza should be conducted ideally yearround using a standard case definition in healthcare facilities according to WHO guidance.{51}  

-- Timely sharing of information and sequence data from both the human and animal health sectors from all regions should continue to be strongly recommended and is critical for rapid and robust joint risk assessment. 

-- The rapid sharing of virus materials with WHO Collaborating Centres of GISRS continues to be essential to conduct a thorough risk assessment and develop or adjust targeted response measures. 

-- The Tool for Influenza Pandemic Risk Assessment (TIPRA) provides an in-depth assessment of risk associated with some zoonotic influenza viruses – notably the likelihood of the virus gaining human-to-human transmissibility, and the impact should the virus gain such transmissibility. TIPRA maps relative risk amongst viruses assessed using multiple elements.{52} 

-- Data pertaining to the risk elements within TIPRA should be generated and shared with WHO.  

-- Efforts to reduce human exposure to birds, livestock, and other mammals infected with or potentially infected with avian and other animal influenza viruses should be implemented and enhanced to minimize the risk of zoonotic infections. 

-- Individuals with activities that involve exposure to infected animals and/or contaminated environments are at higher risk and should take necessary precautions to prevent infection.{53} 

-- Those who are exposed to potentially infected animals should have access to, be trained in their use under different environmental conditions, and wear personal protective equipment including eye protection.{54} 

-- If they develop respiratory symptoms or conjunctivitis, they should be rapidly tested, and precautionary infection control measures should be put in place to prevent potential further spread among humans and to animals. 

-- For detailed guidance on treatment, refer to relevant global and national guidance.{55} 

-- Some manufacturers have initiated production of an A(H5) human vaccine that matches current circulating strains. Although a few countries are procuring vaccine to vaccinate occupationally exposed persons, this is not currently being recommended as a global strategy considering the limited number of human infections with A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b viruses.  

-- Investigations are ongoing to understand the risk to humans from consuming raw/unpasteurized milk contaminated with A(H5N1) virus. FAO, WHO and WOAH advise consuming pasteurized milk, instead of raw/unpasteurized milk. 

-- Due to the potential health risks from many dangerous zoonotic pathogens, raw/unpasteurized milk consumption should be avoided.{56} If pasteurized milk is not available, heating raw milk until it boils makes it safer for consumption.{57}  

-- More information will be available as investigations are actively ongoing in the USA and elsewhere. WHO and GISRS, jointly with FAO, WOAH and OFFLU are working closely together to continuously assess the avian influenza situation. This includes increased surveillance and testing to monitor the evolution and geographic spread of avian influenza viruses, including A(H5N1) viruses, to provide timely and updated joint risk assessments.  


References 

{1} Formerly classified as A(H5) clade 2.3.2.1c. Ort JT, Zolnoski SA, Lam TT, Neher R, Moncla LH. Development of avian influenza A(H5) virus datasets for Nextclade enables rapid and accurate clade assignment. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Feb 3:2025.01.07.631789. doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.07.631789. 

{2} WOAH. Report from World Animal Health Information System (WAHIS). wahis.woah.org/#/inreview/6218?reportId=171807&fromPage=event-dashboard-url

{3} Raut AA, Aasdev A, Kumar N, Pathak A, Mishra A, Sehgal P et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Clade 2.3.2.1a virus infection in domestic cats, India, 2025. bioRxiv 2025.02.23.638954; doi:  doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.23.638954. 

{4} Deng YM, Wille M, Dapat C, Xie R, Lay O, Peck H et al. Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Clade 2.3.2.1a in Traveler Returning to Australia from India, 2024. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Jan;31(1):135-138. doi.org/10.3201/eid3101.241210. 

{5} WOAH. Report from World Animal Health Information System (WAHIS). wahis.woah.org/#/inreview/6453?reportId=174033&fromPage=event-dashboard-url

{6} Thanawongnuwech R, Amonsin A, Tantilertcharoen R, Damrongwatanapokin S, Theamboonlers A, Payungporn S, et al. Probable Tiger-to-Tiger Transmission of Avian Influenza H5N1. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(5):699-701. doi.org/10.3201/eid1105.050007. 

{7} Keawcharoen J, Oraveerakul K, Kuiken T, Fouchier R, Amonsin A, Payungporn S, et al. Avian Influenza H5N1 in Tigers and Leopards. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(12):2189-2191. doi.org/10.3201/eid1012.040759. 

{8} Elsmo EJ, WĂ¼nschmann A, Beckmen KB, Broughton-Neiswanger LE, Buckles EL, Ellis J, et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Clade 2.3.4.4b Infections in Wild Terrestrial Mammals, United States, 2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(12):2451-2460. doi.org/10.3201/eid2912.230464. 

{9} Plaza PI, Gamarra-Toledo V, EuguĂ­ J, Lambertucci SA. Recent Changes in Patterns of Mammal Infection with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Worldwide. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(3):444-452. doi.org/10.3201/eid3003.231098. 

{10} Puryear W, Sawatzki K, Hill N, Foss A, Stone JJ, Doughty L, et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Outbreak in New England Seals, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(4):786-791. doi.org/10.3201/eid2904.221538. 

{11} Uhart MM, Vanstreels RET, Nelson MI, Olivera V, Campagna J, Zavattieri V et al. Epidemiological data of an influenza A/H5N1 outbreak in elephant seals in Argentina indicates mammal-to-mammal transmission. Nat Commun 15, 9516 (2024). doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53766-5. 

