Thursday, June 25, 2026

#Nipah virus disease - #India (WHO D.O.N., June 25 '26)

 


Situation at a glance

    On 11 June 2026, the Kerala State Health Department confirmed one laboratory confirmed case of Nipah virus (NiV) infection in Kozhikode district, Kerala State, India

    The case is an adult male who developed symptoms on 30 May 2026 and was hospitalized on 10 June 2026. 

    He presented with neurological manifestations and at the time of reporting is on ventilatory support in an intensive care unit (ICU). 

    As of 18 June 2026, a total of 104 contacts had been identified and were under monitoring, including health and care workers, with no reported secondary cases to date. 

    NiV is a zoonotic disease transmitted to humans through infected animals, or through consumption of fruits or fruit products, such as raw date palm juice contaminated with the saliva, urine, or excreta of infected bats, as well as close contact with infected individuals

    The current event involves a single confirmed case, with no secondary transmission identified to date. 

    Public health measures are in place, including isolation, contact tracing, and enhanced surveillance. 

    However, as the source of infection has not yet been identified and given the known presence of animal reservoirs, additional cases cannot be excluded.


Description of the situation

    On 11 June 2026, WHO was informed of a laboratory-confirmed case of Nipah virus infection reported in Kozhikode district, Kerala State

    Initial positive results were obtained through PCR testing at local laboratories and were subsequently confirmed by RT‑PCR at the National Institute of Virology, Pune.

    The case is an adult male resident of Kozhikode district. He developed symptoms on 30 May 2026 and was admitted to hospital on 10 June 2026. The clinical presentation was primarily neurological, without reported respiratory symptoms prior to intubation. The patient is on ventilatory support in the ICU.

    Following confirmation of the case, extensive contact tracing was initiated. As of 18 June 2026, a total of 104 contacts had been identified, including four very high-risk, 14 high-risk, and 86 low-risk contacts. Among these, 45 are health and care workers. All contacts are under active monitoring with regular follow-up, and no secondary cases have been reported to date.

    This event follows a pattern of recurrent Nipah virus outbreaks in Kerala, including in Kozhikode district, since the first outbreak was reported in 2018. Additional outbreaks occurred in 2019, 2021, 2023, 2025, and 2026 according to the NCDC Communicable Disease Alert.


Epidemiology

    NiV infection is a zoonotic disease transmitted to humans through infected animals (such as bats), or fruit or fruit products contaminated with saliva, urine, and excreta of infected bats.  

    Fruit bats or flying foxes (Pteropus species) are the natural hosts for the virus.  

    It can also be transmitted directly from person to person through close contact with an infected person.

    The incubation period ranges from 3 to 14 days. In some rare cases, an incubation period of up to 45 days has been reported. 

    Laboratory diagnosis of a patient with a clinical history of NiV infection can be made during the acute and convalescent phases of the disease by using a combination of tests. 

    The main tests used are RT-PCR from bodily fluids and antibody detection via ELISA. 

    Human infections range from asymptomatic infection to acute respiratory infection (mild, severe), neurological symptoms, and fatal encephalitis (brain swelling). 

    Infected people initially develop symptoms including fever, headaches, myalgia (muscle pain), vomiting and sore throat. This can be followed by dizziness, drowsiness, altered consciousness, and neurological signs that indicate acute encephalitis (brain swelling). Some people can also experience atypical pneumonia and severe respiratory complications, including acute respiratory distress. Encephalitis and seizures occur in severe cases, progressing to coma within 24 to 48 hours. 

    The case fatality ratio (CFR) in outbreaks across Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, and Singapore range from 40% to 75%, depending on local capabilities for early detection and clinical management.  

    Intensive supportive care is recommended to treat severe respiratory and neurologic complications.  

    There are currently no licensed medicines or vaccines specific for NiV infection.  

    Henipavirus nipahense (Nipah virus) is considered a priority pathogen for the accelerated development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to respond to epidemics and pandemics as part of the WHO R&D Blueprint for Epidemics.  

    Further information about NiV infection can be found here. 


Public health response

    National and State authorities have implemented a range of coordinated response measures, including surveillance, case management, contact tracing, risk communication, and One Health investigations.

    Immediate initiation of response measures upon preliminary positive laboratory results prior to national confirmation. Ongoing monitoring and coordination by State and Central health authorities, including the activation of Rapid Response Teams and coordination meetings at district level. 

    Deployment of central expert teams: a National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) team and an Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) expert team both visited Kozhikode on 13 June 2026 to evaluate the situation and provide technical support for ongoing response activities.

    Establishment of a State High-Power Committee for Epidemic Control: the Kerala State Health Department has constituted a multi-sectoral expert committee to study recurrent seasonal outbreaks in Kerala and develop evidence-based preventive recommendations. Membership includes government and private-sector clinicians, One Health experts, representatives from Animal Husbandry, Food Safety, Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy (AYUSH), and local government bodies.

    Identification and monitoring of 104 contacts, with twice-daily follow-up.

    Establishment of isolation wards and dedicated quarantine facilities at Kozhikode Government Medical College Hospital. Provision and stockpiling of personal protective equipment (PPE) and essential medical supplies.

