Skip to main content

#Tecovirimat is #safe but #ineffective as #treatment for clade II #mpox

The antiviral drug tecovirimat used without other antivirals did not reduce the time to clinical resolution of clade II mpox lesions or improve pain control among adults in an international clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). 

The trial enrollment was stopped in late 2024 when an interim analysis showed that tecovirimat monotherapy was ineffective in the study population. Detailed results were presented at the 2025 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in San Francisco.

“This study brought us a step forward in better understanding mpox disease and potential treatment strategies,” said Jeanne Marrazzo, M.D., M.P.H., director of NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which sponsored and funded the trial. “We are grateful to the study team and participants for their contributions to groundbreaking research on a disease that we still do not know enough about.”

Mpox is caused by a virus that spreads mainly through close contact. Two types of the virus have been identified, referred to as clades I and II. A clade II virus subtype caused a global mpox outbreak in 2022, and the virus continues to circulate at low levels. In 2024, a clade I outbreak in Central and East African countries was declared a public health emergency of international concern. Travel-related cases of clade I mpox have been reported in the United States, but the risk of clade I mpox to the U.S. population remains low. People with significantly compromised immune systems or certain preexisting skin conditions, children and pregnant women have an elevated risk of developing severe mpox.

The Study of Tecovirimat for Mpox (STOMP) began in September 2022 as part of the U.S. whole-of-government response to the clade II mpox outbreak. There are no mpox treatments approved in the United States. Based on animal studies, tecovirimat, also known as TPOXX, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat smallpox(link is external)—a disease caused by a virus closely related to, but typically causing disease far more serious than, the virus that causes mpox. The drug had not been studied in people with mpox until the STOMP trial and a complementary study called PALM007 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. PALM007 reported findings in 2024 that were similar to the findings reported from STOMP.

STOMP was a randomized international efficacy study that enrolled participants who had been ill with mpox for fewer than 14 days in Argentina, Brazil, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Thailand and the United States, including Puerto Rico. Randomized study participants and trial investigators were blinded, meaning they did not know who received tecovirimat or placebo. Children, pregnant women, study participants with certain skin conditions or substantially suppressed immune systems, and participants who had severe mpox disease as defined in the study protocol were assigned to an open-label study arm, meaning they all received tecovirimat instead of being randomized. The STOMP study assessed the safety of the drug among all study participants and, in randomized arms, evaluated whether a 14-day course of tecovirimat monotherapy reduced the time to clinical resolution of visible mpox lesions and improved other outcome measures like pain, compared to a placebo.

Randomized participants reported experiencing mpox symptoms for a median of eight days before study entry and had a median of nine mpox lesions. About a third of participants reported severe pain, selecting scores of 7-10 on an 11-point scale. By day 29 following study entry, an estimated 83% of participants receiving tecovirimat had reached clinical resolution, compared to 84% who received a placebo, a non-significant difference. Among those reporting severe pain at baseline, improvements were similar between those who received tecovirimat and placebo, with average pain scores decreasing by 3.2 points for participants receiving tecovirimat and by 3.1 points among those receiving the placebo. Participants’ lesions were swabbed and tested for the presence of DNA from the virus that causes mpox throughout the study. At day eight, 48% of participants receiving tecovirimat had undetectable viral DNA compared to 37% of participants receiving the placebo. The difference between the two arms narrowed by day 15 (82% for those receiving tecovirimat versus 80% for those receiving the placebo) as mpox resolved. These differences were not statistically significant at either time point. Adverse event rates were similar between both of the randomized study arms.

A separate exploratory analysis of data collected in STOMP’s open-label arm before the study had closed aimed to determine whether any factors were associated with faster mpox lesion resolution in participants with or at elevated risk of severe mpox. Faster clinical resolution was observed in participants who were younger in age or who did not have HIV or were living with HIV but virally suppressed on antiretroviral therapy; however, no association was significant when considering the duration of symptoms before study entry. The investigators noted that STOMP open-label participants had fewer lesions, but slower clinical resolution than reported from the PALM007 trial.

“Since the start of the clade II outbreak, clinicians treating mpox have had limited evidence to guide their practice, and STOMP provided definitive answers on the lack of clinical utility of tecovirimat monotherapy for the randomized population studied” said Timothy Wilkin, M.D., M.P.H., chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health at the University of California, San Diego. “Taken together, these latest results also highlight that we still have yet to isolate which factors influence mpox disease progression and clinical resolution.”

The STOMP study was conducted by the NIH-funded ACTG, a global clinical trials network focused on HIV and other infectious diseases. SIGA Technologies, Inc., based in New York, provided tecovirimat for the study. Study results also will be published in a scientific journal.

For more information about STOMP, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov using the identifier NCT05534984.

NIAID conducts and supports research—at NIH, throughout the United States, and worldwide—to study the causes of infectious and immune-mediated diseases, and to develop better means of preventing, diagnosing and treating these illnesses. News releases, fact sheets and other NIAID-related materials are available on the NIAID website.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit www.nih.gov.

Source: US National Institute of Health, https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/tecovirimat-safe-ineffective-treatment-clade-ii-mpox

____

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#Neuroinvasive #Oropouche virus in a patient with #HIV from extra-Amazonian #Brazil

{Excerpt} A novel reassortant Oropouche virus (OROV) lineage (with medium [M], large [L], and small [S] RNA segments : M1L2S2) has driven Brazil's largest and most geographically widespread OROV epidemic , expanding beyond the endemic Amazon basin to establish local transmission across multiple Brazilian states and other previously unaffected Latin American countries . The rapid spread of this lineage underscores its evolutionary potential and reinforces its significance as a public health threat .1 Similar to chikungunya and Zika viruses, expanding arboviruses can exhibit unexpected clinical and epidemiological shifts , including vertical transmissions , neuroinvasive effects, and potentially fatal outcomes.2–4 Although OROV typically causes self-limited febrile illness, accumulating clinical and experimental evidence suggests neurotropic potential .5 This Correspondence describes the first confirmed case of neuroinvasive OROV infection caused by the emergent M1L2S2 lineage in ext...

Stability of #influenza viruses in the #milk of #cows and #sheep

Abstract In late 2023, H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAIV) started circulating in dairy cattle in the USA . High viral titres were detected in milk from infected cows , raising concerns about onwards human infections . Although pasteurisation was shown to effectively inactivate influenza viruses in milk, unpasteurised milk still poses a risk of infection, both from occupational exposure in dairies and from the consumption of raw milk. We therefore assessed how long influenza viruses could remain infectious for in milk without heat inactivation. We examined the stability of a panel of influenza viruses in milk , including a contemporary H5N1 HPAIV and a variety of other influenza A and D viruses. We incubated viruses in cows' milk under laboratory conditions : at room temperature to simulate exposure in dairies and at 4°C to simulate exposure to refrigerated raw milk. Following an isolated report of H5N1 viral RNA being detected in milk from a sheep in the UK , we also c...

#Evidence of #Viremia in Dairy #Cows Naturally Infected with #Influenza A {#H5N1} Virus, #California, #USA

Abstract We confirmed influenza A virus (IAV) by PCR in serum from 18 cows on 3 affected dairy farms in California, USA . Our findings indicate the presence of viremia and might help explain IAV transmission dynamics and shedding patterns in cows. An understanding of those dynamics could enable development of IAV mitigation strategies. Source: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,  https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/31/7/25-0134_article ____