{12} Lee D, Bahl J, Torchetti M, Killian M, Ip HS, DeLiberto TJ, et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses and Generation of Novel Reassortants, United States, 2014–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(7):1283-1285. doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.160048.  

{13} United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Federal and State Veterinary, Public Health Agencies Share Update on HPAI Detection in Kansas, Texas Dairy Herds. 25 March 2024. www.aphis.usda.gov/news/agencyannouncements/federal-state-veterinary-public-health-agencies-share-update-hpai

{14} USDA. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) Detections in Livestock. www.aphis.usda.gov/livestockpoultry-disease/avian/avian-influenza/hpai-detections/livestock

{15} Nguyen T-Q, Hutter C, Markin A, Thomas M, Lantz K, Killian ML et al. Emergence and interstate spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in dairy cattle. bioRxiv 2024.05.01.591751; doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.01.591751. 

{16} USDA. APHIS Confirms D1.1 Genotype in Dairy Cattle in Nevada, 31 Jan 2025. www.aphis.usda.gov/news/program-update/aphis-confirms-d11-genotype-dairy-cattle-nevada-0.   

{17} USDA. APHIS Identifies Third HPAI Spillover in Dairy Cattle, 13 Feb 2025. www.aphis.usda.gov/news/program-update/aphis-identifies-third-hpai-spillover-dairy-cattle.  

{18} Lowen AC, Baker AL, Bowman AS, GarcĂ­a-Sastre A, Hensley SE, Lakdawala SS et al. 2025. Pandemic risk stemming from the bovine H5N1 outbreak: an account of the knowns and unknowns. J Virol 99:e00052-25. doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00052-25. 

{19} USDA. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) Detections in Livestock. www.aphis.usda.gov/livestockpoultry-disease/avian/avian-influenza/hpai-detections/livestock

{20} Lombard J, Stenkamp-Strahm, McCluskey B, Abdul-Hamid C, Cardona C, Petersen B et al. Invited review: The One Health challenges and opportunities of the H5N1 outbreak in dairy cattle in the United States, Journal of Dairy Science, Volume 108, Issue 7, 2025, Pages 6513-6537, ISSN 0022-0302, doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-26222. 

{21} Facciuolo A, Aubrey L, Barron-Castillo U, Berube N, Norleen C, McCreary S et al. Dairy cows develop protective immunity against reinfection with bovine H5N1 influenza virus. Nat Microbiol 10, 1366–1377 (2025). doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-01998-6. 

{22} USDA. Detections of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Mammals. 26 June 2025. Available at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/livestock-poultry-disease/avian/avian-influenza/hpai-detections/mammals

{23} Vanstreels RET, Nelson MI, Artuso MC, Marchione VD, Piccini LE, Benedetti E et al. Novel Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (A)H5N1 Triple Reassortant in Argentina, 2025. Available at: doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.23.655175. 

{24} Agence fĂ©dĂ©rale pour la sĂ©curitĂ© de la chaĂ®ne alimentaire. CommuniquĂ© de presse conjoint de l'AFSCA, Sciensano et du SPF SantĂ© publique, SĂ©curitĂ© de la ChaĂ®ne alimentaire et Environnement, 4 Mar 2025. favvafsca.be/fr/publication/communique-de-presse-conjoint-de-lafsca-sciensano-et-du-spf-sante-publiquesecurite-de-la-chaine. 

{25} Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Animal and Plant Health Agency. Influenza of avian origin confirmed in a sheep in Yorkshire, 24 Mar 2025. www.gov.uk/government/news/influenza-of-avianorigin-confirmed-in-a-sheep-inyorkshire#:~:text=The%20UK's%20Chief%20Veterinary%20Officer,been%20confirmed%20in%20captive%20bir ds.   

{26} Banyard AC, Coombes H, Terrey J, McGinn N, Seekings J, Clifton B et al. Detection of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus in a sheep in Great Britain, 2025. doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.27.661969. 

{27} Yang J, Qureshi M, Kolli R, Peacock TP, Sadeyen J-R, Carter T et al. The Haemagglutinin Gene of Bovine Origin H5N1 Influenza Viruses Currently Retains an Avian Influenza Virus phenotype.  doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.27.615407. 

{28} US CDC. CDC A(H5N1) Bird Flu Response Update February 26, 2025. www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1response-02262025.html

{29} US CDC. CDC A(H5N1) Bird Flu Response Update November 18, 2024. www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1response-11152024.html

{30} US CDC. CDC Reports A(H5N1) Ferret Study Results. 7 June 2024. www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/ferretstudy-results.html

{31} Pulit-Penaloza JA, Brock N, Belser JA, Sun X, Pappas C, Kieran TJ et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus of clade 2.3.4.4b isolated from a human case in Chile causes fatal disease and transmits between co-housed ferrets. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024 Mar 17:2332667. doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2024.2332667. 

{32} Eisfeld AJ, Biswas A, Guan L, Gu C, Maemura T, Trifkovic S et al. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of bovine H5N1 influenza virus. Nature (2024). doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07766-6. 

{33} Restori KH, Septer KM, Field CJ, Patel DR, VanInsberghe D, Raghunathan V et al. Risk assessment of a highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus from mink. Nat Commun 15, 4112 (2024). doi.org/10.1038/s41467-02448475-y. 

{34} Pulit-Penaloza JA, Belser JA, Brock N, Kieran TJ, Sun X, Pappas C et al. Transmission of a human isolate of clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) virus in ferrets. Nature. Published online October 28, 2024. doi.org/10.1038/s41586024-08246-7. 