    Establishment of a control room for risk communication and public queries.

    Systematic community surveillance: door-to-door surveys completed across all 320 households (1047 residents) in Ramanattukara Municipality Division 5. No Nipah-compatible symptoms were identified among surveyed residents.

    Psychosocial support: a district mental health programme is providing psychological support to contacts under quarantine, with 125 contacts reached by 18 June 2026.

    One Health and environmental investigation: Animal Husbandry Department conducted specimen collection within a 5 km radius of the epicentre, including bat specimens (collected with Forest Department assistance) and faecal samples from bat roosting sites along with samples from other animals. All samples have been dispatched to the National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases (NIHSAD), Bhopal, for Nipah virus testing; results are pending.

    WHO continues to monitor the evolving situation and support risk assessment and coordination efforts as needed.


WHO risk assessment

    Nipah virus (NiV) (Henipavirus nipahense) is a rare zoonotic pathogen with a high case fatality rate (40–75%) and no licensed vaccine or specific antiviral treatment. 

    Its natural reservoirs are fruit bats (Pteropus spp.), which are widely distributed across India, South and Southeast Asia, and parts of Oceania. 

    Transmission to humans can occur through direct contact with infected animals, including bats and domestic animals, via contaminated food products such as raw date palm sap, or through close and prolonged contact with infected individuals, particularly in healthcare settings.

    Since its first identification in 1998, NiV outbreaks have been reported in Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore

    In India, outbreaks have been recurrent but relatively limited in scale, with the highest numbers reported in 2001 (66 cases) and 2018 (18 cases). 

    Over the past five years, approximately a dozen confirmed cases have been reported, all in Kerala State. Kerala has experienced NiV events since 2018 and has established surveillance systems, laboratory capacity, and rapid response mechanisms, including Rapid Response Teams at central and state levels. Ecological conditions, including those in districts such as Kozhikode, support fruit bat populations, facilitating repeated spillover events. Seasonal patterns are observed and locally, April to September is recognized as a Nipah high‑alert period.

    The current event involves a single confirmed case with no evidence of secondary transmission as of 23 June 2026. The case has been isolated, and public health measures, including contact tracing, enhanced surveillance, and strengthened infection prevention and control in healthcare settings, have been rapidly implemented. The event appears to be geographically limited, with no evidence of international spread reported.

    However, as the source of infection has not yet been identified and given the presence of known animal reservoirs and ongoing seasonal risk, additional cases, including sporadic zoonotic spillover, cannot be excluded.

    This event represents the second notification of NiV infection in India in 2026, following the earlier two epidemiologically linked cases reported in West Bengal state in January 2026. There is an ongoing moderate sub-national risk, driven by recurrent zoonotic spillover, limited clinical specificity during the early stages of disease, and the absence of licensed vaccines or specific therapeutics, with potential for transmission among close contacts and in healthcare settings

    At the regional and global levels, the risk remains low, given the absence of cross-border or international spread and the geographically contained nature of the outbreak.


WHO advice

    In the absence of a licensed vaccine or specific therapeutic treatment for Nipah virus disease, reducing or preventing infection in people relies on raising awareness of the risk factors. 

    This includes providing guidance on and reinforcing risk communication messages about the measures that people can take to reduce exposure to the Nipah virus. 

    Patient management should focus on delivering timely supportive care, supported by an effective laboratory system and adequate infection prevention and control measures in health facilities. 

    Intensive supportive care is recommended for treatment of severe respiratory and neurologic complications.  

    Public health educational messages should focus on

        ° Reducing the risk of bat-to-human transmission 

            Efforts to prevent transmission should first focus on decreasing bat access to date palm sap and other fresh food products

            Freshly collected date palm juice should be boiled, and fruits should be thoroughly washed and peeled before consumption. 

            Fruits with signs of bat bites should be discarded. 

            Areas where bats are known to roost should be avoided. 

        ° Reducing the risk of human-to-human transmission

            Close unprotected physical contact with NiV-infected people should be avoided. 

            Regular hand washing should be carried out after caring for or visiting sick people along other preventive measures. 

            People experiencing Nipah-like symptoms should be referred to a health facility, as early supportive care is key in the absence of treatment. 

            Contact tracing and monitoring are also key to mitigate human-to-human transmission.  

        ° Controlling infection in health care settings 

            Health and care workers caring for patients with suspected or confirmed infection, or handling specimens from them, should always implement standard precautions for infection prevention and control at all times, for all patients. 

            When caring for patients with suspected or confirmed NiV, WHO advises the use of contact and droplet precautions including a well-fitting medical mask, eye protection, a fluid-resistant gown, and examination gloves

            Airborne precautions should be implemented during aerosol-generating procedures, including placing the patient in an airborne-infection isolation room and the use of a fit-tested filtering facepiece respirator instead of a medical mask. 

            Suspected or confirmed cases of NiV should be placed in a single-patient room. 

            Samples taken from people and animals with suspected NiV infection should be handled by trained staff working in suitably equipped laboratories. 

Based on the currently available information, WHO does not recommend any travel and/or trade restrictions

(...)

Source: 


Link: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON609

____

Detection of #antibodies against avian #influenza in #European dairy #cattle, the #Netherlands, January 2026

 


Abstract

In December 2025, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b genotype DI.2.1 virus was detected in a cat living on a dairy cattle farm. Milk and serum samples from the dairy cattle were tested for avian influenza virus. No viral RNA was detected; however, H5N1-specific antibodies were identified in serum samples from 34 (47.2%) of 72 lactating dairy cows and 24 (63.2%) of 38 youngstock. These demonstrate expansion of the mammalian host range of HPAI H5N1 in Europe.

Source: 


Link: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.25.2600464#abstract_content

____

A #drug #repurposing screen identifies #antiviral compounds against #Puumala #Orthohantavirus



Abstract

Hantaviruses are zoonotic negative-sense RNA viruses that cause haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), yet no approved antiviral therapies are available. To identify host-directed modulators of hantavirus infection we performed a drug repurposing screen using live Puumala virus (PUUV). We identified and validated 70 drugs with antiviral activity in A549 cells and primary human endothelial cells. Functional clustering confirmed the known infection-inhibitory effect of several groups of compounds, including inhibitors of heat shock proteins, mTOR pathway and nucleotide synthesis. Our screen also identified compounds yet unexplored as antivirals against Hantaviruses, such as certain antibiotics. Our dataset provides a systematic map of host pathways influencing PUUV infection and highlights candidate compounds and cellular processes that can modulate this process.

Source: 


Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-57843-1

_____

Cross-clade #vaccination to overcome #sarbecovirus or #merbecovirus #neutralization gaps

 


Highlights

    • Multiplex sVNT profiles neutralizing antibodies across two zoonotic viral families

    • Pre-pandemic serosurveillance identifies human exposure to ACE2-using MERS-like viruses

    • Pathogen-specific vaccination leaves major neutralization gaps against related viral clades

    • Cross-clade prime-and-boost vaccination elicits broad-spectrum neutralizing antibodies


Summary

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlights the importance of identifying high risk pathogens, defining the immunity gaps and developing preemptive vaccination strategies. Here, we establish a high-resolution surrogate virus neutralization test detecting neutralizing antibodies against multiple virus families simultaneously, demonstrating good concordance with traditional assays. Extensive serosurveillance of pre-pandemic sera from different continents reveals low prevalence human exposures to different beta-coronaviruses, and identifies individuals with prior exposure to ACE2-binding MERS-like viruses. Furthermore, COVID-19 vaccination induces significant cross-neutralizing antibodies against clade 1b, 1c, and 3 but not clade 1a sarbecoviruses. Similarly, MERS and Nipah convalescent sera neutralize cognate viruses but have limited cross-neutralization against other related merbecoviruses and henipaviruses that utilize DPP4 and ephrin B2 receptors. Finally, a cross-clade prime-and-boost vaccination strategy using antigenically distinct antigens could induce broadly neutralizing antibodies against related viruses beyond vaccine antigens, supporting broad-spectrum beta coronavirus vaccine development.

Source: 


Link: https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(26)00522-X?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS221112472600522X%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

____

Assessment of #safety and immunogenicity of a #protein subunit #COVID19 #vaccine (ABDALA) in #pregnant women: a single-cohort, multicenter, observational ESPIRTA study



Abstract

Background

Pregnant and lactating women are generally excluded from clinical trials during vaccine development. While the safety, inmunogenicity, efficacy, and effectiveness of the Abdala vaccine against COVID-19 have been demonstrated in the general population, there is a lack of specific information regarding its benefits for pregnant women. Consequently, this study was undertaken to evaluate the safety of the Abdala vaccine in pregnant women and their newborns, as well as to assess the maternal immune response elicited by the vaccination and its capacity for passive immunity transfer to the newborn.

Methods

A simple cohort observational multicenter study was conducted across five maternity hospital in Havana City, Cuba. A hybrid approach was employed, integrating both retrospective and prospective data collection methods. The study analyzed all events occurring from the first dose of the Abdala vaccine during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period, as well as those related to the fetus-/neonate. To provide contextual data from our settings as a reference for descriptive analyses, statistical information concerning some pregnancy-related and fetal-neonatal events from the same five maternity hospitals in the year 2020 was utilized (historical data). Immunogenicity analyses were conducted in a subgroup of participants from a single maternity hospital, measuring antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 (Anti-RBD IgG antibodies) and neutralizing antibodies (Nab) against two SARS-CoV-2 strains (D614G and Omicron B.1.1.529) were measured in both maternal and umbilical cord sera. Additionally, anti-IgA antibodies were evaluated in a colostrum samples. Antibody transfer across the placenta and breast milk was also analyzed. Various comparisons were made regarding gestational age at birth, vaccination trimester, timing from vaccination to delivery, and receipt of a booster dose, among other analyses. A formal sample size estimate was not made. Pregnant women who attended the aforementioned hospitals and met the established criteria were included in the study cohort. Descriptive statistics were utilized to characterize the study population. The Wilcoxon sum rank test was used for most immunological evaluations, while logistic regression analyses estimated the effects of different variables. The correlation between anti-RBD IgG titers in maternal and umbilical cord sera was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. All statistical tests were performed at a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