{35} Gu C, Maemura T, Guan L, Eisfeld AJ, Biswas A, Kiso M et al. A human isolate of bovine H5N1 is transmissible and lethal in animal models. Nature (2024). doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08254-7. 

{36} Brock N, Pulit-Penaloza JA, Belser JA, Pappas C, Sun X, Kieran TJ, et al. Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Isolated from Dairy Farm Worker, Michigan, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31(6):1253-1256. doi.org/10.3201/eid3106.250386. 

{37} US CDC. Influenza Risk Assessment Tool (IRAT) - Virus Report. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus; clade 2.3.4.4b Viruses: A/California/147/2024 and A/Washington/239/2024. Date of Evaluation: March 14, 2025. www.cdc.gov/pandemic-flu/media/pdfs/2025/IRATA-California-Washington.pdf 

{38} Daulagala P, Cheng S, Chin A, Luk L, Leung K, Wu JT, et al. Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibodies in Healthy Adults after Exposure to Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(1):168171. doi.org/10.3201/eid3001.230756. 

{39} Le Sage V, Werner BD, Merrbach GA, Petnuch SE, O'Connell AK, Simmons HC et al. Pre-existing H1N1 immunity reduces severe disease with bovine H5N1 influenza virus. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Oct 23:2024.10.23.619881. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.23.619881  

{40} Stevenson-Leggett P, Adams L, Greenwood D, Lofts A, Libri V, Williams B, et al. Investigation of Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Neutralization by Quadrivalent Seasonal Vaccines, United Kingdom, 2021–2024. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31(6):1202-1206. doi.org/10.3201/eid3106.241796.  

{41} WHO. (2012). Rapid risk assessment of acute public health events. iris.who.int/handle/10665/70810.  

{42} US CDC. Past Examples of Probable Limited, Non-Sustained, Person-to-Person Spread of Avian Influenza A Viruses. www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/php/avian-flu-summary/h5n1-humaninfections.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/h5n1-human-infections.htm

{43} US CDC. Technical Update: Summary Analysis of Genetic Sequences of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Viruses in Texas, 2 April 2024. www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1-analysis-texas.html.  

{44} International Health Regulations (2005). Third edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. iris.who.int/handle/10665/246107

{45} Case definitions for the four diseases requiring notification to WHO in all circumstances under the IHR (2005). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. www.who.int/publications/m/item/case-definitions-for-thefour-diseases-requiring-notification-to-who-in-all-circumstances-under-the-ihr-(2005)

{46} WHO case definition for human infections with avian influenza A(H5) virus requiring notification under IHR (2005). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/avianinfluenza/case-definitions

{47} El Masry I, Delgado AH, Silva GOD, Dhingra M, Lyons NA. 2024. Recommendations for the surveillance of influenza A(H5N1) in cattle – With broader application to other farmed mammals. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, No. 37. Rome, FAO. doi.org/10.4060/cd3422en. 

{48} OFFLU Avian Influenza Vaccine Matching (AIM) for poultry vaccines: H5Nx executive summary, October 2024. www.offlu.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/OFFLU-Avian-Influenza-Vaccine-Matching-final-clean.pdf

{49} WOAH. Avian influenza vaccination: why it should not be a barrier to safe trade, December 2023. www.woah.org/app/uploads/2023/12/en-woah-policybrief-avianinfluenzavaccinationandtrade.pdf

{50* WOAH. Case definition for infection of bovines with influenza a viruses of high pathogenicity in poultry (high pathogenicity avian influenza in cattle), 26 March 2025. www.woah.org/en/document/case-definition-hpai-cattle/

{51} WHO. Implementing the integrated sentinel surveillance of influenza and other respiratory viruses of epidemic and pandemic potential by the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System: standards and operational guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. iris.who.int/handle/10665/379678.  

{52} WHO. Tool for influenza pandemic risk assessment. www.who.int/teams/global-influenzaprogramme/avian-influenza/tool-for-influenza-pandemic-risk-assessment-(tipra)

{53} US CDC. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus in Animals: Interim Recommendations for Prevention, Monitoring, and Public Health Investigations, 26 Dec 2024. www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/prevention/hpaiinterim-recommendations.html

{54} Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. APHIS Recommendations for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 Virus in Livestock For Workers, 12 April 2024. www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/recommendations-workers-hpai-livestock.pdf

{55} Guidelines for the clinical management of severe illness from influenza virus infections. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/352453

{56} FAO. Preliminary rapid risk assessment of foodborne avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ca83524e-b3f9-4abe-b52b-dea213227fcf/content

{57} Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Alimentarius: Code of hygienic practice for milk and milk products. www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/livestockgov/documents/CXP_057e.pdf


DISCLAIMER 

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO, FAO and WOAH to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO, FAO and WOAH be liable for damages arising from its use. 

©FAO, WHO, WOAH, 2025 Some rights reserved. This work is available under a CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO licence. 