The study was conducted in five Cuban hospitals from December 2021 to June 2022, involving a total of 940 pregnant women women who received the Abdala vaccine during their pregnancy. The common adverse events reported within the 72 h post-vaccination with the Abdala vaccine were consistent with previous findings using this vaccine in clinical trials and widespread vaccination campaigns in the general population, predominantly presenting as pain at the injection site (4.9%), somnolence (2.6%), and headache (2.3%). All reported events were of mild intensity. In terms of maternal morbidity, the predominant event noted was SARS-CoV-2 infection, with 83 cases (8.83%), primarily categorized as asymptomatic cases or exhibiting mild symptomatic disease. Overall, IgA titers were detected in 202 colostrum samples, with GMT of 1,227 (95% CI 986; 1,527). High anti-RBD IgG titers were found in 189 maternal and 231 umbilical cord blood samples, with GMT of 1,392.15 (95% CI 1,174; 1,651) and 1,923 (95% CI 1,625; 2,275) respectively. The placental transfer ratio (PTR) of anti-RBD IgG titers had a median of 1.54 (IQR 1.48), indicating effective transfer. The PTR of NAb exceeded 1 for both D614G and Omicron (B.1.1.529), being significantly higher in full-term newborns compared to premature newborns.

Conclusions

The ESPIRTA study provides valuable information concerning the application of the Abdala vaccine in specific populations, such as pregnant women, which was not available prior to this study. The safety evaluation of the Abdala vaccine during pregnancy, delivery and the puerperium, as well as in fetus-newborn, revealed no safety signals, as indicated by this cohort study. Elevated anti-RBD IgG titers were detected, in both in maternal serum and cord samples, indicating a positive correlation between them. Moreover, an efficient transfer of IgG antibodies across the placenta was demonstrated. The high anti-IgA titers found in the colostrum may provide an additional advantage regarding the passive transfer of antibodies from mother to newborn through breastfeeding. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies against two SARS-CoV-2 strains, D614 G and the more recent Omicron B.1.1.529 variant, were identified. Further research is recommended to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the Abdala vaccine for pregnant women and their newborns.

Source: 


Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-026-09488-1

____

A #bovine #H5N1 virus efficiently replicates in differentiated #human #nasal epithelial #cells

 


Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) viruses of clade 2.3.4.4b have caused significant losses in bird populations worldwide and repeatedly infected mammals, including humans, without sustained human to human transmission. Here we show that an H5N1 virus (H5N1Tex/24) isolated from bovine milk in Texas in 2024 replicates just as efficiently in differentiated human nasal epithelial cells as a pandemic H1N1 virus strain from 2009 (H1N1HH4/09), at both 37 °C and 33 °C. The adaptive mutations PB2 M631L and PA K497R promoted replication at 33 °C but had no effect on replication at 37 °C. An H5N1 virus (H5N1BE/22) isolated from a pelican in 2022, which lacked these mutations, replicated efficiently at 37 °C but poorly at 33 °C, and this limitation was not overcome by the introduction of the PB2 M631L and PA K497R mutations. The differentiated nasal epithelial cell cultures expressed receptors for both human and avian influenza viruses. Accordingly, no HA mutations associated with altered receptor specificity were detected. H5N1Tex/24 was able to effectively suppress the production of interferon-λ, yet remained sensitive to the antiviral effects of this cytokine. These findings suggest that H5N1Tex/24 possesses intrinsic traits supporting efficient replication in differentiated human upper airway cell cultures.

Source: npj Viruses, https://www.nature.com/npjviruses/

Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44298-026-00208-2

____

Addressing the #zoonotic #threat of #merbecoviruses

 


Abstract

Merbecovirus is a subgenus of betacoronaviruses and exhibits high genetic diversity with a capacity for cross-species transmission. However, beyond Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), our knowledge of the ecology and pathogenic potential of these viruses remains limited. Merbecoviruses were once thought to rely exclusively on dipeptidyl peptidase 4 for cell entry, but recent discoveries have revealed that several members can also engage with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 or aminopeptidase N, expanding their receptor repertoire and potential host range. Here we summarize recent advances in understanding of the receptor usage of merbecoviruses and examine how these insights inform pandemic preparedness and risk assessment. We discuss the development of targeted diagnostics, broad-spectrum antivirals and vaccines, including pan-coronavirus strategies. Together, these advances provide a foundation for predictive surveillance and rational countermeasure design, enabling earlier detection and more effective containment of future merbecovirus spillover events before they escalate into epidemics.

Source: 


Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-026-02397-1

____

#Antibodies Cross-Reactive with #Bundibugyo Virus in #Ferrets Vaccinated with #Ebola Virus #Vaccine

 


Abstract

Banked serum samples from ferrets previously immunized with the Ebola virus vaccine revealed a prominent but limited humoral immune response that cross-reacted with Bundibugyo virus. The supporting immunogenicity data we report may help guide the ongoing response to the current outbreak of Bundibugyo virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Source: Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal, https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/

Link: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/8/26-0948_article

_____

#Bundibugyo Virus Disease in 2026 — #Clinical and Public Health #Responses

 


Summary

Bundibugyo virus is a relatively rare orthoebolavirus that has caused only two previously recognized disease outbreaks but remains capable of producing severe epidemic disease with substantial mortality. The 2026 outbreak of Bundibugyo virus disease in the Democratic Republic of Congo has highlighted persistent challenges in the detection of filovirus disease outbreaks, as well as in diagnosis, clinical management, and the public health response, particularly in resource-limited settings. As with other filovirus infections, effective control of the Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak depends on rapid identification of cases, laboratory confirmation of infection, isolation of cases, contact tracing, infection-prevention measures, protection of health care workers, and community engagement. Although no licensed vaccines or approved therapeutics specific to Bundibugyo virus disease are currently available, advances in supportive care have improved outcomes during recent filovirus disease outbreaks. Experimental evidence from studies involving nonhuman primates, serologic investigations with human samples, and monoclonal antibody research suggests that vaccines and therapeutics developed against Ebola virus may provide cross-protective activity against Bundibugyo virus. These observations support prototype-pathogen approaches to preparedness while underscoring the need for continued development of pathogen-specific countermeasures. The current outbreak reinforces the principle that a successful response to filovirus disease requires integration of medical countermeasures, clinical care, surveillance, diagnostics, and coordinated multinational public health operations.

Source: 


Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra2607216?query=TOC&cid=DM2454531_NEJM_Non_Subscriber&bid=-732391206

____

#Clinical Characteristics of #Patients Infected with #Bundibugyo Virus, #DRC 2026

 


{Excerpt}

To the Editor:

The clinical characterization of Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD), caused by Bundibugyo virus, a species of orthoebolavirus, is less well described than infection with more frequently encountered filovirus species.1 We report here signs and symptoms and basic laboratory data from the current 2026 BVD outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the ethical review committee of the University of Kinshasa.

(...)

In this cohort, we report signs and symptoms at the time of presentation that were mostly consistent with previous descriptions of infection with Bundibugyo virus3 and other filovirus species.

(...)


Link: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2608070?query=TOC

____

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Detection of and Early #Genomic #Insights into #Chikungunya Virus, #Bolivia, 2025

 


Abstract

We report the detection and genomic characterization of chikungunya virus, an arbovirus, during a 2025 outbreak in Bolivia. We identified the circulating chikungunya virus lineage and the transmission dynamics by using genomic surveillance and phylogenetic analyses. Our findings highlight the utility of sustained genomic surveillance for monitoring emerging arboviruses.

Source: 


Link: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/32/7/26-0540_article

____

Yellow #fever - #Global (WHO, D.O.N., June 24 '26, summary)

 


Situation at a glance

    Yellow fever is a viral disease found in areas of Africa and the Americas, spread by infected mosquitoes

    Following an increase of cases in the Americas in 2025, transmission activity remained into 2026

    From 1 January to 26 May 2026, six countries reported a total of 79 human infections along with multiple epizootics, indicating active sylvatic circulation

    In Africa, sustained activity continued across parts of the region, affecting 13 high-risk countries (as per classification in the Eliminate Yellow fever Epidemics (EYE) Strategy). 

    From January to May 2026, three countries in Africa reported 16 confirmed human cases, with an additional 32 suspected cases under investigation in five other countries. 

    The recent rapid risk assessment assessed geographical variations in vaccination coverage, evidence of viral circulation, and the presence of competent vectors, concluding that unvaccinated populations in countries or areas with a history of yellow fever transmission remain at greatest risk. 

    Transmission dynamics are further influenced by seasonal ecological factors, particularly rainfall, temperature, and mosquito abundance

    Outbreaks reported from October 2025 through May 2026 in countries or areas with a history of yellow fever transmission were generally consistent with seasonal patterns or reflected gaps in immunization coverage

    In contrast, cases detected in previously unaffected areas suggest viral introduction and an increased risk of urban transmission

    No imported cases were detected outside the two affected WHO regions, but expanding vector suitability, rapid urbanization, climate shifts, and increased mobility continue to create conditions conducive to international spread

    WHO emphasizes the importance of active surveillance, timely laboratory testing, cross-border coordination, and information sharing. 

    Vaccination remains the primary means for the prevention and control of yellow fever. 

    WHO continues to support countries in expanding vaccination coverage through routine immunization programmes and preventive vaccination campaigns to enhance population immunity and reduce the risk of outbreaks.

(...)

Source: 


Link: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON610

____

#Healthcare-associated #transmission and early #IPC system #vulnerabilities during 2026 #Bundibugyo #Ebola #outbreak in eastern #DRC

 


Abstract

The 2026 Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak in eastern DRC highlighted important early infection prevention and control (IPC) challenges, including healthcare-associated transmission, healthcare worker infections, unsafe triage systems, limited isolation capacity, and shortages of IPC supplies. This commentary argues that pathogen-specific preparedness may remain insufficient in settings characterized by diagnostic uncertainty and proposes an “IPC-first” outbreak response framework based on rapid syndromic IPC activation before definitive laboratory confirmation becomes available.