Source: World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/updated-joint-fao-who-woah-public-health-assessment-of-recent-influenza-a(h5)-virus-events-in-animals-and-people-july2025

____

#SARS-CoV-2 #rebound and post-acute #mortality and hospitalization among patients admitted with #COVID19: cohort study

Abstract

Recent investigations have demonstrated a relationship between the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 and post-COVID-19 conditions. Building upon a potential connection between SARS-CoV-2 persistence and early virologic rebound, we examine the association of early virologic rebound with post-acute mortality and hospitalization due to post-acute sequelae among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Our study includes 13,859, 3959, and 4502 patients in the all-patient, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and molnupiravir group, respectively. Results show that patients who experienced virologic rebound exhibited a significantly higher risk of post-acute mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36–1.70) with a risk difference [RD] of 7.19%, compared with patients without virologic rebound. A similar increase in the risk of post-acute mortality is also observed in nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-treated patients (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.41–2.25; RD, 12.55%) and molnupiravir-treated patients (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.18–1.82; RD, 4.90%). The virologic rebound may thus serve as an early marker for post-COVID-19 condition, enabling healthcare officials to monitor and provide timely intervention for long COVID.

Source: Nature Communications, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61737-7

____

#Botswana - High pathogenicity avian #influenza #H5N1 viruses (#poultry) (Inf. with) - Immediate notification

 


Backyard poultry operation in Chobe Region.

Source: WOAH, https://wahis.woah.org/#/in-review/6676

____

Sunday, July 27, 2025

Primary #bovine embryonic #fibroblasts support seasonal #influenza A virus #infection and demonstrate variable #fitness of #HPAI #H5N1

Abstract

The emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 (clade 2.3.4.4b, genotype B3.13) in dairy cattle presents substantial challenges to the agricultural sector and public health. Mechanistic studies of infection and transmission in cattle have proven difficult due to animal handling restrictions as well as limited availability of established cell culture models. Primary Bovine Embryonic Fibroblasts (BeEFs) were collected from a Montana cow and are investigated here as a model to study influenza A virus (IAV) infection dynamics. We compared sialylation profiles, infectious virus production, viral replication, and plaque morphology in both BeEFs and chicken DF-1 cells following infection with the bovine HPAI H5N1 and an earlier 2.3.4.4b genotype (B1.1) isolated in 2022. The data presented here show increased viral fitness of the bovine origin HPAI H5N1 strains across multiple species and bovine susceptibility to human seasonal IAV. This study highlights the ability of BeEFs to serve as a model for studying IAV infections in bovine hosts.


Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funder Information Declared

United States Department of Agriculture, https://ror.org/01na82s61, 35208-11567

Montana Agricultural Experiment Station (MAES), MONB00443

HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), R21 AI178432-01, N7593021C00045

HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), P20GM12549

Source: BioRxIV, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.26.666677v1

____

The Judgment of Paris, Peter Paul Rubens (c.1636)

 


Public Domain.

Source: WikiArt, https://www.wikiart.org/en/peter-paul-rubens/the-judgment-of-paris-1636

____

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Emerging highly pathogenic #H5N1 #influenza triggers fibrotic #remodeling in #human #airway organoids

ABSTRACT

The ongoing outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b has affected at least 989 dairy herds across 17 states in the United States (U.S.) and resulted in 70 confirmed human infections, underscoring the urgent need to understand the pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions of emerging H5N1 viruses. In this study, we modelled infection with a highly pathogenic recombinant human A/Texas/37/2024 H5N1 (rHPh-TX H5N1) strain using human airway organoids (HAO) to investigate viral replication, innate immune response, infection-induced fibrogenesis, and potential therapeutic interventions. rHPh-TX H5N1 replicated efficiently in HAO, eliciting a robust interferon (IFN) response and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Prolonged infection led to the accumulation of fibroblast-like cells surrounding infected regions, marked by increased alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression and upregulation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), indicative of fibroblast activation and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodelling. Compared to organoids infected with the pandemic A/California/04/09 H1N1 (pH1N1) strain, rHPh-TX H5N1 induced significantly higher expression of fibrosis-associated markers, including fibronectin (FN), collagen 1A (COL1A), collagen 3A (COL3A), metalloproteinases 2 and 9 (MMP2, and MMP9). Notably, the inhibition of Rho-associated coiled-coil-forming protein kinases (ROCK) signalling reduced fibrogenesis, with ROCK1 inhibition being more effective than ROCK2 inhibition. These findings highlight the potential of targeting ROCK signalling to mitigate H5N1-induced lung fibrosis, informing therapeutic strategies for severe influenza infections.

Source: Emerging Microbes and Infections, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22221751.2025.2532684#abstract

____

Random #mutagenesis of #influenza #hemagglutinin identifies new sites which modulate its acid-stability and cleavability

Abstract

The structural instability of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) is related to its function in low pH-mediated membrane fusion, which requires prior cleavage of the premature HA0 by a host protease. The precise determinants underlying the stability and cleavability of HA remain to be fully understood and have implications for risk assessment of zoonotic influenza A viruses (IAV), viral transmissibility and vaccine production. To address this, we conducted random mutagenesis on early 2009 pandemic H1 HA, followed by selection of acid-stable viruses and detailed profiling of the mutant HAs. This resulted in identification of four mutations, which increase the acid-stability and decrease the fusion-promoting activity of H1 HA, without compromising viral entry and replication in cells. The newly recognized mutations are situated in the globular head, vestigial esterase and membrane-proximal part of H1 HA, in regions involved in the refolding of HA at low pH. A fifth mutation, D346N, is located in the cleavage loop and renders H1 HA0 12-fold resistant to trypsin activation, whereas its cleavage by transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) is not affected. Along this line, we found that the poor cleavage of H16 HA0, which is unusual in carrying an N346 residue, only applies when it is performed by extracellular proteases. Since H16 HA also exhibits a very low fusion pH, we propose that gull H16N3 virus may carry a much more stable HA than other avian IAVs. Collectively, our mutagenesis approach revealed new determinants of HA stability and cleavability, with relevance for viral surveillance and vaccine production.

Source: BioRxIV, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.25.666873v1

____

History of Mass Transportation: The FS E333 Three-Phase Electric Locomotive


Di Elio Cossetta - Ricordo quel binario, Alberto Cordara, Calosci-Cortona, Pubblico dominio,  https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=34088072

Source: Wikipedia, https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locomotiva_FS_E.333

____

#Coronavirus Disease Research #References (by AMEDEO, July 26 '25)

 


    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

  1. LAUTRETTE A, Cadoret M, Richard JC, Schwebel C, et al
    Impact of Visitation Restrictions in ICU on Psychological Symptoms in Family Members: Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202412-2470.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Clin Infect Dis

  2. AKANDE ET, Fowotade AA, Odih EE, Oaikhena AO, et al
    Genomic Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  3. STREINU-CERCEL A, Castagna A, Chang SC, Chen YS, et al
    Efficacy and Safety of Obeldesivir in High-Risk Nonhospitalized Patients with COVID-19 (BIRCH): a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 22:ciaf406. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  4. BOSCOLO-RIZZO P, Spinato G, De Colle R, Maniaci A, et al
    Five-Year Longitudinal Assessment of Self-reported COVID-19-Related Chemosensory Dysfunction.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 23:ciaf331. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed        

  5. SUBIDO-CARINO MT, Donadel M, Asi LD, Ariola-Ramos MS, et al
    Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seroprevalence, Illness Recall, and Work Absenteeism Among Healthcare Workers: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study in the Philippines, 2021.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 23:ciaf342. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  6. MA KC, Surie D, Zhu Y, Grijalva CG, et al
    Multimorbidity Profiles and Severe In-Hospital Outcomes in Adults with Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 24:ciaf405. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  7. CHISSUMBA RM, Kwatra G, Ramgi P, Enosse M, et al
    Hybrid Immunity in a Mozambican Cohort After 1 or 2 Doses of the BBIBP-CorV Vaccine.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  8. KANG SSY, Tadesse BT, Jeon HJ, Fallah MP, et al
    Enhancing Clinical Trial Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries to Facilitate Product Development in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  9. KIM CL, Thwe TT, Espinoza LMC, Sugimoto JD, et al
    Overcoming Vaccine Inequities and Research Gaps in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities Identified During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  10. RAMGI P, Siribie M, Rakotozandrindrainy N, Bule O, et al
    Immunogenicity and Safety of Heterologous Versus Homologous Prime-Boost Regimens With BBIBP-CorV and Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 Vaccines: A Multicentric, Randomized, Observer-Blinded Non-inferiority Trial in Madagascar and Mozambique.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  11. RAKOTOZANDRINDRAINY N, Kang SSY, Wandji Nana LR, Sugimoto JD, et al
    COVID-19 Surveillance in Madagascar and Urban Burkina Faso: Addressing Underreporting of Disease Burden Through Integrative Analysis of Diverse Data Streams.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  12. CAPITINE IU, Aziz AB, Manhica A, Tivane I, et al
    Real-world Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Sinopharm COVID-19 Vaccine Against Symptomatic COVID-19 in an Omicron-Dominant Setting in Mozambique: A Test-Negative, Case-Control Study.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  13. DE SCHACHT C, Capitine IU, Lucas C, Muteerwa A, et al
    Importance of Targeted Communication Strategies During COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigns in Mozambique: Results of a Mixed-Methods Acceptability Study.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Emerg Infect Dis

  14. LEGRAND NM, Bull RA, Hajarizadeh B, Lloyd AR, et al
    Surveillance of Viral Respiratory Infections within Maximum-Security Prison, Australia.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:1527-1536.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  15. ROSE EB, Paden CR, Cook PW, Ma KC, et al
    Estimated COVID-19 Periodicity and Correlation with SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 Antigenic Diversity, United States.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:1573-1579.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  16. PARK JS, Kim GJ, Lee SW
    Optimal Timing for Expanding Diagnostic Laboratories, South Korea.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:1-8.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  17. WILSON-HENJUM G, Root JJ, Worgo A, Chandler J, et al
    Community-Scale Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A Viruses in Wild Mammals, United States, 2022-2023.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:1625-1629.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  18. HATTA M, Larson GP, Hatta Y, Wang W, et al
    ACE2 Receptor Usage across Animal Species by SARS-CoV-2 Variants.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:1640-1644.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  19. JUDGE AS, Mitchell T, Klosovsky A, Weinberg M, et al
    COVID-19 Predeparture Test Results and Vaccination Coverage among US-Bound Refugees, 2020-2022.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:1630-1635.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  20. BRADBURNE C, Islam A, Bird I, Abbott E, et al
    Genomic Surveillance Detection of SARS-CoV-1-Like Viruses in Rhinolophidae Bats, Bandarban Region, Bangladesh.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31:1652-1656.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Int J Infect Dis

  21. ZHANG Y, Guo J, Li Y, Song Y, et al
    Pre-pregnancy vaccination with inactivated vaccines protects SARS-CoV-2-exposed neonates from respiratory distress.
    Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 16:107978. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107978.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  22. COBO-VAZQUEZ E, Aguilera-Alonso D, Grandioso-Vas D, Gamell A, et al
    SHARP INCREASE IN THE INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF INVASIVE STREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN AFTER THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (2019-2023): A NATIONWIDE MULTICENTER STUDY.
    Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 16:107982. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107982.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  23. SIEBNER AS, Griesbaum J, Huus KE, Flugge J, et al
    Class switch towards IgG2 and IgG4 is more pronounced in BNT162b2 compared to mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccinees.
    Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 16:107990. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107990.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect

  24. ZHANG S, Liang H, Xu J, Chen B, et al
    Spatial-temporal Dynamics and Virus Interference of Respiratory Viruses: Insights from Multi-Pathogen Surveillance in China.
    J Infect. 2025 Jul 22:106556. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106556.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Med Virol

  25. MASTERS EA, Tang W, Kang I, Kosikova M, et al
    Dissecting Sex-Specific Pathology in K18-hACE2 Transgenic Mice Infected With Different SARS-CoV-2 Variants.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70506.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  26. HERNANDEZ-ORTIZ OH, Naranjo AF, Cadavid JJV, Echavez GR, et al
    Risk Factors for Breakthrough Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Fully Vaccinated Individuals: A Case-Control Study Nested in a Prospective Cohort in Medelln, Colombia.
    J Med Virol. 2025;97:e70508.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Virol

  27. LI Q, Cai X, Li X, Zhang Y, et al
    Structural and functional constraints on spike activation and host protease utilization limit cell entry of SARS-CoV-2-related bat coronaviruses.
    J Virol. 2025 Jul 24:e0100725. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01007.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    JAMA

  28. SCHNEIDER L
    WHO Report Suggests Likely Zoonotic Origin of COVID-19, Doesn't Rule Out Lab Leak.
    JAMA. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.10976.
    PubMed        


    Lancet

  29. APEAGYEI AE, Bisignano C, Elliott H, Hay SI, et al
    Tracking development assistance for health, 1990-2030: historical trends, recent cuts, and outlook.
    Lancet. 2025 Jul 14:S0140-6736(25)01240-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01240.
    PubMed         Abstract available


  30. Global HIV targets: a roadmap to 2030 and beyond.
    Lancet. 2025 Jul 16:S0140-6736(25)01449-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01449.
    PubMed        

  31. WINKLER AS, Brux CM, Carabin H, das Neves CG, et al
    The Lancet One Health Commission: harnessing our interconnectedness for equitable, sustainable, and healthy socioecological systems.
    Lancet. 2025 Jul 14:S0140-6736(25)00627-0. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00627.
    PubMed        


    Nature

  32. CONROY G
    People's brains aged faster during the COVID pandemic - even the uninfected.
    Nature. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-02313.
    PubMed        

  33. RO C
    The COVID-19 pandemic transformed this scientist into a research-integrity sleuth.
    Nature. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-01920.
    PubMed        


    Radiology

  34. KETAI L
    Post-COVID-19 Chest CT Expert Consensus, and a Nod to the Law of the Instrument.
    Radiology. 2025;316:e251890.
    PubMed        

  35. YOON SH, Kanne JP, Ashizawa K, Biederer J, et al
    Best Practice: International Multisociety Consensus Statement for Post-COVID-19 Residual Abnormalities on Chest CT Scans.
    Radiology. 2025;316:e243374.
    PubMed         Abstract available

#Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Research #References (by AMEDEO, July 26 '25)

 


    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

  1. KUSUMOTO T, Yotsukura M, Asakura T, Namkoong H, et al
    Induced lung epithelial-like cells derived by direct reprogramming rescue influenza virus-induced lung injury in mice.
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2025;778:152384.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect

  2. SAITO R, Chon I, Sato I, Kawashima T, et al
    Impact of polymerase acidic subunit (PA) substitutions on fever and symptoms in pediatric influenza A patients treated with baloxavir: A pooled four-season analysis.
    J Infect. 2025;91:106555.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Infect Dis

  3. SIMOES EAF, Suss RJ, Raje DV
    Human Metapneumovirus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza Associated Pneumonia Hospitalizations in Colorado Adults Aged Over 50 Years: 2016-2023.
    J Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 21:jiaf381. doi: 10.1093.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    J Virol

  4. MANNSVERK S, Villamil Giraldo AM, Kasson PM
    Influenza viral infection at the plasma membrane is restricted by lipid composition.
    J Virol. 2025 Jul 24:e0110525. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01105.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  5. SIMONICH CAL, McMahon TE, Ju X, Yu TC, et al
    RSV F evolution escapes some monoclonal antibodies but does not strongly erode neutralization by human polyclonal sera.
    J Virol. 2025;99:e0053125.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  6. ZHANG J, Li M, Cheng J, Wang Y, et al
    CypA inhibits respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) replication by suppressing glycolysis through the downregulation of PKM2 expression.
    J Virol. 2025;99:e0007425.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  7. POWELL BH, Witwer KW, Meffert MK
    Cellular miRNAs and viruses: trends in miRNA sequestering and target de-repression.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 18:e0091425. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00914.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  8. CHEN Y, Shi Y, Zuo X, Dong X, et al
    UNC0638 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 entry by blocking cathepsin L maturation.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 18:e0074125. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00741.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  9. HARRIS C, Kapingidza AB, San JE, Christopher J, et al
    Design of SARS-CoV-2 RBD immunogens to focus immune responses toward conserved coronavirus epitopes.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 13:e0046525. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00465.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  10. LOKUGAMAGE KG, Zhou Y, Alvarado RE, Plante JA, et al
    Convergent evolution in nucleocapsid facilitated SARS-CoV-2 adaptation for human infection.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 12:e0209124. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02091.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  11. COTTIGNIES-CALAMARTE A, Marteau F, He F, Belouzard S, et al
    Direct pharmacological AMPK activation inhibits mucosal SARS-CoV-2 infection by reducing lipid metabolism, restoring autophagy flux and the type I IFN response.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 12:e0039425. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00394.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  12. MORGAN AL, Vu MN, Zhou Y, Lokugamage KG, et al
    The furin cleavage site is required for pathogenesis, but not transmission, of SARS-CoV-2.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 10:e0046725. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00467.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  13. FOSTER CSP, Walker GJ, Jean T, Wong M, et al
    Long-term serial passaging of SARS-CoV-2 reveals signatures of convergent evolution.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 9:e0036325. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00363.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  14. NGUYEN D, Laidlaw SM, Dong X, Wand M, et al
    SARS-CoV-2 infection enhancement by amphotericin B: implications for disease management.
    J Virol. 2025 Jun 4:e0051925. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00519.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  15. KALIN JH, Yin Y, Tran MT, Piassek M, et al
    Discovery of a non-nucleoside inhibitor that binds to a novel site in the palm domain of the respiratory syncytial virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.
    J Virol. 2025;99:e0017825.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Lancet