Source: 


Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-026-01779-8

____

#France, #Ebola: First case identified in a humanitarian #doctor returning from a mission in the #DRC (Min. Health, June 24 '26)

 


    France has specialized capabilities for managing highly transmissible infectious diseases. Patients are treated in a designated healthcare facility, following strict biosafety protocols (negative pressure room, dedicated equipment and protocols). Health authorities are fully mobilized and the situation is being continuously monitored.


    All precautionary measures, including the patient's isolation, were taken upon his arrival in the country, with transfer to the hospital under secure conditions to prevent any risk of contamination. 

    A thorough epidemiological investigation is underway to identify individuals who may have been in contact with the patient. 

    These individuals will be contacted without delay by the regional health agency, will undergo 21 days of home isolation, and will be closely monitored during this period. 

    Following the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) on May 17 in response to the active circulation of the Ebola virus in Ituri Province, DRC, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has assessed the risk of infection as low for European residents and travelers to areas of active transmission, and very low for the general European population.

    A dedicated monitoring system is in place for the return of French aid workers to the national territory.


What is the Ebola virus?

    Ebola virus disease is a serious and often fatal illness. The virus is transmitted to humans from wild animals and then from person to person through direct contact with:

        ° Bodily fluids (blood, saliva, urine, semen, breast milk, sweat, feces and vomit from infected persons, whether alive or not);

        ° The bodies of people who died from Ebola virus disease;

        ° Objects that have been contaminated by the bodily fluids of infected patients (e.g., needles);

        ° Bushmeat from wild animals.

    The disease is characterized by high fevers and often fatal hemorrhages. 

    The incubation period, that is, the time between contact with the virus and the appearance of the first symptoms, varies from 2 to 21 days

    As long as they do not show symptoms, infected individuals are not contagious. 

    Currently, there is no specific treatment for Ebola {Bundibugyo virus} disease; treatment focuses on managing the symptoms, particularly through rehydration.


What are the health recommendations?

    Given the absence of the virus circulating on French territory, the precautionary health recommendations apply mainly to the French territories bordering the Indian Ocean, and to travelers going to or returning to the DRC in the provinces of Ituri, North Kivu and South Kivu and Uganda.

    {1} For French nationals currently in the country, it is recommended to avoid areas experiencing outbreaks of the epidemic and, if this is impossible, to:

        ° Respect basic hygiene rules, including regular hand washing;

        ° Avoid close contact with people who have a fever. The virus is transmitted through direct contact with blood or bodily fluids;

        ° Avoid all contact with wild animals, alive or dead;

        ° Do not consume or handle bushmeat.

    {2} For travelers going to areas where the virus is circulating, it is recommended that those who can postpone their trip, especially the most vulnerable (elderly people, people with disabilities, pregnant women, or those with comorbidities). If the trip must proceed, it is recommended to follow the aforementioned health guidelines and to:

        ° Regularly consult the information from the embassy or the "Travel Advice" section of the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs;

        ° Register for free on the Ariane Thread , in order to receive in real time all information and alerts from the French authorities;

    {3} For travelers returning to France from an area with active virus transmission, the following is required:

        ° Monitor your temperature every day for 21 days;

        ° If you develop a fever of 38°C or higher, and up to 21 days after returning to France, contact 15 immediately and await instructions. Do not go to your doctor or the hospital emergency room.

(...)

Source: 


Link: https://sante.gouv.fr/actualites-presse/presse/communiques-de-presse/article/ebola-identification-d-un-1er-cas-chez-un-medecin-humanitaire-de-retour-de

____

#WHO DG's opening #remarks at the media #briefing – 24 June 2026 {#Ebola in #DRC} (Edited): #France reported a NGO #HCW positive for the virus

 


    Good afternoon to those in the room, and good morning, good afternoon and good evening to those online, wherever you are in the world.

    We begin with the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

    It’s encouraging to see that since the outbreak was first reported five weeks ago, the response has scaled up significantly, under the leadership of the government.

    In the past five weeks, the number of treatment beds has increased from less than 10 to over 500 in 19 health centres.

    With support from WHO and the Africa CDC, laboratory capacity has increased from 30 tests a day at the central laboratory in Kinshasa to over 2000 tests a day in nine labs across three provinces.

    More communities are becoming aware of the risks of Ebola, and asking for the tools and support to protect themselves.

    And more than 100 people have now recovered. With early detection and supportive care, many can survive this disease.

    But we could save many more lives with therapeutics.

    Preparations are now complete for a trial of two therapeutics that is expected to start in DRC next week.

    The trial will evaluate whether two antivirals, MBP134 and remdesivir, can help to reduce mortality in patients with Bundibugyo virus disease, alone or in combination.

    We thank the United States and Gilead Sciences for donating doses for the trial. Together with our partners we will announce more information next week.

    WHO and our partners are working closely with the communities to inform and involve them in the trial.

    We are also working to ensure the communities have access to the therapeutics should they prove safe and efficacious.

    The trial will be conducted by a consortium of partners including DRC’s National Institute for Biomedical Research, ALIMA, Oxford University and WHO.

    Despite the good progress we have made, we still face major challenges, and the outbreak is continuing to outpace the response.