  16. Global, regional, and national trends in routine childhood vaccination coverage from 1980 to 2023 with forecasts to 2030: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.
    Lancet. 2025 Jun 24:S0140-6736(25)01037-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01037.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS Comput Biol

  17. GONG R, Feng Z, Zhang Y
    Using homologous network to identify reassortment risk in H5Nx avian influenza viruses.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2025;21:e1013301.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  18. KEITHLEY J, Choudhuri A, Adhikari B, Pemmaraju SV, et al
    Analyzing greedy vaccine allocation algorithms for metapopulation disease models.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2025;21:e1012539.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  19. KOLAR MR, Kobzarenko V, Mitra D
    Efficient discovery of frequently co-occurring mutations in a sequence database with matrix factorization.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2025;21:e1012391.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS Med

  20. KNOWLTON KU, Siegel LK, Barkauskas CE, Bhagani S, et al
    Passive immunotherapy for adults hospitalized with COVID-19: An individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.
    PLoS Med. 2025;22:e1004616.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    PLoS One

  21. MONROY-IGLESIAS MJ, Thavarajah R, Beckmann K, Josephs DH, et al
    Effects of vitamin D on COVID-19 risk and hospitalisation in the UK biobank.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0328232.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  22. BISHOP F, Howick J, Vennik J, Bostock J, et al
    Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0324649.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  23. KANG ZT, Yen PT, Cheong SA
    Indicator from the graph Laplacian of stock market time series cross-sections can precisely determine the durations of market crashes.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327391.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  24. WILLIAMS R, Bolton T, Jenkins D, Mizani MA, et al
    The challenges of replication: A worked example of methods reproducibility using electronic health record data.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326335.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  25. DORNEY J, Ebna Mannan I, Malicki C, Wisk LE, et al
    Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on healthcare and essential workers: A longitudinal study of PROMIS-29 outcomes.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0324755.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  26. ROMAN-MONTES CM, Tamez-Torres KM, Guaracha-Basanez GA, Ordinola-Navarro A, et al
    Factors associated with indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Test results during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326615.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  27. THITY NT, Rahman A, Dulmini A, Yasmin MN, et al
    An illustration of multi-class roc analysis for predicting internet addiction among university students.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0325855.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  28. MA KPK, Stober T, Gottlieb M, Geyer RE, et al
    Participant engagement in a national longitudinal study of COVID-19: Insights from the INSPIRE study.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0325948.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  29. KRAPEZ U, Kuhar U, Senica P, Slavec B, et al
    Different SARS-CoV-2 variants inhibited by RRM designed peptide.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327582.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  30. QI J, Huang D, Chen Y, Huang D, et al
    From the frontlines to the future: Anti-epidemic volunteer experience and career rewards for doctors.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0328044.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  31. POLLETT SD, Colombo RE, Richard SA, Lalani T, et al
    The infectious diseases clinical research program acute respiratory infection repository protocol: Opportunities to understand current and future epidemics.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0317065.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  32. GOTTLIEB M, Spatz ES, Yu H, Ebna Mannan I, et al
    Effects of long COVID on healthcare utilization.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327218.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  33. DARAGHMEH DN, Salah A, Hamdan N, Zamareh A, et al
    Attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine use: Influenza vaccine intake.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0320412.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  34. ROBERTI J, Carmiol-Rodriguez P, Chan-Liang E, Aguilar-Vidrio OA, et al
    Enhancing tuberculosis treatment support: A thematic analysis of interactive messages in a digital adherence technology trial to identify needs, challenges, and strategies for improvement.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0326492.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  35. TAVARES IC, Maria Guerreiro da Silva D, Ferreira Monteiro W, Janara Veras Lima K, et al
    Therapeutic itineraries and testimonies of COVID-19 patients in Manaus, the epicenter of the pandemic in the Brazilian Amazon.
    PLoS One. 2025;20:e0327127.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

  36. MENON T, McQuilten HA, Samir J, Nguyen THO, et al
    Central memory T cells with key TCR repertoires and gene expression profiles dominate influenza CD8+ T cell pools across the human lifespan.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2501167122.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  37. LEE AS
    Stress-induced translocation of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP78/BiP and its impact on human disease and therapy.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122:e2412246122.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Vaccine