    There are now 1094 confirmed cases, with 277 deaths.

    The outbreak is continuing to move fast.

    Political advocacy and action are essential to create the conditions for increased humanitarian access and a scaled-up response, because the outbreak is happening in a complex situation.

    In neighbouring Uganda, a new case was reported last Sunday, the first in two weeks.

    This brings the total in Uganda to 20 confirmed cases, with two confirmed deaths.

    All cases in Uganda are linked to the outbreak in DRC.

    Today, France reported that a health worker with the NGO ALIMA, who returned to the country after caring for an Ebola patient in DRC, tested positive for the virus, and is now being monitored and receiving care.

    This case is a reminder of the risks faced by frontline responders.

    Almost 80 health workers have been infected, highlighting the risks they face and the importance of strengthening infection prevention and control.

    WHO advises countries to support the safe deployment of personnel responding to this outbreak.

    This includes ensuring that organizations deploying staff provide clear information on risks, how to reduce and manage the risk of exposure, and that countries are prepared to facilitate evacuation if needed.

    Still, the risk to the rest of the world remains low.

    Under the government’s leadership, the coordinated response to the outbreak is starting to take hold.

    But continued scale up is needed.

    Contact tracing is still not at the level needed;

    Capacity at treatment and isolation centres is insufficient;

    Safe and dignified burials remain a major challenge;

    The health system is under pressure;

    Border closures continue to hinder the response;

    Multiple security incidents have been reported;

    The affected area is in the grip of a decades-long humanitarian crisis;

    And financial support is still insufficient.

    Earlier this month, WHO and the Africa CDC announced a joint Continental Preparedness and Response Plan that reflects the funding needs of partners, with an ask of 518 million U.S. dollars.

    Next week, the first financial reporting on pledges and commitments to the plan are expected to be available, providing a clear understanding of gaps and needs. 


===

    Now to the outbreak of hantavirus.

    The total number of cases from the hantavirus outbreak remains 13, including three deaths.

    In all, more than 650 contacts have been identified and followed up by local health authorities in 33 countries and territories.

    All but 54 contacts have completed their period of quarantine, and the remaining contacts are scheduled to complete their quarantine period by the 2nd of July.

    If no further cases are reported by then, WHO will consider the outbreak to be over.

    However, WHO will continue working to advance our understanding of this outbreak, and hantavirus more generally.

    Working with governments and partners, we are continuing investigations into how the outbreak started and spread among those on board.

    We are also working with partners who have collected environmental samples onboard the ship.

    In addition, we are coordinating a study among people exposed to the virus involving 21 countries, to better understand how the disease develops.

    We are also working on having a sample of the virus shared with the WHO BioHub in Switzerland.

    This will be important for developing diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines for future outbreaks.

    I thank all countries that have contributed in different ways to the response to this outbreak, with special thanks to the leadership and solidarity shown by Spain, especially to Prime Minister Pedro SĂ¡nchez.

    I also thank the Captain of the MV Hondius, Captain Jan Dobrogowski, his crew and all passengers for their cooperation in what has been a very difficult situation.

(..)

Source: 


Link: https://www.who.int/news-room/speeches/item/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing---24-june-2026

____

#Bundibugyo #Ebola in #DRC and #Uganda: #community-centred #response must be operational, not rhetorical

 


{Excerpt}

On May 15, 2026, the Ministry of Public Health, Hygiene and Social Welfare of DR Congo declared the country's 17th recorded Ebola disease outbreak after the Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale confirmed Bundibugyo virus (species Orthoebolavirus bundibugyoense) as the aetiological agent.1 That this outbreak was caused by Bundibugyo virus is not a taxonomic footnote. It changes the diagnostic, countermeasure, and risk-communication context of the response.2

(...)

Source: The Lancet Infectious Diseases, https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/home


____

Identification of HLA-A33-restricted #CD8+ T cell epitopes from avian #influenza #H5N1

 


Abstract

The rapid evolution of avian influenza A/H5N1, including the recent U.S. clade 2.3.4.4b outbreak, highlights its pandemic potential and the urgent need for durable, broadly protective vaccines. Given the capacity of CD8+ T cells to mediate cross-strain immunity, we investigated whether geographically distinct HLA-A33 allotypes, HLA-A*33:01 in East/Southeast Asia and HLA-A*33:03 in South Asia, differentially shape the influenza immunopeptidome and influence antiviral immunity. Antigen-presenting cells overexpressing HLA-A*33:01 or HLA-A*33:03 were transfected with single A/H5N1 antigens or infected with A/X-31 (H3N2) as a control comparison representing current seasonal influenza virus. We identified novel ligands restricted to HLA-A*33:01 (57 from A/H5N1; 55 from A/X-31) and HLA-A*33:03 (29 from A/H5N1; 45 from A/X-31). Although fewer peptides were recovered for HLA-A*33:03, a larger proportion of A/X-31-derived peptides were predicted as high-affinity binders (74%) compared with HLA-A*33:01 (61%), indicating qualitative differences in antigen presentation. To determine immunogenicity, peripheral blood lymphocytes from HLA-A*33:03-positive, A/H5N1-naĂ¯ve donors were stimulated with four conserved peptides: PB2GTF, PB2KTY, NPSVQ and PB1MTK. All elicited robust CD8+ T cell activation despite the absence of prior A/H5N1 exposure, demonstrating cross-recognition by memory T cells primed against seasonal influenza. These findings define HLA-A33-restricted influenza epitopes and reveal allotype-specific presentation features that shape CD8+ T cell immunity. Conserved, immunogenic peptides identified here represent promising candidates for rational design of broadly cross-reactive vaccines to protect HLA-A33-expressing populations against severe A/H5N1 disease. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD078870.


Competing Interest Statement

AWP is a scientific advisor for Bioinformatics Solutions Inc (Canada), a shareholder and scientific advisor for Evaxion Biotech (Denmark), and a co-founder of Resseptor Therapeutics (Australia). These organisations had no role in the design of the study in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results. All other authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


Funder Information Declared

NHMRC, 1122099, 2016596

Source: BioRxIV, https://www.biorxiv.org/

Link: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.21.733083v1

____

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

#Antibodies against #influenza #H1N1pdm2009 and B/Victoria strains but not #H3N2 are increased in recent onset type 1 #narcolepsy versus matched controls

 


Abstract

Study Objectives

Onsets of Narcolepsy type-1 (NT1) increased following A/H1N1 vaccination with PandemrixTM in Europe and with A/H1N1pdm2009 infections in China and other countries. To test if other strains could trigger narcolepsy, we measured strain-specific antibodies in patients with recent onset NT1 compared to controls. 

Methods

Antibodies against hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) were tested in 62 patients with very recent onset (onset and blood collection following a single flu season, mean +/- SEM: 0.44 +/- 0.06 years since onset) and 100 controls matched by age, sex, season and year of collection (2000-2025). Results were next extended to 181 recent onset patients (mean +/- SEM: 1.00 +/- 0.05 years) versus 260 controls, matched by sex, season and year, but having a slightly higher mean age. HA inhibition (HAI) and NA inhibition (NAI) assays were conducted using flu strains known to circulate during the corresponding flu seasons. HAI results are shown as % positive (titers >= 40) and NAI results as geometric mean titers. Odds ratio (OR) and coefficient were used to compare antibody titers in NT1 versus controls. The contribution of each assay to prediction was finally quantified in the larger sample set using Shapley decomposition. 

Results

NT1 patients had increased anti-HA and anti-NA antibodies against A/H1N1pdm2009 (anti-HA OR = 3.86, anti-NA coefficient = 0.35) and B/Victoria (anti-HA OR =1.90, anti-NA coefficient = 0.22), but not A/H1N1pre2009, A/H3N2, or B/Yamagata, independent of HLA-DQB1*06:02 status, age, sex, and flu season. Correlations between anti-HA and anti-NA antibodies titers were weak to moderate but significant (r2=-0.10 to 0.34). Multivariable model outperformed age-only baseline (McFadden R2 = 0.19 vs. 0.03; AUC = 0.79 vs. 0.64; likelihood-ratio test X2 = 51, p<0.001), with anti-HA against A/H1N1pdm2009 (coefficient = 0.78, p < 0.001) and anti-NA against B/Victoria (coefficient = 0.69, p < 0.001) emerging as the strongest independent predictors. 

Conclusions

A/H1N1pdm2009 and B/Victoria, but not other strains can trigger the autoimmune process leading to orexin cell loss in narcolepsy.


Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Source: 


Link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.13.26355596v1

____

Deep #mutational #scanning of recent #SARS-CoV-2 #variants highlights changing amino acid preferences within epistatic hotspot residues

 


Abstract

Deep mutational scans across receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of diverging SARS-CoV-2 variants reveal ongoing changes to the effects of mutations, a phenomenon known as epistasis. Careful accounting for these altered mutational effects is important in viral surveillance and forecasting, and more broadly, for understanding the impacts of epistasis on real-world viral evolutionary trajectories. Using a yeast-display RBD deep mutational scanning (DMS) platform, we measure the impacts of virtually all single amino acid mutations and single-residue deletions in the Omicron KP.3.1.1 and LP.8.1 RBDs on folded RBD expression and binding affinity for the human ACE2 receptor. Our comprehensive maps reveal patterns of evolutionary accessibility and constraint at single-residue resolution and, when compared to prior datasets, highlight sites whose amino acid preferences continue to change across viral variants. Notably, sites 455, 456, and 493 – which have exhibited repeated substitutions and epistatic dependencies across Omicron subvariants going back to BA.1 – again demonstrate altered patterns of mutational accessibility and constraint. Therefore, it appears that these hotspots of repeated RBD evolution have not yet converged on fixed amino acid solutions but instead remain sites of ongoing epistatic reconfiguration. We compare our measurements of direct RBD:ACE2 affinity with recently published measurements of mutation impacts on ACE2 binding in the full quaternary spike context, which also integrates the effects of spike conformational dynamics; our analysis uncovers mutations like H505W that could favor adoption of the down/closed RBD conformation as a viral strategy for future antigenic evolution.

Source: 


Link: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1014074

____

My New Space

Most Popular Posts