  38. PICKERING H, Valli E, Carlock MA, Cappelletti M, et al
    Influenza strain-specific T cell responses longitudinally post-vaccination with FluZone.
    Vaccine. 2025;62:127506.
    PubMed         Abstract available


    Virus Res

  39. SANZ-MUNOZ I, Martin-Toribio A, Garcia-Concejo A, Arroyo-Hernantes I, et al
    A 15-year study of neuraminidase mutations and the increasing of S247N mutation in Spain.
    Virus Res. 2025;358:199599.
    PubMed         Abstract available

  40. CHEN Z, Cai M, Chai L, Li X, et al
    Anti-influenza Activity of Blumea Balsamifera (L.) DC. Extract: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation Against Multiple Influenza Virus Strains.
    Virus Res. 2025 Jul 20:199606. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2025.199606.
    PubMed         Abstract available

Friday, July 25, 2025

#Italy, West Nile Virus (#WNV) and #Usutu Virus Situation #Report, July 24 '25



{Summary}

-- During the Week 17-23 July 2025, Italy reported twenty-seven new cases of human infection with West Nile Virus.

-- Since the beginning of the epidemic season, thirty-two confirmed human WNV infection cases have been reportede (there were five cases in the last update), of these:

- twenty-three were West Nile Neuroinvasive Disease (WNND): 2 in Piedmont, 2 in Veneto, 1 Emilia-Romagna, 15 Latium, 3 Campania),

- one asymptomatic case was detected in a blood donor (Veneto),

- six cases of West Nile Fever have been reported (2 in Veneto, 4 Latium), and two asymptomatic cases (Latium),

- among the cases, there were two fatalities (1 in Piedmont, 1 in Latium).

-- The first confirmed case of the season was detected in Piedmont Region on March 20 2025 (sporadic case), then in Novara Province (July 3rd).

-- No confirmed cases of Usutu Virus infection have been detected so far.

(...)

Source: Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Teramo, https://westnile.izs.it/j6_wnd/home

____

#USA, #Wastewater #Data for Avian #Influenza #H5 (US CDC, July 25 '25)

 


{Excerpt}

Time Period: July 13, 2025 - July 19, 2025

-- H5 Detection2 sites (0.5%)

-- No Detection380 sites (99.5%)

-- No samples in last week47 sites




(...)

Source: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/nwss/rv/wwd-h5.html

____

HKU5 #bat #merbecoviruses engage bat and #mink #ACE2 as entry #receptors

Abstract

Identifying receptors for bat coronaviruses is critical for spillover risk assessment, countermeasure development, and pandemic preparedness. While Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) uses DPP4 for entry, the receptors of many MERS-related betacoronaviruses remain unknown. The bat merbecovirus HKU5 was previously shown to have an entry restriction in human cells. Using both pseudotyped and full-length virus, we show that HKU5 uses Pipistrellus abramus bat ACE2 but not human ACE2 or DPP4 as a receptor. Cryo-electron microscopy analysis of the virus-receptor complex and structure-guided mutagenesis reveal a spike and ACE2 interaction that is distinct from other ACE2-using coronaviruses. MERS-CoV vaccine sera poorly neutralize HKU5 informing pan-merbecovirus vaccine design. Notably, HKU5 can also engage American mink and stoat ACE2, revealing mustelids as potential intermediate hosts. These findings highlight the versatility of merbecovirus receptor use and underscore the need for continued surveillance of bat and mustelid species.

Source: Nature Communications, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61583-7

____

Controlling avian #influenza #spillover #events: a modelling study

Abstract

Avian influenza is a highly contagious viral disease that affects both domestic and wild birds, with occasional spillover to mammals, including humans. As of June 2025, 117 H5N1 infections in humans have been reported worldwide since 2020. Given the ability of the virus to infect mammals, there is a growing concern about its potential for human-to-human transmission. Currently, contact tracing and self-isolation are used in the UK to manage contacts of confirmed human cases of avian influenza. In this study, we aimed to estimate potential outbreak sizes and evaluate the effectiveness of contact tracing and self-isolation in managing avian influenza spillover events. We used a novel dataset from the Avian Contact Study to analyse contact patterns within an agricultural population at high risk of avian influenza exposure through contact with birds. We modelled outbreak sizes using a stochastic branching process model with measured contact data. Most simulations resulted in small-scale outbreaks, ranging from 0 to 10 cases. When the basic reproduction number was 1.1, contact tracing and self-isolation reduced the average outbreak size from 41 cases (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 37-46 cases) to 7 cases (95% CI: 6-8 cases), preventing, on average, 8 out of every 10 infections. However, they became less effective in reducing the outbreak size when a higher proportion of cases were asymptomatic. Overall, our findings suggest that contact tracing and self-isolation can be effective at preventing zoonotic infections. Increasing awareness, encouraging self-isolation, and detecting asymptomatic cases through routine surveillance are important components of zoonotic infection containment strategies.


Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding for the Avian Contact Study was awarded by PolicyBristol from the Research England QR Policy Support Fund (QR PSF) 2022-24 for investigating Zoonotic spillover of avian influenza. AT is funded by the Wellcome Trust, Early Career Award [227041/Z/23/Z]. EBP and IA acknowledge support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Evaluation and Behavioural Science at the University of Bristol (NIHR207385).

Source: MedRxIV, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.22.25331905v1

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts